Senior Trender

Noticed an concerning omission on the newly released UAP files. Page 17 of this document batch has a index filing form for a document called "Intelligence Requirements on Flying Saucer Type Aircraft" but lacks the actual document it references. Well I have previously found this actual document (albeit hard to locate). war.gov/medialink/ufo/… The document itself is one of the most revealing on the subject in my opinion as it seems to almost infer that they have possession of a craft based on the very specific details requested. web.archive.org/web/2025071019…

The National Security Agency has UAP records in highly classified intelligence channels. Disclosure Foundation obtained hundreds of pages after challenging the agency’s initial denial under FOIA. The production includes radar tracking reports, visual sightings, and intelligence reporting involving unidentified objects. Many records were previously classified TOP SECRET UMBRA. TOP SECRET is the highest baseline classification level in the U.S. government, and UMBRA is historically associated with highly sensitive signals intelligence. Many remain heavily redacted, even decades later. A initial review reveals a striking pattern: entries with conventional explanations are often more readable, while several of the most anomalous reports remain heavily withheld. High-speed objects. Silent lights changing direction. Disc-like forms. Luminous emissions. Fighter scrambles. The takeaway is clear: the U.S. government was monitoring foreign reporting and technical observations related to UAP for decades, and treating that information as highly sensitive intelligence. The data exists. The records exist. The secrecy remains. Disclosure Foundation will continue fighting for the public disclosure these records demand. Read the full release: disclosure.org/news/nsa-top-s…

@shawnkevinjason That is interesting I agree but how does one even suggest things like this purely from intel gathered via long range observation of the outside of a saucer shaped object?

@seniortrender "German scientists" is the more interesting note on this document. Likely Paperclip reference...

Noticed an concerning omission on the newly released UAP files. Page 17 of this document batch has a index filing form for a document called "Intelligence Requirements on Flying Saucer Type Aircraft" but lacks the actual document it references. Well I have previously found this actual document (albeit hard to locate). war.gov/medialink/ufo/… The document itself is one of the most revealing on the subject in my opinion as it seems to almost infer that they have possession of a craft based on the very specific details requested. web.archive.org/web/2025071019…

Today’s release includes UAP records from 4 agencies: the Department of War, FBI, NASA, and State Department. That means key departments and agencies like the @NRO_gov, @NGA_GEOINT, @CIA, and @ENERGY still appear absent from the public picture. The next step is for the agencies with the government’s most advanced collection and analytic capabilities to follow through, so Congress and the public can get a fuller picture of what we are dealing with.

The question is, why was this not included in the release if they have the filing form to go with it (suggesting they have the original document as well)? Is this how little they plan to release that they even omit previously publicly released documents?

Disclosure Foundation stands with Rear Admiral Tim Gallaudet, Ph.D., U.S. Navy (Ret.). Public servants with records of distinguished service deserve to be heard with seriousness, not dismissed through stigma or misrepresentation.

This is really interesting as Samuel Reid was a co-founder at the Institute for Exotic Science along with Amy Eskridge. Samuel Reid also was/is director of NCAGE L0FH6 for the Mars 42 day mission with his company Geometric Partners. This mission included the Canadian Space Agency, NASA, Department of the Navy, Department of Defense, General Dynamics, Lockheed Martin, DARPA, Northrup Grumman, and Boeing. kepleraerospace.com/wp-content/upl…

This is a good point to have settled and will admit I got it wrong based on my previous understanding of FOIA laws. Glad to see that this was also internally seen as a mistake and not typical FOIA practice to google open source material for further action on official requests.

@theblackvault I posted a correction based on this information, but do have to ask the same question as you that if this was relayed back to the requestor - was the update posted anywhere and if not, why? That would have ended the speculation early on.

🚨 Lots of people made a big deal about Dan Sherman, Project Preserve Destiny, and how the Air Force forwarded a FOIA request to the NSA, thus somehow confirming that this alien communication and/or adaptation project was real. That didn't seem right to me (as referrals are commonplace, even when no records exist), so, I set out to find out why, given I saw absolutely nothing that indicated what so many were excited about. As expected, after a new FOIA drop just came in earlier today to me from the Air Force, it turns out the FOIA officer made a mistake and simply did a Google search after getting a vague FOIA request, which led to them forwarding the request to the NSA based on results they saw on Google. They absolutely made a mistake here, given they did research (when normally they shouldn't or wouldn't) then identified the IC component they forwarded it to which they never like. It's frustrating, but that happens. In response to this behind the scenes, the NSA wondered why it was forwarded to them, and somewhat lectured the Air Force about them forwarding it in the first place. Apparently, the Air Force stated to the NSA that they had already corrected themselves with the FOIA requester (@NoahHradek), but I don't recall ever hearing about that correction. What I kept hearing about only focused on the fact it was forwarded, but the part about where the Air Force admitted to a mistake is not something I was aware of. Did I miss that somewhere? Attached here is the original FOIA, case processing notes to the FOIA request we heard about, and the back and forth between the NSA and USAF. What I don't see is the correction. @NoahHradek - did they send you one? Did you post that anywhere? For those keeping notes, these documents came to me through FOIA 2026-00487-F as processed by the USAF. cc: @AmericanALCHMY @AlchemyAmerican

