Saif Gideon سيف جدعون חרב גדעון
2.7K posts
@SaifGideon
Anti Islamic #Colonialism & Marxism. 🇺🇸Patriot. Support self-determination for Jews in their indigenous ancestral homeland🇮🇱 Research History & Religion.
Me again. There is another new development on the @AP newsroom website in which the Body in Rubble Wide Shot from the Minab school bombing has been re-submitted (March 13, but still the August 2020 EXIF Creation Date as usual) with a new story slug line that says: “Iran US Cyber Threats”. This likely indicates to journalists that the photo should now become used in stories about cyber threats, yeah? I’m making assumptions, I know, this is again why I’m asking for help from experienced industry folk. Unless too many industry folk think a story about highly emotive incorrect casualty numbers from the strike and photo manipulation after the strike (that I’ve never denied happened) should go quietly under the bloody radar? I don’t think it should. Iranians deserve better. Iranians inside the country (voiceless) and in diaspora deserve retractions if mistakes were made. Naive or blatantly dishonest Islamic Republic regime sympathising should be stamped out. There’s too much riding on this for the Lion and Sun Revolution. #FreeIran @PahlaviReza #KingRezaPahlavi #JavidShah #Iran #rescuemission @smh @theage @SkyNews @perthnow @BreakingNews @Channel10AU @Channel9 @abcnews @ABCmediawatch @SBS @CNN @nytimes @guardian @GuardianAus @bbcpersian @ManotoNews @IranIntl @snopes @Wikipedia @australian @newyorkpost @latimes @TheSun @piersmorgan @PiersUncensored @Asmongold @dailytelegraph @BBCNews @crikey_news @ConversationEDU @politico @thehill Epilogue Opinion: The initial stories on Feb 28 to March 3 were rushed with clicks and engagement taking top priority. It did *feel* like a cutthroat frenzy. Here’s what we had: Zero reliable witness statements from Minab due to an Internet blackout. The word of regime officials like Abbas Araghchi who I believe pulled casualty numbers out of his arse and then had a content farm of whitelisted internet users scramble to match imagery to his word… Meanwhile, Iranian voices screaming “bullshit” have been suppressed or ignored or too easily “debunked”, as was the case a lot back in January when the regime massacred Iranians into the thousands, documented via citizen journalism on @Vahid 😔 Listen. To. Iranian. People. Please. Cheers 🍻
Tucker Carlson on Tucker Carlson: “Here’s a man that constantly attacks Israel, constantly attacks American Jews for supporting Israel, has said that Jews push America into war—I believe there’s a pattern of needling the Jews—and that’s antisemitism.”
🚨Watch Tucker Carlson TWISTS Trump and Rubio’s statements to sell his Iran narrative - PURE PROPAGANDA: What Tucker claims Trump said on camera: “We’re thinking about using nukes against Iran. The president of the United States just said out loud that if this gets more intense, we could nuke them.” What Trump actually said when asked what more militarily needs to be done in Iran was “more of the same,” and that he is “leaving certain things.” He did not say he was “thinking about using nukes,” as Tucker claimed. Full quote from Trump: “More of the same. And we'll see how that all comes out. They've lost their navy. They've lost their air force. They have no anti-air force apparatus at all. They have no radar. Their leaders are gone. And we can do a lot worse. We're leaving certain things. That if we take them out, we take them out by this afternoon. In fact, within an hour. They'd literally never be able to build their country back.” Tucker went on to say that “there's been very little interest in convincing you we did this in America's national interests,” claiming Secretary of State Marco Rubio “came out and said Israel forced our hand.” This narrative has already been shot down by Rubio himself, who said he was taken out of context and that Trump made the decision to strike Iran after negotiations fell through. Rubio, when asked about claims that he told the press the U.S. got involved because Israel was going to strike Iran, said: “No. Yeah, your statement is false. I told you this had to happen anyway. The president made a decision. And the decision was that Iran wouldn’t be allowed to hide behind its ballistic missile program. That Iran was not going to be able to hide behind the ability to conduct these attacks. That decision had been made. The president made a decision to systematically destroy this terroristic capability that they had, and that we carried that out. I was very clear on that answer. This was a question of timing - of why this had to happen as a joint operation - not a question of intent. Once the president made a decision that negotiations were not going to work, that they were playing us in the negotiations, and that this was a threat that was untenable, the decision was made to strike them. That's what I said yesterday. If you're going to play these statements, you need to play the whole statements - not clip them to reach a narrative you want to do.” That last sentence could explicitly apply to Tucker Carlson.
