CuriousNeuron

2.7K posts

CuriousNeuron banner
CuriousNeuron

CuriousNeuron

@StillBuffering2

Passionate about the universe and everything that’s in it.

Netherlands Katılım Haziran 2025
271 Takip Edilen79 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
CuriousNeuron
CuriousNeuron@StillBuffering2·
@AstronoLive @ken_caudle Wondering how many Flat Earthers have reached out to the thousands of members of the Astronomical League over the years, offering to help them "re-measure" the distance to the sun. 🤔
English
0
1
9
192
Earthly Skeptic
Earthly Skeptic@earthlyskeptick·
Here’s the second measurement, from my iPhone’s inbuilt gravimeter, which uses spring compression: g = 9.8006 m/s^2. This one is more precise due to the method used, and is almost exactly equal to what I should expect at my location: 9.8008 m/s^2. I did the same measurement in Singapore and got a significantly lower value. Earth bulges near Singapore, which reduces g slightly at the equator. Again, you’re welcome.
Earthly Skeptic tweet media
English
2
0
10
547
Kaleb The Socrat
Kaleb The Socrat@KalebTheSocrat·
Just so everyone doesn’t forget, there is no experiment that can verify gravity terrestrially according to its current theory. Stop asking us to drop our phones. Stop referring to the feather & bowling ball in a vacuum. Stop referring to torsion balance experiments. The archaic idea that mass attracts mass has been superseded; to now defend your position you must look to the sky. Unfortunately once you do none of your claims can be verified past the first step of the scientific method. Necessitating that any claim made about the bending & warping of space time must be placed in a basket labeled with pseudoscience.
Kaleb The Socrat tweet mediaKaleb The Socrat tweet media
English
43
13
108
4.1K
StoopsTheCat
StoopsTheCat@StoopsTheCat·
Now that all the "Where's the bottom?" losers have admitted they dont understand how perspective works, Heres the video from an elevation of about 25 feet. You can see how close I am to the water in the video. I used my 1500x digital zoom for this one. Eat it globies.
English
232
13
144
145.2K
Earthly Skeptic
Earthly Skeptic@earthlyskeptick·
-15°, right? Mintaka has a declination of 0° if I remember correctly. Hey @AntiDisinfo86 and @space_audits, long time no hear? Thoughts on @haprho’s question? And @space_audits, any updates on that written response to my celestial theo analysis from 5 months ago? Just wondering.
English
2
0
5
60
Matt Wallace
Matt Wallace@MattWallace888·
Footage of the “ice wall” is going viral as more people start to notice 👀
English
403
1.4K
10.2K
1.5M
CuriousNeuron
CuriousNeuron@StillBuffering2·
@haprho Saturn as seen from earth. Flers should grab a telescope instead of a mic.
CuriousNeuron tweet media
English
0
0
5
49
AD.nl
AD.nl@ADnl·
Nooit meer een écht donkere nacht: dat toekomstbeeld komt dichterbij nu de Amerikaanse communicatiewaakhond FCC toestemming heeft gegeven voor de test van een satelliet die zonlicht naar de aarde kan weerkaatsen. ad.nl/binnenland/ref…
Nederlands
28
7
17
8.6K
CuriousNeuron
CuriousNeuron@StillBuffering2·
@TomvanderH @ADnl It’s a time-lapse photo of one single NASA research balloon launched in Antarctica, pasted next to a real shot of a Starlink satellite train. Two completely unrelated images to create a visual illusion. You’re bad at this.
English
1
0
1
15
CuriousNeuron
CuriousNeuron@StillBuffering2·
@TomvanderH @bits2read @ADnl The word nasa (נָשָׂא) means “to lift,” “to carry,” or “to bear”, and even then, it’s not related to NASA in any way. NASA doesn’t mean deceiver, and the acronym comes from English. You’re wrong. Once again.
English
0
0
1
32
Tomvanderh 👑 🇳🇱 🇵🇹 🇪🇸
@StillBuffering2 @bits2read @ADnl I am licensed radioamateur My radiosignal took 8 to 12sec to return signal I used science Found evidence space is a lie Space doesnt exist Astronauts working at -270 Celcius in a vacume 🤡 No bouncing from the Moon as it is plasma not rock We are lied too NASA meaning 🐍 deceiver
English
1
0
0
49
CuriousNeuron
CuriousNeuron@StillBuffering2·
@TomvanderH @bits2read @ADnl If a "firmament" existed at 11,500 km, TV satellite dishes couldn't work. They must be bolted rigidly to houses, pointing at a fixed spot exactly 35,786 km away where orbit matches Earth's spin. We bounce lasers off the Moon daily; if there were a dome, they'd bounce back early.
English
1
0
1
25
CuriousNeuron
CuriousNeuron@StillBuffering2·
@TomvanderH @RDEIL @ADnl If GPS came from cell towers, the signal would be strongest in dense cities under trees where towers are everywhere. Instead, GPS glitches there because wet leaves block weak signals coming from space. Cell towers don't have atomic clocks; they get their time from GPS satellites.
English
1
0
1
57
Tomvanderh 👑 🇳🇱 🇵🇹 🇪🇸
@RDEIL @StillBuffering2 @ADnl Every celltower broadcast Time, Date and Position. You dont need something in the sky. Using software to do a triangle calculation for position isnt rocket science either. When driving under trees on a small road in the city, GPS loses connection.
English
1
0
0
63
CuriousNeuron
CuriousNeuron@StillBuffering2·
@TomvanderH @ADnl If GPS ran on cell towers, it wouldn’t work in the middle of the ocean, deep in the desert, or in an airplane miles above earth, right? 5G needs more towers because high frequencies have short range, not for "control." You can't run a global tracking system on local antennas.
English
1
0
2
47
CuriousNeuron
CuriousNeuron@StillBuffering2·
@MaxQHellcat @did8hurtu @LuisECayetano83 Indeed you can. Here are Saturn and its moons, captured by Sreesha Belakvaadi, Bangalore, India, 1 May 2021 Equipment: ZWO ASI290MC colour camera, Celestron 9.25” SCT, iOptron CEM40 mount
CuriousNeuron tweet media
English
1
0
1
38
Hap Rho
Hap Rho@haprho·
@AstronoLive @ken_caudle @RoundEartherGod Very nice effort and good description. I was actually in that space with sacred (@100KryptoKeyz) and argued instrument error and confusion between fore- & back-ground stars. He quickly blocked me. How do they distinguish between fore & background?
English
2
0
3
57
Hap Rho
Hap Rho@haprho·
flat earthers (in particular, @ken_caudle) deny observable reality
Hap Rho@haprho

