SomewhatWindy

@zzzz_jjjjj @FirstSquawk Funny how Americans like you and Jensen Huang with actual strategic vision seems to be outside the government. The government seems to be serving the geopolitical interests of China and Israel rather than its own.

@SomewhatWindy @FirstSquawk That’s not really my advice. That’s basically the position Nvidia CEO has. There might be a conflict of interests there since he obviously wants to sell more chips. But you can search the latest podcast where he explained his position. And obviously he is authority on making chip

HUAWEI'S AI CHIP SALES ARE SURGING AS NVIDIA LOSES GROUND IN CHINA, WITH CHINESE TECH FIRMS PLACING LARGE ORDERS FOR HUAWEI'S ASCEND 950PR PROCESSORS, AND THE COMPANY EXPECTING AI CHIP REVENUE OF AROUND $12 BILLION THIS YEAR. - FT

@zzzz_jjjjj @FirstSquawk Why the hell can't a strategist like you get elected US President? What's broken in America's system? Why doesn't anybody give the government advice?

@FirstSquawk With AI having no net positive profit in the near future, US really should have dump chips to China in this AI race. China will pay US chip makers hundreds of billions to train AI and got no tangible profit or job created in return.

@AngelicaOung It's behind a paywall. People actually paid to read that garbage...

Actually “Teacher Li’s” work is grifting crypto. Sad!

@MechanyBy @ylzylzyl 韩语有两套数字系统，一套是汉字词，一套是韩语本身的固有词。图里的是汉字借词，跟汉语数字用的字一一对应。韩语自身的数字表达只能表示1-99的数，使用场景基本只限时间、年龄、小数量物件计数。说明当时朝鲜半岛生产力低下数数数不到100的时候中国这边的影响力就过去了😂。

@ylzylzyl 韩国那个是不是jiu bai jiu shi jiu？

这是中国的汉字，Hanzi，Kanji，Hanja，不是日语 这才是日语：きゅうひゃくきゅうじゅうきゅう

@arun260284 @anishmoonka Most of the wall stretches across remote, inaccessible mountains where no one lives and no maintenance happens. After centuries of exposure, the vast majority has simply crumbled back into the landscape.

@arun260284 @anishmoonka The viral photo of the Great Wall reaching the water is real. What tourists actually visit are the restored sections in Beijing, mainly Badaling and Mutianyu. They've been maintained for visitors.

Less than 2% of the Great Wall of China looks like the postcards. The other 98% looks like the photos in this tweet. Crumbling mounds of dirt. The full thing runs 21,196 km. About half the Earth's equator. But it was built across 2,000 years by more than a dozen dynasties, and only the Ming (1368 to 1644) built it at scale with brick and stone. Everyone before them, the Qin, the Han, the Warring States kingdoms, used whatever was at their feet. Mostly dirt. The technique is called hangtu, which just means rammed earth. Workers poured soil and gravel into wooden frames and pounded each layer down from 18 cm thick to 13 cm. Then another layer. Then another. In the Gobi desert, where the ground was mostly sand and there was no clay to bind it, builders alternated sand with reed and willow branches. Some of those Han-era walls are still standing 3.2 meters tall after 2,000 years, made entirely from packed sand and sticks. Then in 1644, the wall stopped having a job. The Ming dynasty fell after a Ming general opened the gates at Shanhai Pass and let the Manchu armies through. The Manchus founded the Qing dynasty and ran China from inside the wall, which meant the wall was now guarding nothing. They also did something the Ming never did. Instead of fighting the Mongols on the other side, they pacified them through trade and diplomacy. Within a few decades, the wall had no enemies left to keep out. So the maintenance budget that had kept it standing for almost three centuries just ended. For the next 380 years, weather did its work. Farmers carved into the base for fields. Villagers pulled bricks for houses. Salt seeped in and ate the rammed earth from the inside. Even the famous Ming sections lost about 30% of their length this way. The stone wall in every photo, with watchtowers and stairs, is mostly one strip near Beijing. Badaling is 3.74 km long. The Chinese government picked it to restore in 1957 because it was close to the capital and easy to reach. Over 500 visiting heads of state took photos there. That image is what most of us now picture when we hear "Great Wall." It pulls 70% of all Great Wall tourism, while the other 99.98% of the structure quietly erodes. The rammed-earth sections that survive are getting help from biology. A 2024 paper studying eight Ming-era earthen walls found that bacteria, moss, and lichen growing on the surface (called biocrusts) make the dirt up to 321% stronger than bare earth. The microbes form a thin living skin that holds soil particles together, blocks rainwater from soaking in, and slows salt damage. 380 years of human attempts at preservation. A layer of moss is doing more work. The world's most famous wall is, mostly, a 21,000 km ruin held together by bacteria.

