Jonathan Struhl

1.1K posts

Jonathan Struhl banner
Jonathan Struhl

Jonathan Struhl

@Struhl

General Partner @indicatorVC | Board Member & Bone Marrow Donor @GiftofLife | 🎸 | 🏃 | Heat 🏀 | Dolphins 🏈 https://t.co/mZTBIDkchM

New York, USA Katılım Ocak 2011
711 Takip Edilen1.3K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Jonathan Struhl
Jonathan Struhl@Struhl·
6 yrs ago today I had the incredible opportunity of donating bone marrow to Leya, a mother of 4 battling leukemia. Thankful to @GiftofLife for facilitating the entire process & today Leya is cancer free! lmk if you havent been swabbed for the registry nydailynews.com/new-york/leuke…
Manhattan, NY 🇺🇸 English
6
2
41
0
Caitlin Bolnick Rellas
Caitlin Bolnick Rellas@caitlinbolnick1·
Today was a fun day to be a VC. I went from seeing a working robot in the AM to demoing a next-generation interface for AI engagement. Purposely staying a bit vague here 😊 The world of the weird and wonderful has never been more exciting.
English
4
1
39
2.4K
Jonathan Struhl
Jonathan Struhl@Struhl·
@HarryStebbings @gokulr Our best seeds recently have been 30-60M BUT we were able to get our ownership through a combination of a) writing larger check, b) issuing SAFE at lower cap, c) actively buying up secondary, d) investing multiple times before the A. Price matters if you can’t get your ownership.
English
0
0
0
315
Harry Stebbings
Harry Stebbings@HarryStebbings·
Price Does Not Matter At Seed: "At seed and Series A the price almost does not matter if you are right about the company. I invested in the seed round of Faire at a $20M valuation, which was very expensive at the time. That investment ended up returning 200x." @gokulr Do you agree price does not matter at seed @jasonlk @honam @infoarbitrage @Struhl @rabois
Harry Stebbings@HarryStebbings

Most podcasts are BS because they are fluffy and lack substance. This is the densest, most insightful episode you will listen to this year. @gokulr breaks down the 8 defensible moats you need for your company to be successful in a world of AI. 1. Data (Proprietary and inaccessible) 2. Workflow (Deeply embedded operations) 3. Regulatory (Licenses and contracts) 4. Distribution (Exclusive proprietary channels) 5. Ecosystem (Third-party platform reliance) 6. Network (Marketplace liquidity density) 7. Physical (Infrastructure and atoms) 8. Scale (Low cost through volume) (Links below)

English
18
6
45
46.9K
Turner Novak 🍌🧢
Turner Novak 🍌🧢@TurnerNovak·
Just figured out an EPIC hack to win this: 1) go to every game 2) update your final pick with 1 second left on the clock before it hits the system and locks 3) go 63/63 4) win $1 billion
Kalshi@Kalshi

The $1 Billion Kalshi Perfect Bracket Challenge $1 Billion for a perfect bracket $1 Million guaranteed to the top scoring bracket $1 Million to charity and scholarships See the full rules and submit your bracket: kalshi.com/billion-dollar… No purchase or deposit required. SIG Parametrics, LLC, a member of the Susquehanna International Group of Companies, is financially backing this promotion.

English
9
2
43
42.3K
Harry Stebbings
Harry Stebbings@HarryStebbings·
Seed stage founders today have a clear misunderstanding about the state of media. Sadly, press do not care about seed round announcements. Move on. Build the business. Enough said.
English
30
4
144
16.9K
Drew Oetting
Drew Oetting@andrewoetting·
@Struhl @HarryStebbings Tbh that’s badass. When I was doing seed I never had the balls to run anywhere close to that concentrated. @HarryStebbings reminds me of our convo from long ago about Kelly Criterion bet sizing in seed. I’d imagine across 3 funds = statistically significant selection ability
English
1
0
1
41
Harry Stebbings
Harry Stebbings@HarryStebbings·
LPs love the idea of the 30M-75M high ownership seed fund. These will be the worst performing funds of this vintage. Average top tier seed rounds are $5M. These funds don’t have enough to lead and have a diversified portfolio. But they are too large to be collaborative and work with the best leads. Adverse selection takes effect. Be small enough to collaborate (sub $20M) or be large enough to lead ($100M+).
English
50
12
169
96.9K
Jonathan Struhl
Jonathan Struhl@Struhl·
@HarryStebbings True. You also have to stay away from shiny objects and can’t compete for hot deals. We don’t do anything with a .ai
English
1
0
0
260
Harry Stebbings
Harry Stebbings@HarryStebbings·
@Struhl It can work but you have to be such a good picker. Like such a good picker. I promise 99% of those with this fund size aren’t that picker.
English
1
0
5
1K
nihal
nihal@nihalmehta·
Nothing brings a VC inner peace quite like an LP distribution day. 😊
English
13
2
106
7.7K
Shahzad Younas
Shahzad Younas@ShahzadYounas_·
Another Israeli company bought by big tech at some mad premium. It was stealth. It has zero revs. Apple's second largest acquisition ever approx $2bn. Yet another grubby deal to get tech funds into Israel. Another deal that stinks tbh. Who is pulling the strings on this stuff?
Tom Hulme@thulme

Congrats to the brilliant Q.ai Ltd team: they’ve been acquired by @Apple, marking Apple’s 2nd largest acquisition ever 🚀 It’s been a pleasure to work with Aviad, Yonatan and Avi since we co-led their Seed in 2022 with our friends at Aleph (coinvestors with us in Lemonade and Simply). What they’ve built, entirely in stealth, at the intersection of AI and physics has the potential to transform communication. At Apple, their innovation will have the opportunity to reach global audiences. We are going to deeply miss working with them, they are extraordinarily smart, high integrity and tenacious. After the horrendous Oct 7th attack in 2023 approximately 30% of the company were drafted into military service, and for months afterwards our meetings were interrupted as the team had to scramble into bomb shelters, this slowed them down less than I could have imagined and not once did they complain, instead their energy was focused on supporting their community and making technical breakthroughs. Congrats from all of us @GVteam !

