@davemeltzerWON She literally said "I have never walked away".
English
Skinny Satan
152 posts
Skinny Satan
@SkinnySatans
No Clue What We Are Anymore...
World Wide Web Katılım Haziran 2011
102 Takip Edilen519 Takipçiler
How you derived that from what she said I have no clue.
Skinny Satan@SkinnySatans
@KAIRI_official So @davemeltzerWON was lying af
English
What I can say is I know there’s been a lot of speculation,
but I truly love this work, my teammates, and my fans.
I’ve never walked away, and I’ve given my all in everything I do.
I hope you’re all doing well ❤️
English
If @TKOGrp really determined to let Kairi go, then there is no point watching @WWE
#WeWantKairi or we leave.
English
@KAIRI_official Doesn't matter. We want you now. #WeWantKairi
English
I’m truly grateful to have people like you by my side.
Thank you for always being with me.
I’ll set sail… in my own time ⛵️
Until then…
I love you ❤️
English
@fromsoftserve Benjamin Franklin witnessed the flight of one of the first hot-air balloons. As the balloon soared into the air, a spectator asked Franklin what this new invention could be used for. Franklin responded by saying “What good is a new-born baby?”
English
i've never had anyone give me a reasonable answer as to why this benefits society at all
Angry Tom@AngryTomtweets
2.5 years of AI progress twitter.com/minchoi/status…
English
@EZE3D Because customers do not care it is AI or not. Investors do. Customers only care if the intended task is done or not.
English
Why are people who love generative AI so scared of transparency?
It's shoved on us everywhere on the timeline but the second it comes to selling it as a product it's all.
"No we shouldn't need tags or labels!"
If your AI generated product is so good, why hide that it's AI? 🤔
English
@JPHilllllll Good job missing the point.
Duolingo is losing its market because AI made language learning obsolete. Cope and seethe.
English
I love companies being punished for replacing workers with AI. Gimme more
More Perfect Union@MorePerfectUS
Duolingo announced it was going “AI-first” just over six months ago. Since then its stock is down 64%.
English
Nano Banana PRO is amazing but there is something still so satisfying about training your own bespoke LORA styles and mixing and matching them to make these crazy hybrid styles.
IDK if any of these models will ever eliminate the need for that
English
@dwarkesh_sp AI will never solve law completely for a reason (saying this as a huge AI proponent)...
Because law is contradictory and does not have a consistent logic behind it like other things say programming.
Chatgpt may get closer to the levels of Lawyers, but that is pretty low level.
English
I totally buy that AI has made you more productive. And I buy that if other lawyers were more agentic, they could also get more productivity gains from AI.
But I think you're making my point for me. The reason it takes lawyers all this schlep and agency to integrate these models is because they're not actually AGI!
A human on a server wouldn't need some special Westlaw/Lexis connection - she could just directly use the software. A human on a server would improve directly from her own experience with the job, and pretty soon be autonomously generating a lot of productivity. She wouldn't need you to put off your other deadlines in order to micromanage the increments of her work, or turn what you're observing into better prompts and few shot examples.
While I don't know the actual workflow for lawyers (and I'm curious to learn more), I've sunk a lot of time in trying to get these models to be useful for my work, and on tasks that seemed like they should be dead center in their text-in-text-out repertoire (identifying good clips, writing copy, finding guests, etc).
And this experience has made me quite skeptical that there's a bunch of net productivity gains currently available from building autonomous agentic loops.
Chatting with these models has definitely made me more productive (but in the way that a better Google search would also make me more productive). The argument I was trying to make in the post was not that the models aren't useful.
I'm saying that the trillions of dollars in revenue we'd expect from actual AGI are not being held up because people aren't willing to try the technology. Rather, that it's just genuinely super schleppy and difficult to get human-like labor out of these models.
prinz@deredleritt3r
Agreed. Dwarkesh is just wrong here. GPT-5 Pro can now do legal research and analysis at a very high level (with limitations - may need to run even longer for certain searches; can't connect to proprietary databases). I use it to enhance my work all the time, with excellent results. I would REALLY miss the model if it became unavailable to me for some reason. And yet, the percentage of lawyers who actually use GPT-5 Pro for these kinds of tasks is probably <1%. Why? There's a myriad reasons - none having anything to do with the model's capabilities. Lawyers are conservative, lawyers are non-technical, lawyers don't know which model to use, lawyers tried GPT-4o two years ago and concluded that it sucks, lawyers don't have enterprise access to the model, lawyers don't feel serious competitive pressure to use AI, lawyers are afraid of opening Pandora's Box, lawyers are too busy to care about some AI thing when there's a brief due to be filed tomorrow morning, lawyers need Westlaw/Lexis connected to the model but that's not currently possible. I suspect that there are many parallels to this in other fields.
