Olusola

@KingdmHeritage Shout out to Papa Gideon… an OG..

CHIKE, the guy who slept with SANDRA (A married Woman), showed up at Film House cinema!. And instead of disgust or shame, ladies were going crazy, fighting to take pictures with him like he’s some kind of hero. 👀🌚 Let’s call this exactly what it is: A disgusting celebration of home wrecking. -This is not “he’s fine.” -This is not “mind your business.” -This is not “single ladies having fun.” This is women openly hyping and rewarding a man for sleeping with another woman’s husband. The same women who will later cry “men are trash” when it happens to them. The Implications Are Deadly: -Marriage vows now mean nothing. If you can cheat and still get celebrity treatment, why stay faithful? -Women are actively destroying the standards they claim to want. Today they cheer the side guy. Tomorrow they’ll be shocked when their own man becomes the side guy. -Young boys are watching this. They’re learning that destroying another man’s home = fame and female validation. That’s how we breed a generation of useless men. -Character is officially dead. Talent or looks now excuses moral bankruptcy. We have reached the level where adultery is content and home wrecking is a flex. -The married woman involved just became public property. Her husband is humiliated, her children will grow up with this shame, and society is laughing. Chike had thousands of single girls available. He deliberately chose another man’s wife. That’s not alpha. That’s weak, low value, and dangerous. And the ladies rushing for selfies? They’re loudly advertising: “My future marriage can also be opened for the right man and the right thrill.” This is how societies collapse, not with war, but with celebration of nonsense. Real talk for Kings: Any man celebrating this is advertising his own future pain. Any woman defending this is telling you she has no loyalty when temptation comes. Consequences don’t do PR. What you clap for today will clap for you tomorrow. The standard has fallen so low that adultery now gets applause. Wake up people. 🗣️🗣️🗣️

@OA_Thinks @BrotherPossible It's called a Believers class. That itself counts for something While I might not have the kind of boldness to come out to condemn her and the church, cos there are many details I might not know, it is still clear something is wrong with the church's process or teaching

@BrotherPossible Oh, and I'm not sure you're right that people are enrolled into the programme after getting saved: a screenshot from Spiricoco containing information about the programme has the words "none" in the requirements section. So, you see again the problem about speaking on this issue.

Lady Kay don make me open Tiktok. I finally watched the video. To be fair to her, she studied hard and came first out of 158 students. She met the criteria for her award, and the pastor understanding what would follow said, "you earned it, and I can't deny you." The problem here is the criteria for joining and completing the Foundation Class. I believe that people are enrolled into these classes after they're saved, and qualified to graduate (not by exams) by the sustained proof that their testimony is true. That is the problem. See image attached: here is a supposed member who may have completed the foundation class saying she likes her content. So, my take is that the criteria for joining and completing the class should be scriptural and should reflect that sanctification should be the proof of justification. Those who have been saved by grace should deny ungodliness and worldly lusts, and live soberly, righteous and godly in this present world. And if the pipeline is not fixed through the right theology, the outcomes won't be different. And in one of her videos, she admitted that she has been taught that things should be different but in obstinacy she refused. See in the comments. And if you go through the comments of the award video, she repeatedly said that she passed the exams. The point she's is sharing is that the award has nothing to do with her repenting. She got it because she had the highest score. Looking at it as a standalone video, and assuming it's for a Bible Quiz which we should liken to the exam, anyone who has done Youth Ministry might pass it off because you'll see that brilliant, obstinate youth, you're praying for. But this is a pipeline for people who are said to have accepted the faith and taught the first principles of the Gospel. The outcome should be better than than this, ought to be, must be. So @SpiricocoNg approach contextualized everything logic church have been teaching and what it's producing, and the backclash he received also contextualized that he has been about things like this for sometime. But the honest truth is that while Lady Kay deserve her award and right to her life without judgement, LOGIC church don't. And if you don't see this as a Logic Church issue, rather than Lady Kay and her content, you'll be missing a lot.