English
25
157
1.2K
77.8K
Nicole DeTommaso 🪄
Nicole DeTommaso 🪄@nic_detommaso·
Finding funds that 𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑙𝑦 invest in pre-seed is hard. Here's a list of some I know do A LOT of pre-seed (add to comments): Hustle Fund Everywhere Ventures Pear VC Antler Wonder Ventures Forum Ventures Precursor Ventures Wischoff Ventures Nido Ventures Plug and Play Tech Center Gaingels Amplify LA Dorm Room Fund MBA Ventures Unshackled Ventures Torch Capital Rally Cap Cortado Ventures LvlUp Ventures Ganas Ventures Symphonic Capital Alpaca VC Deciens Capital Afore Capital The Council GoAhead Ventures Barrel Ventures Enzo Ventures Redbud VC Next Wave NYC f7 Ventures Recall Capital Launch Factory Kiplin Capital Better Tomorrow Ventures Incisive Ventures Boost VC Outlander VC XRC Ventures Basis Set BoxGroup What are others?
English
123
64
750
78K
Jason Shuman
Jason Shuman@JasonrShuman·
15 months ago I met Meltem at a VCs wedding in Turkey. A couple of weeks ago she thought we were getting dinner with an LP of ours… She even asked for a briefing on the way. Instead she became my fiancée. #Engaged
Jason Shuman tweet media
English
124
3
707
278.6K
Chris Barber
Chris Barber@chrisbarber·
Charlie Songhurst and I are drafting (pls spot errors) a list of investors who started funds without working in VC: 1. @ItzSuds: SF1 (2025) 2. @gefkovicz, @benmtaft: Genius Ventures (2024) 3. Fiona Leng: Xtal (2024) 4. @kokoxsu, @carloagostinel2: Nova (2024) 5. Sunny Sandhu, Manraj Singh Sandhu: Vicus Ventures (2024) 6. @v_maini: Mythos (2023) 7. @erica_wenger: Park Rangers Capital (2023) 8. @mollyfmielke: Moth Fund (2022) 9. @alanaagoyal: Basecase Capital (2022) 10. @simarsmangat: Magic Ventures (2022) 11. @jm: LMNT Ventures (2022) 12. @andrewvigneault: Flexcap (2022) 13. @sophiaamoruso: Trust Fund (2022) 14. @NWischoff: Wischoff Ventures (2022) 15. @kanjun, @RohdeAli, @joshalbrecht: Outset (2022) 16. @packyM: Not Boring (2021) 17. @paigefinnn, @jslishi: Behind Genius (2021) 18. @davefontenot, @EmilyatHF0, @escliu: HF0 (2021) 19. @jackbplatts, @rphmeier: Hypersphere (2020) 20. @LFarleigh, @zachperret: Mischief (2020) 21. @cory: Z Fellows (2020) 22. @lachygroom: LGF (2020) 23. @Joshuabrowder: Browder Capital (2020) 24. @eladgil: Cosmic / Gil Capital / Gil & Co (2020) 25. @joshbuckley: Buckley Ventures (2019) 26. @tnachen: Essence VC (2019) 27. @avichal and @curtis0x: Electric Capital (2018) 28. @DakinSloss: Prime Movers Lab (2018) 29. @ramtinnaimi: Abstract Ventures (2018) 30. @etarczynski: Contrary (2017) 31. @zxocw: Polychain (2016) 32. @IanRountree: Cantos (2016) 33. @AriannaSimpson, @tikhon (@AlexBangash also involved): Crystal Towers (2015) 34. @pmarca and @bhorowitz: a16z (2009) 35. @peterthiel, @KenHowery, Luke Nosek: Founders Fund (2005) Excluded if one of the founders worked full-time in startup investing for >1 yr. Still included if: vc advisor, scout, intern or a <1 yr stint
English
44
11
160
24.8K
Jonathan Struhl
Jonathan Struhl@Struhl·
How do we realistically build a city on Mars? Here it is.
Ti Morse@ti_morse

First interview with Saurav Shroff (@SauravShroff5), co-founder & CEO of Starpath (@StarpathSpace). We talk about what it takes to build a self-sustaining city on Mars, creating rocket propellent production plants on the Moon and Mars, and selling solar panels to satellite companies. 0:40 Inputs to create a self-sustaining city on Mars 3:53 Creating rocket propellent production plants 6:21 How much a Nasa rover costs to build 8:02 Building solar panels 15:51 Scaling Starship production 17:56 Why it’s important to make life multi-planetary 24:16 Starting Starpath 26:53 Creating the first 10 Starpath rovers 31:20 Rover testing 33:09 How to simulate Martian soil on Earth 35:11 What if SpaceX didn’t exist 40:14 Keeping fast iteration loops as you scale 49:19 How many Starships it takes to make Mars viable 1:02:43 What are Starpath’s biggest risks 1:11:31 Finding talent that’s aligned with the mission 1:15:30 Living on Mars 1:18:46 Idiot index in the space industry

English
0
0
5
207