English
@Rahll No one is "shilling" it. There is no need. Stuff is so powerful it has made most humans obsolete. Why manufacture consent when you can simply give people the tools to empower them.
English
AI companies are throwing obscene amounts of money at people to, as Caleb Hearon puts it, 'manufacture consent.' They won't pay for your data, but they'll pay you to shill.
More Perfect Union@MorePerfectUS
Caleb Hearon on AI: "T hey're in the process right now of manufacturing consent for this technology and when they come and offer people with cool platforms or audiences or whatever, and they offer you an outsized amount of money, which they are, all of them, they offer you hundreds of thousands of dollars to do an ad deal for them, they are doing that because they need your help to manufacture consent for this."
English
@IsThisA3DModel This is how legacy studios will die, while one person AI supported studios will end up making Millions.
English
love to see it!! AI is not inevitable if we keep pushing back on it 🥰
Dexerto@Dexerto
A Japanese game studio is making applicants draw in front of them during interviews to prove they don't use generative AI The Chief Graphic Designer at the undisclosed company said, “It is humans who can create compelling characters and graphics from scratch”
English
@jzux Nice. Omw to build 100% AI generated radio station to fill the market gap.
English
hello companies. if you do this, I will respect you more and will make a deliberate effort to support you in the future!
Pop Base@PopBase
iHeartRadio has banned its radio stations from playing AI-generated music or using AI-generated personalities, as part of its “Guaranteed Human” program.
English
@Stretchedwiener @djpain1 See, I can't tell if your response is in bad faith or not. But I will bite.
Remember few months ago, regular people were ghiblifying their pictures using ChatGPT?
AI gave them immense happiness by doing that.
Meanwhile puritans were enraged for some reason.
English
1 "Prompting" takes time.
2 "Under privileged folks" working multiple jobs to feed themselves also have equipment and subscriptions to AI generative software?
Artists come from all walks of life. Some have privilege, yes, and many don't. It doesn't take much to start on that path. Storytelling, singing, drawing, performing, it's all accessible at all levels.
Saying "they don't have time to draw" and "they have time to prompt" is, sorry, a contradiction.
2 hours on public transportation is 2 hours to draw (ask me how I know). I know because I did it. Post it notes and a pencil in their pocket at all times is cheap and accessible and fills in free minutes. Again, I know because I do it.
English
@Stretchedwiener @djpain1 The key word is "time". Most under privileged folks don't have that when they are traveling for work 2hrs one way, doing multiple jobs to feed themselves.
AI allows them to make their wildest dreams come true.
Why should there be other people getting butthurt about it?
English
@SkinnySatans @djpain1 What privilege and resources are required to utilize AI generative software?
They need money and time and a computer and internet connection.
How is that less of a strain than paper and pencils? Or writing a poem? Or telling a story to a friend?
English
@MichaelG_3D Its amazing have oblivious legacy artists are about how fast the world is changing. All the wasteful tasks will be automated. Even mine. Peak human experience is not the grind of 21'st century. There is much more to it.
English
@XfinitySupport @Xfinity Are you guys ever going to respond to my queries? I am stuck responding to the machine without any human in the loop.
English
@AllenMckay18427 @XfinitySupport Did they end up responding to you over DM? I am in exact same situation.
English
@XfinitySupport I called and cancelled my mobile service on 7/24/25, the billing cycle ended on 7/25/25. I paid the next bill as it was owed. Then you took my money again the next month, I called again on 8/17/25 and again on 9/1/25. Now sent to collections.
English
@bpratt01 @XfinitySupport I had cancelled the service and they still charged me, and there is no way to connect to a human through their chat bot :|
English
@XfinitySupport your cancellation process violates MA consumer protection laws. 940 CMR 38.00. You must provide a method to cancel which is as easy as it is to sign up.
English