Ryne Weiss

935 posts

Ryne Weiss banner
Ryne Weiss

Ryne Weiss

@RynoWeiss

Director of Research @TheFIREorg. Views expressed are my own.

Brooklyn Katılım Mayıs 2009
631 Takip Edilen370 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Ryne Weiss
Ryne Weiss@RynoWeiss·
With my 8th anniversary at @TheFIREorg right around the corner, and a big life change, moving from Philly to Brooklyn in process, I've been reflecting on FIRE and why I’m so proud to work there. Over the 8 years, a lot has changed! 1/16
Ryne Weiss tweet mediaRyne Weiss tweet mediaRyne Weiss tweet media
English
15
21
200
40.3K
Matt
Matt@SegaSnatchers·
@PLAION_UK Honestly, this would be the best case scenario and it makes sense as his work would actually suit better on ASIC than FPGA.
English
1
0
0
97
Ryne Weiss retweetledi
Jacob Mchangama
Jacob Mchangama@JMchangama·
🧵ORBÁN'S WAR ON FREE SPEECH: THE RECEIPTS J.D. Vance criticized European democracies for censorship — but praised Viktor Orbán for sharing values incl. on free speech. Many on the right agreed. But did Orbán actually support free speech, or were his critics right? A thread.
Jacob Mchangama tweet media
English
2
7
12
1.3K
Ryne Weiss retweetledi
Nico Perrino
Nico Perrino@NicoPerrino·
Meanwhile, politicians want to effectively mandate these services in order for you to use vast swaths of the internet. It’s not only your freedoms that are at risk.
NetChoice@NetChoice

🚨🚨 @FoxNews: 1 BILLION identity records exposed in ID verification data leak — INCLUDING +203 MILLION America records Governments requiring Digital ID w/ "age verification" mandates create MASSIVE security risks The threat is NOT hypothetical. Another unfortunate example:

English
5
115
328
12.7K
ManCloud
ManCloud@ManCloud89·
#SwancolorHD V2 in the making. This version will include - a QSB for easy attachment to the mainboard. - embedded Bluetooth controller support - remote power-on/off Prototypes will be ordered in the coming weeks. @zwenergy0 @machonachomedia #wonderswan
ManCloud tweet mediaManCloud tweet media
English
6
9
60
9.4K
Ryne Weiss retweetledi
Greg Lukianoff
Greg Lukianoff@glukianoff·
The government can absolutely decide not to contract with a company that won’t build the product it wants. That’s normal procurement discretion, and nobody should pretend otherwise. What’s NOT normal is escalating from “okay, we’ll take our business elsewhere” to “we’re going to brand you a supply chain risk unless you change your internal rules.” That label is supposed to be about genuine security vulnerabilities—foreign control, compromised systems, coerced access—not about an American company drawing lines around what it will and won’t build. Using it as a pressure tactic is a dangerous category mistake. And right there is where the First Amendment problem starts to come into view—not as some abstract argument about whose viewpoint wins, but as a very concrete free-speech issue: compelled speech. If the government uses extraordinary leverage—blacklisting-style designations, emergency authorities, or other coercive tools—to force a private company to generate outputs it would not otherwise produce, that’s not ordinary contracting anymore. That’s the state coercing a private speaker to speak. The reported threat to invoke the Defense Production Act takes it into even darker territory. The DPA is meant to prioritize or compel production for genuine national-defense needs, not to function as a “rewrite your model’s rules or else” mechanism. Using it that way would be a breathtaking precedent: the government effectively reserving the power to commandeer the policies of a leading AI company when it doesn’t like the answer “no.” That should worry anyone who cares about free speech—and about reality-testing. Once the government normalizes coercive pressure to make AI systems behave as it prefers, you’re no longer just talking about procurement choices. You’re talking about government power shaping one of the core tools we increasingly use to understand what the world actually looks like.
Sean Parnell@SeanParnellASW

The Department of War has no interest in using AI to conduct mass surveillance of Americans (which is illegal) nor do we want to use AI to develop autonomous weapons that operate without human involvement. This narrative is fake and being peddled by leftists in the media. Here's what we're asking: Allow the Pentagon to use Anthropic's model for all lawful purposes. This is a simple, common-sense request that will prevent Anthropic from jeopardizing critical military operations and potentially putting our warfighters at risk. We will not let ANY company dictate the terms regarding how we make operational decisions. They have until 5:01 PM ET on Friday to decide. Otherwise, we will terminate our partnership with Anthropic and deem them a supply chain risk for DOW.

English
71
575
3.1K
275.1K
Ryne Weiss
Ryne Weiss@RynoWeiss·
@rshibley This guy makes the classic interview mistake of focusing on your list of questions rather than listening to what your subject says. You hate to see it.
English
0
0
1
33
Ryne Weiss
Ryne Weiss@RynoWeiss·
@lotcazbrad @49bit_cat Yeah, I got one in. Order number is 102X, so it seems that somewhere around 30-50 were made at most.
Ryne Weiss tweet media
English
1
0
0
27
Comptable Rennais
Comptable Rennais@lotcazbrad·
@49bit_cat Yeah, I don't think there ever was one, is there 1 person than can show an order confirmed email?
English
1
0
0
44
49bitcat
49bitcat@49bit_cat·
After the long delay of the nileswan we are here with good news. The new launch date is the 12th of February!
English
19
6
36
4K
Ryos
Ryos@Jonathansh34226·
@49bit_cat Did anyone actually manage to get one?
English
2
0
2
180
Ryne Weiss
Ryne Weiss@RynoWeiss·
@glukianoff The illiterate deserve your sympathy, not scorn.
Ryne Weiss tweet media
English
0
1
17
3.7K
Ryne Weiss
Ryne Weiss@RynoWeiss·
@WadeMiller You quote tweeted the wrong post, this doesn't depict violence against an ICE agent. I am curious if you would apply the same analysis to this post.
English
0
0
0
22
Wade Miller
Wade Miller@WadeMiller·
I don’t agree with this assessment. Normally I’d agree that extreme generalized hyperbole should be protected, but in this case, the poster’s explicit endorsement of the death of ICE agents, combined with its graphic depiction of lynching, could reasonably be seen as conveying a true threat and attempting actually incite violence against a identifiable group of federal officials, rather than abstract political hyperbole. The current socio-political context amplifies this point, where ICE agents face documented and escalating attacks and dangers, ranging from cartel threats to actual and very recent acts of violence. Cartels are offering bounties even now. In other words, the poster isn’t merely vituperative rhetoric, but an amplification of existing and ongoing calls to harm that are resulting in actual harms that are credible, and imminent threats.
FIRE@TheFIREorg