This reply shows how widespread this cancerous doctrinal position has gone. While we don't have to be legalistic, this mindset of human rights pushed up to liberty without consequence is the root cause And sadly this wokeness has infiltrated the church.

@JanetKelvi49594 I never said that I only affirmed that the gift of prayer tongues is needed much more widely & frequently WHILE Tongues as a foreign language is often occasional in necessity & manifestation There are countless documentation of it both in church history & even today Thanks

@Solextwit So from the 1st century till now, there isn't special occasion for that to manifest?

There are two types of speaking in tongues in the New Testament

In conclusion, God truly promises to preserve His people, but Scripture never uses grace as permission for persistent rebellion. Any doctrine that comforts people in stubborn sin rather than leading them toward holiness is misusing assurance. ...4

PRESUMPTUOUS SECURITY Deut.29.19: "and so it may not happen, when he hears the words of this curse, that he blesses himself in his heart, saying, "I shall have peace, even though I follow the dictates of my heart'--as though the drunkard could be included with the sober." ..1

Healthy Christianity therefore holds that: 1. God truly preserves believers. 2. Believers must not become presumptuous toward sin. ...3

Deut 29:19 exposes the danger of using covenant status as psychological protection while persisting in stubbornness. This warning & pattern appears repeatedly throughout Scripture; Hebrews 3:12 Hebrews 10:26–31 Romans 11:20–22 Galatians 6:7–8 ...2

@MattuTemi I thought you said you needed to go study more on the space the other time Guess you have done so Otherwise...

I'll answer with a simple question. Are you a splitter or joiner in how you interprete bible prophecy. If you are a splitter you see multiple events. If you are a joiner, you see one event: the parousia. And it is not a snatching away

Grace has only one purpose. Holiness. Holiness has only one means. Grace. If I do not receive grace, I cannot be holy If I am not living holy, then I have not received grace When I receive what God gives me in Christ. Grace I become what God makes me in Him. Holy. Grace is God extending Himself. To me. Holiness is me becoming an extension. Of God. The more I receive what God is giving me The more I become what God is making me. The evidence of growth in grace is this and this alone: Growth in holiness.

@samjunyarts @lekan_olayinka1 Nigerian's church space is big, We have hundreds of ministers that can qualify as elders within the Pentecostal space. Let's be practical, We don't need to have Baba G. O. Is Baba Adeboye even a Theologian in that respect?

@Solextwit @lekan_olayinka1 So adeboye should be the host bro think this thing na

It’s a request that can be accepted or denied. But those who believe they preach the truth of our shared faith should be able to defend it. Peter commanded this. Paul did this for two years. If someone like Onayinka says Jesus is the same as the Holy Spirit, says there’s no Second Coming, says Jesus never left the earth: He has a duty to clarify these strange teachings that have never been part of the faith for 2,000 years. But he’s charged you his disciples “not to respond to critics”. Isn’t that suspicious that instead of doctrine he’s feeding you all with indoctrination? Regardless, for 2,000 years of Christian history, pastors have been invited to media spaces to defend their doctrine. If you’re confident Onayinka teaches the truth, come defend it to the body of Christ.

