John Nguyen

266 posts

John Nguyen banner
John Nguyen

John Nguyen

@Tesla4Parents

John Nguyen | Founder of https://t.co/omZ6MGiETB | Elon, Tesla, and parenting | 🌞🔋👨‍👩‍👧 | Tesla Referral Code https://t.co/KCAhesfJZ1

Los Angeles, CA Katılım Ocak 2018
63 Takip Edilen67 Takipçiler
John Nguyen
John Nguyen@Tesla4Parents·
@DavidCarbutt_ From an edge compute perspective that is really impressive. Compare that with officers chasing down Waymo's and not having ability to stop it entering and getting stuck in concrete construction. These edge cases are very appreciated and to see the technology is working.
English
0
0
2
342
John Nguyen
John Nguyen@Tesla4Parents·
Elon shares this during AI day like 5 years ago. Good luck Waymo.
Brivael Le Pogam@brivael

Aujourd'hui grosse discussion avec mes ingés (chez Argil) sur pourquoi Elon a viré le LIDAR de ses voitures autonomes. Choix radical, moqué pendant des années, et comme d'hab il avait raison depuis le début. Le LIDAR c'est un laser qui balaye l'environnement et crache un nuage de points 3D. Sur le papier tu obtiens la géométrie exacte du monde. Dans la vraie vie c'est une verrue technologique collée sur le toit parce qu'on sait pas faire mieux avec la vision seule. Problème numéro un : ça rajoute une modalité dans le training du modèle. Ton réseau doit apprendre à fusionner vision + lidar + radar + ultrasons. Chaque capteur en plus c'est une source de désaccord à arbitrer, pas une source d'info supplémentaire. Sensor fusion artisanale = dette technique permanente. Problème numéro deux, la bitter lesson de Rich Sutton : scaler le compute sur une seule modalité bat systématiquement les architectures bricolées à la main. Tesla a dropé le radar, puis les ultrasons, est passé full end-to-end vision. Leur courbe sur les edge cases s'est accélérée APRÈS, pas avant. Waymo fait l'inverse et reste stuck en ops géofencée. Problème numéro trois, le plus fondamental : le LIDAR voit la géométrie, pas la sémantique. Il sait qu'il y a un truc, pas ce que c'est ni ce que ça va faire. Les derniers 9 de fiabilité sont des problèmes de cognition, pas de perception brute. Un capteur de plus résout rien, il ajoute du bruit. Sébastien Loeb balance une 208 T16 à 180 dans un chemin boueux corse sous la pluie avec zéro LIDAR. Deux yeux, un cerveau. L'évolution a donné des yeux aux prédateurs pendant 500 millions d'années, pas des lasers. Il y a une raison. Le LIDAR c'est l'équivalent du marxisme appliqué à l'économie. Une solution planifiée, centralisée, qui prétend modéliser explicitement ce qui doit émerger d'un système distribué et adaptatif. Tu remplaces l'intelligence par de la mesure, la compréhension par de la donnée, l'émergence par le contrôle. Ça rassure les ingénieurs qui veulent tout spécifier en amont, exactement comme la planif rassurait les économistes soviétiques. Et ça échoue pour les mêmes raisons : la réalité est trop riche pour être capturée par un capteur, comme elle est trop riche pour être capturée par un plan quinquennal. La vraie intelligence, celle de Hayek comme celle de Tesla, c'est de faire confiance à un système qui apprend de l'expérience plutôt que de tout pré-encoder. L'élégance d'une solution c'est son rapport signal sur complexité. Le LIDAR explose le dénominateur. Défendre le LIDAR en 2026 c'est préférer empiler des hacks plutôt que résoudre le vrai problème. C'est de la feignasserie intellectuelle maquillée en rigueur d'ingénieur. Les mêmes gens qui défendaient les systèmes experts en 2012 contre le deep learning. Ils finiront pareil. Never bet against end-to-end. Never bet against la simplicité. Never bet against Elon.

English
0
0
0
92
John Nguyen
John Nguyen@Tesla4Parents·
There's lots of talk about never trusting autonomous driving. But real-world data shows Teslas are WAY safer than humans. Here's what I see every time I drive FSD vs. the humans around me 👇 Safety first for families 👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 tesla4parents.com #TeslaFSD #TeslaSafety
Dr. J. J. Levine@drjjlevine

Watch this full 60 seconds closely. Then watch it again. This isn’t a demo. This is real-world chaos. • Tesla and a Mercedes ahead both slide into a left-turn-only lane to safely pass cyclists • Both return cleanly to the correct lane after safely passing the bikers. • A child on a bike waits at a crosswalk and reaches for the button • Before the lights even turn on, the Tesla is already slowing • The Mercedes keeps going • A Cadillac, going the opposite direction, blasts through illegally while the lights are active Pause there. The Tesla didn’t react to the lights. It reacted to the child. Speed drops early. Controlled stop. Zero drama. Then the cyclists reappear. Tesla carefully eases into the center turn lane, slow and deliberate, gives space, clears them, returns fully to lane, and finishes the drive. No honking. No hesitation. No human guesswork. This is inference. This is anticipation. This is autonomy in the wild. Watch the nuances. The timing. The intent. Tesla FSD is already playing chess while others are playing checkers. Mercedes-Benz and Cadillac show the contrast in real time. $TSLA has won real-world autonomy.

