Oooh Teddy
616 posts


@weballzhard @TeddyTalkin @Leonlittle5045 @LegacyProgramVP Irresponsible people like @TeddyTalkin can get people killed with their poor comprehension of case law.
English

People can speculate all they want to about the situation with Dalton Eatherly, aka ChudtheBuilder, and Joshua Fox, but the surveillance video was used in determining who was at fault and that’s why Dalton was charged like he was, not because they’re trying to make an example out of him, because they’re oppressing him and his rights, or whatever goofy claims his followers are saying.
Here’s the deal: Dalton’s whole schtick was people shouldn’t react over words. They were in a verbal altercation. If Dalton went to draw his weapon and threatened to use it because of “words”, it’s very plausible that Fox reacted to save his own life. If someone draws a weapon on you or is attempting to, your true “fight or flight” instinct will kick in.
That video will eventually surface, and maybe even the livestream. But right now, it’s clear that Dalton was at fault here according to authorities and because he shot sporadically, hitting Fox, himself, and other buildings in the area where people walk to/from and work in, that’s why Dalton’s bond is so high: he’s a public danger and liability.
Video credit: @SeeRacists
English

@trad_west_ Didn’t this guy get one of his constituents fired for criticizing Israel? And wasn’t he busted liking pictures of muscular dudes with their shirts off?
English

@TheBrancaShow @Cici_94Percent @LeeJezzy6 @LegacyProgramVP Hey Andrew, big fan. Could you point me toward where I could find good information on the Martin/Zimmerman case?
English

Trayvon Martin was kicked out of school when his locker was found to contain stolen jewelry. Burglary tools were found in a bush near where Martin attacked George Zimmerman. Martin had video on his phone of engaging in street fighting, using precisely the same techniques he used on Zimmerman. Martin, this "child", had photos on his phone of his unlawful possession of drugs and guns, wearing a gold grill on his teeth. Martin attempted to murder an armed man who was doing nothing but chatting with police and watching over his community.
That's the thug.
English

WHAT A GREAT DAY FOR DALTON EATHERLY!
TLDR: The State's case against Eatherly appears to be utterly lacking in ANY LEGAL MERIT WHATEVER, based upon what appears to be the official Affidavit of Complaint just made public (attached).
This in a case in which the State's BURDEN is proof of guilt, and disproof of self-defense, beyond ANY REASONABLE DOUBT.
All of it: So, it appears the affidavit of complaint against Dalton "Chud the Builder" Eatherly has been made public, and the contents will ABSOLUTELY SHOCK many of you.
FIRST SHOCKER: THERE IS NOT A SINGLE WORD ABOUT DALTON HAVING UTTERED ANY RACIAL SLUR TOWARDS JOSHUA FOX WHATEVER, SO AS TO HAVE PROVOKED THE FIGHT AND THUS TO HAVE LOST THE LEGAL JUSTIFICATION OF SELF-DEFENSE.
NOT. ONE. WORD.
That was Dalton's biggest potential vulnerability on self-defense, and we can now be confident that we can put that concern to rest.
But it gets even BETTER for Dalton.
SECOND SHOCKER: Even if self-defense IS NOT EVEN CONSIDERED, the Affidavit of Complaint fails to present ANY evidence-based narrative that Dalton has committed ANY CRIME WHATEVER. (But, of course, self-defense WILL be raised, only further buttressing Dalton's legal position.)
Specifically, there's literally not a SINGLE WORD in this Affidavit of Complaint that describes ANY criminal conduct whatever.
I've embedded the Affidavit in my possession, but for purposes of succinctness, the relevant portions reads:
"... Dalton Eatherly and Joshua Fox engaged in a verbal altercation in front of the Montgomery County Courthouse."
This is not a crime, unless it's merely the misdemeanor of disorderly conduct, which would apply equally to both Eatherly AND Foxx. And in any case Eatherly has not been charged with disorderly conduct (nor Fox, of course).
"During this verbal altercation, Mr. Eatherly turned his body in a bladed stance towards Mr. Fox ..."
There's nothing unlawful about taking a defensive stance when dealing with an angry antagonist. Certainly Eatherly is not charged with the "crime" of "taking a bladed stance."
"... and reached for his firearm located in his right jacket pocket."
Again, there's nothing unlawful about reaching for a firearm in one's pocket in preparation for possible necessary self-defense. Note that Eatherly is not charged with the "crime" of "reaching for a firearm in located in his right jacket pocket."
"Thereafter, a physical altercation ensued."
Note the passive voice. The "altercation ensued." There's no claim that EATHERLY initiated the "altercation."
Indeed, if anything, to the extent the affidavit has detailed Eatherly's conduct, the absence of any representation of his conduct to indicate that it was EATHERLY who initiated the altercation, we can only infer that it was instead FOX who initiated the altercation.
This would, of course, make Eatherly the VICTIM of Fox's unlawful attack upon him.
The next paragraph: "Mr. Eatherly discharged his firearm, striking Mr. Fox multiple times."
There's nothing inherently unlawful about discharging a firearm and shooting someone multiple times. Thousands of shootings that fit this description occur every year, and qualify as perfectly lawful self-defense. Of course, now self-defense need actually be put on the table.
Then there's a discussion of Fox being flown to a hospital, followed by: "In addition, at the time shots were fired, there were several innocent bystanders in the area. Surveillance video fo the incident shows a ricocheting projectile hitting nearby walls."
Again, there is nothing inherently unlawful about firing shots that miss the intended target. Police involved in lawful shootings of suspects routinely miss about 70% of the shots fired. Those shots ALSO go flying about the neighborhood until they hit something. None of that is a crime, absent evidence of recklessness--and the affidavit provides no statement of recklessness. Indeed, not a word of recklessness.
Note that if the shots were fired in lawful self-defense, as a matter of law they were not fired recklessly.
I would also note that there's not a word in this affidavit that even contests, much less contradicts, even a single legal element of Dalton's anticipated claim of self-defense. Not Innocence, not Imminence, not Proportionality, not Avoidance, and Not Reasonableness.
Not a single element. Not a word of it.
If this were a civil case, I would argue that this complaint fails to state a cause of action.
Indeed, it's hard to recall the last time I saw an Affidavit of Complaint so utterly lacking in legal substance whatever.
At this point I have to say that I've never felt more positive about Dalton Eatherly's claim of self-defense, at least based upon the representations of this apparently official "Affidavit of Complaint."
If these facts provided in this Affidavit of Complaint are all the State of Tennessee has on which to prosecute Dalton on the attempted murder, aggravated assault, reckless endangerment, and malicious firearms possession charges brought against him, I simply don't see any prospect to any reasonable degree of legal certainty of prosecutors securing a conviction on any of those charges beyond a reasonable doubt on the legal merits.
HEY! IF YOU LIKE THIS KIND OF USE-OF-FORCE LEGAL ANALYSIS, and would like to know more about how to be HARD TO CONVICT if YOU are ever compelled to defend yourself, your family, or your property against criminal predation, consider picking up a FREE copy of my best-selling plain-English book, "The Law of Self-Defense: Principles" (we only ask that you cover the S&H).
lawofselfdefense.com/FREEBOOK
@AmiriKing @ArchetypeTheory @JackPosobiec @DLoesch @Timcast @TheOfficerTatum @MyronGainesX @TateTheTalisman