Public outrage against heresy is not enough. False arguments must be met with the right ones. This is another lie forged from the cauldrons of hell and I will rebut this elaborately —not for the notorious and unrepentant purveyors of blatant heresies like this — but for the impressionable. I am doing this so that anyone who reads this will not have ignorance as an excuse to fall for this demonic deception. 1. A born-again Christian who becomes a Muslim is NOT still saved. This teaching is dangerously false and contradicts the clear witness of Scripture. Becoming a Muslim isn't "losing your mind" or a temporary mental lapse—it is explicit, ongoing denial of Jesus Christ as Lord, Son of God, crucified, and risen Savior. The Bible treats this as apostasy with eternal consequences. 2. Denying Christ severs relationship with God: "Whoever denies me before men, I also will deny before my Father who is in heaven." (Matthew 10:33) "Who is the liar but he who denies that Jesus is the Christ? This is the antichrist, he who denies the Father and the Son. No one who denies the Son has the Father." (1 John 2:22-23). To become a Muslim, one must affirm the Shahada and the Islamic doctrine that Jesus is not divine, not the Son, not crucified for sins, never ascended and is not Lord. This is not forgetting your "DNA"—it is actively trampling the Son of God (Hebrews 10:29). 3. Apostasy after enlightenment brings judgment: "For it is impossible, in the case of those who have once been enlightened, who have tasted the heavenly gift, and have shared in the Holy Spirit... and then have fallen away, to restore them again to repentance, since they are crucifying once again the Son of God to their own harm and holding him up to contempt." (Hebrews 6:4-6) "If we go on sinning deliberately after receiving the knowledge of the truth, there no longer remains a sacrifice for sins, but a fearful expectation of judgment..." (Hebrews 10:26-27) True saving faith perseveres. 3. The Prodigal son analogy is an embarrassing false equivalence: The prodigal boy repented and returned to his father. He did not join a rival household that declared the father a liar and denied his character. A permanent, unrepentant switch to Islam (or atheism) while denying Christ is not the same as the prodigal's story. The son who never returns stays lost. 4. "Bought with a price" (1 Cor 6:19-20) does not override free rejection: This verse calls believers to holiness because they belong to God. It does not teach that God forces ownership on those who publicly renounce Him and serve another. The Bible warns us that believers can fall away (Galatians 5:4; 1 Timothy 1:19-20; Revelation 2-3). 5. Salvation is by grace through continuing faith in Christ – Hebrews 3:14: "We have come to share in Christ, if indeed we hold our original confidence firm to the end". Eternal security belongs to those who persevere in the true gospel—not to those who abandon it for another. This "remind them of their identity" approach may sound compassionate, but it offers false assurance to people actively rejecting the only name by which we must be saved (Acts 4:12). True love warns the apostate to repent and return while there is time. I enjoin everyone to follow the full counsel of Scripture, not haphazard, cherry-picked, disingenuous analogies and vain, false philosophies. Mr. Ayintete is presenting a clear distortion of scriptures. Please, do not fall for it.📌📌📌

@zionpearl @darasoba The epistles were letters written specifically to a church or sometimes groups of churches The writers were not thinking of us when they wrote, they were replying to specific issues in each church We read those books to give us the mind of d 1st Apostles, but also contextually

@darasoba We cannot pick and choose which portions of scripture we will obey and which we will say are for specific audiences. If the instruction to women was specifically for the churches where there was disorder, then why would any other portions of ANY letters or prophecies be for us?