English
0
0
0
12
John Nguyen
John Nguyen@Tesla4Parents·
@damianplayer Mark Cuban nails it — our kids don't just need to learn AI. They need to learn business, leadership, and how to apply these tools to solve real problems. As a dad, that's my mission with my 7-year-old. Not just book smarts — real world reps: 🔧 How to fix things around the house 🤝 How to consider people's emotions when getting a task done 🤖 How to use AI tools like @OpenClaw to help run a business 🧠 How to assess a situation, weigh options, and make good decisions for others Book smart is great. But being useful in the real world? That's what matters. Leadership starts at home.
Damian Player@damianplayer

Mark Cubans advice on selling AI agents to SMBs is the MOST underrated clip on the internet right now. here’s the full play he didn’t break down (bookmark this): pick one vertical. learn the flows. become the AI team they never hired and wish they had. you really don’t need a CS degree or VC money. you need claude, a cold email sequence, and the willingness to learn one industry better than anyone. bonus, find an industry leader who knows nothing about AI but knows everything about their business. partner with them. bring AI into their operations. you increase EBITDA. you increase multiples. you own a piece of the upside. this is the business model of the decade.

English
0
0
1
25
John Nguyen retweetledi
Michelle Maxwell ™
Michelle Maxwell ™@MichelleMaxwell·
I had to eat what my Mom made or I didn’t eat. With my daughters I made the mistake of catering to them(short order cook). Now my grandson is back to you either what is made or you don’t eat.I think each generation adapts&learns from mistakes.I can admit my parents knew best,you?
English
54
286
2K
99.2K
John Nguyen
John Nguyen@Tesla4Parents·
The future bottleneck isn't chips — it's energy. Not just for data centers. For families. For everyone. As we scale up chips, robots, and AI agents — Earth needs massively more power. This is what Elon keeps saying: concentrate enough energy production in one area to serve the whole country. China already gets this. SpaceX building their own data centers in space helps. But the real shift? AI agents like OpenClaw becoming the family hub — managing your home, then telling Optimus what to do. The limitation was always energy. Now we're finally seeing why.
Rohan Paul@rohanpaul_ai

🇨🇳 The scale of China’s electricity projects is just on another level. A hillside in rural Guizhou, China covered in solar panels. Thousands of them stretched across mountain ridges to the horizon, transforming bare rock into terawatt-hour electricity.

English
0
0
1
17
John Nguyen
John Nguyen@Tesla4Parents·
I always thought that faith, character, discipline, persistence, grit, and leadership were the most important things for our kids to learn. Even before AI technology was mainstream, I thought that being creative, being relational, and being able to inspire others is what really provided value. I agree that with AI replacing technical skills, those skills are probably even more important in the future.
Teslaconomics@Teslaconomics

I might get some pushback for this, but I honestly think a lot of parents, especially in places like Silicon Valley and especially many Asian parents, are training their kids for the wrong world. I see kids at the age of 7-8 packed with after-school math, more reading, more test prep, with the goal to make them “smarter.” But from my perspective, living deep in the AI world every single day, I’m pretty sure raw intelligence is about to become a commodity. Very soon, AI is going to do math better than the best mathematician, it’ll diagnose better than top doctors around the world, it’ll draft contracts better than elite lawyers, and it’ll learn faster than any PhD, instantly, endlessly, and without any fatigue. All of that knowledge will live right in your pocket. So think about it… if we’re raising kids to win by being “the smartest in the room,” we’re really training them for something that’s already being replaced. In my opinion, this is a waste of time, $, and effort. What I focus on with my kids is very different. I care about willpower. I care about passion. I care about loving something enough to stick with it, especially when it feels hard. And as a Dad, my job is to support that, whatever it is, and teach them to never give up. I could be totally wrong though… But when I look at where AI is headed, I don’t think the future belongs to the kid who memorized the most formulas or did the most math problems, etc. In the future, I think the winners are going to be kids who 1/ can push through frustration 2/ can stay curious 3/ can keep going deeper into their passions than others 4/ can use AI tools to build cool things 5/ has the will power to never give up In this day and age, school doesn’t really teach this and I don’t think after-school classes teach that either. I don’t think any of this can really be taught at school tbh, it’s something that is developed inside the home through the environment we as parents cultivate. In a world where AI will help you build anything, create anything, and learn anything instantly, I don’t think the real edge will be intelligence anymore like the past. The edge will come down to grit, discipline, emotional strength, and to keep going as others quit. AI will be so deeply woven into our kids’ lives whether we like it or not. That part is unavoidable. However, what is avoidable is raising kids who only know how to follow instructions, chase grades, and wait for approval. I always tell my kids, I don’t care what grade you get in a test. I care that you know what you got wrong, why you got it wrong, and what you’re doing to avoid that mistake in the future. Because I firmly believe in the future, the kids who will thrive the most will be the ones who want something badly enough to go after it, who aren’t afraid to fail, and those who know how to leverage AI. Just my two cents. But if we’re serious about the future, I think it’s time parents start training for that world, NOT the one we grew up in.

