Soul Alt

Dear @TeamYouTube @YouTube @YouTubeCreators @YouTubeGaming @YouTubeIndia @YouTubeInsider @nealmohan two of my youtube channels have been wrongfully terminated by your shitty AI program and i haven't been able to summit an appeal because you didn't send my my URL. @Dexerto

@vidIQ @TeamYouTube @youtube What does this mean?! What would happen to indie animation channels that have cutesy artstyles but is made for mature audiences like terrible mouse or happy tree friends? Do bigger franchises like Larva or sonic exe games gets demonetized too??

@YouTubeCreators my channel was Demonetized due to harmful content but now it's change into misleading family content but my channel was wrongfully flagged as misleading family content please proper review my Channel 🙏🙏 My Chan link:youtube.com/channel/UCxTyq… @NpcUniverse help me

🚨 History channels are now Child abuse 🚨 In February, my archive channel youtube.com/channel/UCjejQ… which had already been reduced to just a few Shorts was suddenly taken down. Within minutes, my entire account was disabled due to alleged “sexual abuse-related content.” This situation is unacceptable @TeamYouTube. If this is indeed accurate, the appropriate authorities should be notified. This is not just an issue with a Google product, my YouTube channel has been terminated without proper justification. Because why is my channel terminated?? #YouTubeCreators #ReinstateAllChannels

@TeamYouTube @YouTube @YouTubeCreators I respectfully request a manual review of my channel: Channel: 1분HM youtube.com/channel/UCTJ2r… 📌 Timeline Feb 3 – Channel terminated (Spam/Scams) Appeal rejected Feb 17 – Channel reinstated after review (no violation found) Feb 24 – Terminated again under the same policy Further appeals were rejected almost instantly 📌 Content Dashcam-based road safety content with narration. No external links, scams, misleading metadata, or artificial engagement. 📌 Concern The same content was first approved, then removed again. This inconsistency suggests a possible error or automated decision. 📌 Request Please review my case again and restore my channel. If anything is incorrect, I will fix it immediately. Thank you. @Saybiggaming @D_YellowMadness @LilSoftieGacha @jhweiss1999

Dear @reneritchie, if you’re reading this, I’m reaching out for help regarding my channel. It was terminated 10 months ago for “severe or repeated violations of Community Guidelines,” despite having zero past strikes or warnings. The termination occurred shortly after I uploaded a video I had worked on the night before. Since then, I’ve only received generic responses with no specific explanation — no cited video, policy, or timestamp. I spent 2 years building that channel without prior issues, and I’m still seeking clarity on what led to its removal. If possible, I would greatly appreciate a proper human review and a clear explanation of any violation, if one exists. If you and the YouTube can’t find any, my channel should be restored. Channel URL is above main post: ⬆️

Well, looks like @TeamYouTube finally came through…🔥 After 10 months, they reviewed my channel & restored 2 years of hard work. I can finally create again. Appreciate everyone who supported me through it. …That’s what I would be saying. 🚫 In reality, it has now been 10 months since my channel was terminated for “Community Guidelines” with: ❌ No prior strikes ❌ No warnings ❌ No cited video or policy Since then, I’ve received no clear explanation — only AI-repeated template responses. I’m still here asking for one thing: A genuine human review and a transparent explanation of what was violated, if anything. Channel URL: youtube.com/channel/UCTsiV…

To All Creators who believed that their channel was Falsely Terminated You can Join our Group Chat. We help each other in the group.

@TeamYouTube @YouTube @YouTubeCreators I am writing to respectfully request a thorough manual review of my YouTube channel: Channel Name: 1분HM Channel URL: youtube.com/channel/UCTJ2r… 📌 Timeline of Events February 3, 2026 My channel was terminated under the “Spam, Scams, and Deceptive Practices” policy. Appeal Submitted (initial appeal rejected) My first appeal was rejected. February 17, 2026 After submitting another appeal, my channel was reinstated following review. This indicated that my content did not violate the policy at that time. February 24, 2026 Only one week later, my channel was terminated again under the same policy. Subsequent Appeals I submitted additional appeals, including after the required waiting period. However, they were rejected almost instantly, suggesting that they may not have been properly reviewed by a human. 📌 Content Description My channel focuses on road safety awareness using real car dashcam footage. Some footage is recorded by myself Most footage is voluntarily submitted by subscribers via email I add narration and explanations to analyze accident situations and highlight safety lessons The purpose of my content is educational and safety-focused, not entertainment through misleading or harmful means. Importantly: I do NOT include external links I do NOT promote scams, products, or services I do NOT engage in artificial engagement (no sub4sub, no manipulation) I do NOT use misleading titles, thumbnails, or metadata The channel had fewer than 10 public videos and approximately 20 private videos, all following the same format. 📌 Key Concern The most critical issue is the inconsistency: My channel was reinstated after a review, confirming no violation at that time The same type of content was later terminated again under the same policy This suggests a possible error in the review process or reliance on automated systems without proper human verification. 📌 Request I sincerely and respectfully request: A full manual review by a human reviewer Consideration of the previous reinstatement decision (Feb 17) A clear explanation of what specific content or elements triggered the violation If any part of my content is found to be problematic, I am fully willing to: Remove the content immediately Make any necessary corrections If I unknowingly made a mistake, I sincerely ask for one more opportunity to correct it. 📌 Final Statement I am openly providing my channel information because I am confident that my content does not violate YouTube’s Community Guidelines. I am not trying to bypass policies, and I have always aimed to create responsible, educational content. I respectfully ask for a fair and transparent review of my case. Thank you very much for your time and consideration. @Saybiggaming @D_YellowMadness @LilSoftieGacha @jhweiss1999

