SearchCz

48.6K posts

SearchCz

SearchCz

@SearchCz

non fui, fui, non sum, non curo memento mori

Katılım Aralık 2008
548 Takip Edilen266 Takipçiler
SearchCz
SearchCz@SearchCz·
@evilsteveve I suppose so, but believing in fire breathing dragons is pretty harmless. Meanwhile, god beliefs crate countless problems.
English
1
0
1
9
Steve Morgan
Steve Morgan@evilsteveve·
How can there be an atheist worldview when atheists don't agree on anything. Not even the definition of the word atheist.
English
7
0
5
222
SearchCz
SearchCz@SearchCz·
@evilsteveve The "god" concept exists though. No denying that reality.
English
1
0
0
6
Matt Fuller
Matt Fuller@MEPFuller·
The reason Biden’s age was a fair topic is because it spoke to his capacity to make big decisions — about war and peace, about our economy, about the direction of our country. So given Trump’s recent behavior, why isn’t there more discussion about his capacity?
English
272
549
4.6K
151.8K
Creation Museum
Creation Museum@CreationMuseum·
Those who reject the Creator must explain how the world came into existence without God.
English
51
13
98
2.1K
Luce
Luce@lucyshow11·
A pocket door! 🤣
Luce tweet media
English
212
20
75
14.4K
SearchCz
SearchCz@SearchCz·
@Amelia558rs The fellow on the left died at age 24. So that would be the photo of what went wrong, correct?
English
0
0
0
1
Amelia
Amelia@Amelia558rs·
What went wrong?
Amelia tweet media
English
802
328
2.1K
45.5K
SearchCz
SearchCz@SearchCz·
2/2 We have this capacity to act with reason, consciousness, and accountability. It is in our nature. Our moral agency would not change one iota if it was given by nature rather than God. It is sufficient that we possess it and have the capacity to honor it.
English
0
0
0
4
SearchCz
SearchCz@SearchCz·
1/2 Wow, you are so close ! Let’s back up one step though. People do possess the capacity you describe, from an early age. Indeed, concepts like fairness seem to be innate an universal … and not limited to humans by the way.
Darwin to Jesus@darwintojesus

This is an interesting question. So firstly I’ll just say I believe God does give us moral knowledge as babies. I believe this because as soon as children are able to express themselves they show they have awareness of things like fairness, justice, and right/wrong. I’ve noticed this in my own children, and I also believe that even if a child was never taught morality or moral language, they would still have a sense of these things and try to express it, even if they don’t know how to do so. But secondly, let’s just say for sake of the argument that babies aren’t born with moral knowledge. Can’t we also argue that babies aren’t born with rationality? They have the potential of rationality, but it hasn’t actualized until they’ve matured, until they’re ready. They don’t need it yet. Why can’t a baby be the same way with morality? As they grow older and become more aware of the world, they also become more aware of their moral knowledge. In fact, when a baby is born what does it know? Probably close to nothing. It seems that God allows us to discover all kinds of things both in the world, and in ourselves, which is fascinating. So either way, I don’t see any issue here.

English
1
0
0
10
Elma
Elma@oelma__·
But are you floppy disk old..
Elma tweet media
English
1.8K
85
2.4K
74.5K
SearchCz
SearchCz@SearchCz·
@shesbonky Unsanitary and unattractive didn’t come to mind watching this clip.
English
0
0
1
542
bonky
bonky@shesbonky·
H0RNY ACTIVISM pt. 921 CONSERVATIVES: It's unsanitary and unattractive for women to be hairy. Women need to take care of themselves and respect their bodies by shaving/waxing all of their natural body hair. MEANWHILE, MEN:
English
93
297
5.8K
431.2K
SearchCz
SearchCz@SearchCz·
People don’t demand evidence leprechauns, unicorns, mermaids, celestial teapots, or gods. We simply treat all those claims as unsubstantiated fantasy.
Darwin to Jesus@darwintojesus

Weird.

English
0
0
0
14
SearchCz
SearchCz@SearchCz·
@ThinkingAtheist There is no theory of evolution suggesting that humans descended from macaques. That’s a distant cousin, which maybe is what theists know as a grandparent?
English
1
0
12
177
Jacy
Jacy@Jacy2570·
@SearchCz @NotEvolution1 The Book Changing is of human origin not of God the words on the pages however are inerrant
English
1
0
0
16
SearchCz
SearchCz@SearchCz·
@Jacy2570 @NotEvolution1 Of the book is full of INERRANT, NEVER CHANGING SCRUPTURE why would 5e book ever change? Or need to? What’s in that book?
English
1
0
0
7
Jacy
Jacy@Jacy2570·
@SearchCz @NotEvolution1 This conversation is about the inerrancy of scripture not the inerrancy of the collection of scripture
English
1
0
0
20