Ryan F Allard

531 posts

Ryan F Allard banner
Ryan F Allard

Ryan F Allard

@RyanFAllard

Helping professionals build systems for work-life leverage and career optionality.

Between the sea and a forest. Katılım Mart 2020
277 Takip Edilen192 Takipçiler
Ryan F Allard
Ryan F Allard@RyanFAllard·
@DanielPink Sounds like all of these say the same thing: humans should learn how to give AI purpose.
English
0
0
0
6
Daniel Pink
Daniel Pink@DanielPink·
The future belongs to humans who master: • Questioning • Taste • Iteration • Composition • Allocation • Integrity When the world gets more artificial, we must get more human. What skill would you add to this list?
English
22
20
116
10K
Daniel Pink
Daniel Pink@DanielPink·
The headlines are relentless. AI seems posed to outthink many of us. So what do humans do? Twenty years after writing A WHOLE NEW MIND about the rise of right-brainers, here’s my initial answer: Double down on six human skills. 🧵👇
English
23
54
315
88.3K
Matt Ridley
Matt Ridley@mattwridley·
So weird that in all the thousands of years of Chinese history this virus first infected humans the year after a plan was hatched to put a furin cleavage site into a sarbecovirus for the very first time - in the very same city.
Rebecc@ ███████@Rebecca21951651

So the theory is that there was a virus circulating in bats & then it somehow got an FCS optimally suited to infect humans & it was so perfected to launch a pandemic that the spike initially did not evolve at all?

English
41
350
2.2K
275.1K
Ryan F Allard
Ryan F Allard@RyanFAllard·
@IntuitMachine An interesting implication for professionals: Your maximum leverage comes from taking strategic action perfectly aligned with your principles.
English
0
0
0
4
Ryan F Allard
Ryan F Allard@RyanFAllard·
@balajis I'd bet that each of the 6,000 that stayed had more leverage to affect the company than the 4,000 that left. Best to understand what that means for your career.
English
0
0
0
264
Balaji
Balaji@balajis·
This is the first AI cut. And it will send shockwaves. Remember: Jack is one of the greatest founders of all time. He created this platform that we’re all on, and has been early to many technological shifts. And Block was doing very well as a business. So, for him to cut 40% of headcount in this way is a signal to everyone in tech: get good now. Become indispensable. Work nights and weekends. Learn the AI tools and raise your game. Or you might not make the cut, as an employee or as a company. I know. That sucks. But capitalism is natural selection. The market is unforgiving, because you are the market. After all, it’s not like you’re buying some random gallon of milk from the store; you’re always buying the best product at the best price. So too for apps: your customers are always installing the best piece of code they can get. And because AI is going to create new winners, if you aren’t the best in your market, someone may become better with AI. Particularly with the new agentic workflows. To be clear: Block’s severance is generous by any measure. 20 weeks of pay, six months of health insurance and vested equity, all of that goes far beyond any typical package. Jack did his level best to cushion the disruption. The laid off are a temporarily unfortunate class, as opposed to a permanent underclass. But had he not leaned into the AI transition, he might have had to lay off more people, slowly, and over time, as faster competitors went after his market share. How would they do that? Sure, AI isn’t a panacea by any means, but the closer you are to software engineering the more aggressively you need to embrace agentic workflows. The AI companies are already doing that, and places like Stripe, Shopify, Coinbase, and now Block are pushing hard on this area. There will be overcorrection. But the fundamental technical innovation is real. And you need to either disrupt yourself or get disrupted.
jack@jack

