Dirk Gerhardt aka SilverSit

Alles, was ich in 2 1/2 Jahren Recherchen herausgefunden habe, hier verlinkt. Mit über 2.000 Quellen. facebook.com/10000044715681… Das war es für mich fürs Erste. PS: in der aufkommenden Erkenntniswelle ein Job, den ich auf keinen Fall haben möchte: des verlogenen Faktencheckers

This makes sickened and angry. I can’t comment on the intel except that we plenty of unclassified information that was specific and damming. For an objective unclassified analysis please read Dr. Steven Quay’s book the Code as a Witness— it’s all you really need to know. The sequence was obviously altered with synthetic biology. Also note that our January 2021 Intel declassification, we singled out the Pangolin research…..

@SenatorDurbin A mass murderer enabling the greatest homocide ever you would say

Dr. Fauci is a deeply caring physician, a brilliant scientist, an extraordinary public servant, a humanitarian, & a patriot—whose work has helped save tens of millions of lives. It is a shame to watch him be dragged in front of Congress in the name of bogus conspiracy theories.

🚨Fauci’s Diary reveals he stopped the CDC from stating that messenger RNA tech was “not effective at all in preventing infection and transmission.” Why? Because - “it would undermine the DOJ's efforts at mandates.” And not only did Pfizer say they never tested their product for transmission.... they already had the data it never would! It's massive institutional and regulatory power exerting every lever of control they could over the population.

@SenRandPaul always talks about GoF research. But the 30+ GoFs the SARS-CoV-2 virus indeed has, especially the spike-protein, are never discussed. I don't get it. How can you prove something without elaborating the underlying? It's a basic approach. What does the SP do?

@WolfgangRichtEU LOL read the diaries

Dr. Anthony Fauci is one of the most brilliant scientists in the world. The shameful smear campaign by Rand Paul, which my sources tell me is financed by Russia, will not succeed. Without Dr. Fauci, millions more people would have died during Covid. We all owe him great gratitude. Have a wonderful day, Wolfgang

“You've done more to harm science than anybody in my lifetime. And I hope you'll go home and write that in your diary.” Sen. Josh Hawley unleashes a scathing attack on Dr. Anthony Fauci during his Senate hearing, accusing the former top public health official of putting personal fame ahead of the American public. The Senator slams Fauci for seeking media attention and dodging accountability, calling his actions a total betrayal of his role. “You became a narcissist and a megalomaniac and a liar, and you've lied to the American people, and you've lied to this body, and you've disgraced your profession by doing it.”

@NPR Now look at the many GoFs the virus has, especially the 'inserts' in the spike-protein. It should be the 101 of any investigation. What functions did the virus gained or are stronger against its peers? I can tell you. Do the research on your own, if you are really journalists.

Virus researchers — who are familiar with lab accidents and how research on coronaviruses is conducted — say there is virtually zero chance that the novel coronavirus was released as result of a lab accident, despite misinformation being circulated. trib.al/BqdOxwm

Punctual Fauci arrived early flanked by his wife, bodyguards and 5 lawyers. To me he looked nervous or less confident than usual. (The diary release pissed him off). @RogerMarshallMD from Kansas sat next to me and nodded as I calmly explain my bat shit crazy story. He responded, who are you? @CosmicTusk and I sat behind Fauci’s army of lawyers. He sat next to @IngrahamAngle. The room was tiny but not full. The seat next to me was free. Before the cameras turned on, Rand Paul’s chief council, Salazar, who found the Fauci files and chased him for months to testify, walked up to the dream team of defense lawyers and started a quiet argument with them. I didn’t understand the context until it blew into the open. Fauci’s lead lawyer had been asked to sit by me, but remained next to Fauci. He was escorted out during the hearing but Fauci’s 4 other lawyers remained. Fauci sat alone for 10 minutes as the casually late Senators took their seat. The hearing started as he sat motionless while both sides of isle lectured him. Fauci invoked the 5th and wouldn’t acknowledge anything. He grew in confidence as the Senators questions remained unanswered. @SenBlumenthal recited a line from Fauci’s lawyer who had been removed. Committee co-leads Peter’s and Paul were friendly but no longer. Fauci divided the room more than any other. @SenFettermanPA showed up causally late dressed in a coat & tie and sat on 1/2 full Democrat side. He asked about lab leak then left. During the hearing, I was reminded of a line in my book: DC is Hollywood for ugly people. In the book, I closed with his Fauci’s 2024 hearing and called Fauci the 5 star bio general. With his diary published and private thoughts in the open, he conquered the hill again with his silence. With his 5th invoked, a pardon, and an army of lawyers: Do y’all still think Fauci funded some research on Wuhan or created Covid in his own biodefense lab? As Fauci walked away with an army of lawyers and bodyguards, I told him to say hi to Vincent Munster for me. He wanted to look at me but didn’t.

