Solid Snake 🥓🥓

Rate my setup

🚨 Here is the full 40 minutes of my crew and I exposing California fraud, Minnesota was big but California is even bigger... We uncovered over $170,000,000 in fraud as these fraudsters live in luxury with no consequences. Like it and share it, the fraud must STOP. We ALL work way too hard and pay too much in taxes for this to be happening. These fraudsters have been able to defraud American taxpayers for years without any pushback from the public and politicians. It is time to EXPOSE IT ALL and end America's fraud crisis.

If you want to see Tina Peters FREE, like and share this post.

@StefanMolyneux You belong back on top

I guess someone at X decided I was never going to be allowed to trend again

@ThePosieParker @WallStreetApes Incredible job!

@WallStreetApes This is my video, I made it. X

This is genius A video was made in the style of Disney that explains Sharia Law This makes Islam and Sharia Law easy to understand for everyone of all ages

@naomirwolf Also, Islam is not a race Criticizing witchcraft isn’t racist, just like criticizing Astrology isn’t racist

Is this video racist? It is making no claims that are not based in fact. This all actually happened in Iran. And in many, many open, tolerant countries.

@WallStreetApes @GuntherEagleman Honestly this should have 20M views

@realMaalouf 😳

This is how Lebanon went from being a prosperous Christian country to being destroyed by Islam. Pay close attention! “As Christians, we opened our doors to Muslims, and welcomed them into our country. We wanted to be inclusive and even made them part of the government. But due to having several wives and many children, Muslims became the majority. Once they were the majority, they thought they could do whatever they wanted, and began massacring the Christians who welcomed them.”

@Boldyboy1975 Amazing

The force is strong in this one😳🤣🤣🤣

@SamaHoole Great post IIRC, Seventh Day Adventists consistently live longer than the general population, across many geographic locations. But likely not due to vegetarianism. They abstain from other things as well … Hong Kong is still #1 for longevity ( meat, pork )

In 1837, a nine-year-old girl in Portland, Maine, was struck in the head by a rock thrown by a classmate. She spent three weeks unconscious. Her skull was permanently damaged. She emerged from it with seizures, visual disturbances, difficulty concentrating, and an inability to hold a pen steadily for years. She could not complete her formal education. She suffered neurological episodes for the rest of her life. She interpreted these episodes as divine visions. The visions, helpfully, were very specific. God was not merely offering general spiritual encouragement. God had views about diet. Specifically: meat was corrupting the faithful. It was inflaming their animal passions. It was producing lust, aggression, and physical debasement, and it was making the congregation difficult to keep properly pious. Ellen G. White published these revelations. She preached them. She built institutions around them. She co-founded the Seventh-day Adventist Church and became the single most influential figure in the history of organised Western vegetarianism. Her writings shaped an entire denomination's theology, which shaped an entire set of research institutions, which shaped the dietary guidelines that are currently framed on the wall of every NHS waiting room in the country. The woman whose neurological damage gave her hallucinations she attributed to God is, through a very direct and thoroughly documented line of institutional causation, the reason your doctor suggested you eat less red meat. She also, for the record, ate meat herself. Privately. Her own household records confirm this. Multiple contemporaries documented it. Her personal physician noted it. The church has never fully resolved the discrepancy. The visions, it turns out, were not binding at dinner. I am not mocking a woman who suffered a serious childhood injury. That would be unkind and it is not the point. The point is that the origin of modern mainstream nutritional dogma is not a randomised controlled trial. It is not a century of dispassionate scientific enquiry. It is a vision, from a head injury, in 1837, that told a woman meat was sinful, and that woman's followers built laboratories and professional associations and dietary guidelines, and here we are. Start there. Then work forward.

😑

@dom_lucre @atkinastarling Hard to believe. Looked it up. It actually happened

🔥🚨BREAKING: It is being claimed on X that In 2009, Tim Tebow proved the existence of God, a post that is trending reveals the statistically impossible consistency with a bible verse and the former football player. Trad West: ‘Tim Tebow wrote John 3:16” under his eyes during the National Championship Game. 94 million people searched the verse that night. Exactly three years later to the day, Tebow played his first NFL playoff game against the Pittsburgh Steelers. He threw for 316 yards. His yards per completion were 31.6. The TV rating peaked at 31.6. The opponent’s time of possession was 31:06. The only interception in the game was thrown on 3rd and 16. The game was played exactly 316 weeks after Tebow declared he would play college football for the University of Florida. Six different statistics. All pointing to the same verse. On the same date. Three years apart. Nobody planned this. Nobody could have.’ “For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life.” John 3:16

@Nero @Transvestigater The social engineering they tried on us for the past 10-15 years wouldn’t have had a chance on a population full of cigarette smokers. Smokers who haven’t had one in a few hours get cranky, no-nonsense, and combative Probably a big reason why Asia didn’t go woke

It is 100% going to come out during our lifetimes that cigarettes are some sort of universal cure, a medical marvel they had to hide from us whose healing properties render 95% of the pharmaceutical industry obsolete

This is awesome to see. Biblical hermeneutics on Capitol Hill. This woman "pastor" is left stuttering and doesn't know the Bible—shocking, I know.

