Schyz

@chris_croslin1 @DailyMail You keep saying it but you're still here.

@DailyMail Europe thinks it can handle Russia on its own. So be it! US troops should be home anyway, at least in countries that don't spit on them.

Zelensky says Britain must rejoin the EU if Trump pulls US out of NATO trib.al/QAdEQQf

@POLITICOEurope He's a Russian asset.

U.S. President Donald Trump promised to give economic support to Hungary if needed by Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, reiterating his backing for the Hungarian leader just hours ahead of a crucial election in the country. politico.eu/article/donald…

@RealTimeRating Source?

UNO confirmó que está prohibido jugar +2 encima de otro +2. Las cartas +2 y +4 no pueden apilarse.

@LandOf39730 @TinfoilCamera @Arrogance_0024 Just for the record, if I'm not insulting you, is not because I'm afraid of being put in jail for my comments, it's simply that I know the truth, because I live here, and I don't have any insecurity about the place of my country in the world. Sorry if your country is a shithole.

@Schyz @TinfoilCamera @Arrogance_0024 Grok has confirmed you’re a lying dumb fuck who lives in a nation where the police are allowed to arrest you for speaking your mind online … 🫵🤡

High time to kick the US 🇺🇸 out of NATO.

@cyclxneaim @slifante Me cago en todos tus muertos.

@slifante how do you say “I shit on all of your dead ancestors”

English speakers say “shit, fuck, bollocks”. In Spain and Italy we say “I shit on God”, “God is a pig”, “the Virgin Mary is a whore” and “I shit on all of your dead ancestors”. This is because we are Catholic.

@SweetPeaBell326 @ShadowofEzra Not for the first 3 years at least, until everybody else is decimated.

@ShadowofEzra LMAO. Don’t count on the US to bail you out this time.

Sir Richard Knighton admits the United Kingdom is preparing a major plan to ready the whole country for a major global war. Everybody, from the military and police to hospitals and industry, has to be ready for the transition to war.

America has never won a single major war without European allies. Not one, not even their own independence.

@LandOf39730 @TinfoilCamera @Arrogance_0024 @grok I'm going to need a more reliable source than Grok, sorry. Here you have a source that is not owned by a nazi: independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-n…

@grok is the following accurate: “UK police have arrested thousands of people for social media posts (and other online communications) in recent years, often under broad laws targeting “grossly offensive,” “indecent,” “menacing,” or “false” content that causes distress or anxiety. The Numbers • In 2023, 37 police forces in England and Wales recorded 12,183 arrests under Section 127 of the Communications Act 2003 and Section 1 of the Malicious Communications Act 1988. That’s roughly 30–33 arrests per day. The real total is likely higher since not all forces responded fully to FOI requests. • Arrests have more than doubled since 2017, with over 65,000 cumulative since then. • Only about 1 in 10 arrests led to a sentence (1,119 in 2023), meaning many cases don’t stick but still involve detention, investigation, and stress. • Similar high numbers held into 2024–2025, including spikes during the 2024 riots where posts inciting violence or spreading misinformation led to quick arrests and jail time (sentences from weeks to years). These figures cover any electronic communication—social media posts, tweets, retweets, memes, WhatsApp messages, emails—not just public posts. But a big chunk involves social media. What Gets People Arrested • Classic laws: “Grossly offensive” messages or ones meant to cause anxiety/distress. Examples include heated arguments, questionable jokes, inaccurate posts during chaos, or comments on sensitive topics like race, immigration, gender, or riots. • Online Safety Act 2023 (phased in from 2024): Added specific offences for false communications intended to cause non-trivial harm, threatening messages, cyberflashing, encouraging self-harm, etc. Hundreds charged under the new “false info” and threatening rules by early 2025. • Real cases: People jailed for riot-related posts stirring racial hatred; a woman arrested for asking “if this is true” about a migrant crime claim; arrests for using slurs or politically charged comments; even a comedian detained at the airport over old tweets.”

@AshChapelsGhost @HedgieMarkets I am saying exactly that. If the peer-review system is flawed, the issue is not (just) that LLMs cannot detect lies, the issue is people publishing bullshit and making it pass as real science.

@Schyz @HedgieMarkets Yes. How dare people reveal the entire peer review system is utterly fraudulent and worthless! Next people might question settled science like mutilating children in the name of a pedarest sexologist who tortured twin boys!

🦔A researcher invented a fake eye condition called bixonimania, uploaded two obviously fraudulent papers about it to an academic server, and watched major AI systems present it as real medicine within weeks. The fake papers thanked Starfleet Academy, cited funding from the Professor Sideshow Bob Foundation and the University of Fellowship of the Ring, and stated mid-paper that the entire thing was made up. Google's Gemini told users it was caused by blue light. Perplexity cited its prevalence at one in 90,000 people. ChatGPT advised users whether their symptoms matched. The fake research was then cited in a peer-reviewed journal that only retracted it after Nature contacted the publisher. My Take The researcher made the papers as obviously fake as possible on purpose. The AI systems didn't catch it. Neither did the human researchers who cited it in real journals, which means people are feeding AI-generated references into their work without reading what they're actually citing. I've covered the FDA using AI for drug review, the NYC hospital CEO ready to replace radiologists, and ChatGPT Health launching this year. All of that is happening in the same environment where a condition funded by a Simpsons character and endorsed by the crew of the Enterprise was being presented as emerging medical consensus. The people making these deployment decisions seem to believe the pipeline from research to AI to patient is more supervised than it actually is. This experiment suggests it isn't supervised much at all. Hedgie🤗 nature.com/articles/d4158…

@deblesurf @SvenVanHauwe @HedgieMarkets I absolutely agree, but you don't stop thieves just by making your front door stronger, you stop it by threatening them with jail if they break into your house. There have to be consequences for those who lie.