@ddiamond The SARS-CoV-2 virus is a bioweapon with over 30 GoFs. No matter the spin.

BREAKING: Fauci says he is *invoking his 5th Amendment right to not answer ANY questions,* per written testimony Fauci says he believes Rand Paul is seeking to wrongly trap him today

One of the biggest mistakes conservatives have made, certainly since the Trump era and probably for much longer, is celebrating whenever the fake news merely acknowledges something. “Look, even the New York Times mentioned it.” Sorry, but that is nowhere near good enough. Look at what they actually did here. They did not report that Fauci repeatedly lied. They framed the story as his supposedly deranged “critics” pouncing on an innocent misstatement made years later in an unrelated interview. The article was written for their brainwashed liberal readership, not for us, and those readers will absorb exactly the intended message: a mob of crazed right-wingers forensically combed through hundreds of pages and found nothing more than one trivial slip of the tongue. What those readers will never learn is that Fauci’s diary, from beginning to end, is a relentless stream of contradictions between what he said publicly and what he recorded privately.

@breakfast_dogs One of that questions would be. If the virus is from a lab. What did they do with it, what functions it gained, where in the genome? The bioweapon character will emerge suddenly. Therefore such questions seem to be taboo.

Sadly this is too much like political theater though. Very little effort to find the truth - or even ask the right questions.

Dr. Fauci says Rand Paul has an "UNHINGED OBSESSION WITH ME," all while he can't keep his paper still during his opening statement. "Given Senator Paul's obvious obsession with calling for my prosecution, his repeated slanderous comments about me, and recently his publicly releasing my unredacted personal diary aimed at embarrassing and intimidating me, the only conclusion I can reach is that the sole reason he is calling me before this committee is to get me to say something, anything, that could vindicate his repeated public pledges that I end up, in his words, quote, 'behind bars,' unquote." "Any reasonable person who has followed his unhinged obsession with me would readily come to the same conclusion. Therefore, although it pains me to do so, because of the respect I have for the legislative branch of government and my decades-long record of cooperating with Congress, under the advice of my attorneys, I will invoke my right under the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution to refrain from answering your questions."

I think you lack the training to weigh the molecular evidence. But more importantly, as a lab accident does not fit your political agenda, you just frame scrutiny of the gross negligence that killed 20 million people as an “obsession” to avoid engaging with it. Just in case you are genuinely interested in the evidence: youtu.be/YcdhIPxdbN4?si… -> it was a lab leak

@peter_berghmans @TheSeeker268 Precedent for the implosion of the zoonosis narrative and room for not only lab leak, lab origin, but the real bw nature of the virus.

@TheSeeker268 "it should not be retracted, also because that sets precedence". Precedence to correct what's wrong?! We can't let that happen! 😬

Damn. The Proximal Origin paper got laid bare in this chat by NIH officials: "But now that is has been shown that it was not a full accounting of how the authors felt about potential origins, but clearly drove a specific narrative, I am not sure what to think any more." "The problem came with how the Dems and NIH leadership used it as a weapon to silence scientific debate. It is also an important historical record at this point." "I am still siding with you that it should not be retracted, also because that sets precedence. But what went on behind the scenes is pretty bad."

@HansMahncke 30 GoFs are not accidentally possible. The virus was designed to be stealth, malicious, tricky, on the first view like a possible zoonosis result. In reality most if not all of the precursors were adapted to humans. Otherwise Spike-Protein capabilities remain inexplicable.

I do not believe Covid was deliberately released, not because I doubt that anyone was capable of such a thing, but because I have studied, researched and written about the origins of Covid for longer than almost anyone, and all the evidence points to an accidental leak. That said, Fauci’s diary, and especially the fact that his pathological narcissism stretches back decades, does raise a darker question. Was he merely supremely reckless in outsourcing extraordinarily dangerous experiments to a hostile country notorious for abysmal biosafety standards, which he unquestionably was, or had his recklessness become something more disturbing, almost as though he wanted a catastrophe to occur so that he could finally play out all his grandiose fantasies on the world stage?

