TeslaDoctor

ABC has canceled The Bachelorette after their lead was seen in a leaked footage physically attacking her ex-boyfriend and throwing metal chairs at him while her child was present and reportedly the child was struck during the altercation.

Terafab may be the most essential vertical integration Tesla has ever undertaken— and it is truly non-optional. It will take years to build and will test even Elon’s speedrunning abilities to the limit, but that won’t stop him from trying. The breakthrough likely lies in overhauling the overall facility’s cleanroom model. By moving wafers in sealed pods with localized micro-environments, the fab no longer needs a monolithic ultra-clean space. Elon’s line about “eating cheeseburgers and smoking cigars” on the fab floor isn’t silly, it’s the practical reality of a radically simpler, cheaper, faster approach that could finally change the economics of chipmaking. This is all forced by the brutal “pinch” in chip supply. Tesla must produce on the order of 100–200 billion AI chips per year just to saturate its roadmap. That volume powers: FSD cars & Robotaxis (tens of millions of vehicles needing AI5 inference for near-perfect autonomy), Physical Optimus (scaling from thousands today to millions per year, each requiring AI5/AI6-level compute), Digital Optimus (the new xAI-Tesla software agents for digital/office automation, running massive inference clusters), Space-based data centers (AI7/Dojo3 orbital compute for GW-scale training and inference beyond Earth limits). AI5 delivers the ~10× leap for vehicles and early robots; AI6 shifts focus to Optimus + terrestrial DCs; AI7 goes orbital. No external foundry (TSMC, Samsung, etc.) can deliver that scale or timeline— hence the Terafab launch. Without it, the entire robotics + autonomy future hits a brick wall. Terafab isn’t optional; it’s the only way forward.

Another day, another anti-Tesla hit piece based on allegations in a lawsuit. Here's what the media won't tell you about what happened: This tragic incident was a drunk driving crash. Every year, more than 11,000 Americans die due to drunk driving, representing about 30% of traffic fatalities. Sentry mode footage on the Tesla showed one of the occupants carrying a half gallon bottle of alcohol, which was inside the car at the time of the crash. The driver was found to have both cocaine and alcohol in his system at the time of the crash, with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.19, 2.5 times the legal limit. At 3:07 AM, the driver drove into a tree at 84 miles per hour. Five seconds before hitting the tree, the driver was pressing on the accelerator pedal. Automatic Emergency Braking activated a half second before impact. Tragically, 3 of the 4 occupants perished after the wrecked car caught fire. The way the media reports these stories, you would think that Elon Musk invented drunk driving, and that drunk driving crashes only happen in a Tesla. In reality hundreds of thousands of drunk driving crashes happen every year across every brand of car on the market. The survivor of the crash is now suing Tesla, claiming the crash was their fault because the other occupants were unable to escape. But Tesla's doors are designed to function even when the vehicle completely loses power. Below you can see a picture of Tesla's doors, with both the electronic door open button and the emergency door latch clearly marked. Even in a horrific high speed crash like this one, simply pulling on the manual release would have opened the door and allowed the occupants to exit easily. I don't see any evidence that the door was the issue here. Rather, the issue seems to be that the occupants were drunk and high on cocaine. The Plaintiff in this lawsuit could have called his friends an Uber. He could have told them not to drive drunk. He could have told the driver not to speed given that he was already drunk. Sadly, the Plaintiff did none of those things, but is now trying to shift the blame to Tesla. In the United States, people can sue over anything. It's very common, even in situations where a drunk driver was at fault, to sue the manufacturer — especially when the manufacturer is run by the wealthiest person on Earth. That doesn't mean the manufacturer is at fault, or that the court will find they did anything wrong. These types of lawsuits happen all the time, but they only make headlines when the car is a Tesla. In one case last year, Mercedes-Benz was sued after the owners of a Benz were hit by a drunk driver driving on the wrong side of the road. The crash occurred at 2 AM in Michigan. Plaintiff's sued claiming a design defect caused the Mercedes to catch on fire, and that the second row seat release mechanism was defective making it difficult for occupants to escape. Two family members tragically died in the crash, and another sustained serious injuries. After five weeks of evidence, the jury cleared Mercedes-Benz of any wrongdoing in just 2 hours. But i'm guessing you never heard about that lawsuit, because the media didn't report on it. In another example, Ford was sued after a Ford owner was driving drunk and crashed, resulting in the death of the driver and one passenger. The driver's father sued claiming the air bags should have deployed sooner. Ford won the lawsuit, with the jury finding that the crash was caused by the driver's intoxication, not by any defects in the vehicle. There are countless other examples, but you've probably never heard about them. These types of unproven allegations only get reported if it's a Tesla. For any other brand, they wait for the court to look at the facts and find out who was really at fault. It is sad that the media and Tesla short sellers are trying so hard to smear the safest car brand in the world. They try to make it seem like humans can only get into car crashes in a Tesla. What they don't tell you is that Tesla is the only brand working to end tragic crashes like this through the structural design of their vehicles, over the air updates that improve safety constantly, and self-driving built into every car. The saddest thing about this Cybertruck crash is that if the drunk driver had just using Tesla Self-Driving, this horrific crash never would have happened. So what's with the media digging up these old crashes and trying to blame Tesla for them? Why are they not reporting on lawsuits from other manufacturers? My read on this is that as Tesla's unsupervised self-driving hits the road, they are trying to throw anything they can at the wall to see what sticks and makes Tesla look unsafe. There's a special place in hell for people who try to convince others that life saving safety tech will actually hurt them. It's frustrating to see the media twist the facts around tragic incidents like these day after day, but the truth will come out in court. Please keep spreading the word about all the safety innovations Tesla is pioneering to fight back against FUD from the mainstream media.