Make America Free Again

@DefiantLs Based??? I don't get it, why is this a bad thing?

Joy Reid: "There were no income taxes, there were no regulations on business. You could earn as much money as you want and leave 100% of it to your children with no taxes. That's the world they want back."

@UziCryptoo That's why you have a 30k standard deduction. So you already dont pay taxes on those things

HOT TAKE: IF BUSINESSES ONLY HAVE TO PAY TAXES ON PROFIT, NOT REVENUE, THEN I SHOULD ONLY HAVE TO PAY TAXES AFTER I'VE PAID ALL MY BILLS AND RENT.

@SenWarren Why don’t you guys eliminate fraud before asking for more money?

@NateSilver538 Why is wall street apes considered right leaning exactly? Also Elon was left to center his whole life, he didn't change, the left went crazy so a historically left tof center position is now considered right leaning

These are the Twitter/X accounts with the most engagement so far in 2026. I suppose I had some intuition for how bad it was, but jeez, this is what you get when the ecosystem is broken.

@ShahrazzAa @GerardAlba Definitely not, 99% of people still have no idea

@TErickson87 @GerardAlba That’s baked into the stock already. So what’s the upside?

Investing in $TSLA is waiting for ever for things that will never happen. The end.

@VanjaPoker Facing an overbet he is never jamming the jack high flush. He would only get called by better hands and would fold out all worse hands. The nut flush is literally his only value hand in that spot. So the question is does he have bluffs. I think that answer is also no.

The Andrew Robl hand caused a lot of debate. Here is my take: Personally, I would just jam the river, not small OB. When we don’t face bluff jam and aren’t getting raised by a weaker flush, our hand mainly wants to go all-in, imo. As played, we have to think about two things: - Is Gavri jamming worse for value? - Is he find bluffs here? We are getting a decent price. He just needs to find 2-3 worse combos and we make money by calling, so folding here is pretty tough. Everyone saying “easy fold” is just not thinking about this spot enough. Versus a player type that is not finding bluffs here and likely not jamming so fast with worse, folding seems good. But again, it’s easy to say after the cards are revealed. If Gavri had a J-high flush, everyone would berate Robl. The hand basically shows how result-oriented people are. What’s your take here?

@Denver4VA Under democrat regimes governments post to appease the woke religion all of the time.

This is inappropriate. Government accounts should not be posting religious content. This isn’t Iran.

@FinanceJack44 My car drives itself, that's why. This has not yet shown up in earnings, but will soon

For the $TSLA bulls out there, can you please explain to me why it deserves to trade at 330x earnings? $PLTR I can understand at 226x because it is growing revenue 70% with margin expansion. Tesla has no revenue growth over the past 2 years... I'm genuinely listening here, bring your best stuff.

@OffThePress1 No, the opposite. To assert the right to live in someone else's home without paying them is violence. It is you claiming the right to the fruits of their labor

🚨WATCH: Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-MA) claims "eviction is an act of violence."

@RobKuhn_ @ICuRaRook You really think the 3rd or 4th nut flush is value shoving over a 130% pot bet?

@ICuRaRook But he doesnt have to be bluffing, could over value J/10xx of hearts

I'm in shock Robl is on another level

@Cernovich If you decide to buy one let me send you a referral code

Last time I was in a Tesla, FSD was so-so and no Grok. Feel like I time traveled.

@Cernovich @thejefflutz Makes you want to go buy some tesla stock doesn't it.

Rode with a friend who has a Tesla FSD and kept asking Grok questions to fill in some gaps he had and man this is living in the future. How the hell is anyone still an Elon doubter.

@Jason Except the democrats fought so hard to protect fraud that they deposed the DOGE boys as an intimidation tactic. The fraud is the point. Their whole view of government is wielding power to help their friends. No one actually cares about solving problems.

Do you feel your tax dollars go to missiles, boomers who own their homes and institutionalized fraud? Do you feel both parties are completely out of touch and captured by extremists and elites? You’re America First and might be convinced to be American Only

@twit_grim @JOBhakdi Elon doesn't think a crash is coming, he thinks the economy will 10x in 10 years. It is actually the opposite, he needs a cash infusion to turbocharge the growth.

