Ros Thain
382 posts


A year ago it was very reasonable to wonder if OpenAI or Anthropic had over-leveraged themselves for the revenue they were likely to get in the near term and there might be a "bubble". I wondered that myself. Now though? With these revenue numbers? There's no chance.

OUT NOW - how @WarrenPies sees it: - Stocks: "I'm scared out of my mind & also very bullish" - Earnings "unprecedented" on AI compute scramble - Oil headed higher... "crisis is not over yet" Apple🔊shorturl.at/a0jXA Spotify📽️shorturl.at/6J9Jt 1/3

Samsung is trading at 3x 2028 operating profit, according to Goldman Sachs estimates If the memory shortage is structural and becomes the standard for a couple of years longer than the market thinks, the re-rating in some stocks will be absurd


Goldman Sachs raises its Samsung Electronics operating profit forecasts: 2026: KRW 315tn ($213.7B) → KRW 355tn ($240.9B) 2027: KRW 307tn ($208.3B) → KRW 438tn ($297.2B) 2028: KRW 318tn ($215.8B) → KRW 495tn ($335.9B)




Goldman Sachs raises its Samsung Electronics operating profit forecasts: 2026: KRW 315tn ($213.7B) → KRW 355tn ($240.9B) 2027: KRW 307tn ($208.3B) → KRW 438tn ($297.2B) 2028: KRW 318tn ($215.8B) → KRW 495tn ($335.9B)

wait... i had no idea that clickhouse was an actual yandex spinout and that nebius (fka yandex) owns 25% of the biz

This is based on today though where there is a good difference between models I think in the future it is likely the differences become more incremental. I can see a lot of tasks not needing the “absolute frontier of intelligence” and “Good enough” models also could be cheaper to run


"I no longer think of the harness and the model as these entirely separable things I would also suspect that model and harness come together more over time"


@ThainRos I don’t know that you need perfect homogeneity though Having a better option and 2 that are “good enough” could still lead to commoditization for a lot of use cases And the baseline of “good enough” will keep improving every year







$NBIS UPDATE: Nebius publicly disclosed receiving 40% pre payment in Microsoft deal 🔥🔥🔥 Nebius 20-F filing reveals: (1). Microsoft deal now discloses $6.9B upfront prepayment (~40% of $17.4B TCV) for the first time. This crushes the typical 15-25% at $IREN and $CRWV (2). Nebius 2nd GPU tranche for Microsoft was delivered ON TIME in February

$nbis Overlooked amidst recent press releases, co. dropped their 20-F late last week. Some news, confirmatory nuggets, & potential read-through for upcoming earnings: 1. Microsoft Deal: --Upfront prepayment pegged @ ~40% of TCV ($6.95B on $17.39B contact value), which MStanley sees as significantly “higher than expected” and well above crwv’s referenced 15-25% prepayments --Successful delivery of 2nd tranche from Vineland detailed against a 9 tranche delivery schedule; corroboration MS has contracted service-level credit compensation & termination rights 2. DC Strategy & Dev List --Commentary on secured contracts across Europe, Middle East & US 3. Potential Benefits from Higher Pricing --Disclosure of a RPO @ $21.3B (pre-2nd Meta deal), plus a declaration that (outside Meta/Microsoft) “most of our customer engagements to date have relatively short term” implies possible read-through benefit from positive pricing trends --In a note earlier this month, Mstanley marked Nebius's exposure to spot market pricing at its ~550M arr base, suggesting it could lead to near term “outperformance"