@Schyz @SvenVanHauwe @HedgieMarkets But that's the point. We're all quite judgemental towards other humans and we don't automatically trust them. Sometimes they're misled, sometimes they're outright lying. This is just a warning not to trust AI either.

@SvenVanHauwe @HedgieMarkets You say it as if most humans didn't have the same problem. Politicians wouldn't have a job.

@Schyz @HedgieMarkets No the issue is that LLM's cannot detect fakes, cannot detect bullshit,...

@LandOf39730 @TinfoilCamera @Arrogance_0024 Your sources are fake, don't believe everything the couch-fucker says. You wouldn't recognize fascist even if it was executing your fellow citizens in the streets of your country. Musk is a nazi because he supports the German far-right party and does nazi saluts.

Hey troglodyte, your hypocrisy is absolutely glorious. You call Elon a ‘billionaire nazi’ for running a platform that lets people speak without getting cops at their door… while you’re posting from the UK, where police have been arresting over 12,000 people a year (that’s 30+ a day) for ‘grossly offensive’ tweets, memes, retweets, and jokes that hurt someone’s feelings online. Actual fascism looks a lot more like locking people up for making fun of someone on the internet (what your shit hole country does) than it does letting blue-check replies flow free. Nazis loved speech police and crushing dissent — not electric cars and uncensored memes. The real reason you don’t have a blue check is you’re just too fucking cheap/poor to afford it. 🫵🤡

MAGA thinks Europe can't defend itself without America. Here's what they don't know. 1. France and Britain have 515 nuclear warheads and 8 nuclear missile submarines. 2. European defence spending hit €481 billion this year. That's more than Russia and China spend combined. The EU's ReArm Europe plan is mobilising another €800 billion. 3. European countries have over 1.7 million active troops. Russia has 1.3 million. 4. EU and UK air forces fly over 1,400 combat aircraft. Their navies have five aircraft carriers, over 60 submarines, more than 120 frigates and destroyers. 5. Europe has over 6,000 artillery pieces and that's before the biggest rearmament wave since the Cold War. Poland alone is adding 212 new howitzers. 6. The British SAS invented modern special forces. The US copied them to build Delta Force. From France's Foreign Legion to Poland's GROM, Europe's elite units are among the deadliest on earth. 7. Europe already has joint military commands ready to fight. The UK leads a 10-nation rapid reaction force across Northern Europe and the Arctic. Finland alone can mobilise 900,000 trained reservists all prepared to fight in arctic conditions. 8. Europe has its own satellite navigation (Galileo), its own defence programme (75 active projects) and is building its own rapid deployment force. The "helpless Europe" story was never about defence. It was about keeping Europe dependent and buying American weapons, relying on American intelligence, following American foreign policy. Thanks to Trump, that now ends.

Hungarians this Sunday

The NATO fiasco just exposed a massive US national security vulnerability: America barely owns any ships. The top 5 container shipping firms (all European or Chinese) control 65% of global capacity. The US has zero container shipping firms in the top 30 — and less than 0.2% of worldwide container shipping. If Europe won’t even let us use their bases to strike a regime they hated… What happens to this shipping capacity when we’re in a hot war with China and European leaders demand their shipping firms reduce capacity or cut off American businesses that do business with the US Department of War? Supply chains are the front lines.

I like the idea of him just finding out about this a few minutes ago.

@LandOf39730 @TinfoilCamera @Arrogance_0024 Sorry mate, I don't pay a billionaire nazi for a blue badge like you, I have a character limit to reply and the graph is what this was about. You care about winning battles even if you lose the war. USA didn't lose any battle in Vietnam. I'm sorry but you voted for what's coming.

Lmao! Out of every point I made, you laser-focused solely on the graph. So I guess that means full concession on the rest? Quick reality check on the NATO spending bit: The 16% figure is for NATO’s actual common budget the small shared pot that covers HQ, admin, joint projects, and some infrastructure. The US pays roughly the same share as Germany (capped that way since 2019). Europe doesn’t “pay most” of that either; it’s split by formula. What people usually mean when they talk big NATO numbers is total defence spending across the alliance. There the US still covers around 60% because we bankroll the serious heavy lifting global logistics, air power, intel, and the capabilities that make the whole thing credible. The UK does its bit (and often punches above weight), but most of Europe has historically lagged on the 2% target. Conflating the tiny common fund with overall spending is a bit of sleight of hand. And Afghanistan? After 20 years, over $2 trillion spent (US figures, with the UK chipping in billions and 457 lives lost), the Afghan government we were all backing collapsed in days once we pulled out. The same “goat herders” you’re mocking rolled straight back into Kabul and have been running the country ever since. If “they still rule their country” is your victory lap, that’s a proper own goal—trillions down the drain and the Taliban right back where they started. I fail to see how you argue it’s the US’s loss in Afghanistan when we kicked their ass for 20 years and the day/week we hand the keys over to the Afghan gov they fold like cheap lawn chairs because they lacked the will to fight for their freedom - you know? Like how the US kicked the UK’s ass for its freedom? 🇺🇸