This is crucial, as well as the Air Force’s Tactical and Technical Liaison Committee’s involvement alongside the Armed Forces Special Weapons Project out west at Kirtland/Sandia. Anywhere that had nuclear-level secrecy getting overlaid on top of aircraft related programs around the 1947-1949 time frame are rife for further research.

@lesternare @aboss Thanks Lester! Jeremy also says in that same interview that the hangar (if it really was this one) was the backup plan for if the AAWSAP Vegas transfer failed. So the craft actually ended up there.

As has been identified before, the best public fit would be Hangar 2905 / Aircraft Prototype Facility (APF), NAS Patuxent River. Potentially the same location as the AAWSAP/AATIP technology transfer attempt. Great work from @seniortrender and @aboss osa.news/p/the-us-navy-…

The government's sole psychological warfare body proposed an agency in 1947 with the exact same structure as the NSA: same oversight, same CIA liaison, same foreign/domestic scope, same JCS channel. They called it a "cover" name. Three years later, the NSA was created and handed their UFO report on day one. open.substack.com/pub/seniortren…

@MagentaUFOUAP @BobMcGwier_N4HY And NEPA was likely a white world cover for the deep black s-craft program. NEPA was working on fixing the same problems overtly that the s-craft was experiencing covertly.

@BobMcGwier_N4HY The AEA and AEC were created to protect NEPA @EscapeVelocity1/nepa-or-the-nuclear-energy-for-the-propulsion-of-aircraft-program-run-by-curtis-lemay-was-started-12791fa988ce" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">medium.com/@EscapeVelocit…

The Constitutional Crisis of Restricted Data Legislative Subterfuge, Corporate Enclosure, and the Erosion of Article I Oversight. The intersection of the Atomic Energy Act (AEA) and the United States Constitution represents one of the most profound jurisdictional conflicts in American law, creating a structural anomaly that effectively permits the executive branch to bypass congressional oversight in matters of existential national significance. Since its inception in 1946, the doctrine of Restricted Data (RD) has functioned as a legal fortress, shielding a vast and increasingly autonomous complex of "legacy programs" from the standard mechanisms of legislative accountability. This analysis examines the historical genesis of the "Born Secret" doctrine, the specific statutory content of the 1946 and 1954 Acts, and the resulting constitutional tensions with the First, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments. Central to this inquiry is the systemic use of private corporate structures and Independent Research and Development (IR&D) funds—often described as a form of legalized financial subterfuge—to sequester information regarding Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP) within an opaque industrial-governmental silo. By utilizing the "Born Secret" framework as a jurisdictional shield, the executive branch and its private partners have successfully challenged the Article I "Power of the Purse," creating a "secret bureaucracy" that operates outside the reach of the "Statement and Account" requirement. Apologies to @LM62988781. I hate RD and Born-Secret. I believe the AEA is unconstitutional and will need to be revised by Congress and ruled on by SCOTUS. Full Article on my Google Drive: drive.google.com/file/d/1YU3PiP…

I've removed all of the speculation from @BarackObama’s Instagram post. Note that @rosscoulthart’s reporting is that Obama was briefed on the existence of (not contact with) non-human intelligence (not ET) after his presidency (not during).

This is a fantastic write-up. There's actually a few snips from newspapers of the time mentioning Eric H. Wang as having worked for 10 years with Air Force Research & Development as well as mentions his latest civilian position as Chief of Structural Division at Air Force Special Weapons Center at Kirtland. newspapers.com/article/albuqu… newspapers.com/article/albuqu… newspapers.com/article/albuqu…

Alright Disclosure crew, time to take the plunge… open.substack.com/pub/datbutters… @aboss @KermDawgENT @burningrob @UAPGERB @superliminality @blockedepistem