English
0
0
0
36
John Nguyen
John Nguyen@Tesla4Parents·
The value of full self-driving, able to pick up anyone—kids, older parents who can't drive, or someone who's really tired—and take them safely and immediately where needed, is priceless. We've seen it protect elderly parents who can't drive and get them to the right places. Future subscription prices for full self-driving will be unimaginably high. While we can still get it for $8,000, it's a no-brainer. It makes any car valuable in the future, as it's not the vehicle itself but the software that adds the expense.
Jack Brandt@JJackBrandt

x.com/i/article/2019…

English
0
0
0
12
Sawyer Merritt
Sawyer Merritt@SawyerMerritt·
It’s worth noting that Tesla’s 1.1M active FSD subscriptions figure is as of Dec 31, 2025, and Tesla provided over 1.5M HW4 Tesla owners in North America with a ~45-day free trial of FSD V14 in late Nov/early Dec. Because all those trials ended in January 2026, any owners who subscribed to FSD for $99/month after their trial expired are not included in the 1.1M subscription count, so when you pair that with outright FSD purchases ending on Feb 14th, it's possible we could see a decently large jump in active FSD subscription in the Q2 earnings report.
Sawyer Merritt tweet media
English
81
73
1.4K
113.7K
John Nguyen retweetledi
谢嘉琪
谢嘉琪@XieJackie·
🚨浙江高速上一辆特斯拉Model3被追尾,几乎被压成废铁! 当时载着一家老小,后方大货车高速撞上,直接把车装进旁边卡车底下,整车面目全非! 🚀但撞击瞬间,气囊全部弹出,车窗自动下降、车门解锁,车辆未起火。车主全家安全下车,还在现场拍照发朋友圈。两个月后,车主又买了一辆ModelY!
中文
245
888
5.9K
1.1M
John Nguyen
John Nguyen@Tesla4Parents·
Cybertruck batteries just make so much sense for emergency backups, especially during this black ice storm. You can't drive, so the truck doesn't need to really go anywhere, but you need power at home, which the truck can deliver up to 9 power walls' worth. I was talking to other parents about buying power generators before this storm, and just made so much sense to have a powered vehicle that had 9 Tesla walls in it. As parents and DIY-ers, we always think about ways of knocking out two birds with one stone. A Cybertruck just makes so much sense, but as a parent and a DIY-er, it's like a double wambi
Cybertruck@cybertruck

Home backup capacity of 9 Powerwalls Also, I’ll drive you wherever you want

English
0
0
0
23
John Nguyen retweetledi
Ray
Ray@ray4tesla·
Was FSD being sentient here? How did FSD anticipate that the truck turning right might encroach into its left-turn lane, and proactively leave enough space for it?
English
315
206
4.6K
499.8K
John Nguyen retweetledi
Martha 🌑🚀
Martha 🌑🚀@MyTeslaMoonship·
An act so small made me so shocked!!! I saw there was a box ahead, I was fine with FSD driving over the box, but FSD had other plans. It turned on the signal to do a little side step into an area of the road that is not a lane to dodge the box....😱 V14.2.2.3
English
10
6
120
8.8K
John Nguyen
John Nguyen@Tesla4Parents·
Sorry to hear that. I would definitely be frustrated too. Thanks for sharing your data points. I have an x with hw3 and i agree it’s different/ better than other hw3 vehicles I’ve driven in. It’s interesting how your 3 and Y have switched between which vehicle is better. Makes me wonder the different parameters that Tesla considers when pushing out the model updates.
English
0
0
1
16
Whole Mars Catalog
Whole Mars Catalog@wholemars·
I estimate that 54% - 60% of Tesla’s US car fleet is running AI3. This partially explains the wide gap in FSD perception. Most FSD users aren’t running the latest version. Fixing this could be a huge unlock.
English
115
33
1.1K
67.2K
John Nguyen
John Nguyen@Tesla4Parents·
@CyberSolarX @wholemars If you have t recalibrate it. Sometimes after an update it drives not normal and then a recalibration can fix it. Use best practice while driving the recalibration.
English
1
0
0
35
Josh
Josh@CyberSolarX·
@wholemars Some HW3 vehicles have a big that ruins FSD. I have 2 HW3 in v12.6.4. One is really good, one is garbage.
English
5
0
7
1.3K