NerdyByNature

@wendy_hume @MeetJess Based on that post, I would say you’re a horrible human being

@MeetJess I would say of all those older people who died were wrongly diagnosed with a fake illness and killed by inappropriate treatment.

About 28% of older people in England who died of COVID-19 in the first 2.5 years of the pandemic would likely, if uninfected, have lived at least another five years cidrap.umn.edu/covid-19/many-…

@AllisonPearson @lukerobertblack @nadhimzahawi Strong and wrong. Classic

@lukerobertblack @nadhimzahawi Sorry, that just isn’t true. The Covid jab does not protect against getting Covid and it never did. It neither prevents infection or transmission but may modify symptoms.

Covid vaccines were not necessary for younger, healthy people. All risk and no benefit. Forcing people to get jabs they don’t need was grossly unethical.

@hicasamadim 72

bunu çözersen, IQ seviyen ortalamanın üstündedir. çözebilir misin?

@informedviewer @grahamformaine Don’t you think that proves the point about issues re private equity and the influence they have? You’re applauding your own parasitism

Not what happened. Like many Americans, I am concerned about private equity’s increasing role in the residential home market. There should be a legitimate debate about the wisdom of that, even for those of us who are very free market oriented. But your advertisement didn’t get taken down for that. Your advertisement attacked the private equity owners of the Red Sox. You ran it on the station that is owned by the same people. In a free market, we don’t make private owners run advertisements that criticize them. Deal with it. And go Yankees!!!

Yesterday we started running this ad during the Red Sox game. Midway through the game the ad was taken down by the station (which is owned by Red Sox ownership). And then the Sox blew a 4-0 lead.

@Andreas65920876 @pseudopslop @TakethatCt @BerryTartlet @JamieAA_Again You consistently demonstrate you either don’t read or can’t comprehend what you’ve read because you consistently present nonsense as fact. You don’t actually understand the fundamentals of these experiments, and hand wave them away. Do better.

@pseudopslop @TakethatCt @SimonDTweets @BerryTartlet @JamieAA_Again Insults about “not reading” won’t change the elementary fact: virology still has zero proof of a purified pathogenic virus causing disease via natural routes under clean conditions.Same old story. No virus. Just bad science and industrial-level cope.

The so-called HIV tests are not detecting a virus - they measure antibodies or genetic fragments (like reverse transcriptase activity or PCR sequences) that come from cellular debris, stress, oxidation, or toxic exposures, not from a specific exogenous retrovirus. @JamieAA_Again

@Andreas65920876 @TakethatCt @BerryTartlet @JamieAA_Again

@TakethatCt @SimonDTweets @BerryTartlet @JamieAA_Again Because you are not diluting a “virus.” You are diluting toxic cell culture supernatant.What you call a “virus stock” is the fluid from cells that were deliberately starved, poisoned with antibiotics, antifungals, and other chemicals.

@Andreas65920876 @TakethatCt @BerryTartlet @JamieAA_Again All contained within vehicle control

@Andreas65920876 @TakethatCt @BerryTartlet @JamieAA_Again

@SimonDTweets @TakethatCt @BerryTartlet @JamieAA_Again When proper controls are run (identical conditions, same cell types, only the alleged “viral” material differing), the cytopathic effects and “tropism” patterns appear anyway — because the procedure is the cause, not a phantom virus.

@Andreas65920876 @TakethatCt @BerryTartlet @JamieAA_Again So, you admit you don’t accept evidence. The structure of the viral tegument was characterized in this paper. And wouldn’t you know it?- Not found in control samples-

@Andreas65920876 @TakethatCt @BerryTartlet @JamieAA_Again Incorrect

@Andreas65920876 @TakethatCt @BerryTartlet @JamieAA_Again No. It does not. So you also misinterpret valid experiments. Good luck to you.

@SimonDTweets @TakethatCt @BerryTartlet @JamieAA_Again That does not prove the existence of a specific pathogenic virus with receptor-mediated entry. It proves that different cells have different resilience to poison.

@Andreas65920876 @TakethatCt @BerryTartlet @JamieAA_Again I missed this in your tirade. This statement is not true and the accusation is reprehensible

@TakethatCt @SimonDTweets @BerryTartlet @JamieAA_Again A valid scientific control must keep every single condition identical except for the presence of the purified alleged virus. That standard has been systematically violated for decades.

