SickNik
6.3K posts


BREAKING: Iran's Foreign Minister Araghchi says safe passage through the Strait of Hormuz "will be possible via coordination with Iran’s Armed Forces and with due consideration of technical limitations."
"If attacks against Iran are halted, our Powerful Armed Forces will cease their defensive operations," he says.

English

Continuing...
Iran accepting the ceasefire after all the bragging, missile attacks, and human shield stunts shows one thing clearly:
Trump’s maximum pressure worked.
They went from “we will never surrender” and launching missiles 10 minutes after the announcement… to quietly accepting a deal within hours.
The ball is now in Iran’s court to prove they’re serious by immediately reopening the Strait of Hormuz.
If they do — we move toward longer-term peace.
If they don’t or start stalling — the two weeks end and the strikes come back harder.
Strength brought them to the table. Only strength will keep them there.
English

@tentacionn_ @KobeissiLetter they aren't capable to control Hormuz and never will be... with modern war tools like drones, no one can control a ~2000 km coastline
English

@KobeissiLetter That’s about it, green light for the US to take Kharg Island, and by that: total control over Iran and Hormuz.
English

BREAKING: Iran has officially rejected the US' peace proposal and sets five conditions for an end to the war.
Iran's conditions include:
1. Immediate end to attacks and assassinations on Iran
2. Establishment of "concrete guarantees" against future US attacks
3. "Clear determination and guaranteed payment" for war damages
4. International recognition of Iran's "authority" over Strait of Hormuz
5. An end to the war across all fronts, including for all Iranian proxies in the region
We now await a response from the US.
English

@KobeissiLetter They don’t own the strait, they’re not getting these demands met
English

@BrewMetaX @KobeissiLetter no one asked. Also no one asked trump to throw bombs...
English

@KobeissiLetter Little bit of ridiculousness if you ask me.
Brew@BrewMetaX
Payment for war damages? It’s war brother… And you are charging 2m a ship for days now.
English

@KobeissiLetter These people are insane. The war must continue until they abdicate
English

@vantamaga @KobeissiLetter some drones are totally enough... dumb trump couldn't see this coming 🤣🤣🤣
English


@LViehler @MartinSonneborn @DocFlo4 natürlich nicht. Sonst könnte man sich die Abstimmerei ja gleich sparen, wenn mans so lange macht bis das Ergebnis stimmt
Deutsch

@MartinSonneborn @DocFlo4 Ist das üblich? Mehrfach über den gleichen Sachverhalt abzustimmen?
LG
LW
Deutsch

Die Mehrheit des EU-Parlaments hat soeben dafür gestimmt, morgen noch mal die #Chatkontrolle abstimmen zu lassen. Zum "Schutz der Kinder"... Sie wollen einfach so lange weitermachen, bis die Sache durchgeht...
Martin Sonneborn@MartinSonneborn
Die Abstimmung heute um 15 Uhr könnte wider Erwarten knapp werden, bin spontan auf dem Weg nach Brüssel. (Könnte sein, dass ich morgen leicht verspätet zur TITANIC-Lesung in Dreieich komme) (bitte sämtliche Autobahnen in NRW, Hessen und Belgien freimachen!)
Deutsch

JUST IN🔥: @nyse selects @securitize to build tokenization infrastructure.
24/7 markets. Onchain settlement.
Sound familiar?
Injective brought stock trading onchain in 2020.
The biggest exchanges are rebuilding themselves on blockchain rails.
Slowly, then all at once. 🥷

English

@jensspahn Was treibt Poltiker wie z.b. Spahn, die sich generell großer Unbeliebtheit erfreuen (erst Recht in den jüngeren Altersgruppen), an einen X Account zu betreiben? Ist es ein Spiel, wer die meisten negativen Kommis erzeugen kann? Bestätigung und Zuspruch findet er hier ja nicht 🙈
Deutsch

