Slotsflops

1.9K posts

Slotsflops banner
Slotsflops

Slotsflops

@Slotsflops

Victoria, Australia Katılım Mayıs 2023
60 Takip Edilen14 Takipçiler
Slotsflops
Slotsflops@Slotsflops·
@40zz168256 @D1678618D @synthesis1010 I think that if there ever is a successful republican referendum, it would be appropriate to change the flag to represent the new national identity separate from the crown.
English
0
0
0
11
superposition
superposition@synthesis1010·
from 'australia' to 'australasia'. or worse. they're gonna call for a name change sooner or later ..
English
28
8
209
5.4K
Slotsflops
Slotsflops@Slotsflops·
@Tam85414 @D1678618D @synthesis1010 I assume its just laziness and wanting to be more inclusive (in a very cheap manner) At the very least there are some good designs out there should we ever want to change it after a successful republican referendum
English
0
0
0
9
Slotsflops
Slotsflops@Slotsflops·
@D1678618D @synthesis1010 Watch them change it to that ruddy awful uninspired design that simply substitutes the union jack with the aboriginal flag
English
1
0
7
69
Luca D
Luca D@D1678618D·
@synthesis1010 I wish they would change the flag instead of just changing the name of it
English
3
0
2
435
Slotsflops retweetledi
TimOnPoint
TimOnPoint@TimOnPoint·
Yes, yes, yes, combined arms and all that... I read these opinion pieces being published by West Point and I wonder if these well-credentialed authors have really been paying attention. *The article was written by Canadian tankers btw. Drones are NOT just the "next TOW." Why? 1. Remote UAS controller not at risk: A TOW or Javelin team is right there in the line of fire (or at least line-of-sight vulnerable). An FPV pilot can be kilometers back, often in a dugout or even further with fiber-optic relays. This removes the “suicide mission” calculus that limited massed ATGM use. Ukrainian operators routinely cycle through dozens of sorties per day from relative safety. 2. Cost differential & scalability: A heavy FPV runs ~$500–1,200. A T-90M is ~$3.8–4.5 million. Russian analysts themselves ran the numbers in early 2026: one T-90M = ~3,200 heavy FPVs; one BMP-3 = ~870. Ukrainian FPVs have accounted for an estimated 50–65% of Russian tank losses as of early 2025 (Forbes/OSINT tracking), with some T-90M batches showing ~50% of kills as final FPV strikes. Even at a pessimistic 20–43% hit rate per sortie (per Ukrainian veteran accounts), you’re still talking single-digit thousands of dollars to mission-kill a multimillion-dollar vehicle. TOWs/Javelins never offered that exchange ratio at scale. 3. Drones can (in fact) hold ground: We’re just entering the nightmare phase now. Right now drones excel at denial (exactly what the article says—they restrict mobility without controlling terrain). But with fiber-optic, AI/autonomous navigation, and loitering munitions, we’re already seeing the shift to persistent presence. Autonomous “last-mile” navigation has pushed success rates from ~10–30% to 70–80% by cutting out constant radio links and operator skill ceilings. Swarms + AI target recognition + reusable platforms (some Ukrainian systems now resupply themselves) start looking like cheap, attritable area-denial forces that don’t need 24/7 human babysitting. We’re not there for true “holding” yet, but the trajectory is clear and the article underplays it. 4. Automation - human-in-the-loop obsolescence: Already happening faster than most Western armies admit. Fiber-optic drones are unjammable; AI-enabled ones handle navigation and terminal guidance independently. Ukrainian sources in 2025–2026 report this is slashing both drone losses and required operator skill. The article’s “evolutionary” framing treats this as just better guidance systems. It’s not—it’s the removal of the vulnerable link that made past guided weapons (TOW, Hellfire, etc.) manpower-intensive and detectable. 5. Area denial is insanely economical in manpower & cost: One well-trained FPV section (a handful of operators + production teams) can paralyze a mechanized battalion’s movement. Compare that to the crew, logistics, and fuel for equivalent ATGM teams or attack helicopters. Russian analysts themselves are now questioning whether tanks remain cost-effective precisely because of this. 6. Skill curve: Training a competent FPV pilot takes weeks. A tank crew or even a Javelin gunner takes months/years plus expensive platforms for live-fire practice. Ukraine has flooded the battlespace with operators from a civilian gamer/drone-racing pool. The article notes that poorly trained crews suffer more, but the flip side is that anyone can become a lethal drone operator extremely quickly. That’s not true for traditional mechanized warfare. 7. Dev cycle speed: Attritable = sprint. Bespoke = crawl. FPV airframes, warheads, EW countermeasures, and AI modules are iterating in weeks/months because losing a $700 drone is trivial. Tank armor packages, APS, or new IFV designs take years and billions. Ukraine’s drone ecosystem (modular 7–10 inch FPVs that can swap ISR/strike/relay roles on the fly) proves this. The article acknowledges rapid advance but treats it as historically normal. It isn’t—not at this price point and iteration speed. *The authors correctly note that drones have helped create a static, attritional battlefield reminiscent of 1916. Where they err is in presenting this as a failure of drone warfare or proof that "combined arms" simply needs better integration. For the defender—Ukraine, outgunned in traditional metrics—this stasis is the win. Drones didn't just deny maneuver to the attacker; they made large-scale Russian armored advances prohibitively expensive in blood and treasure, freezing the front and preserving Ukrainian sovereignty. A static line where your country still exists is not "limited strategic effect." It is survival against long odds. History's tank-killers (Saggers, TOWs, Javelins) never achieved this scale of denial at this cost ratio. Drones did. The Cold War and GWOT are gone people. Adjust your thinking.
TimOnPoint tweet media
English
43
118
602
53.9K
YIMBYLAND
YIMBYLAND@YIMBYLAND·
I’m sorry, but “turdherder69” is a god-tier handle for the CEO of a water treatment operation. The Welch have no sense of humor. This man would be lauded as a hero in the United States lol.
YIMBYLAND tweet media
ITV Wales News@ITVWales

