Sugar💕😍

NEW: Lionel Messi and Jude Bellingham's chances to win the World Cup Golden Ball (MVP) are SPIKING on Kalshi: 49% — Lionel Messi 33% — Jude Bellingham 8% — Rodri 5% — Harry Kane 2% — Lamine Yamal

He was not sent off for diving. He just got a yellow card for simulation. What can the ref even do if he already had a yellow?

this scene make me sick to my stomach im glad aegon smashed that stupid ass miniature he spent his life building viserys targaryen u are a nothing

Lol. You’re grasping at straws here. Nobody said football has to be played one way. Nobody said Ronaldo had to play like Messi. Nobody said Ronaldo was only goals. That’s a straw man. The argument is not “Messi looks better on the ball, therefore he is better.” The argument is that Messi has the stronger total case: trophies, individual awards, goalscoring, playmaking, dribbling, chance creation, control of games, and overall influence. Ronaldo has his own profile and he mastered it at an all-time level: movement, finishing, heading, weak foot, athleticism, big moments, UCL dominance and longevity. That is clear. But different profile does not automatically mean equal level. A player can be great in his own style and still not be greater than another player who affects more areas of the game. Messi was competing with Ronaldo in goalscoring, while also competing with players like Xavi, Iniesta, Özil, De Bruyne, Bruno and Modrić in playmaking and chance creation. That’s the difference. Messi was not just aesthetically pleasing. He was functionally elite in multiple areas of football. He could score like an elite forward, create like an elite playmaker, dribble like an elite winger, and control games like an elite midfielder. And even in goalscoring, Messi has more European Golden Shoes, so the idea that Ronaldo owns that lane completely is not even true. Ronaldo was one of football’s greatest final weapons. Messi was the final weapon, the creator, and the controller of the attack. Also, saying assists depend on teammates is convenient because goals also depend on teammates: service, crosses, cutbacks, through balls, penalties won, and chances created. So if you want to reduce assists because of teammates, you have to apply the same logic to goals too. And let’s be honest: if Ronaldo was the one functionally elite across more areas of football while Messi was mostly dominant in one lane, would Ronaldo fans still accept “they are equal”? If Ronaldo had more Ballon d’Ors, more Golden Shoes, more trophies, a World Cup, more playmaking awards, more assists, more dribbling influence, more chance creation and more control of games, nobody would be saying “they are equal.” They would say Ronaldo is clear. That’s why the equality argument feels forced. Ronaldo’s case is strongest in goals, UCL dominance, mentality and longevity. Messi’s case stretches across goalscoring, playmaking, dribbling, chance creation, passing, match control, individual awards and team trophies. And no, the World Cup is not the only thing that puts Messi above Ronaldo. Before the World Cup, Messi already had the stronger all-round case. The World Cup did not create Messi’s superiority. It removed the last excuse. So the question is simple: If Messi can stand with Ronaldo in goals, while Ronaldo cannot stand with Messi in playmaking, dribbling, chance creation and control of games, what exactly are they equal at functionally? Ronaldo is one of the greatest footballers ever. But “different profile” is not the same as “equal to Messi.” Being different explains Ronaldo. It does not erase Messi’s edge.

7 goals in 5 World Cup games, I’m sorry what Erling haaland is doing for Norway is far more impressive than Mbappe at France.

If you had the opportunity to sign one of: - Morgan Rogers - Nico Paz - Bradley Barcola - Iliman Ndiaye For Chelsea, who would it be? Surely Barcola, right?