Silvan Tanner

315 posts

Silvan Tanner

Silvan Tanner

@SilvanTanner

Katılım Mart 2012
550 Takip Edilen45 Takipçiler
CryptoVegeta
CryptoVegeta@opieaccount4·
@SilvanTanner @dancantstream lol massive cope. A bill existing with these quotes, support from both parties and support from these people. Passing would just be the icing on the cake, its existence is damning
CryptoVegeta tweet media
English
1
0
1
127
Dan Saltman
Dan Saltman@dancantstream·
Hasan said he is more politically relevant than Destiny and I hate to say it- but its absolutely true. Destiny will never get a bipartisan bill passed calling him a racist- he just does not have what it takes.
Dan Saltman tweet media
English
30
107
2.4K
65.8K
Silvan Tanner
Silvan Tanner@SilvanTanner·
@dancantstream Ok cool, I just said it hasn't passed as you claimed. That's it. Keep trucking.
English
2
0
4
1.1K
John Ridge
John Ridge@WeaponScientist·
@NotWoofers What makes you think it was Kuwait? Besides it being the most obvious candidate
English
3
0
33
8.2K
Silvan Tanner retweetledi
Anatoly Karlin 🧲💯
Anatoly Karlin 🧲💯@akarlin·
The idea that Switzerland is rich as a result of being a tax haven is very low-info. It's a comprehensively impressive country with very high human capital and pro-growth institutions.
Benoit Dubosson@beniduboss

I am so tired of the “Switzerland is just evil bankers hiding elite money” narrative Banking is only about 5% of Swiss GDP Pharma is bigger, at 5.8%, fyi we account for 10.5% of global pharmaceutical exports Manufacturing is around 24% We also rank #1 in innovation world wide Oh and we also have the only real democracy in the world The issue is that the foreigners view of Switzerland and its economy is plagued by it’s image… No sorry but it isn’t just Zurich and Geneva carrying a country of cows and ski chalets where inhabitants produce chocolate and expensive watches Zurich canton, aka the state of Zurich, produces roughly 18% of Swiss GDP with about 18% of the population Geneva produces about 8% of GDP with only 5.9% of the population The reality is that the country is full of small towns with industrial and service bases that employ people locally and sustain entire regions Take Monthey, where I grew up. It’s a city of around 15,000 people, yet it holds one of the largest contiguous chemical site in Europe: 2,000 people on site daily, with names like Ciba, BASF, Huntsman, Sun Chemical, and Syngenta. For Syngenta, largest crop protection producer in the world, Monthey is a globally important production hub That site is also where the world famous Ferrari red pigment was invented That’s the real Switzerland Small places quietly making world-class things, and the system works: My father grew up on a rural farm, couldn’t get a higher education. To give my family a better life he got a job at Syngenta working night shifts as a factory worker. 20y later he still works there, but now he moved up to a coordinator role in charge of a part of manufacturing where he leads a team of 20. There aren’t many places where you can leave school at 14, spend your whole life as an employee, never invest a cent beyond your retirement savings, and still work your way from the lower class into a very comfortable middle-class life 2 months ago, I took the day off to join my dad as he picked up his Porsche Taycan 4S. Sure, it was secondhand and around 120k off sticker, but for someone who grew up waking up at 4:30 to milk cows before school, then back to work again after class, and never had a vacation until he met my mom in his mid-20s, it’s an extraordinary milestone The state covered my healthcare until I was 20, and it quite literally saved my life, I would not be here otherwise Swiss taxpayers spent roughly CHF 18 million keeping me alive, and a big part of what drives me is the desire to repay that debt by becoming a net positive for my country And yes, of course Switzerland made real moral compromises during WWII, but for the love of god consider the situation it was in Judging those choices without looking at a map is deeply unserious: by 1940 Switzerland was effectively surrounded by Axis-controlled territory, so neutrality was a survival strategy under extreme pressure, not some claim to moral purity lol. So yes, the Swiss National Bank bought gold from Nazi Germany. The real question is not whether compromises happened, but if survival ended and complicity began. It’s very easy to moralize about clean choices once the war is over and someone else had to live through the alternatives… If you are going to criticize Switzerland, do it where criticism is deserved Lastly, before calling Switzerland cowardly for neutrality, remember that Pope Julius II founded the Swiss Guard in 1506 because Swiss mercenaries were the best in the world and had a reputation for loyalty and military effectiveness. Five centuries later we are still protecting the Pope btw Next time instead of taking about our big bad banks, talk about: our factories, our labs, our medicines, our engineering, or the diplomacy, the humanitarian work and so on Oh and look at your own countries actions before having the audacity to criticize others…

English
45
121
1.9K
79K
Colby Badhwar
Colby Badhwar@ColbyBadhwar·
@sfrantzman Arrow 3 doesn't make sense for the UK for a number of different reasons.
English
5
0
33
3K
Charlie Herbert
Charlie Herbert@Charlie533080·
@shashj Not disagreeing, but doctrinal force ratio generally set at 3:1 for attack v defence. If Gen Votel believes a battalion is sufficient, it suggests he believes Kharg is defended by a single IRGC company. That’s hard to believe. I’d be amazed if IRGC not there at brigade level +.
English
5
4
44
18.1K
Charlie Herbert
Charlie Herbert@Charlie533080·
A battalion? 🤷🏻‍♂️ @shashj. That’s less than 1000 soldiers. I’m not sure that’s what any sensible or experienced military official has suggested. A brigade perhaps? But even that would require an enormous joint force to enable and then sustain it.
The Economist@TheEconomist

Former military officials estimate that America would need at least a battalion of combat forces to take the Iranian island. Getting them there is only the first step economist.com/middle-east-an…

English
6
8
57
15.8K
Colby Badhwar
Colby Badhwar@ColbyBadhwar·
🇩🇪🇨🇭🇮🇹 Rheinmetall is building out production capacity for ~400 Skynex/Skyranger systems per year. I don't know why European governments don't order substantially more of these both for Ukraine & themselves.
Colby Badhwar tweet media
SuperGAU@thegauguy

I know these systems are very expensive, but I'll never forget that the German government has never financed additional Skynex systems for Ukraine beyond the four contracted & delivered over the past years. In places like Odesa, they would work magic with a steady supply of ammo.