English

@wirbelsturm13 @weballzhard @LegacyProgramVP Trayvon Martin attacked George Zimmerman and was shot and killed. It depends on the state, but you can absolutely shoot someone for swinging on you if you believe you are in imminent danger.
English

@paleochristcon @Ghost_Groyper Maybe if they weren’t starting new wars and getting rid of the people releasing the Epstien files they might be able to carry that Trump 24 momentum into the midterms. However, younger conservatives aren’t going to simp for Israel. Goodwill is hard earned and MAGA burned theirs.
English

@Ghost_Groyper Republicans will likely lose the midterms. It's common and predictable.
English

@MoronMining Now ask them what they would like to do with republicans.
English

@EnglarBrian @OriginalBrettC @GP1800SVHO @Leonlittle5045 @LegacyProgramVP Uh oh guys, look out! It’s an internet tough guy… lmao it’s so clear when some Redditor that doesn’t know jack shit about self defense is talking tough. Keep chimpin out, pussy. Someday some one will cash in on that tough guy bravado.
English

@OriginalBrettC @GP1800SVHO @TeddyTalkin @Leonlittle5045 @LegacyProgramVP Chud is the pussy you fucking clown. Who the fuck talks shit then plays the victim and pulls a gun when they can’t back up their words like a man? And what kind of pathetic simps would support that pussy behavior? You all keep reaching new lows.
English

@TeddyTalkin @Leonlittle5045 @LegacyProgramVP No boomer here you weak fucken coward. It has everything to do w/ your racist hero. Everything you said was a coward fucken lie that you can’t substantiate. Chud’s life wasn’t in danger, it was always his intent to murder someone offended by his racism and he said exactly that.
English

@wirbelsturm13 @Leonlittle5045 @LegacyProgramVP Lol, ok internet tough guy. If someone physically attacks you without a weapon you are absolutely within your rights to shoot them. It’s called imminent threat of bodily harm. Life ain’t no video game. People get killed in fist fights.
English

@TeddyTalkin @Leonlittle5045 @LegacyProgramVP Murder? The guy had fists and no firearm. Y’all act like you’ve never been in a brawl. Fuckin’ pussies.
English

@GP1800SVHO @Leonlittle5045 @LegacyProgramVP Idk wtf you are talking about. This has nothing to do with what I said. You fuckin boomers can’t argue your way out of a wet paper sack.
English

@TeddyTalkin @Leonlittle5045 @LegacyProgramVP Sure you don’t, sure you don’t. Anyone who’s ok w/ a 10 year old being racially attacked and bullied while walking down the street for no other reason than being the skin color you’ve been raised to hate is indeed racist. Thats Chud for you. As vile and racist as it gets.
English

@Leonlittle5045 @LegacyProgramVP I don’t hate black people; they are made in the image of God. I do despise degenerate behavior and people who think murder is permissible if someone offends you.
English

@LegacyProgramVP no matter how much you try to explain it the chud dickriders are just racist pricks like him and dont care.
English

@itsgoingdown4re @GigaBasedDad Lmfao you fix your own sink, my ass. And if someone breaks in, you are for sure losing that battle. Moreover, who do you appeal to if you need a new sink? Men. Who built that Glock? Men. You can’t get around it sweetie. Women need men.
English

@itsgoingdown4re @GigaBasedDad I don’t hate women. They are amazing. They are uniquely equipped to nurture children. You hate yourself and are jealous of men and are trying to turn women into men.
English

@itsgoingdown4re @GigaBasedDad No. You fucking retard. Men are the enforcement arm of legal system and make up almost the entirety of the military(which women are not needed in) they build the home you live in and all the appliances in it. They show up to fix the shit when it breaks.
English

@ywomendeservles We should be locking these people away from civilized society.
English

@AtheistTakes Galaxy brained argument from the atheists. Wow guys, you really got us with that one.
English