Perhaps surprisingly, both the New York Times and the Washington Post have now published articles on the Fauci diaries. Unsurprisingly, both are complete whitewashes. They sanitize his record and reduce the criticism to the suggestion that he may have been a little too narcissistic. Neither outlet confronts the diaries’ central revelation, which is that Fauci repeatedly said one thing in private and another in public. That applies to the possibility of a laboratory origin, the supposed role of the Wuhan seafood market, the Wuhan lab’s extraordinarily dangerous gain-of-function research, the infection fatality rate, dissenting scientists such as Jay Bhattacharya, and much more. This was their chance to admit that they were wrong to trust Fauci, that he was a charlatan, and that they had failed their readers by acting as establishment propaganda outlets rather than journalists. They could even have blamed Fauci and washed their own hands of the entire scandal. But they cannot bring themselves to do even that.

@rmonikab @Mwgfd_official Es sind keine Nebenwirkungen. Es sind die Hauptwirkungen des Triumvirats der heimtückischen Biowaffe Spike-Protein, der getarnten LNPs, und dauerhaft gemachter modifizierter mRNA. Überall, für immer.

@Mwgfd_official Also, nach der anfänglichen Notfallzulassung der Impfstoffe sollten doch die Nebenwirkungen komplett und akrobatisch erfasst werden. Aber diese Mail‘s beweisen doch, was viele schon erahnt haben, dass Nebenwirkungen systematisch geleugnet und unter den Teppich gekehrt wurden!

