Shnarf Shnarf

@mcindahouz @DynastyDadFF @rotobot_ai @DynastyNerds Yes Your league should veto this trade

@DynastyDadFF @rotobot_ai @DynastyNerds Yeah i keep fleecing this dude is that wrong?

#DynastyDadApproved Top 32 REDRAFT Wide Receiver TIERS 🍿SMASH Starts 1 Ja'Marr Chase 2 Puka Nacua 3 Jaxon Smith-Njigba 4 Amon-Ra St Brown 5 Malik Nabers 6 Drake London 7 Justin Jefferson 8 Ceedee Lamb 9 Nico Collins 🧵WR9-32 & @rotobot_ai tools to Smash 2026 Fantasy League ⬇️

@___Javin @JamesDiMichele3 @paleochristcon He appears to be critiquing the defense for the woman. Maybe he doesn’t know you can consent to being slapped. He does not appear to be saying we should change the laws but he is critiquing the defense by using that analogy. What do you think he’s saying? Maybe I’m wrong 🤷‍♂️

@ShnarfShnarf727 @JamesDiMichele3 @paleochristcon Then what’s the argument?! What the law is? How is there any argument to be had about that?

On Clavicular getting smacked.... The defense seems to be "She asked if she could slap him and he said yes" so there is no crime. If I ask to shoot you and you say yes and I do is there no crime?

@___Javin @JamesDiMichele3 @paleochristcon Andrew himself is talking about the law. He talks about the defense against a crime. What are you talking about? What the law should be? I don’t think that’s what Andrew was talking about. That’s why his analogy was so bad

@ShnarfShnarf727 @JamesDiMichele3 @paleochristcon If the argument isn’t about what the law SHOULD be then there is no argument to be had. You can just look up the law.

@DmWalken @JamesDiMichele3 @paleochristcon He mentions a defense for a crime. You are the one who doesn’t understand the argument mate. Or what do you think he is arguing? It’s honestly a terrible hypothetical from him, he’s usually better at this.

@ShnarfShnarf727 @JamesDiMichele3 @paleochristcon Go read the OP. You're arguing what you want to argue so you can be right instead of arguing the point Andrew is. Try again dumbdumb

@DmWalken @JamesDiMichele3 @paleochristcon We aren’t just talking about the physical nature, but the consent. You can consent to a slap or even an ass beating (boxing match for instance). You can’t consent to being shot (maybe 200 years ago via duel). It’s a stupid hypothetical you just don’t understand consent

@ShnarfShnarf727 @JamesDiMichele3 @paleochristcon Youre proving my point with your idiocy. Slapping is battery.

@GabsP14 @Staymares @TheOmniLiberal It’s a silly point. Like why? Just call it what it is. A stronger border. We all have eyes

@Staymares @TheOmniLiberal Are you going to pretend you don’t understand his point?

It’s like curing cancer by killing the patient and asking for credit.

@DmWalken @JamesDiMichele3 @paleochristcon He is being consistent with the law.

@JamesDiMichele3 @paleochristcon Tell us you don't understand logical consistency without telling us you don't b understand logical consistency

@___Javin @JamesDiMichele3 @paleochristcon It’s not an appeal to authority. The law is the entire basis of the argument. It would be an appeal to authority if he said “well this lawyer says I’m right”

@JamesDiMichele3 @paleochristcon I don’t give a fuck about your appeal to authority. My take has nothing to do with what the government claims is a crime. By your logic a crime is whatever the government says and nothing more.

@Luka77_x @illusion_333 @JoeySalads @paleochristcon Not really. You can give consent for someone to slap you. Hell you can give consent for someone to beat your ass (boxing match for instance). Nowhere in the USA can you give consent to be shot (maybe 200 years ago via a “duel”)

@ShnarfShnarf727 @illusion_333 @JoeySalads @paleochristcon Both are crimes

@Happyda17131754 @LibTearCreator1 Is this about Joe Rogan or someone else

@LibTearCreator1 He had me fooled for awhile..I guess thats his MO..talk sweet..then lie like a mother fucker..vile man.

🫡🫡🫡

@___Javin @MAGAMax2024 @paleochristcon That’s why Andrew’s analogy was so dumb

@MAGAMax2024 @paleochristcon Not in an argument it isn’t. Obviously the argument is about whether or not it should be illegal, otherwise anyone can just look up the law.

@theycensoredmee @EsBigred @paleochristcon This is a better analogy than getting permission to shoot someone

@EsBigred @paleochristcon Picture this... Someone comes up to me arguing , and they say , im gonna beat your motherfuckin ass bitch... And i say , do it then nigga! And then we fight... Did i really consent for him to beat my ass? Or was it , me not backing down because im not a bitch?

@BrosnanHoban @paleochristcon How do boxers stay out of prison after a sanctioned fight?

@paleochristcon Consent isn’t a free pass for felony assault, bro.

@gimpboy199 @TMSTRS_ @paleochristcon The more relevant question would be is that legal in Germany which I don’t know. Assisted suicide is legal in Canada from what I’ve heard

@ShnarfShnarf727 @TMSTRS_ @paleochristcon he did consent... is assisted suicide in Canada murder?!

@RickTheDickhead @TaiAmaranth @paleochristcon You guys are just wrong. How do you think boxers stay out of prison after a sanctioned fight? This is so basic it’s crazy to see the Andrew guy making this argument

@gimpboy199 @TMSTRS_ @paleochristcon That’s murder lol

@TMSTRS_ @paleochristcon he gave his consent theguardian.com/world/2003/dec…

@fartbox187 @horizoncloud7 @paleochristcon This is exactly the kind of thing I would expect dr. mantis toboggan would say

@horizoncloud7 @paleochristcon Both can be fatal. You’re just stupid

@GlobePulses @BleacherReport 🤖

Vandy and Nebraska really turned this into a pure shot-making clinic on national TV, exactly what you want from a 4–5 second-round matchup with a Sweet 16 ticket on the line. Nebraska came in as the 4-seed out of the Big Ten with a 27–6 record and that physical, disciplined defense, while Vanderbilt rolled in as a 5-seed at 27–8 behind Tyler Tanner’s downhill scoring and late-game shot creation.

VANDY AND NEBRASKA ARE GOING BUCKET FOR BUCKET 🚨 Watch March Madness on TNT Sports

@MentalDrift @Just_Hoodie @JamesDiMichele3 @paleochristcon @grok That’s what we are saying.

@ShnarfShnarf727 @Just_Hoodie @JamesDiMichele3 @paleochristcon @grok It’s also completely ignoring the fact that the law may deem any form of unwanted sexual contact—an ass slap would certainly qualify—as an offence if the victim feels they’ve been violated, esp. where women are concerned. It’s asinine to believe otherwise if charges were made.

@Just_Hoodie @JamesDiMichele3 @paleochristcon @grok Pressing charges doesn’t determine someone else’s guilt. He is right, if the wife said the husband could (and they could prove it), the man is innocent.

@grok just to clarify in this guy’s retard hypothetical, couldn’t the wife, technically press, assault charges, and un give consent, especially if she felt like it was hard or he meant it? And she could obviously just lie and say these things so his hypothetical was invalid correct me if I’m wrong.