@Andreas65920876 @TakethatCt @BerryTartlet @JamieAA_Again You clearly didn’t pay attention. Tissue tropism, alone, would disprove the claims you make. Viruses can’t penetrate every cell type. Experiments with varied cell types and receptors yield varied results. Not just equivalently “poisoned cells”. Do better

@SimonDTweets @TakethatCt @BerryTartlet @JamieAA_Again Pointing at structures in a messy electron micrograph and calling them a “viral tegument” is not science — it’s wishful interpretation of cell culture artifacts. These papers use the same poisoned, starved cells that produce such particles even without any alleged virus.

@Andreas65920876 @TakethatCt @BerryTartlet @JamieAA_Again Not the teacher’s fault, then.

@SimonDTweets @TakethatCt @BerryTartlet @JamieAA_Again Yes, I’ve taken basic immunology and virology courses. That’s precisely why I no longer believe in the virus model. The deeper you examine the primary literature and actual methods, the clearer it becomes: it’s built on circular reasoning and systematic fraud.

@Andreas65920876 @TakethatCt @BerryTartlet @JamieAA_Again Have you taken a basic immunology course where the characteristics of various virus are taught?

@SimonDTweets @TakethatCt @BerryTartlet @JamieAA_Again Spare us the patronizing “find a better teacher” nonsense. The real teachers are the ones demanding basic scientific integrity: purification, characterization, and proper controlled causation experiments. You are the one who cannot produce them.

@Andreas65920876 @TakethatCt @BerryTartlet @JamieAA_Again Herpesvirus

@TakethatCt @SimonDTweets @BerryTartlet @JamieAA_Again The real knee-deep irony is this: A field that calls itself “virology” refuses to do the most elementary control experiments. People who have never seen a purified virus in their life defend its existence with religious certainty.

@Andreas65920876 @TakethatCt @BerryTartlet @JamieAA_Again The evidence isn’t missing. You just either can’t or won’t comprehend it. Find a better teacher

@TakethatCt @SimonDTweets @BerryTartlet @JamieAA_Again You defend a multi-billion-dollar industry built on a claim that has never met the basic requirements of science, then mock those who point out the missing evidence as if we are the ridiculous ones.

@AmAndAJ70627599 But the website says it’s “science-backed”. So, which is it? Are we to trust modern science or not?

Neurodevelopmental brain damage from vaccinations drugs trauma environmental pollutants - neurons that are not firing together need heart brain coherence and attempting to do that with autistic children is near impossible We need med beds - the crystalline chambers that the elites have used for eons

I have not believed the official stories for over a decade. Not about HIV, Ebola, Zika, Covid or any other fictitious fucking “VIRUS” Once I began questioning testing, everything else started collapsing beside it. Kary Mullis himself repeatedly warned that PCR was never designed to function as some infallible diagnostic oracle. Yet decades later it became exactly that: a machine capable of manufacturing fear through amplification. A fragment becomes a “case.” A case becomes a headline. A headline becomes a global emergency. And suddenly the world reorganises itself around invisible enemies most people will never personally verify. From my perspective, HIV followed the same script long before Covid did. Fear. Testing. Authority. Pharmaceutical intervention. Mass panic. Silencing dissent. Then came AZT, a drug I see as catastrophically toxic. To me, AZT resembles what Remdesivir and Midazolam became during Covid, emergency-era pharmaceutical interventions administered under the guise of saving lives while many people believe the treatments themselves contributed to immense suffering. When I look back at the wasting, lesions, immune collapse, and devastation associated with AIDS, I question whether the narrative ever fully added up. Were people dying from a mysterious ‘virus?’ NO! Or were people dying from toxicity, chronic stress, immune suppression, malnutrition, recreational drug use, fear, and harsh pharmaceutical protocols? YES! The deeper I look into modern medicine, the more I see a system built around symptom management, market expansion, and institutional protection rather than genuine inquiry. I see industries that require lifelong patients. I see dissent labelled dangerous and questioning framed as irresponsibility. And once trust breaks, every “pandemic” resembles the same playbook.

@TakethatCt @Andreas65920876 @BerryTartlet @JamieAA_Again That was quite the notification storm to return to

@Andreas65920876 @SimonDTweets @BerryTartlet @JamieAA_Again The irony here is knee deep and thicker than treacle