WATCH: This is the moment we asked Dwr Cymru Welsh Water's Chief Operating Officer if his personal social media account was appropriate whilst the company is accused of 'unacceptable' levels of sewage. Read more here: itv.com/news/wales/202…

English
45
280
6.9K
277.2K
mjr123
mjr123@emjayr8·
@MustermannMani @ayeejuju If a man likes to suck on dummies when he gets older, will he likely be secure in his masculinity
English
2
0
0
192
FXKLM
FXKLM@FXKML·
@YIMBYLAND The Welsh language makes me irrationally angry. Those are not words.
English
14
0
7
3.6K
J P
J P@JAxonius·
@Rothmus I don't see a problem. Let the left kill their offspring. That's what monkeys do.
English
2
0
4
538
Rothmus 🏴
Rothmus 🏴@Rothmus·
I still remember the first time I saw this chart. Something inside me died that day.
Rothmus 🏴 tweet media
English
623
4.1K
32K
3.2M
Workhouse Overseer 🌐🥑🍌
It appears our superiority has caused some controversy
Workhouse Overseer 🌐🥑🍌 tweet media
George Regnery@georgeregnery

@RaminNasibov Since 1912, only eight countries have never had a violent overthrow of the government or been occupied by a foreign country. 1. United Kingdom 2. Sweden 3. Switzerland 4. Australia 5. New Zealand 6. United States 7. Canada 8. South Africa

English
20
63
2.2K
172.2K
Vials
Vials@hisbelovedsleep·
leftists pretend to respect these jobs until they find out an anonymous right wing twitter poster works at one of them
MC Squared@mcsquared34

English
71
560
14K
221.7K
koba
koba@becomemycrown_·
@Slotsflops @LT0771 @hisbelovedsleep I advocate giving people what they deserve. If you want to violate company policy and spread hate speech, you don’t need to be at that company, work at a company who allows that.
English
1
0
0
63
koba
koba@becomemycrown_·
@Slotsflops @LT0771 @hisbelovedsleep Not my concern, I just go to work, mind my business, and go home, if someone is harassing me with slurs, I’m reporting it, it’s really that simple. Leave people alone lol
English
1
0
0
77
koba
koba@becomemycrown_·
@Slotsflops @LT0771 @hisbelovedsleep The “normal” thing to do is report their hate speech to HR, actually, it’s explicitly a workplace violation to call people slurs, clearly “they” aren’t professional enough for their job.
English
3
0
0
113