we're making @blocks smaller today. here's my note to the company. #### today we're making one of the hardest decisions in the history of our company: we're reducing our organization by nearly half, from over 10,000 people to just under 6,000. that means over 4,000 of you are being asked to leave or entering into consultation. i'll be straight about what's happening, why, and what it means for everyone. first off, if you're one of the people affected, you'll receive your salary for 20 weeks + 1 week per year of tenure, equity vested through the end of may, 6 months of health care, your corporate devices, and $5,000 to put toward whatever you need to help you in this transition (if you’re outside the U.S. you’ll receive similar support but exact details are going to vary based on local requirements). i want you to know that before anything else. everyone will be notified today, whether you're being asked to leave, entering consultation, or asked to stay. we're not making this decision because we're in trouble. our business is strong. gross profit continues to grow, we continue to serve more and more customers, and profitability is improving. but something has changed. we're already seeing that the intelligence tools we’re creating and using, paired with smaller and flatter teams, are enabling a new way of working which fundamentally changes what it means to build and run a company. and that's accelerating rapidly. i had two options: cut gradually over months or years as this shift plays out, or be honest about where we are and act on it now. i chose the latter. repeated rounds of cuts are destructive to morale, to focus, and to the trust that customers and shareholders place in our ability to lead. i'd rather take a hard, clear action now and build from a position we believe in than manage a slow reduction of people toward the same outcome. a smaller company also gives us the space to grow our business the right way, on our own terms, instead of constantly reacting to market pressures. a decision at this scale carries risk. but so does standing still. we've done a full review to determine the roles and people we require to reliably grow the business from here, and we've pressure-tested those decisions from multiple angles. i accept that we may have gotten some of them wrong, and we've built in flexibility to account for that, and do the right thing for our customers. we're not going to just disappear people from slack and email and pretend they were never here. communication channels will stay open through thursday evening (pacific) so everyone can say goodbye properly, and share whatever you wish. i'll also be hosting a live video session to thank everyone at 3:35pm pacific. i know doing it this way might feel awkward. i'd rather it feel awkward and human than efficient and cold. to those of you leaving…i’m grateful for you, and i’m sorry to put you through this. you built what this company is today. that's a fact that i'll honor forever. this decision is not a reflection of what you contributed. you will be a great contributor to any organization going forward. to those staying…i made this decision, and i'll own it. what i'm asking of you is to build with me. we're going to build this company with intelligence at the core of everything we do. how we work, how we create, how we serve our customers. our customers will feel this shift too, and we're going to help them navigate it: towards a future where they can build their own features directly, composed of our capabilities and served through our interfaces. that's what i'm focused on now. expect a note from me tomorrow. jack