The @UofIllinois’ Urbana-Champaign campus is “reviewing” the Illini Republicans student group’s social media post in support of ICE. The post states, in part, “Traitors such as Alex Pretti and Renee Nicole Good had voided their liberties the moment they decided they were above the law and the popular opinion.” The group says a graphic originally included in the post depicting a masked agent holding a gun to the head of a stumbling man was intended to show support for immigration law enforcement and does not target any group. While administrators condemned the post for expression that "appears to glorify violence," such statements are protected political speech under the First Amendment. UIUC itself has acknowledged that registered student organizations are independent and that their social media accounts reflect their own views, not the university’s. As a public university, UIUC may not investigate or punish student groups for their protected expression, even when others view it as controversial or offensive. Disagreement should be met with conversation and debate, not punishment.

English
2
1
1
722
Ryne Weiss retweetledi
Ryne Weiss
Ryne Weiss@RynoWeiss·
@Tyler_A_Harper @lickenshine Which Holosun is that? I have been wanting an optic for my Glock19, and have given up on the dream of RMRs dropping in price.
English
2
0
2
182
Tyler Austin Harper
Tyler Austin Harper@Tyler_A_Harper·
This isn't something I like to talk about in public — the point of concealed carry is not to draw attention — but like many Americans, I carry everyday. The purpose of the second Amendment is the prevention of tyranny. What happened today was tyrannical, so I wrote about it. 🧵
Tyler Austin Harper tweet media
The Atlantic@TheAtlantic

The Border Patrol’s killing of Alex Pretti in Minnesota sends a message that “masked federal agents can murder you in cold blood, simply because an American citizen exercising their Second Amendment rights scares them,” @Tyler_A_Harper argues: theatlantic.com/culture/2026/0…

English
444
852
5.9K
1.1M
Ryne Weiss retweetledi
Will Creeley
Will Creeley@WillatFIRE·
The First Amendment protects our right to film law enforcement. Officers are public servants paid by our taxes to uphold the law. When the exercise of First Amendment rights results in detention, let alone execution, officers have violated the law. These are evil, lawless days.
David J. Bier@David_J_Bier

New video shows what appears to be the start of the interaction between the ICE observer and Border Patrol that resulted in the agents killing him. He does not approach with a gun. He approached with a phone in his hand. If he has a gun, it's not "brandished" in any manner

English
25
191
513
51.7K
Ryne Weiss retweetledi
Adam Steinbaugh
Adam Steinbaugh@adamsteinbaugh·
Here is the newly-unsealed State Department memo confirming -- finally -- that the detention of Tufts student Rümeysa Öztürk was based on an op-ed. No antisemitic activity. No support of terrorism. An op-ed in a student newspaper.
Adam Steinbaugh tweet mediaAdam Steinbaugh tweet mediaAdam Steinbaugh tweet media
Peter Bonilla@pebonilla

“The files on Öztürk … indicate further that the government relied solely on the inferences made from an op-ed she wrote for the student newspaper to carry out the revocation of her visa, her arrest, and her detention.” They had nothing, and they knew they had nothing.

English
95
3.3K
9.6K
1.2M
Ryne Weiss retweetledi
FIRE
FIRE@TheFIREorg·
BREAKING: The Department of Justice is reportedly investigating elected officials for criticizing the administration’s immigration enforcement operations. If this is the basis for the investigation, it is blatantly unconstitutional and intolerable in a free society. The right to condemn government action without fear of government punishment is the foundation of the First Amendment. This would not be the first time the administration has used boundless, imaginary definitions of “obstruction” or “incitement” that have no basis in the law and run headlong into constitutional limits. The few exceptions to the First Amendment are defined by narrow, exacting standards for a reason: to prevent the government from wielding its power to squash dissent. If criticism of government policy can be rebranded as a crime, then constitutional protections become meaningless and the government becomes unaccountable. That is precisely the danger the First Amendment is meant to prevent, and it is a line no administration may cross.
English
132
820
3.3K
513.8K
Ryne Weiss retweetledi
Will Creeley
Will Creeley@WillatFIRE·
Sure as hell looks like the Department of Justice is criminalizing political speech. There’s no allegation involving anything other than protected rhetoric and statements in this reporting. Words are not violence. Anyone who cares about freedom of speech should be outraged.
Will Creeley tweet media
Jennifer Jacobs@JenniferJJacobs

SCOOP: Justice Department is investigating Minnesota officials, including Gov. Tim Walz and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey, for impeding federal immigration agents, sources told @camiloreports @SarahNLynch and me. @CBSNews cbsnews.com/news/justice-d…

English
77
368
1K
261.1K