Revolutionary_TW

really miss having jhekub's creativity on here hope you're doing ok man

@bankons @BubbleBullQ @fvckrender @opepenedition Congrats Reno! Awesome set!!

I didn't want to take @BubbleBullQ spot light yesterday but this legend is a part of the story of my first full set. We worked out a deal for my last piece needed. for @fvckrender @opepenedition 10 edition. Been chasing full set for a while but here yah go... (1/2)

@BubbleBullQ @jackbutcher @ArtOnBlockchain @visualizevalue @opepenedition Congrats! Legendary set

Can't quite believe I'm saying this but... Snowpepen full set is now complete ✅

@cryptocowboy108 Looking forward to it mate

@T_R3volutionary Thank you so much! More to come…

GM, Algo Warriors

The gold vs Bitcoin debate officially ended this week. Nobody called it. The data is conclusive. The implications reshape everything. 2013: Gold crashes 28% $GLD: $25 billion in REDEMPTIONS Investors panic. Flee at first stress. 2025: Bitcoin drops 10% $IBIT: $25 billion in INFLOWS Institutions accumulate. Buy the entire dip. Same drawdown psychology. $50 billion behavioral swing. Opposite directions. This has never occurred for any alternative asset ETF in history. Now check the 2025 flow leaderboard: $IBIT ranked 6th overall $25.4 billion in net flows The ONLY negative performer on the board Every other top fund up 15% to 30% Meanwhile $GLD ran +64% Best gold year since 1979 Hottest precious metals tape in 45 years Bitcoin still out-raised it. While down 10%. Let that sink in. The pension consultants see this data. The endowments see this data. The RIA models are already adjusting. BlackRock didn’t build an ETF. They canonized an asset class. Stocks. Bonds. Real Assets. Bitcoin. 60/40 just became 55/35/5/5. Bookmark this: BTC +30% in 2026 = IBIT pulls $60B to $80B and cracks $150B AUM faster than any fund in history. Screenshot it. 12 months. I own the outcome. Institutions just voted. $25 billion during a correction. While gold ran the tape of its life. They didn’t choose gold. That’s not noise. That’s the signal.

@jackbutcher Massive win

Self Checkout has been acquired by X Museum, Beijing.

@batzdu Congrats batz!

Something else that I am extremely thankful for is that BABY BATZ #2 IS COMING IN 2026!!!! No words can describe the feels.

@HighStakesCap @DaanCrypto @ki_young_ju IBIT inflow/outflow info is always 1 day behind others I believe

@no_context____ @HughMungusFinch Impressive!

@T_R3volutionary @HughMungusFinch about 40 right now

For the set 046 enjoyors. Thank you @HughMungusFinch for contributing to the set 081 submission. Eighty First for 046

@Innerdevcrypto Didnt you already close 50% of your btc position some time ago?

- Btc weekly candle closed under 100k so i stuck to my plan - Sold 50% of the bitcoin i bought around 18k/19k during this weekend since was pretty obvious it would close below 100k - A x5 in 3 years, so very content - And no, will not sell the other 50% at 150k-190k if we get there....always want to have 50% of what i bought at 19k - Will not put this money back in crypto. - Not an ideal time to sell since fear is so high, but a x5 instead of a x6 really is all fine by me - Will probably invest more in eco-farms, growing food, projects related to nature and helping people anyway. All investments will be linked to resilience long term in the face of ai wiping out many jobs, costs of living going up, and my work with inner development. No need to rush things, something will pop up what feels right, will see what the universe brings on my path. - Parking it in usdt & usdc for now (and no...not in risky defi protocols for some yield) before moving it to other investments - Last cycle bought 5k (after 3k bottom) and sold 48k (after 69k top), so no, i am not an expert on timing the bottom and tops, did get a large part of the move. If this is the bottom, so be it...still got 50% - People will say i caved, but the opposite is true. 50% of total net worth basically in bitcoin is still a lot. If i did not believe in the long term potential of bitcoin i would dump at least 95% here and try to buy lower again, but i doubt 4 year cycles still exist so that is why i keep 50% + i remain convinced bitcoin will reach the marketcap of gold within 5 to 10 years - obviously not the best cycle multiplier wise, in 2017 and 2021 did way bigger multipliers (especially with alts), but size wise this is the biggest gain yet since went heavy this time - Trading goes on as usual (not a lot lately, very easy going but still doing ok). - Still buying tesla stock every month with trading-profits as well - Do not copy me. Think for yourself. If bitcoin moves up hard after this, do not come crying to me ¨you told me to sell¨, since i am not telling you that, i am telling you to think for yourself and take responsibility for your own decisions. I am just sharing openly what i do, and as you can see in the post below, i stick to my plan have a lovely day look inside once in a while

@LionSnows Top right

@blue_onchain @opepenedition Only one of this in the collection of 16.000 😉

I'm looking to buy a blue @opepenedition /4 or /5 for a forever PFP

@opepenedition What a collection!

