@King22Swing@SamAkerFinance@Fidelity All good points. Hopefully Fidelity gets this fixed asap. In the meantime; def small caps and BB stocks will be more of a focus for me
Anyone else with @fidelity seeing this error message when attempting to buy #otc shares? Seeing it across multiple tickers and limiting how many shares I can buy at a time. Never seen it before and wondering if that's why volume this morning is slower than usual. Odd
@ZoolanderTrades@King22Swing@Fidelity I’ve been playing around with it. I can’t make bid orders bigger than 1% of the 90 day average… for one company that’s like a 40 dollar max bid I can make. Wtf
@ZoolanderTrades@King22Swing@Fidelity Kind of weird because I’ve had issues on OTC companies with fidelity in the past and they’ve usually been good about fixing it. Or just manually entering a trade for me for free over the phone
@fatscharts@fidasinlucreza Presumably their entire suite of services is done for Dalrada… it’s 90%+ of their revenue. And they only disclosed a 634k investment at cost. Not 15m plus of AR forgiven… makes no sense. But if you love $DFCO then feel free to not care about this.
$TREP good lord this is bad. This was just flat out ignored in their unaudited statements. I’m afraid to even look at their 2023 audited fins when they come out. This company is basically just an extension of $DFCO at this point
@fidasinlucreza Definitely good to have the correct financials, even if they reveal bad things. But they’re so far off their unaudited ones that it erodes my trust in management.
@fidasinlucreza It will be very telling what the 2023 audited fins look like. There could be other stuff in there that makes it look less bad. But basically you cannot rely on their financials for 2023 and year to date 2024 IMO
@fidasinlucreza They are providing services to $DFCO, not getting paid, and instead getting paid in convertible preferred shares in $DFCO. $DFCO management is the same as $TREP. $DFCO’s share price has tanked. They also hid this from their prior 2023 financials. Their 2023 fins make no sense now
📊 #Trucept Update: 2022 audited financials have been published, reflecting our ongoing commitment to operational excellence and client success. Watch for 2023 financials soon! #TrustedPartner
View this & other news: bit.ly/3BEmClb
$CYBL it’s funny watching this video of mine again from last year now that the CE is off. Not sure we’ll ever get an explanation from OTCM as to what happened, but happy for all of the $CYBL longs.
youtu.be/VKDOeAiS4n8
@LawOfficeJasonO Blink twice if your potential lawsuit against Brad is for unpaid salary that was offered to you for worthless common stock in lieu of cash.
$SIRC Update: All round shitty news. First, I was fired last week. The circumstances were such that I will be suing Brad. More once that's filed.
This week the judge dismissed the Massey case. It was WITHOUT prejudice. Meaning the judge knows there's a there there, but seems to want the complaint more specific, even though we've already bent over backwards spelling out what Massey did.
Here, I'm confused. The local attorneys we have helping us are confused as well. For instance, on page 8 of the judge's opinion, the judge conceded that we provided evidence Massey signed a Board resolution stating he hadn't been paid, the judge conceded that the board resolution provided him Preferred B shares based on that representation, and the judge conceded that we provided Massey's tax returns showing he had in fact been paid; yet the judge somehow concludes that it's not clear how Massey made a misrepresentation. 🤷♂️
The remainder of the judge's opinion is similarly puzzling. On a motion to dismiss, the judge is, under the applicable standard, essentially supposed to find every reason to uphold the complaint; but this judge seemed to be looking for any reason, even if a stretch, to throw it out. Again, we're all a bit shocked. The lawsuit was overly detailed.
So the ruling, in our opinion, makes no sense. I and our local counsel are dumbfounded. Nevertheless the court did do the dismissal without prejudice, meaning that SIRC could theoretically amend one last time to add even more detail. The problem is that I was fired because, as you can see from the latest quarterly filing, SIRC isn't doing well financially.
And here, Brad is being irresponsible in my opinion. There should be a PR letting investors know exactly what's going on. I can't go into detail due to confidentiality, but Brad's failure/refusal/whatever to keep shareholders in the loop is highly irresponsible. All I can say is that I think in my opinion that the latest quarterly filing shows that Brad has run this company straight into the ground. And he should have the decency and integrity to provide the facts in a PR.
I have to leave it at that for now.
@BrettRosen325@DEUSVULTREV68@twsmith2824
@soaknsleep The prepaid work comp asset is questionable. They don’t seem to record a corresponding liability on the BS. I highly doubt the asset they book is net of any liability. I always manually add in a corresponding liability equal to 100% of the asset to get a true picture of SH equity
Good. NASDAQ has placated zombie dipshit companies like $ALPP and $MULN that abuse RS’s and dilute the value of NASDAQ. Give them 30 days and allow one RS. Problem solved.
wsj.com/finance/stocks…
@ILUS_INTL@NicolasLink Why does “people selling” have to equate to “stock manipulation”? Bold claim. Your shares are trading on a volatile, rilliquid, exchange. Maybe some people are just selling their shares like normal. If the SP is manipulated and low, why doesn’t mgmt buy some shares themselves…