SamuelGoldman

4.1K posts

SamuelGoldman

SamuelGoldman

@SWGoldman

Heavy into lots of different worlds.

Washington, DC Katılım Mart 2010
2.5K Takip Edilen9.5K Takipçiler
SamuelGoldman
SamuelGoldman@SWGoldman·
@DamonLinker I threw a lot away when clearing my house this winter. They turned to dust in my hands.
English
1
0
2
63
SamuelGoldman retweetledi
Aelfred The Great
Aelfred The Great@aelfred_D·
1. Jewish 2. From the Midwest 3. Took a non-Jewish sounding name 4. Hobnobbed with the elite but was never one of them 5. Used his outsider status to both thrill and critique that same elite Jay Gatsby is Bob Dylan
Armin Rosen@ArminRosen

Really important literary detective work from David Samuels, who compared various manuscript versions of The Great Gatsby in the Princeton library's Fitzgerald archive and found abundent proof of the title character's Judaism tabletmag.com/sections/arts-…

English
6
11
153
17K
SamuelGoldman
SamuelGoldman@SWGoldman·
@stevenfhayward I do wonder if the rise of AI will promote a return to biography and narrative, since those are things the brain robot doesn't do so well.
English
0
0
3
143
SamuelGoldman
SamuelGoldman@SWGoldman·
@nmosvick Whatever their particular views, I do wish people would make clearer distinctions about origins vs. trajectory.
English
1
0
1
15
Dr. Nicholas Mosvick
Dr. Nicholas Mosvick@nmosvick·
@SWGoldman One also can think of the difference between arguing conservatives shouldn't view the founding itself as merely protestant and liberal and arguing that the American tradition evolved over time towards a liberal one, such that the American Right also became increasingly liberal.
English
1
0
1
9
SamuelGoldman
SamuelGoldman@SWGoldman·
@nmosvick "Consensus" was something of a straw man, but I think you do get closer to that in someone like Boorstin than Hartz. BTW Boorstin was an Oklahoma Rhodes Scholar contemporary of Willmoore Kendall.
English
1
0
1
34
Dr. Nicholas Mosvick
Dr. Nicholas Mosvick@nmosvick·
@SWGoldman I appreciate the nuance! As a matter of the 19th and 20th century, his argument is certainly, as you say, plausible. It might be more interesting to explore Hartz v. not only "Hartzian" views, but neowhigs and other members of the "consensus school."
English
1
0
0
28
SamuelGoldman
SamuelGoldman@SWGoldman·
@nmosvick I think plenty of people did read Hartz that way. But the actual argument is IMO more interesting and plausible (though obviously not conclusive) than he gets credit for.
English
2
0
3
37
Dr. Nicholas Mosvick
Dr. Nicholas Mosvick@nmosvick·
@SWGoldman Fair points. I concede that I was thinking more of a school of thought, historiography, rather than Hartz's particular thesis. There may be a better way to categorize a liberal reading of the Founding that is both normative and historical.
English
1
0
0
40
SamuelGoldman
SamuelGoldman@SWGoldman·
@nmosvick It's also worth noting that he thought this was a bad thing, not so much because it overwhelmed organic conservatism but because it made socialism impossible at the same time. In that respect, connected to the original "American exceptionalism" thesis.
English
1
0
2
47
SamuelGoldman
SamuelGoldman@SWGoldman·
@nmosvick For Hartz the "Lockean" quality of the American political tradition is more sociological than intellectual, and becomes dominant in the 19th century with the exhaustion of the New England patriciate and the Old South planters, rather than at the moment of creation.
English
1
2
9
506
Confessions of a Conservative
Confessions of a Conservative@TwisteChristian·
@varadmehta @SWGoldman True. I have a buddy that does videos of opening old baseball card packs. The cards from the early 80's are such shit, it's almost hard to believe they were every popular. The paper was cheap, the text mottled and fuzzy, the photos could've been taken with a polaroid. :)
English
1
0
0
19
Varad Mehta
Varad Mehta@varadmehta·
@SWGoldman People pining for mass market paperbacks from three or four decades ago probably haven't picked any up lately.
English
2
0
2
126
SamuelGoldman
SamuelGoldman@SWGoldman·
@IvankoBarbell @suzania I think he’s confusing introspection with something like “the therapeutic”. Rieff is the classic source on that.
English
0
0
2
13
Ivanko Barbell
Ivanko Barbell@IvankoBarbell·
@SWGoldman @suzania What a bizarre take. Must be missing some context. Indeed, the canon refutes the claim in general & in particular (for the modern) Shakespeare, Johnson, among others. If anything we’re prob less truly self-aware now. IIRC, Charles Taylor’s Sources of the Self good on this
English
1
0
0
38