Hi @TeamYouTube, It has been 81 days since my channel (@DrgGaming) was demonetized, and it has been a very challenging period. During this time, I have made the necessary changes to ensure my content aligns with YouTube’s policies. I kindly request you to review my channel and please consider reinstating monetization. Thank you for your time and support.

🚨BREAKING: A Court Just Ruled that YouTube Needs to RETRACT ALL “Inauthentic Content” Penalties The Violation: No Clear Explanation About The Policy Just Tag Team YouTube Here and Send Them Your Channel URL to Rejoin the YPP

@TeamYouTube What about the "Misleading Family Content" Policies My Channel is Demonetized under this since 27th January. My Channel is only Gacha Club/Anime Edits Content So I am Very Sure that this policy is wrong as if it were about art style than all of anime content should be demonetized right? Re-instate this policy as well Channel Name: Zahardanime23 Channel Link: @Zahard23" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">youtube.com/@Zahard23 Demonetized due to "Misleading Family Content" Conclusion is that my channel does not violate any youtube guidelines all my videos are labelled not made for kids and include anime/gacha club content I fail to understand how you can label this under misleading family content when streamers bark on your platform and kids watch them? Re-instate my channel. #ReinstateAllChannels #Youtube

we soo back @SouleBoiYT" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">youtube.com/@SouleBoiYT

The funniest thing I'm 100% certain of when it comes to “Inauthentic Content”: Anyone who waits out the 90 days and submits for monetization again - will almost always get their monetization back. But they won't give you back the money you've honestly earned. I've been through this exact situation before with “Harmful content involving minors” (which was completely false). They disabled my monetization, rejected all my appeals.. and then? They approved my re-application without any issues after the 90-day wait.

I hope some creators see this, if I don’t get remonetized by the end of this week, I will start contacting lawyers in regard to this. If you have been affected please comment, the more of you we have the stronger we are in getting a resolution and putting pressure on @TeamYouTube

@allysonfan20 @TeamYouTube I was demonetized just a few days ago. I submitted my appeal immediately, but it was rejected today without even being watched (0 views). It's very frustrating because I put a lot of work into my scripts and editing. Hoping @TeamYouTube can take a look at the evidence.

Hola @TeamYouTube . Mi canal @cinecuriosofilm?si=3WzJVRTrm3Whlnrx" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">youtube.com/@cinecuriosofi… fue desmonetizado por "Contenido Repetitivo". Apelé mostrando mi edición manual pero fue rechazado con 0 VISUALIZACIONES. ¿Cómo es posible una revisión cuidadosa sin ver las pruebas? Abro hilo para demostrar mi trabajo.

Wow. Justice for the demonetized. About 250 channels had to suffer this demonetization wave. docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d…

Hey so @TeamYouTube the deadline for you to respond to my complaint (case id: 20260309-0005) under the EU DSA already passed and you didn’t reply. The DSA saw my case was strong enough to be forwarded directly to you and you were given 14 days to respond and finally confirm what was wrong. But still no response and you can’t prove what was wrong. Therefore, I am respectfully asking for you to please reinstate my channel. Irreparable damage has already been done. I already lost over $1000 of withheld revenue since it’s been over 50 days. Please just fix this already. Channel link: m.youtube.com/channel/UCgzeJ…

Reapplied today after 90 days — now under review. I’ve removed almost all my videos from the past and i updated titles, descriptions, tags & thumbnails to align with YouTube policies. I truly believe I’m eligible for YPP again. All I ask is a fair human review 🙏🏻🤞🏼 @TeamYouTube

@TeamYouTube @YouTube The YouTube reused content policy was last updated in July, 2025 and I made sure to follow those guidelines before monetization. My channel was monetized on Oct 20 2025. On Dec 17, my monetization was suspended by the AI system for "reused content," but my appeal on Dec 19 was successful and my channel was accepted again. My second most popular video was uploaded on Oct 9 and reviewed on Oct 20 and again on Dec 19 — both times it was accepted by the YouTube team. Even my #1 most popular video includes added commentary, storytelling, and loading screen effects to enhance viewer experience and provide originality. I also invested in custom 3D elements created by freelancers to improve my content quality. However, on March 9 my monetization was suspended again for the same reused content issue, and this time my appeal was denied. I have never received any copyright strikes or community guideline warnings. I respectfully request a thorough manual human review of my channel. After my appeal was successfully accepted on December 19, I did not change my content strategy, and continued producing content in the same style that was previously reviewed and approved by the YouTube team.