More papers detailing the "MEASUREMENT OF EARTH'S ORBITAL VELOCITY" Title: Long-Term Variations of Daily Insolation and Quaternary Climatic Changes Authors: André L. Berger Journal: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences Publication Year: 1978 Volume/Issue: Volume 35, Issue 12 Pages: 2362–2367 DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(1978)035<2362:LTVODI>2.0.CO;2 Citations: ~3189 (highly cited classic for trigonometric formulas and long-term variations of Earth's orbital elements used in insolation calculations) Summary: Provides trigonometrical formulas for direct spectral analysis and computation of long-term variations in Earth's orbital elements (eccentricity, obliquity, precession) relevant to Quaternary climate changes. Title: Long-term variations of caloric insolation resulting from the Earth's orbital elements Authors: André L. Berger Journal: Quaternary Research Publication Year: 1978 Volume/Issue: Volume 9, Issue 2 Pages: 139–167 DOI: 10.1016/0033-5894(78)90064-9 Citations: ~1869 Summary: Proposes solutions for Earth's orbital elements (including terms up to second/third degree perturbations) and computes caloric insolation variations; a cornerstone for paleoclimatic modeling of orbital forcing. Title: Insolation values for the climate of the last 10 million years Authors: André Berger and Marie-France Loutre Journal: Quaternary Science Reviews Publication Year: 1991 Volume/Issue: Volume 10, Issue 4 Pages: 297–317 DOI: 10.1016/0277-3791(91)90033-Q Citations: ~5342 (extremely highly cited) Summary: Proposes new values for Earth's orbital and rotational parameters (eccentricity, obliquity, precession) over the last 10 Myr, widely used as a reference for paleoclimate studies and insolation reconstructions. Title: Orbital, precessional, and insolation quantities for the Earth from -20 Myr to +10 Myr Authors: J. Laskar Journal: Astronomy & Astrophysics Publication Year: 1993 (building on 1986/1988 works) Citations: ~796 (for this specific paper; Laskar's series is foundational) Summary: Provides numerical solutions for Earth's orbital elements and precession over extended timescales, a key reference for accurate long-term integrations. Title: The Planetary and Lunar Ephemerides DE430 and DE431 Authors: William M. Folkner et al. (JPL/NASA) Journal/Publication: IPN Progress Report 42-196 Publication Year: 2014 (but based on long-standing DE series; DE405/DE421 predecessors from 1990s/2000s are classics) Citations: ~1468 Summary: Modern high-precision ephemeris providing fitted orbital parameters for Earth (and other bodies) from observations; DE series papers are standard references for current/best orbital elements of Earth.