@_sh1tstain @TeaTramRussia When the Ukraine war broke out, I used a browser plugin to block thousands of NAFO bots. Next thing I knew, Twitter banned me for bot-like behavior.

@TeaTramRussia True. I was even permabanned on Twitter before Elon bought it.

To all the idiots who say that 'Russians have to use VPN because there is no freedom of speech in Russia'. Dear idiots, I have to use VPN because ALL RUSSIAN MEDIA ARE BLOCKED IN THE USA AND THE EU. In response, Russia blocked some Western websites, such as Twitter/X.

@FantMusict @Eugene31943159 @RezaNasri1 He can't. He's a bot. He has the blue checkmark, but he still split his post into two.

@Eugene31943159 @RezaNasri1 Can you elaborate?

China has an enormous advantage over the United States when it comes to serving as a strategic partner, a reliable trade partner, or an effective mediator in international disputes. In terms of political system, unlike the United States, where individuals with questionable mental stability, character, or moral clarity can ascend to the highest offices through electoral spectacle, China’s leaders are rigorously selected, highly sophisticated, battle-tested, and consistently reliable. They emerge from a meritocratic process that prizes competence, long-term vision, and institutional discipline rather than short-term populism or personal charisma. This systemic stability extends to China’s foreign commitments. Whereas a single U.S. administration can casually repudiate treaties, alliances, or multilateral agreements signed by its predecessor—something the world witnessed dramatically with the election of Donald Trump and the abrupt scuttling of major accords—China’s undertakings survive electoral cycles and leadership transitions. This state continuity is not provisional but structural, giving Beijing a decisive edge in predictability and trustworthiness that Washington has largely forfeited. China’s broader vision of global affairs is markedly more balanced, pacifist, and respectful of other nations’ legitimate interests. While the United States has long profited from sowing and sustaining conflict—particularly in the Middle East, which it transformed into a perpetual powder keg through aggressive arms sales, the proliferation of military bases, and repeated regime-change operations—China has actively worked to reduce tensions. Its successful mediation between Iran and Saudi Arabia stands as a concrete example of constructive diplomacy aimed at reconciliation rather than division. Beyond these strengths, Chinese officials consistently observe diplomatic norms both in rhetoric and in action. They avoid the crude threats and ultimatums that have become routine in U.S. statecraft, such as explicit warnings to “kill” or otherwise eliminate foreign diplomats who fail to deliver Washington’s desired negotiating outcomes. China steadfastly upholds the principle of national sovereignty and refrains from interfering in the domestic affairs of other countries, treating internal political choices as matters for sovereign peoples alone. In sharp contrast, the United States openly regards "regime change" as a legitimate policy tool and routinely interferes through sanctions, covert operations, or outright military pressure. Furthermore, China’s foreign policy remains grounded in objective facts and pragmatic analysis rather than ideological labels or manufactured narratives. It does not weaponize terms such as “terrorism” to justify unlawful aggression against rival states, nor does it allow its strategic decisions to be hijacked by powerful foreign lobbies (most notably AIPAC and similar interest groups) that shape U.S. policy through selective storytelling and political funding. Beijing’s approach is rooted in evidence, mutual benefit, and long-term stability, not in the dangerous American doctrine of “peace through strength,” which in practice translates into illegal aggression, economic coercion, and the subjugation of other states by force. In every respect—reliability, respect for sovereignty, adherence to international law, and a genuine commitment to the prohibition on the use of force—China demonstrates a principled consistency that positions it as the superior partner for nations seeking genuine cooperation rather than subordination.

@BitcoinI7055 @coinbureau @grok While it's true that the Chinese robotics company ROBOTERA has signed agreements with major logistics firms in China, and their robots are already being tested for sorting operations at logistics centers, this specific video was actually AI-generated by a TikTok account.

@coinbureau Hey @grok, is this true? Or is this video AI generated?

🇨🇳 CHINESE LOGISTICS CENTER RUN BY HUMANOID ROBOTS. It is rumored that the AI robots operate 24/7 and have already achieved 85% human-level efficiency. The future is here.

@jacobreynolds @BBCWorld Voice-to-text is automatic now? Which messaging app doesn't support that?

@BBCWorld It’s a direct proxy for civilisation. It’s like returning a shopping trolley. Voice note offloads your inconvenience onto someone else. It’s marginally easier for you to do but much longer for the recipient.