English
50
182
1K
66.7K
Silvan Tanner
Silvan Tanner@SilvanTanner·
@ColbyBadhwar 1. Patriot not Tomahawks (as in the picture) 2. Will deliver later not can't deliver 3. The quote about not receiving the F-35 is not attributable to the linked article
English
1
1
13
882
Colby Badhwar
Colby Badhwar@ColbyBadhwar·
The fastest way to get rich on this platform is to post absolute nonsense.
Colby Badhwar tweet media
English
10
27
480
15.5K
Silvan Tanner
Silvan Tanner@SilvanTanner·
@DanielGmur @JosefWiederkehr Ich kann Argumente für eine kleinere F-35 Flotte verstehen, da Geldmangel, würde aber den Mehrwert des F-35 nicht kleinreden (v.a. Sensorik) Die Armee braucht auf alle Fälle mehr Geld (leider)
Deutsch
0
0
0
9
Silvan Tanner
Silvan Tanner@SilvanTanner·
@DanielGmur @JosefWiederkehr Aber nur mit Geld kann man Drohnen/cUAS kaufen :) Gibt auch andere, günstige (!) Mittel gegen Drohnen, eben z.B. Skynex oder APKWS
Deutsch
0
0
0
24
Silvan Tanner
Silvan Tanner@SilvanTanner·
@SilFoiera @markusgisel @JosefWiederkehr Es braucht beides, wobei DPS bei noch nicht auf Radar ist. Auch politisch schwierig, siehe u.a. auch deine ursprünglichen Aussagen & SRF Beitrag. F-35 wirkt durch Sensorik als Force Multiplier für andere DPS Mittel. Nachteile, aber nicht Ausschlusskriterien(!), hast du gelistet.
Deutsch
0
0
0
12
Silvio Foiera ن
Silvio Foiera ن@SilFoiera·
@SilvanTanner @markusgisel @JosefWiederkehr D'accord. Aber für S/IRBM, CM, Drohnen, brauchen wir grad eben keine Träger, welche das im sneak mode 1000km im Feindgebiet deployen. Der F-35 ist hingegen kaum Feldfähig, auf wenige ausgerüstete Basen angewiesen, welche als HVT gelten. Danach bleibt er im Stollen.
Deutsch
1
0
0
24
Silvan Tanner
Silvan Tanner@SilvanTanner·
@SilFoiera @markusgisel @JosefWiederkehr Deep Precision Strike ist nicht exklusiv für F-35, bezieht sich auf Wirkung weit hinter der Front, also z.B. auch via Ballistic/Cruise Missiles und Drohnen (imo wichtigste Fähigkeitslücke der CH). HVTs am Boden zum Beispiel C2 oder Logistik. AWACS für Bodenziele nur beschränkt.
Deutsch
1
0
0
27
Silvio Foiera ن
Silvio Foiera ن@SilFoiera·
@SilvanTanner @markusgisel @JosefWiederkehr Shoot the archer, agree. Das geht aber im vernetzten Feld gut auch ohne DeepStrike cap. (Siehe UKR F-16) Aufklärung, Gefechtsfeldbeleuchtung. DeepStrike ist bei HighValue Targets nötig. zB Todesstern Ventilationsschacht (-> Natanz) x.com/i/status/19321…
Polymarket Intel@PolymarketIntel

BILD reports a Swedish Saab 340 AWACS helped a Ukrainian F-16 shoot down a Russian Su-35 in Kursk, detecting it from nearly 300 km away and relaying coordinates.

Deutsch
1
0
0
26
Silvan Tanner
Silvan Tanner@SilvanTanner·
@SilFoiera @markusgisel @JosefWiederkehr Hallo, Air Interdiction bezieht sich nicht nur auf die 2 genannten Effektoren (SAM, Air Sup Fight). Wenn der Gegner auf die Schweiz mit stand-off Mitteln wirken kann, soll die Armee Mittel gegen diese haben, bevor diese zum Nutzen kommen (Prinzip: shoot the archer).
Deutsch
1
0
1
14
Silvio Foiera ن
Silvio Foiera ن@SilFoiera·
@markusgisel @JosefWiederkehr Ebe ja: deep-strike capability gegen stark verteitigte (SAM, Luftüberlegenheitsjäger) Lufträume. Einsatzprofil, welches zB Israel hat um latente & akute Bedrohungen im Iran, Syrien, Libanon, Yemen zu neutralisieren. Wo müsste die Schweiz mit SE🇸🇪 AWACS Ziele in Belgien treffen?
Deutsch
2
0
0
53
Silvan Tanner
Silvan Tanner@SilvanTanner·
@DanielGmur @JosefWiederkehr In der Armeebotschaft 2026 sind 800 Mio. für Bodengestützte Luftverteidigung kleiner Reichweite (Skynex) und 70 Mio. für Abwehr von Mini-Drohnen budgetiert.
Deutsch
1
0
0
15
Daniel Gmür
Daniel Gmür@DanielGmur·
@JosefWiederkehr Korrekt. 10 50'000.- Drohnen würden reichen um ein F35 auf der Startbahn zu zerstören. Wir haben nichts gegen 10 Drohnen. Schongarnichts gegen 10'000.
Deutsch
1
0
1
43