Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Matt Dinan
47.5K posts

Matt Dinan
@second_sailing
dad, prof, writer. director @stugreatbooks (say it like "dine in")
Fredericton, NB Katılım Haziran 2009
996 Takip Edilen5K Takipçiler

@chezaristote @SWGoldman @GregMcBrayer3 I think it’s useful to know the necessary, if not sufficient, criterion of the varieties of good teaching, though.
English

@SWGoldman @second_sailing @GregMcBrayer3 It seems like good teaching might be one of the stranger exceptions to a kantian idea of universal principle, it’s not just that there’s not one way to codify it, or that exceptions exist, but that our particular examples of what a remarkable teacher does are always opposite
English

“Faculty should meet to talk about teaching on a regular basis: troubleshooting, sharing insights, discussing best practices. Master teachers ought to serve as mentors for less experienced ones, including through team-teaching…”
persuasion.community/p/how-to-reviv…
English
Matt Dinan retweetledi

Sure, our public schools are gigafrying childrens’ brains by giving them iPads at age five, but at least those kids are still graduating borderline technologically illiterate


Paul Schofield@pschofie79
Relevant to that story about Lower Merion saying that parents cannot refuse iPads
English

@SWGoldman @GregMcBrayer3 I think charisma is a side effect of actual passion or wonder
English

@GregMcBrayer3 I've seen great teachers who barely said anything in class. I've seen great teachers who wouldn't shut up. How are both possibly? I don't know!
English
Matt Dinan retweetledi

In a very general sense having such intimate access to so much confident stupidity is just bad for one's mind and heart
Joe@JoePostingg
Guy who cannot read Ancient Greek arguing with people who can read Ancient Greek about the technical nuances of Ancient Greek translation is sort of the Platonic ideal of Twitter interactions
English

Yeah, that’s definitely, incontrovertibly true
andrew arruda@andrewarruda
“E-mails 'hurt IQ more than pot'” - CNN, Friday, April 22, 2005
English

@NickAllmaier Well you’ll be able to see the beautiful top of my hair
English

@CallowayScott Phaedrus reverses the account in Aeschylus about who is a lover and who a beloved. I don't at all object to the general cultural point, I just think that it's funny to use Phaedrus' speech, since this example is obviously meant to make the speaker look bad in context
English

@second_sailing I mean this is accurate in as far as no one persona in the dialogues is a complete stand in for "Plato's views"—but Phaedrus expresses well the cultural consensus of 5-4th century Greeks here
English

lol unfortunately Phaedrus in the Symposium is not a great representative of whatever Plato’s views might actually be
Sami Gold@souljagoyteller
Madeline Miller didn’t need to make up out of thin air that Achilles and Patroclus were gay, Plato already called them lovers over 2,000 years ago
English

@dwaldenwrites @theo_nash But if someone wants to cite fragments from Aeschylus, go right ahead. My point is very narrow.
English

@dwaldenwrites @theo_nash And Phaedrus also seems to be refuting Aeschylus in his speech, if I recall
English