„Die Linke“ hat sich verloren zwischen Hammer, Sichel, Palästinensertuch und Wassermelone. Das haben die Linken in Niedersachen erneut deutlich gemacht, wofür diese Partei eigentlich steht: Islamismus und linker Lifestyle-Antisemitismus sind inzwischen gängig geworden, anscheinend wird die Partei von Heidi Reichinnek systematisch von Hamas-Sympathisanten unterwandert.
Deutsch

@IiiMahony @jensspahn Klar, weil die Großeltern einen Genozid verübt haben, muss man einem anderen wortlos zuschauen. Macht richtig Sinn
Deutsch

@jensspahn Allen Mitgliedern der Linkspartei sei der Besuch eines ehemaligen Konzentrationslagers empfohlen. Einfach damit diese Leute etwas über deutsche Geschichte lernen und verstehen, auf welchen Spuren sie gerade wandeln.
Deutsch

@jensspahn Genau, immer schön die Augen verschließen. "Die einzige Demokratie im nahen Osten" 🙈🤣 Mit Ministern die Menschen zu Ungeziefer degradieren. MAn muss nicht mit Terroristen sympatisieren, um zu erkennen, dass dort unrecht geschieht.
Deutsch
SickNik retweetledi

SickNik retweetledi

Many conservatives responded to incidents like Charlie Kirk's assassination with charged rhetoric of their own and calls for swift, violent retribution against their political opponents who they've instinctively blamed for the horrific actions of a single individual.
On the other hand, these same people have continuously downplayed or ignored countless other similar tragedies in the past involving culprits that have been radicalized by far right conspiracy theories, propaganda, and online extremist networks.
The fact remains—domestic extremism in the US has been HISTORICALLY and disproportionately committed by right wing radicals.
But conservatives overlook this fact while they prematurely speculate about violent incidents to get out in front of the facts and control the narrative.
They are more interested in politicizing violence to reinforce and justify their hatred for their perceived enemies.
These conservatives exploit victims to portray them as casualties of "radical left violence" without knowing the facts or without acknowledging the role that right wing extremists have played in this history of political violence and division.
When a white male radicalized by far right dogma attacks and/or murders a democratic lawmaker and their family in their own home; opens fire on school children, federal buildings or minorities in a supermarket, the response is to downplay widely recognized systemic issues while decrying "mental illness" and offering meaningless thoughts and prayers.
But when a transgender gunman or a black man is involved in a high profile crime or shooting, it's an issue of race, gender or leftist ideology, despite the fact that these individuals have obvious mental health problems that transcend race, gender or politics.
Conservatives don't have sympathy for these victims. In many cases, they're treated more like political props.
Conservatives politicize these attacks to justify their enmity or their bigotry towards the communities of people they demean and vilify on a daily basis.
They're eager to exploit these incidents to perpetuate certain stereotypes and push narratives that associate immigrants, minorities, the LGBTQ community, Muslims and their political opponents with violence, "domestic terrorism" and criminality.
They manipulate these stories and capitalize off of these victim's traumatic experiences or deaths to incite violence and validate right-wing grievances—often resorting to the use of stigmatizing and fearmongering messaging that fans the flames of division.
They incessantly demonize and scapegoat out-groups and marginalized segments of our society, and all while ignoring systemic issues and the growing number of incidents of political violence and extremism committed by the far right.
At the same time, the Republicans in power that they continue to elect have done next to nothing to address the underlying, root causes of crime, "domestic extremism," widespread gun violence and mental health problems among Americans especially.
In fact, Republicans are actively defunding and dismantling the programs, community support structures, social services, agencies, organizations and operations that monitor, manage and try to address these issues.
And let's be clear. Federalizing the military and law enforcement to occupy the streets of cities around the country where Trump's political opposition remains defiant of him and his policies, is NOT how you even begin to address the root causes of crime and political violence.
And it is without question that this culture and political climate of hostility, violence and extremism is primarily a consequence of Trump's frequent use of inflammatory and divisive rhetoric, his cruelty, his assault on democratic norms, his constant politicizing of every issue, his normalizing of revenge as a political tool, his weaponization of the federal government, and his faux populist appeals to hate groups and their many grievances
English