"Ich verstehe nicht, warum Walter das nicht abstellt." Diesen Satz schrieb im April 2021 der zweithöchste Beamte der obersten US-Gesundheitsforschungsbehörde an seinen Chef. Gemeint war: Ein eigener Wissenschaftler hatte Nervenschäden nach der COVID-Impfung dokumentiert – und wollte darüber berichten. Kurz die Beteiligten, damit alle mitkommen: ▪️ NIH – die National Institutes of Health, die staatliche Gesundheitsforschungsbehörde der USA. Das größte Forschungsinstitut der Welt, Jahresbudget rund 45 Milliarden Dollar. Was dort als gesicherte Erkenntnis gilt, prägt weltweit die Medizin – auch bei uns. ▪️ ICAN – eine US-Bürgerrechtsorganisation, die seit Jahren gerichtlich Behördenakten erstreitet und veröffentlicht. Sie ist erklärt impfkritisch. Das darf man wissen. Es ändert nichts daran, dass die Dokumente echt sind: Es sind die eigenen E-Mails der Behörde. ▪️ FOIA – das US-Informationsfreiheitsgesetz. Es gibt jedem Bürger das Recht, Akten und Mails von Behörden anzufordern. Ein Werkzeug, das es in dieser Schärfe in Deutschland nicht gibt. Und genau so kam das hier ans Licht: ICAN stellte im Oktober 2023 einen Antrag. Das NIH antwortete nicht. ICAN klagte im Juni 2025. Am 22. Juli 2026 lagen die Mails auf dem Tisch. Fast drei Jahre für Dokumente, die dem Steuerzahler gehören. Was passiert ist April 2021, mitten in der weltweiten Impfkampagne: Avindra Nath, leitender Forscher am NIH-Institut für Nervenerkrankungen, hat Patienten untersucht, die nach der Impfung Nervenbeschwerden entwickelten: Kribbeln, Brennen, Taubheit in Gesicht und Gliedmaßen, Herzrasen, Kreislaufprobleme. Er schickt den Entwurf an seinen Institutsleiter Walter Koroshetz. Der informiert Anthony Fauci und schreibt, ihn erreiche ein stetiger, langsamer Strom solcher Meldungen – meist Störungen der äußeren Nerven. Er merkt an: Dass Beschwerden nach einer Impfung auftreten, beweist noch nicht, dass sie von ihr kommen. Das ist prinzipiell zwar korrekt, angesichts eines neuartigen Impfstoffs aber besorgniserregend. Ende April erfahren NIH-Direktor Francis Collins und sein Vize Lawrence Tabak, dass eine große Fachzeitschrift den Text abgelehnt hat. Collins fragt zurück, wie diese Patienten überhaupt zu Nath gekommen seien – man könne so nicht erkennen, ob das häufig oder selten sei. Auch das ist eine faire Frage. Dann kippt es. Collins nennt das Vorgehen "sehr beunruhigend": Einzelfälle zu sammeln und daraus einen Fall zu bauen, sei wissenschaftlich nicht überzeugend – und werde vor allem Impfskepsis und eine Überreaktion in den sozialen Medien auslösen. Und Tabak antwortet mit dem Satz vom Anfang: "Ich verstehe nicht, warum Walter das nicht abstellt." Lesen Sie ihn noch einmal. Da steht nicht: Die Methode ist zu schwach, macht es besser. Da steht: Warum stellt das niemand ab? Collins schrieb an Fauci ausdrücklich, man brauche selbstverständlich die Fakten zu Nebenwirkungen – nur halte er diesen Ansatz für schlecht durchdacht. Das ist als Einwand nicht falsch. Eine Sammlung von Einzelfällen ohne Vergleichsgruppe kann nicht beweisen, dass die Impfung die Ursache war. Aber es folgt daraus die entscheidende Frage: Wenn die Studie zu schwach war – warum hat die größte Forschungsbehörde der Welt dann nicht binnen Wochen eine bessere in Auftrag gegeben? Sie hatte das Signal, die Patienten, das Personal, das Geld. Was in diesen E-Mails praktisch nicht vorkommt: Sorge um die Betroffenen. Der Preis Naths Arbeit erschien nie in einer Fachzeitschrift. Sie kam erst im Mai 2022 als sogenannter Preprint heraus – eine Vorabveröffentlichung ohne die übliche Begutachtung durch Fachkollegen. Also mit deutlich weniger Gewicht und Reichweite. Über ein Jahr nach dem ersten Entwurf. Was drinsteht: Bei gut der Hälfte der Patienten fand sich ein objektiv messbarer Schaden an den feinsten Nervenfasern der Haut – nachgewiesen per Gewebeprobe, nicht per Erzählung. Und: Von den mit Kortison behandelten Patienten ging es 58 Prozent nach zwei Wochen vollständig oder fast vollständig besser. Ohne diese Behandlung war nach zwölf Wochen nur einer von elf wiederhergestellt. Diese Behandlungsanleitung erreichte die Hausärzte und Neurologen dieser Welt anderthalb Jahre später, als sie es hätte können. Betroffene, die in dieser Zeit als eingebildete Kranke abgewiesen wurden, gibt es auch bei uns. Zu Tausenden. Die Mails beweisen nicht, dass jemand angeordnet hat, das Manuskript fallenzulassen. Aber bewiesen ist ein viel schwererer Vorwurf: In der Führungsspitze der weltweit einflussreichsten Gesundheitsbehörde wurde ein Warnsignal nicht zuerst danach beurteilt, ob es zutrifft. Sondern danach, was es beim Publikum auslöst. Wer Arzneimittelsicherheit unter Kommunikationsvorbehalt stellt, erzeugt genau das Misstrauen, das er verhindern will. Das Vertrauen ist nicht durch Kritiker zerstört worden, es wurde vom NIH verspielt. Alles selbst nachprüfbar: 🔹 Die Veröffentlichung von ICAN (22.07.2026): icandecide.org/press-release/… 🔹 Die E-Mails im Original (PDF der Behördenakte): icandecide.org/wp-content/upl… → S. 34 Nath · S. 56 Koroshetz an Fauci · S. 17 und 16 Collins · S. 13 Collins und Tabak 🔹 Die Klageschrift, mit der die Herausgabe erzwungen wurde: icandecide.org/wp-content/upl… 🔹 Die Studie (Safavi, Walitt, Oaklander, Nath u.a., 16.05.2022): doi.org/10.1101/2022.0… 🔹 Erstbericht: Zachary Stieber, The Epoch Times, 24.07.2026 #NIH #Arzneimittelsicherheit #Informationsfreiheit #Impfschaden

I wouldn't interpret it like that. He was saying "more isn't necessarily better" which most bioscientists understand, and easy for Chinese to discover. AMMS was way ahead. Same principle applies to furin cleavage. It's weird he pretended this was some dark secret though.

Starting in less than 4 hours from now: youtube.com/live/kT5xuodO6…