@Cernovich "… if foreigners were allowed to meddle with the affairs of a nation as soon as they settled down in its midst, many dangers might occur, since the foreigners not yet having the common good firmly at heart might attempt something hurtful to the people." - St. Thomas Aquinas

When is the last time a Catholic service scolded illegal immigrants for using tax payer services and told them to not commit welfare fraud? We all know how these lectures go. It’s all how we are supposed to welcome the stranger. Never that the stranger shouldn’t rob us.

@rabbitholebot 😳

100% of all school shooters in documented US history were on anti-anxiety or anti-depressant drugs.

@thesurepath1 😳

“Employing a thousand young men means a thousand women will get married and form a thousand new families. But employing a thousand women means a thousand young men unemployed and a thousand women unmarried.” Khalid Al-Sulaimani

Two points: Number 1) Below-average men are often the result of: - Arranged marriage - Cousin marriage - Two below-average people “settling” for each other - Rape - All of these are increasingly uncommon in the modern age ( thank God ) Number 2) Women’s choice - Women in each era CHOOSE what men they procreate with - This does not always result in exceptional men being chosen - “Attractiveness” is a major factor, and is not 1:1 with IQ - Social palatability is a major factor: mate with who your friends approve of … this isn’t always the smartest men - Men must be “CONTEMPORARILY attractive” to pass their genes on to the next generation, or else rely on other means, eg. “Settling” The filters women apply to mate choice don’t always select for the smartest men

Why? It's simple. Men are the evolutionary sacrifice. To push human evolution forward, "nature" experiments with men, tweaking here and there to see what works and what doesn't work. This bears out in extreme geniuses and extremely dysfunctional men. Historically, all men in the bottom 50% never reproduced and never did anything supremely productive other than perhaps dying in war or manual labor. There were also several major bottlenecks that indicate a large number of men were wiped out due to some kind of event 6000 and 8000 years ago. Women, on the other hand, are the reproductive bottleneck, the gender that is required in much greater numbers to maintain the population, and thus tend more towards the average.

@ObviousRises YES, 💯

This Martha Stewart interview is such a great example of how women rewrite reality in their own heads, she calls her husband a piece of shit for cheating but then the interviewer reveals it was she who cheated first (he only started after he found out), her reaction is telling.

The only fields where males prevail in academia now are, coincidentally, the ones where instructors cannot choose the student’s grade, but must give them the grade they actually deserve ( STEM )

@SovereignIM In my observation, “J” names seem to thrive the most socially ( before adulthood ) Jesse, Jason, Jessica, Jordan Incidentally, the shape “J” is perceived by the left-brain as a smile

Naming your daughter Victoria is essentially calling her "conqueror/winner" (feminine version), masculine version: Victor (Origin: Latin) Essentially, it's opting to give your daughter a power name instead of a beauty name, when most feminine names encompass material or spiritual beauty (hope, faith, gift, destiny, or some type of flower) Problem is, Victoria just straight up isn't aesthetic. It is not sweet sounding to the ear and stumbles slightly on the tongue (4 syllables). It sounds like someone has just issued an edict in the roman senate. And you can't shorten it to something cute either. Vick/Vic? Sounds like a bald man who is coming to collect a debt. To be fair, I don't think Victor is very aesthetic either, though naturally it's not as jarring (so less unaesthetic) because it's masculine and doesn't try to soften that with the ending like Victoria does (and thus fails as both a power name, and a beauty name) An aesthetic powerful masculine name for example would be Magnus (origin: Latin - meaning: Mighty) - if it's a tie up between Victor and Magnus, Magnus is the clear winner, and again, most of you only know of one guy called Magnus and that's only if you're into chess: Magnus Carlsen (who in the chess world, certainly lives up to his name) All of this to say: Victoria is patently just a bad name for a girl. Not because I am opposed to giving women power names (I'm not) but because power shouldn't come at the cost of beauty. This being said, Queen Victoria lived up to the meaning of her name (Conqueror/Winner) but, much like my commentary on the name suggests, was also known for being pretty inelegant as far as royalty goes (her portraits tend to be unflattering).