Calvin Coolidge

4.2K posts

Calvin Coolidge

Calvin Coolidge

@Silent_Calvin

Former President. I like spending time hiking in Vermont, the Black Hills, and napping.

Washington, D.C. Katılım Mayıs 2011
353 Takip Edilen2.4K Takipçiler
Dan McLaughlin
Dan McLaughlin@baseballcrank·
Still more examples from @AndrewCMcCarthy @NRO of why the Democrats mad at Trump's abuses aren't mad about the abuses, they're mad that it's Trump doing it this time:
Dan McLaughlin tweet media
English
20
22
86
9.7K
FactPost
FactPost@factpostnews·
ICE has detained Annie Ramos, the newlywed spouse of an Army sergeant training to deploy. Ramos was taken from the military base where the couple planned to live.
FactPost tweet mediaFactPost tweet media
English
174
709
10.3K
854.3K
Shelby K.
Shelby K.@Camman1233·
@wells_sl @factpostnews @TheDemocrats @grok Eh feel like some nuances got left out there. She only applied for DACA in 2020 and was never approved. She only tried for a green card recently so she could live on base. I’m sympathetic but it’s a slap in the face to people who actually go through the right processes
English
1
0
5
1.9K
Calvin Coolidge
Calvin Coolidge@Silent_Calvin·
@WeatherBrew @HistoryDean @walterkirn I don’t understand what’s controversial about this. Using someone’s death as an opportunity to mention what a dirtbag you thought they were in life is not “empathy”. Did hundreds face punishment after making posts about Charlie Kirk because they were being empathetic?
English
1
0
1
20
Walter Kirn
Walter Kirn@walterkirn·
Non-believers don't believe that believers really believe. It harms their understanding of the world.
English
293
394
5.5K
171K
Calvin Coolidge
Calvin Coolidge@Silent_Calvin·
@HistoryDean @walterkirn Pretending you know the thoughts of a person so you can justify your dislike and name-call them when they die isn’t empathizing. It’s called fantasizing. You’re decrying the lack of empathy in this country without having a firm grip on what that word means.
English
1
0
0
28
Dean Karayanis
Dean Karayanis@HistoryDean·
No. I put myself in his shoes. He didn’t like the result of an election so he used his power to try and invalidate the vote. He did the same thing James Comey did against Hillary. Ken Starr was criticized for the same thing. I understand why they did it. That’s why I disagree and I’ll criticize the as much as I do anyone who undermined our democracy. We criticize McCarthy and J. Edgar Hoover and Watergate. I don’t think it’s good for the country to say we can’t criticize law enforcement or anyone else. They have way too much power. Mueller made his choices. He was so horrified by the guy who won the election that he just had to do something. I guess he thought it was worth it. I disagree with that position. I hope you can put yourself in my shoes and empathize with that. I want our elections fought fairly. If and when people collude with enemy nations, nail them to the wall. But don’t launch a new Red Scare and exploit those fears to undermine democracy. When the Soviets approached VP Hubert Humphrey while he was running in ‘72 against Nixon and offered to bankroll his campaign, he told them no thank you. I’ve cited that in columns. Imagine if he’d won and a former FBI director had used that to target HHH as having colluded with Russia and being their puppet. Jeff Sessions met the Russian ambassador as a senator, when they meet with ambassadors all the time, and it was at a party. That’s far flimsier ground than what happened with Humphrey. Look at @GeorgePapa19. They approached him to tell a tale about Russia hacking Hillary and then they sent someone else to ask if he’d heard anything about Hillary and the emails. Fortunately they were dumb enough to send a woman named Turk to a Greek guy and he didn’t trust her. He pled guilty to lying to the FBI, okay. But had they not targeted him based on a story they gave him, it never would have happened. If they could do all this to a president, I’m worried about what they can do to you or me. If we can’t criticize FBI agents, they have free rain to do whatever the hell they want.
English
2
0
1
110
Dean Karayanis
Dean Karayanis@HistoryDean·
The inability to put yourselves in the shoes of others — to empathize or sympathize even if you don’t agree — is a plague. Nobody can put themselves in anyone else’s shoes or wants to. It’s why Hollywood movies are increasingly just people inserting themselves as characters instead of creating characters.
English
2
2
18
1.7K
Everybody is Insane
Everybody is Insane@colorblindk1d·
@Silent_Calvin @Odoyle1201 @jonathanchait Do you not think that if they had enough evidence they would have tried to get him on criminal charges? Do you not find it absurd that leftwing donors passed a law to get rid of the statute of limitations for just one year and the suit against him dropped the same day?
English
1
0
0
47
Everybody is Insane
Everybody is Insane@colorblindk1d·
@Odoyle1201 @jonathanchait Yet New York had to change the law to temporarily abolish statutes of limitations and charge him in a civil court where you don't need to prove anything beyond a reasonable doubt and even then they did not provide enough evidence that he raped her.
English
3
0
2
247
Calvin Coolidge
Calvin Coolidge@Silent_Calvin·
@GWHayduke97 @ClwnPrncCharlie @JacobAShell There’s a word for the thing where 99 people who don’t own a piece of property get to decide what the person that owns the property does with it, and it’s not “capitalism”.
English
1
0
1
66
Hayduke ⏹️
Hayduke ⏹️@GWHayduke97·
@ClwnPrncCharlie @JacobAShell Because, for instance, in a neighborhood of 100 people, 99 of them all have a strong and important interest in not allowing the one guy looking for a big payout to have a high-rise casino built on his plot.
English
1
0
0
129
Jacob Shell
Jacob Shell@JacobAShell·
Here's the theory-level question yimbies havent answered: why should 10 million ppl who want to be in, say, Boston for totally banal, horde-like reasons get to have a say about what the future shape of that city will be, rather than the people who own the city? What is yimbies' larger polticial theory which disfavors the preferences of owners (who want Boston kept "artificially" small and pricey) and favors the preferences of this vast abstract horde? I could see a communist answer to the question: the owners of the city should lose their ownership because they're now "historically obsolete"'...a state apparatus dominated by workers' organizations should grab all the land...etc etc etc. Sure. But last I checked, yimbies arent communists! They say they believe in capitalism. And if you're taking capitalist property rights seriously, then why arent you taking seriously owners' rights to do what they want with the physical environment that they own? If what owners want to do is pool political resources to set up zoning laws they like, then this is just spirit of capital doing its thing, isn't it? Since when does big capital not get to set anything up as exclusive? And BTW, in the "communist" version of the thought experiment, I am not sure the communist state would tear down historical Boston to put up giant housing boxes everywhere. Maybe they'd do that (producing the kinds of cities China has), or maybe they'd preserve it as some kind of "dialectical political symbol," like the Soviets did with St Petersburg (Petrograd) or Novgorod.
English
91
1
83
143K
Calvin Coolidge
Calvin Coolidge@Silent_Calvin·
@HistoryDean Agreed. It’s really out of line to try and use a culture you’re not a part of to settle political debates.
Calvin Coolidge tweet media
English
1
0
0
25
Dean Karayanis
Dean Karayanis@HistoryDean·
Don’t presume to quote Greeks and tell us what they meant. That’s our culture. You don’t get to use it. I can 100% guarantee you that the ancient Greeks, had the purge and spent 50 years calling for the death of them all, murdered them, would’ve one day decided that it was time to take action.
Dan Carlin@dccommonsense