English
4
0
15
1.3K
CuriousNeuron
CuriousNeuron@StillBuffering2·
@TomvanderH @ADnl Wrong. Balloons drift unpredictably with stratospheric winds. GPS relies on trilateration, requiring positions accurate to the centimeter and nanosecond. Only satellites locked into mathematically perfect, predictable orbits in a vacuum can provide stable navigation.
English
2
0
2
46
CuriousNeuron
CuriousNeuron@StillBuffering2·
@TomvanderH @ADnl Jouw telefoon, auto en de scheepvaart bepalen hun positie via een netwerk van GPS-, Galileo- of GLONASS-satellieten. Dit kan fysiek niet via een onderzeekabel.
Nederlands
1
0
2
60
Tomvanderh 👑 🇳🇱 🇵🇹 🇪🇸
@ADnl Satellieten bestaan niet. 99,99% van communicatie loopt over onderzeese glasvezel. Rest over Mobiele telefonie. NASA en SpaceEx zijn grootverbruikers van Helium. Wat betekent dat? Dat ze met helium ballonnen werken.
Nederlands
3
0
2
157
CuriousNeuron
CuriousNeuron@StillBuffering2·
Yes people, oceans do curve.
AstronomyLive@AstronoLive

@TheGlobeIsDead Wrong. Here is a Falcon 9 rocket landing on a drone ship behind the curvature of the Atlantic Ocean. The super bright flame gets obscured, so it’s not caused by a “limit of vision” as you people like to claim. In fact my scope resolves the width of the rocket even as it lands.

English
3
4
24
1.5K
CuriousNeuron
CuriousNeuron@StillBuffering2·
@haprho @ken_caudle @selbsman1 True. Venus looks huge as a crescent (near Earth) but tiny when full (far side of the Sun). This changing distance destroyed the old Earth-centered model and paved the way for the truth: we're all orbiting the Sun.
CuriousNeuron tweet media
English
0
0
1
19
Hap Rho
Hap Rho@haprho·
@ken_caudle @selbsman1 Silly boy. Simple geometry proves Venus and Mercury are visible in dark skies from Earth. Attached are images of Venus¹ over 5 months, proving planetary motion. Anyone with a telescope can verify this proof. ——— ¹ all at the same scale/magnification
Hap Rho tweet media
English
2
0
1
37
CuriousNeuron
CuriousNeuron@StillBuffering2·
@darkagenda @kellyc7c @MckeeganDave Notice the pattern: you’ll talk about priests, faith, AI bias, line drawings, and memes, literally anything to dodge the actual math and avoid asking AI the real question. Honestly, if I were a flat-Earther, I would also dodge like crazy.
English
0
0
2
15
Failed Normie
Failed Normie@darkagenda·
@StillBuffering2 @kellyc7c @MckeeganDave AI is like people, brilliant at some things, terrible at others. Would I ask a priest if Jesus was the son of God and died for our sins? The fact the priest believes it, doesn't make it anymore convincing. Maybe you'd be converted instantly. 😏
English
1
0
0
40