Expanding Node 0x5959...fed9 Received a.c.k., Set 030, Ed. 20 Owns 11 Opepen Node uptime: 930d 6h

@BubbleBullQ @toadswiback Congrats 🥩

Finally

"Consensus Is Temporary" i'm incredibly excited about Opepen V5 - more than i've been for a long time. i think it completes the project beautifully; makes it a true protocol; brings home the gift of a metaphor of it being an internet native museum (🙏 @ArtOnBlockchain). ever since working out how the initial version would work in 2023, one thing was clear to us - it should function as the opposite of Checks. if Checks is a commentary on scarcity, Opepen should be one on abundance. Checks starts with thousand different visuals and ends with one. Opepen starts with one symbol and ends with however many people are interested in making. in the first versions of the protocol we only tangentially hit this principle (there can be an infinite number of set submissions but the collection is capped at 16,000 and that always felt like a missed opportunity to me). at the same time, we have (i think) encountered a negative feedback loop of collectors being very hesitant to opt in to art and artists being discouraged by the high bar / low chances of becoming part of the permanent collection. don't get me wrong; the bar should and will be high, but there shouldn't be economic incentive not to take part in the curative process (and arguably right now there is). V5 will tackle both of these points, and solidify the workings of the protocol long term (we iterated quite a bit on the consensus protocol, and V4 fully solved the opt in / reveal process. we feel confident we can protocolize this - it's tried and tested by now). 1) when V5 goes live, sets can be cleared of their currently exhibited art. all Opepen tokens will become unrevealed and the set slot will be free for the next exhibition. 2) the exact conditions for losing consensus are yet to be defined, but expect them to be much lower than what is required for reaching consensus. 3) when a set submission reaches consensus, it is revealed unto the next free slot (probably; still thinking through a potential alternative approach). it is already clear that Opepen will never reach all 200 sets (some tokens are burned, some are in lost wallets) - but that is besides the point: Checks is complete even without one Black Check in existence. We want Opepen to feel the same way. It is complete when the protocol works; indefinitely. and as mentioned earlier - i think this will create a much more interesting bar for collectors to judge submissions to Opepen and be more welcoming to artists that give their hearts and souls with their contributions. remember no one earns anything from this (nothing monetary at least), neither the artists nor us; and that's how it should be - a celebration of intrinsic motivation and decentralized consensus building while using financialized assets to approximate truth / value. and if we're right; this will work indefinitely - and if built right even past VV's existence. "Exhibited in Opepen; Mar 2026" is a celebration, not a failure. appreciate all of you; with love!

@backseats_eth @jalilwahdat @jackbutcher @ArtOnBlockchain Depending on the threshold it can still be the majority I think?

@jalilwahdat @jackbutcher @ArtOnBlockchain Doesn’t resetting consensus with a lower threshold just lead to a tyranny of the minority?

@0xDigitalOil @trilliveNFT @hkm_crypto @F1rstclassJG @jackbutcher Ah explains it!

@T_R3volutionary @trilliveNFT @hkm_crypto @F1rstclassJG @jackbutcher Ah, it was a trade of a 001 for another 001

Grails flying in the last 24h ✍🏻! - Opepen Set 004, Ed. 10 sold for 4 ETH ($16K) to @hkm_crypto - Opepen Set 001, Ed. 40 sold for 9.5 ETH ($38K) to @F1rstclassJG Both absolute grails — generational scoops 🤝🏻!

@0xDigitalOil @trilliveNFT @hkm_crypto @F1rstclassJG @jackbutcher Haha no worries. Thanks for your reply

@T_R3volutionary @trilliveNFT @hkm_crypto @F1rstclassJG @jackbutcher Shit total mind lapse. Shows as transferred, not even sold. I have no memory of how this happened.