I see many quoting ancient authors(Thucydides,etc)when trying to find applicable passages to the Iran war. But this is to miss the forest for the trees.The ancients made a big point of condemning HUBRIS as a factor in the humbling of powerful peoples/states.We are drowning in it.

English
1
0
1
163
Seth Frantzman
Seth Frantzman@sfrantzman·
Melania is a decent person and it’s incredibly unfair to be critical of her. She’s never done anything negative in her public career. Compared to the other corrupt charlatans and terrible people at the UN, she’s a saint How many of these UN bureaucrat monsters were not only corrupt but leaned into abuses and genocide?
English
5
2
38
2.1K
Sweet Meteor O'Death
Sweet Meteor O'Death@smod4real·
The neocons/liberals were responsible for two lengthy conflicts with U.S. ground forces, and for pouring gasoline on more than a few bloody civil wars. Trump has avoided these outcomes so far, and tho I disagree with his war making decisions, I will judge them by their fruits.
English
6
5
33
5.1K
Calvin Coolidge
Calvin Coolidge@Silent_Calvin·
@sfrantzman @RyanNewYork @MattWalshBlog Who in history has ever avoided war with the US due to America’s well armed contractors? I’m not saying well armed militias. I’m referring to individuals with “small arsenals”.
English
0
0
0
23
Seth Frantzman
Seth Frantzman@sfrantzman·
@RyanNewYork @MattWalshBlog You underestimate how well armed we are. My contractor builds his own guns, has a small arsenal, so do several other neighbors I know where I live. People take this seriously. And they are well trained and good shots.
English
2
0
1
90
Matt Walsh
Matt Walsh@MattWalshBlog·
The whole debate about which countries have "the right to exist" is based on a false premise. There is no "right to exist" for nations. What does that even mean? How can a country be entitled to exist? Every country on Earth came into existence through force and remains in existence through force. If you can't defend your existence, you will not exist anymore. The history of civilization is full of countries that existed and then ceased to exist. Are the rights of those countless now non-existent countries being perpetually violated by their non-existence? It makes no sense. If you can defend your existence, then you can exist. If you can't, then eventually you won't exist. It's really that simple. A right is an entitlement, by definition, and there is no country that has an eternal entitlement to exist whether it can defend and support itself or not. The very concept is absurd, meaningless.
English
1.3K
1.4K
15.9K
1.2M
Frankie Boy
Frankie Boy@frankieboy1·
@atlanticesque To a working-class guy Romney always came off as the guy who just laid you off from work.
English
7
1
42
4K
𝖓𝖎𝖓𝖊 🕯
𝖓𝖎𝖓𝖊 🕯@atlanticesque·
Gosh, looks like whoever is in the “Low Education” quadrants tends to win! Clinton ‘96, Bush ‘00 and ‘04, Obama ‘08 and ‘12, Trump ‘16 and ‘24. Only 2020 breaks the trend. Seems clear to me that if you want to actually win the election, you should appeal to cranks, not wonks!
English
38
50
856
109.8K
Calvin Coolidge
Calvin Coolidge@Silent_Calvin·
@AuburnJPJ @AndrewCFollett @MeghanMcCain “The Press called McCain Hitler” “When?” “On this Fox show” “That’s Family Guy” “Well, on this NPR show.” “Read the transcript, that’s not true.” “Well, they said McCain was either a cynical asshole or America’s Hitler.” “That’s JD Vance talking about Trump.”
English
1
0
0
54
Andrew Follett
Andrew Follett@AndrewCFollett·
@MeghanMcCain I wasn't old enough to vote for your dad on election day 2008... But, I was old enough to be horrified how he was treated by our press. He went from "every Democrat's favorite Republican" to "literally Hitler" the instant he became a political threat.
Andrew Follett tweet media
English
10
6
313
8K