Dan Thompson

7.2K posts

Dan Thompson banner
Dan Thompson

Dan Thompson

@Spacedog19

Nuclear fission and a fair world order

UK Katılım Ekim 2011
310 Takip Edilen194 Takipçiler
Power to the People ☭🕊
Power to the People ☭🕊@ProudSocialist·
A worker in Ontario, California sets his company’s warehouse on fire and has a message for the CEO: “There goes your inventory. All you had to do was pay us enough to fucking live.” Expect to see more of this as people struggle to survive under our decaying capitalist system.
English
1.3K
7.9K
45.5K
1.4M
Dan Thompson retweetledi
Dan Thompson
Dan Thompson@Spacedog19·
@policytensor Pretty much nothing is survivable on the modern battlefield. We need to rethink the utility of war.
English
0
0
0
15
Dan Thompson
Dan Thompson@Spacedog19·
@WarMonitor3 Oh I forgot, it's a Wednesday. Time to start ratcheting up the tensions for the weekend.
English
0
0
4
169
WarMonitor🇺🇦🇬🇧
US airforce continues to transfer fighters across the Atlantic and a consistent stream of cargo aircraft into the Middle East despite ceasefire agreement.
English
126
1.1K
5.5K
248.1K
Dan Thompson
Dan Thompson@Spacedog19·
@AngelicaOung We're watching a WWE event, the blood is real but everyone has their lines and Trump is the ringmaster. Where it ends is anyone's guess
English
0
0
1
102
Grob 2.0
Grob 2.0@Grob2point0·
@Spacedog19 @jacksonhinklle You know who has a fair bit of thsoe rare earth refineries? Venezuela. If only the US toppled their government and installed a puppet regime that'd do what they wanted. Oh wait. 🤣
English
1
0
0
30
Jackson Hinkle 🇺🇸
Jackson Hinkle 🇺🇸@jacksonhinklle·
🚨🇺🇸🇨🇳🇮🇷 BREAKING: The breakthrough in negotiations came as China promised to act as a guarantor that the U.S. would ‘accept at least some of Iran’s conditions’ stated in the 10-point framework As a gesture of trust, China vetoed a UN Security Council Resolution on the Strait of Hormuz earlier today, despite the crisis affecting China itself – Sources via Middle East Spectator
Jackson Hinkle 🇺🇸 tweet mediaJackson Hinkle 🇺🇸 tweet media
English
353
4.9K
27.1K
2.2M
Grob 2.0
Grob 2.0@Grob2point0·
@Spacedog19 @lugkgn_1 @jacksonhinklle "fighting India every few years with sticks" is not an ad hominem. It is a thing that happens, every few years in a disputed area in the himalayas between India and China. Just becasue you don't actually know anything doesn't make my accurate statement an "ad hominem"
English
1
0
0
14
Dan Thompson
Dan Thompson@Spacedog19·
@Grob2point0 @jacksonhinklle You can get the resources but how will you refine them? How will you manufacture at the scale and cost that China does? Your phone would cost as much as your house if we built them.
English
1
0
1
42
Grob 2.0
Grob 2.0@Grob2point0·
@Spacedog19 @jacksonhinklle Thankfully Africa and South America have all the rare earths and other scarce resources to make such things that are needed. I wonder which country has the power projection ability to get those resources. 🤔
English
1
0
0
56
Grob 2.0
Grob 2.0@Grob2point0·
@lugkgn_1 @Spacedog19 @jacksonhinklle The country that has to resort to fighting India, every few years with sticks is pretending that it has endless ICBM production capacity LOL You communist bandits don't even have the might to seize a small little island next to you. You're not even China, you're just West Taiwan
Grob 2.0 tweet media
English
2
0
0
65
Grob 2.0
Grob 2.0@Grob2point0·
@Spacedog19 @jacksonhinklle India, Vietnam, Cambodia, Indonesia, plenty of other dirt poor large population southeast asian countries to get your cheap goods from. That's the good thing about being the country not being blockaded. You have much more options for where you can import goods from.
English
3
0
0
117
Dan Thompson
Dan Thompson@Spacedog19·
@Grob2point0 @jacksonhinklle Sure, and do you all of your consumer goods that you buy from China are going to magically appear from somewhere else? Our economies have become so structurally weakened that we need them more than they need us. We should stop meddling in other people's houses and fix our own.
English
1
0
0
123
Grob 2.0
Grob 2.0@Grob2point0·
If you think you can magically increase demand from your (small and poor) neighboring countries to the extent that of the demand that you'd lose from everywhere not within walking distance, you know nothing about economics, and lack common sense. If you lose the ability to sell y goods to country A, why do you, in any way, think country B, which only buys x goods, would then magically start buying x + y goods? Did the population and the resources from country A suddenly teleport to country B?
English
3
0
0
166
Dan Thompson
Dan Thompson@Spacedog19·
@Grob2point0 @jacksonhinklle As I say, China has a huge internal market and nearby customers. Not that a blockade is ever going to happen, the US would not dare because it knows the response would be far more painful.
English
1
0
0
178
Dan Thompson
Dan Thompson@Spacedog19·
@Grob2point0 @jacksonhinklle I'm sorry but you've been consuming too much propaganda slop. China has barely even started developing their own market, they have 1.4 billion people, more than the either Western world combined, and then there's the Global South to develop. They'll never lack customers.
English
1
0
0
409
Grob 2.0
Grob 2.0@Grob2point0·
You know how easy it is to just move all your assets outside the range of the missiles? It's really easy. China is far far more import and export dependant on the world than the US is. And they are a far weaker economy, overall, than the US is. Were they to come to blows, the US could do far far more crushing damage to China than China could ever do to the US.
English
1
0
0
526
Dan Thompson
Dan Thompson@Spacedog19·
@Grob2point0 @jacksonhinklle You try something like that and every US base in the region will be flattened within an hour. I'm not trying to start anything here, just trying to say that making a move China is not smart and will hurt you more in the long run. There are better ways to deal with countries.
English
2
0
0
633
Grob 2.0
Grob 2.0@Grob2point0·
Did the houthis sink anything? No. Do you know how easy it would be to blockade China from outside it's ballistic missile range? Very easy. Because China does not have a blue water navy that can contest the oceans or fight for access to shipping lanes. You don't actually know anything. Which makes sense because you're a eurofäg.
English
3
0
1
835
Dan Thompson
Dan Thompson@Spacedog19·
@RealPepeEscobar Someone keep an eye on the Israelis to make sure they don't accidentally murder the negotiating team again.
English
0
0
5
297
Pepe Escobar
Pepe Escobar@RealPepeEscobar·
From the Supreme National Security Council in Iran: the key take away: "It has been decided at the highest level that Iran will conduct two weeks of negotiations in Islamabad based solely on these principles. This does not mean the war is over; Iran will only accept the end of the war once these principles are confirmed in detail."
English
75
831
2.6K
83K
Dan Thompson
Dan Thompson@Spacedog19·
@ryangrim Does anyone seriously believe the Democrats wouldn't have been at war with Iran in the first week if they were in charge? The script writing on this show is terrible, I want a refund.
English
0
0
0
512
Grob 2.0
Grob 2.0@Grob2point0·
@Spacedog19 @jacksonhinklle LOL China doesn't have a blue water navy. The US could literally blockade all of China and their country would collapse almost immediately.
English
3
0
1
2.5K