Tea Lover

Banning accounts for parody, satire, or sarcasm directed at politicians is neither logical nor defensible. Political expression, especially criticism, is meant to be uncomfortable. Suppressing it simply because it offends sets a dangerous precedent. Account blocks are justified only when content crosses into incitement of violence, promotion of terrorism, or poses a clear threat to public order or national security. Beyond that threshold, disagreement, even sharp or mocking, remains protected speech. At the same time, I am not a free speech absolutist. If someone is abusive, spreads fake news, or violates the law through their online activity, action should be taken against the specific offence through due process. Just as in real life, if someone breaks the law, you punish them accordingly, but you do not permanently strip them of their right to speak again. Suspending or silencing an entire platform of expression is therefore disproportionate and undermines fundamental freedoms. Supporting such overreach may feel convenient when it targets others, but the same logic will inevitably be used against you. You will not be in power forever, and once this precedent is set, opponents, if they come to power, will return it in kind.

Visited the Udaan Yatri café at Mumbai Airport and had chai for just ₹10. Was flying to Delhi and wanted chai before the flight. Spoke to several travellers while I was there. All of them happy, all of them saying the same thing: Easy on the pocket, good service, value for money. Affordable airport food is possible. And this is proof☕ ✈️

😇

Indira Gandhi international Airport, Delhi. Madhavi Latha entered a women’s prayer room and began performing Puja Archana in the presence of Muslim women who were offering Namaz (prayers). Prayer rooms in public places are designated for silence, respect, and personal devotion, where every individual should be able to pray without interruption

Hit me with the craziest Mumbai history facts you know.