English
674
1K
9.5K
2M
Earth
Earth@earthcurated·
Let's see your creativity!!
Earth tweet media
English
6.3K
371
4.9K
2.8M
Ryan F Allard
Ryan F Allard@RyanFAllard·
@drgurner Yes, so much happens here first. Sorting through and using that info before others know of it is the challenge tho.
English
0
0
0
39
Dr. Julie Gurner
Dr. Julie Gurner@drgurner·
In case you're wondering, being on X puts you weeks & sometimes months ahead of the average person in the information you get. True of AI, whatever news item hits, or just connecting dots no one else does. It can be rough & tumble on here, but worth it.
English
71
70
1.4K
37.2K
Ryan F Allard
Ryan F Allard@RyanFAllard·
@KTmBoyle It sounds like you understand the drivers of action at the executive level of the organization. What did it take to get that? Only hindsight?
English
0
0
0
480
Katherine Boyle
Katherine Boyle@KTmBoyle·
I left the Washington Post 12 years ago. An editor told me Jeff Bezos would gut the paper and I wouldn’t have a job very long. The motto when I left, before they changed it to ‘Democracy Dies in Darkness,’ was “For and about Washington.” They changed it to communicate the diminished ambitions of a once grand paper. Anything that didn’t directly impact the Bethesda or Fairfax reader had already been cut. The newsroom had dwindled to 600 or 700 reporters after many buyouts. The Graham family strategy was to become a local paper, free from the cost of international bureaus and expensive teams. Marty Baron was brought on to execute this local strategy (we called it managed decline) before the surprise Bezos purchase changed everything. Bezos did the opposite of what the newsroom assumed he would do: he poured obscene amounts of money into a cash incinerator. He gave the Post a fancy new building. He subsidized every section of the paper, even the ones with no readers. He expanded international. He financed experiments in video and podcasting. He gave the newsroom a blank check for over a decade. Rather than pursuing a strategy based in reality, the Post newsroom became very accustomed to a billionaire patron giving them everything they wanted in perpetuity. In retrospect, this was a terrible business decision because it made the young reporters and editors delusional. The old ones who remembered the cuts and the pain of the business before Bezos— when they finally took the free coffee away—they had all been fired or left the industry. The “For and About Washington” strategy was also a loser, because it retained the most expensive parts of the newsroom while diminishing its reach. Sports is expensive. Metro news is expensive. And as pretty much every other local newspaper in the country has learned, the old local paper model is broken and has been since the internet arrived. The Post’s brand was and is Washington politics. It’s the seat of American power. It should be focused on covering politics from its premier perch in DC. It should have never been distracted by anything else— it only ever needed this product. It lost sports to the Athletic. It lost International to The Times. There’s no reason to compete on those products. The Post can still own politics, and every story, feature and reporter should be focused on covering it. But it needs to stop pretending that the world didn’t change 20 years ago and start listening to its readers again. There are solid media companies being built for the future and the Post can become one of them. But the old Post died many decades ago. Pretending Bezos killed it isn’t true.
English
284
546
3.5K
784.3K
Ryan F Allard
Ryan F Allard@RyanFAllard·
@girdley Interesting. The false sense of security from working for a corporation is starting to crumble. Stereotypical careers are probably gone.
English
0
0
0
7
Michael Girdley
Michael Girdley@girdley·
The Scalded Frog A colleague put in his resignation. I dropped by his office and asked, "Why are you leaving?" He went on to tell me the story of the scalded frog. If you put a frog in a pot of water, then put the water on the stove at high heat. The frog will slowly boil itself to death. The frog doesn't realize things are getting bad because it happens gradually. But throw the same frog into a pot of already boiling water -- he'll jump right out. Is this true about frogs? I have no idea. But I am convinced that many of us are in hopeless, scalded-frog situations. We choose not to recognize it.
English
15
4
34
8.1K
Ryan F Allard
Ryan F Allard@RyanFAllard·
@Tim_Denning One great thing about this approach is that you can build in, from the new start, access to people that matter.
English
0
0
0
2
Tim Denning
Tim Denning@Tim_Denning·
The best way to get unstuck is to become deeply dissatisfied with your life.
Tim Denning tweet media
English
16
21
169
5.8K
Ryan F Allard
Ryan F Allard@RyanFAllard·
@DearS_o_n Don't go hard if it doesn't build your adaptability and options up.
English
0
0
0
8
Dear Son.
Dear Son.@DearS_o_n·
You promised yourself you’d go harder this year. Keep that promise.
English
42
90
672
17.2K
Ryan F Allard
Ryan F Allard@RyanFAllard·
@johnrushx Sure, but these 2026 corps will do what they need to survive. We should each be prepared to adapt to whatever they do to thrive.
English
0
0
0
122
John Rush
John Rush@johnrushx·
1980 2026 IBM. Google Apple. Anthropic Microsoft. OpenAI Intel. Nvidia Toyota. Tesla These are the new corporations to eat the world
English
52
31
611
27.3K
Ryan F Allard
Ryan F Allard@RyanFAllard·
@dickiebush I think the kind of ability to influence that you gain from these books is important for all professionals, not just writers.
English
0
0
0
11
Dickie Bush 🚢
Dickie Bush 🚢@dickiebush·
9 books I recommend to every beginner writer: • Atomic Habits • The War of Art • On Writing Well • Show Your Work • The Boron Letters • Writing That Works • The Elements of Style • The Adweek Copywriting Handbook • The Art & Business of Online Writing Each of these formed the foundation for everything I know about writing.
English
40
49
367
14.9K
Ryan F Allard
Ryan F Allard@RyanFAllard·
@NavalismHQ @naval I think the benefits compound because these examples increase leverage when you deepen your commitment to them.
English
0
0
0
31
Navalism
Navalism@NavalismHQ·
"All benefits in life come from compound interest, whether in money, relationships, love, health, activities, or habits. I only want to be around people I know I’m going to be around for the rest of my life. I only want to work on things I know have long-term payout." @naval
English
31
97
841
24.9K
MATT GRAY
MATT GRAY@matt_gray_·
The greatest killer of progress is burnout.
English
128
14
260
8.8K
Ryan F Allard
Ryan F Allard@RyanFAllard·
@AnnaEconomist @kevg1412 These institutions can change their tune at any time. It's more important to ensure your career and life are able to adapt to whatever they do.
English
0
0
0
17
Anna Wong
Anna Wong@AnnaEconomist·
New Fed Chair Nominee Kevin Warsh on what he would do if he were Federal Reserve Chairman, and on stock market. H/T @kevg1412
Anna Wong tweet mediaAnna Wong tweet mediaAnna Wong tweet media
English
65
82
461
162.1K
David Kobrosky
David Kobrosky@thebrunchguy·
Best articulation I’ve seen on why high agency is less common than you’d expect. from @george__mack
David Kobrosky tweet media
English
31
338
3K
119.6K
Ryan F Allard
Ryan F Allard@RyanFAllard·
@benkellyone Borrowed capital can accelerate optionality or trap it. What's the difference?
English
0
0
0
4
Ben Kelly
Ben Kelly@benkellyone·
Creative Financing changed my life. The fact that you can just buy a business using other people's money is one of the greatest wealth-building hacks in existence.
English
20
5
87
10.6K
Ryan F Allard
Ryan F Allard@RyanFAllard·
@gedamtekle Sounds like you deftly navigated building optionality with building leverage on great options! 👏
English
0
0
0
509
Gedam Tekle
Gedam Tekle@gedamtekle·
I increased my net worth by 16% last year. Without chasing trends. Without day trading stocks. Without taking on a ton of debt. Here are my 7 best financial decisions of 2025:
English
14
25
135
68.5K