@JOBhakdi Btw, I think that the unseemly haste of the SpaceX IPO, to me, indicates that Musk also thinks a crash is coming. I think he's thought that for about a year. He was scarred by the dotcom crash. They should have built more car factories for the unboxed process.

I don't think an AI crash is coming. Mag7 is driven by massive cash flow growth. Look at NVDA, META and AMZN. Tesla is at the verge of the greatest cash flow explosion since... NVDA (lol). SpaceX is bubbly and stretches the P/E a bit too far for my taste. It's still a good investment in the sense that it will have a decent CAGR, given its massive cash flow potential within 5-10 years, but the odds of it going below IPO price are just extremely high.

I hope you realize that none of your problems are due to billionaires. People become billionaires because they build companies that change the world for the better. You might hate the world's richest man, but he has undoubtably made the world a much better place. He is rich because other people see the things he has done and they place a high value on his companies. If people didn't want to own a share of Elon's companies he would be broke. He has very few assets outside of his ownership in Tesla and SpaceX

@TErickson87 yes, i hope u buy in at 2 trillion+ make the worlds richest man even richer lol

SpaceX just asked Wall Street to price it higher than every company on Earth except Apple, Microsoft, and Nvidia. The math here is wild. They want to raise $75 billion in a single IPO. Saudi Aramco held the record at $29.4 billion in 2019. SpaceX is trying to more than double it. But the real number everyone should focus on is the jump. SpaceX merged with xAI in February at a combined $1.25 trillion valuation. Two months later, they're pitching investors at $2 trillion. That's a $750 billion markup in 60 days. No new product shipped. No new revenue disclosed. Just a filing and a roadshow. That gap reveals how Elon's team views the IPO window. They're not pricing SpaceX based on fundamentals. They're pricing it based on demand scarcity. There is exactly one SpaceX. There will never be another rocket monopoly with 10 million broadband subscribers, $24.4 billion in government contracts, and 165 orbital flights last year. The Starlink business alone is generating stable recurring telecom revenue at monopoly scale. That's the anchor. But the premium above $1 trillion is pure optionality: Starship, Golden Dome missile defense, orbital AI infrastructure. Investors are paying for futures that don't have revenue yet. And here's the part nobody's pricing correctly. The Saudi PIF is reportedly in discussions for a $5 billion anchor stake. The same sovereign fund that pushed Aramco to IPO at a $2 trillion target in 2019 and had to settle for $1.7 trillion. Now they're buying into someone else's $2 trillion IPO. The Saudis learned: if you can't build the future, buy a seat on the rocket. SpaceX is testing whether a single company can absorb more capital in one day than most countries raise in a decade. If the market cooperates, Elon's net worth approaches $500 billion and he controls two separate trillion-dollar public companies. If volatility kills the window, even the best company in the world waits. That's the only real risk here. The company is real. The question is whether June's tape cooperates.

@grok @GerberKawasaki @grok what was the net loss per vehicle, not gross

In 2025, Rivian delivered 42,247 vehicles and reported an automotive gross loss of $432 million (core vehicle business), or about $10,225 per vehicle. Consolidated gross profit was positive $144 million thanks to software/services revenue. For 2026 ("this year"), Rivian is not expected to be profitable overall. Guidance calls for adjusted EBITDA losses of $1.8–2.1 billion, though they target positive automotive gross profit by Q4 and EBITDA breakeven in 2027, with deliveries rising to 62k–67k.

On the other hand, Rivian deliveries were up 30% ! With new models coming and continuing tech improvements, Rivian is the pure EV play now. $RIVN

@SenCortezMasto You left out the part of the 14th amendment that says "and subject to the jurisdiction thereof." Its kind of an important part.

The Fourteenth Amendment is clear: if you’re born in the United States, you’re an American citizen. The Court must swiftly rule against this Administration's shameless effort to subvert the Constitution and advance Stephen Miller's racist agenda.