Voice notes are massive in some countries but not the UK. This is why. bbc.in/4t0zffb

@JQOjUzDSeSc78uX @shangguanluan 难说，主要是孩子和傻子看了容易被忽悠瘸了。这玩意一检测到你浏览器是中文，没注册账号就给你疯狂推送反华视频。温水煮青蛙，看多了肯定对社会有负面影响。

@shangguanluan 其实我想说，大陆开放油管，想武统的鹰派只会更多，到时候别说一个习近平三个习近平都不一定能摁住！

台湾还是有挺多清醒理性的人 只不过他们经常因为说实话被青鸟出征

@raymekee @op7418 这个好通过吗

@raymekee @op7418 我都忘了我什么时候注册的小米平台的账号了

小米 MiMo -V2.5 系列模型全部开源 采用宽松的 MIT 协议，允许自由商用、二次训练与微调，无需额外授权。 同时他们还推出了Orbit 100T Token 计划。 这个太牛批了！如果你有自己 Vibe Coding 一些东西可以去领一下。 包含两部分： 分别是面向 AI builder 的『百万亿 Token 创造者激励计划』，与面向 Agent 框架团队的『Agent 生态共建计划』。 百万亿 Token 创造者激励计划： 申请通过的 AI builder 用户最高将获得 Max 档位的 Token Plan，包含 16 亿 Credits ，价值 659 元。 Agent 生态共建计划： 将为你的 agent 框架提供 MiMo token 限免支持，让你的用户免费接入并体验 MiMo 系列模型。

@linacly @jlaw520 @xiabingqian1 估计她就十几岁，境外媒体看多了让人忽悠瘸了也正常。我大学学英语的时候一天一篇经济学人，连听带读加背诵，也给人忽悠瘸了，天天神神叨叨的，直到真出去了才滤镜跌破。😂

@SomewhatWindy @jlaw520 @xiabingqian1 都还需要搭梯子，肯定在国内。还是一个正在逼着父母卖房，供她留学的不孝女

之前日本签证重拳出击外国人时，我就提醒过：莫把他人危机当笑谈，覆巢之下安有完卵？大家都要居安思危。可偏有一群精日戏瘾发作表演『铁拳只锤支那人，我已脱支』果然报应不爽，接二连三最终所有再留身份无一幸免全被暴击，就连铁饭碗永居未来都随时取消。 感谢高市亲发长文，话已经说得很明白『政策加码没有终点，朝令夕改是日本的权利，谁经不起折腾？滚蛋』看到没？时代铁拳从不管谁舔得够不够虔诚。 事已至此，所有在日华人我想问你们：如果中日关系持续破裂，游客不来，日币再跌，商贸熔断……拿什么身还有意义么？再留卡若不能创造价值，那和酒店房卡有啥区别？

@quanyuqn27902 @flrande 还是ChatGPT厉害啊。国内模型怎么调整都没有这么好的漫画效果。

@SomewhatWindy @flrande gpt 的

我们 DeepSeek 又开始降价了。 事实上 我们降得太多了多到都不知道该怎么才好。 用户来求我 说 求求您梁文峰先生我们降太多了。我们用户不习惯一直降价，在你出现之前 我们总是被宰猪。 我说 不 不 不你们会大获全胜 —— 价格更低！你们会比以往任何时候都大赢特赢 —— tokens 更便宜！

@WZNH3 @rena_in_dc 日本人在讨论美国的时候总是选择性忘记原子弹袭击。 也可能他们觉得这两颗原子弹所造成的平民伤亡是完全必要的，所以美国不是战狼，而是终结战争的和平鸽。

@rena_in_dc 日本人又在讲笑话了，美国人什么时候不是战狼？

中国は「戦狼外交は逆効果だ」と気づいて軌道修正したのに、今度はアメリカが戦狼外交始めてて草。

@YagaoDirac @card_board1909 @tangyuan412 不行了快笑死我了😂😂😂

@card_board1909 @tangyuan412 兄弟，这 trick works。 this is crazy😅😅 im so surprised tbh

今天我朋友教我怎么发音 我友真善良、谢谢 ü很难☹️ 但没有拼音、就没有中文 啊、我可以读中文一点 但、谈谈中文非常难 但我会尽力 谢谢你们教我中文 在x、我也可以学中文 晚安💤

@quanyuqn27902 @flrande 人才啊哈哈。这是GPT还是国内模型。

@joe_gyliop @ripo0079 我甚至看不出来你把字的排序打乱了😅。好像母语者阅读中文不是从左到右的线性阅读。其他语言的母语者会不会也有这种效果？

@ripo0079 说话我果如语序完颠倒全阁下又应何如对呢

我非常怒because高市政治極化 So我can't取得航空券 without直行便、航空券非常expensive

@jlaw520 @xiabingqian1 他甚至都不是留学生。估计也没有在读书。

@xiabingqian1 那些纳税的人都随时驱赶，你一个蚊子大小的留学生还心存幻想。真是不知道自己几斤几两，就这认知还读书