Paul was not contradicting Pentecost, nor was he suggesting that women who spoke were not under the influence of the Holy Spirit. The strongest statements Paul makes about women appear in letters written to churches dealing with serious disorder and false teaching, especially Ephesus and Corinth. In Ephesus, Paul tells Timothy to “charge some that they teach no other doctrine” (1 Timothy 1:3) and warns against myths and speculative teaching (1 Timothy 1:4). He describes people who desired to be teachers but did not understand what they were saying (1 Timothy 1:7). That is the backdrop for “I do not permit a woman to teach or to exercise domineering authority” (1 Timothy 2:12). The Greek verb “authentein” (translated “to have authority”) does not mean healthy pastoral authority. It implies domineering or disruptive control. The problem was not gender, it was untrained and disruptive teaching. That is why Paul first says, “Let a woman learn” (1 Timothy 2:11). In the first-century context, this was radical. Women were rarely encouraged to receive theological instruction. Paul’s instruction was corrective, not dismissive. Learn first. Be formed. Then function. Paul later explains that false teachers were particularly targeting certain women in Ephesus, describing them as those who were “always learning and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth” (2 Timothy 3:6–7), and others who were “saying what they ought not” (1 Timothy 5:13). This shows a situational problem, not a generic ban. The same pattern appears in Corinth. In 1 Corinthians 14, Paul instructs women to keep silent (1 Corinthians 14:34), but in the same chapter he also tells tongue-speakers to be silent if there is no interpreter (1 Corinthians 14:28) and prophets to be silent when another receives revelation (1 Corinthians 14:30). Silence here is about order, not spiritual legitimacy. Earlier in the same letter, Paul explicitly acknowledges that women prayed and prophesied in public worship (1 Corinthians 11:5). Paul cannot be banning what he already regulates. If Paul believed women could not speak or teach by the Spirit, he would be contradicting his own ministry. Priscilla, alongside Aquila, instructed Apollos more accurately in doctrine (Acts 18:26). Phoebe is commended as a deacon and trusted with delivering Paul’s letter to Rome (Romans 16:1–2). Junia is described as notable among the apostles (Romans 16:7). As you mentioned, Pentecost remains the controlling framework. Peter declares, quoting Joel, “I will pour out my Spirit on all flesh… your sons and your daughters shall prophesy” (Acts 2:17–18). Paul never overturns this reality. He affirms that the Spirit distributes gifts as He wills (1 Corinthians 12:7–11) and that in Christ there is neither male nor female (Galatians 3:28). So the issue was never that women speaking were “not under the Holy Spirit.” The issue was order, formation, and sound teaching, for men and women alike. Any reading that turns Paul into someone who silences Spirit-filled women fails to account for the context, the whole counsel of Scripture, and the Spirit Paul himself preached.

@AbrahamOlawunmi @lekan_olayinka1 @SpiricocoNg I have heard you Next...

@Solextwit @lekan_olayinka1 @SpiricocoNg Awwwnnn..reporting to your twitter overlords, eh? Nobody is in a debate or discussion with you guys... Counting rice grains is of more benefit spiritually to me

@_data_alchemist @lekan_olayinka1 The elders don't need to organize the space, spiricoco could still have organized the space but the moderators and the panel could not have been people who are younger in ministry than the person who is been invited Ethics exist around this things That's my point

@Solextwit @lekan_olayinka1 I am asking the question not in malice, and a proper answer would at least state some clear name. Sincerely, you can attest to the fact that the space is open to all! As much as wants to attend. But if you think you will get some elders organizing spaces here. I am not sure!

@_data_alchemist @lekan_olayinka1 The elders don't need to organize the space, spiricoco could still have organized the space but the moderators and the panel could not have been people who are younger in ministry than the person who is been invited Ethics exist around this things That's my point

@Solextwit @lekan_olayinka1 Who are the fathers of faith please?

@deolarepublic @lekan_olayinka1 @ToksOdunsi Spiricoco, Pls don't allow zeal for d inherency of God's word push you to be overzealous Paul was a father, there are things his office allowed him over d body God will never joke with honour & authority, even when you know you are right We have been having success. Easy bro

I did. You don’t have spiritual authority over the Nigerian church, if you curse them (or continue to be harsh on them) apart from the fact that it won’t hold spiritually, it’ll be a sin on your path. You’re a member of the body like Rev Onayinka and his disciples. No matter how heretic they are, this is wrong. You don’t use wrongs to right wrongs.

@lekan_olayinka1 @SpiricocoNg I already condemned Abrahams derogatory use of words x.com/i/status/20557… I am not faulting the need to discuss this doctrinal positions, this is established in church history. But there is a way such should be done and have been done even though church history Thanks

@lekan_olayinka1 My reference is not about Temi but about this post accusing @SpiricocoNg of summoning Ps Onayinka x.com/i/status/20556… I didn't expect you to reply him as if you actually were willing to invite an elder minister. There are proper ministry ethics in doing this if at all