reid

109.2K posts

reid banner
reid

reid

@ThatOneKidReid

Katılım Ağustos 2011
1.3K Takip Edilen840 Takipçiler
reid retweetledi
Curt Hogg
Curt Hogg@CyrtHogg·
Abner Uribe apologized for his gesture toward the Cardinals dugout and explains what happened leading up to it, saying the Cardinals had been motioning that they were going to throw at his teammates previously.
English
14
12
318
40.1K
reid retweetledi
Sony Thăng
Sony Thăng@nxt888·
The Atlantic slave trade is not singled out because other slavery didn't exist. It is singled out because it built the world we currently live in. The financial institutions. The insurance markets. The shipping routes. The racial categories. The colonial borders. The wealth distribution between continents that still defines the global economy today. The Atlantic slave trade is not studied with particular intensity because historians are biased. It is studied with particular intensity because its consequences are not historical. They are present. You don't single it out to assign ancient blame. You examine it to understand current reality. The reason your argument wants to dissolve that specificity into universal human wickedness is precisely because universal human wickedness requires nothing from anyone today. Specific, traceable, present consequences do.
Mike Hunt@Mike_hun7

@nxt888 The logical destination of my point is that slavery was a world wide system at the time acceptable to most, and most participated in it. Singling one part of that trade out to be to blame makes no sense logically or morally.

English
111
1.3K
3.3K
116.2K
reid retweetledi
Christopher Hale
Christopher Hale@ChristopherHale·
It seems to me Silicon Valley is, in general, deeply unfamiliar with both the genre and the purpose of a papal encyclical.
Eddy Lazzarin ☀️@eddylazzarin

Magnifica Humanitas is light on the theology of artificial intelligence, and thick in reiterating Catholic social doctrine. You could remove the concept of artificial intelligence without changing much about the piece, which could have applied to any major technology shift. Heavy in asking for political intervention, and light in political theory — the encyclical protects human dignity by saying intelligence was never the point, but it doesn't explain our role given this shift. Many people believe the emergence of AI, and perhaps even superintelligence, must in some sense fall within divine providence. The encyclical gestures at technology as part of the history of salvation, but does not really engage that claim. If we are in fact on a path toward superintelligence, the encyclical barely faces that possibility. For a papal letter on AI, the omission feels bizarre. The encyclical’s answer to AI is basically: good AI may help, bad AI may hurt, and markets or labs cannot be trusted to sort the difference out. It worries about AI centralizing power in private hands, but says far less about the risk that political remedies could centralize power even more dangerously: through state control, regulatory capture, surveillance, or international bureaucracies insulated from accountability. The encyclical feels defensive. It protects human dignity by saying intelligence was never the point, without really explaining what that means — or explaining what it means for us when intelligence is no longer uniquely human. By the end, I mostly wanted to ask GPT-5.5 what Newman or Aquinas might have said: not for more moral warnings, but for a deeper account of intellect, providence, creation, and the human vocation under artificial intelligence.

English
9
56
954
36.8K
reid retweetledi
Sebastian
Sebastian@Seb__flyte1·
Hate when people simplify Latin American politics like this. In Peru, fascism-lite’s perennial candidates are Japanese, and its Maoist insurgency was led by a white philosophy professor. In Mexico, the lefty last election was a Jewish woman and the right winger was named Xochitl.
Luca Maxim@ChildOfKhan_

Pablo Guevarra vs. Alberto Himmler

English
65
693
10.1K
271K
reid retweetledi
Boots Riley
Boots Riley@BootsRiley·
Every day of the weekend, movies box office drops a certain percentage each day. I Love Boosters had the least percentage drop of all the movies this weekend, by a fair amount. This tells me the word of mouth is working.
English
70
615
7.9K
83K
reid retweetledi
Boots Riley
Boots Riley@BootsRiley·
Take the whole bbq to see I Love Boosters today- either late morning before it or even after. Whoever already has T-Mobile can use their phone to get $5 tickets.
English
13
176
1.7K
22.9K
reid retweetledi
Pope Leo XIV
Pope Leo XIV@Pontifex·
We must, then, avoid the “Babel syndrome,” namely the idolatry of profit that sacrifices the weak, a uniformity that neutralizes differences, and the pretense that a single language — even a digital one — can translate everything, including the mystery of the person, into data and performance. This is the risk of dehumanization: building a future that excludes God and reduces the other to a means.
English
104
2.5K
10.3K
324.7K
reid retweetledi
Boots Riley
Boots Riley@BootsRiley·
Besides the lower number of screens, one of our problems is awareness. Although we've spent good money on marketing- we can't spend what the big studios spend. So word of mouth is our way- which is why we have to stay in theaters so that people can discover.
samsquantch@samsquantchhh

a few people have mentioned to me hearing nothing about I Love Boosters and I want to ask them what rock they’re living under but then I realized I’m the one living under Boots Riley’s hat

English
10
339
2.5K
68.6K
reid retweetledi
Kieran Maguire
Kieran Maguire@KieranMaguire·
I’ll be talking to @LBC shortly about the financial consequences of West Ham’s relegation
English
12
12
130
149.2K
reid retweetledi
gatito jetón
gatito jetón@gatojeton·
The augustinian Pope Leo just said, in a Magisterial document, that the "just war" theory is OUTDATED. OUTDATED. LOUDER FOR THOSE IN THE BACK!
gatito jetón tweet media
English
29
1.4K
9.4K
98.6K