Athan xanthis

If you’ve been following my posts here, make sure to join my page on Facebook too… I post more in-depth content on individuals, rare documents, and updates I don’t always share here.. Appreciate the support, let’s make this big!! facebook.com/share/g/1V37Lz…

@jamesbangell Was he deceiving as they all say he was?

@TheRealCurly5 Here’s your boy, my former neighbor David Atlee Philips: jamesburrillangell.substack.com/p/david-atlee-…

These 1976 cables are the paper trail of a cover-up in motion, showing exactly how the CIA moved early to sabotage the House Select Committee investigators investigating the JFK assassination. While former CIA officer George Joannides is often the focus of this era, these documents prove the orders to kill the Mexico City investigation came straight from the top at Langley. HQ was firing off urgent commands to block any info on Oswald’s alleged 1963 trip, terrified that a "full public disclosure" would expose their high-level assets and surveillance operations. Hmmmm. By fixating only on Joannides as the "gatekeeper," we’re missing the bigger picture here, he was just a tool used by the Agency to protect the actual architects of the 1963 operations who were still hiding in the shadows e.g CIA officer David Phillips. This wasn't one man lying to Congress, it was a coordinated HQ strike to ensure the truth about Oswalds alleged visit in Mexico would stay buried. The CIA has yet to provide a picture of Oswald in Mexico City for 60 plus years. David Phillips lied to HSCA investigators about the surveillance tapes of Oswald in Mexico City that were destroyed, committing perjury. This also has not been a focus point for the so called “task force”. And neither has the full disclosure of records been pursued either relating to this? Disgraceful. archives.gov/files/research…

@sfu1m3r LAPD destroying ballistics evidence is the most vile thing in the investigation pertaining to RFK.

Excuse me. There was evidence of 13 bullets fired at RFK’s assassination. Sirhan’s pistol only held 8. Sirhan is a political prisoner in the war over consciousness. x.com/ianonpatriot/s…

While JFK was officially cooling off sabotage operations after the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis peace settlement, these documents prove the CIA was doing the exact opposite lol, by actively recruiting non-officer personnel to destroy dry docks and sink Cuban ships. They were even hunting for "willing and able" assets to perform sabotage on the high seas, explicitly looking for people who wouldn't care about the "consequences" if they got caught. This is more of the paper trail of the Agency running a rogue war in direct defiance of the President's public policy, proving that by the spring of '63, the CIA was already operating as its own government. archives.gov/files/research…

@mjdaly57 @ThrillaRilla369 This was definitely an eye opener and provided much context needed to understanding the assassination. But there was a few other reasons besides the Vietnam war that the book dosnt outline.

What I’ve never understood is how the Vietnam War is never really discussed in the context of the JFK assassination. A prime mover in doing this was The Pentagon Papers. As the late Col. Fletcher points out in his excellent book - JFK, The CIA, Vietnam And The Plot To Assassinate John F. Kennedy - the Pentagon Papers just airbrushed any reference to JFK and his assassination when mentioning events on the weekend of the assassination - namely LBJ meeting with the Chiefs of Staff on Saturday 23rd November and on 29th November 1963 with Johnson effectively telling the generals that he would be breaking with JFK’s policy of restraint and supporting the generals in their aims for Vietnam. The Pentagon Papers simply referred to ‘the President’ and made no distinction between Johnson and Kennedy. The given impression was that the green light for the Vietnam war was a natural development of US foreign policy instead of the drastic u-turn that resulted from the public execution of a sitting president. Kennedy’s murder, imo, was the catalyst for the war that followed, the loss of 58,220 US soldiers’ lives and the approximate loss of 3 million Vietnamese lives.

Does anyone actually remember the Vietnam War? Was it as bad as the stories my uncle used to tell us

@timfattig Yeh I’m guessing it’s multiple sources. Not sure about Haig tho.

Who ya got? Richard Helms? Alexander Haig? Patrick Gray? All? None? Colonel Mustard in the library with a wrench? thedailybeast.com/bob-woodward-p…

@mcarmystrong @StackingAG @GWOTstudies What are you on about dude

@TheRealCurly5 @StackingAG @GWOTstudies I don’t work for anyone. Thank you for answering in good faith.

MURDER MOST FOUL: THE MYSTERY OF THE LIBERTY By M.C. Armstrong How did America get so lost? I recently read an article by Jeremy Kuzmarov titled, “State of Israel and Lyndon Johnson Deliberately Murdered 34 American Sailors in 1967, Fabricated Massive Cover-up Still in Effect After 55 Years.” As Kuzmarov details, “On June 8, 1967, Israeli air and naval forces—with covered over insignia—fired rockets, torpedoes and napalm on a US spy ship, the USS Liberty, in the Mediterranean Sea, killing 34 Americans and injuring 174 more. A secret congressional hearing revealed that two of the pilots were Americans—ex Navy fliers.” Studying the JFK assassination these past decades has immersed me in the world of amateur and professional historians who are obsessed with the crimes of Lyndon Johnson and the way LBJ’s foreign policy revealed the DNA of contemporary America’s madness. Kuzmarov’s article, published in @CovertActionMag, drew heavily from primary documents. He demonstrated, through recently released @CIA files, that Israeli fighters, under instructions from Israeli Defense Minister Moshe Dayan, knew they were attacking their ally on June 8 and that our National Security Agency, at that time a secret entity, was actively monitoring the attacks with agency aircraft. Furthermore, the historical record revealed that neighboring carriers witnessed the attack on the Liberty and sought to defend their American brothers but were commanded by none other Robert McNamara and Lyndon Johnson to recall all defensive aircraft. Why did nobody tell me about this treacherous act at @JMU when I was studying history? One of the survivors of the USS Liberty (a passionate subculture that still meets yearly) recalled an explosive detail. Ernest Gallo, a “28-year CIA veteran specializing in electronics,” said that when an American Admiral named Lawrence Geis challenged McNamara’s orders, “President Johnson came on the line and stated, ‘I don’t care if the ship sinks; I won’t have my ally embarrassed.’” Why were documents pertinent to this story concealed for so long? Why were newspapers at the time “forbidden from photographing the battered” Liberty and why were American sailors “ordered not to talk to reporters?” Why was LBJ putting Israel above his own country? Why was Johnson more concerned about embarrassing Israel than saving American lives and what does that have to do with the Kennedy assassination? Kuzmarov and others insistently make the argument that the Israeli attack on America was a premeditated and “botched ‘false-flag’ operation” designed to draw America into a proxy war with the Soviet Union via Egypt. In other words, Lyndon Johnson, in 1967, wanted what folks like George W. Bush, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, @LindseyGrahamSC, and @realDonaldTrump continued to want throughout the twenty-first century: regime change wars in the Middle East to shift the dynamics of power between America and Russia. Russia supported Egypt’s nationalist leader, Gamal Abdel Nasser, and so had JFK. Under Lyndon Johnson, not only did the JFK policy of withdrawal from Vietnam flip, but so did the support for Nasser’s Egypt and Kennedy’s stance against Israel’s desire to acquire nuclear weapons. Did JFK's conciliatory foreign policy position have anything to do with his murder? Did the murder of the USS Liberty sailors serve as a precedent for the argument that Johnson was capable of treacherously conspiring to kill another American—John F. Kennedy? There was an entire subculture of JFK assassination researchers who agreed with me that LBJ played a decisive part in the murder of Kennedy. But some believed Israel was the true mastermind. They pointed to the 12/3/63 Secret Service file that showed a Cuban exile named Homer Echevarria claiming to an ATF informant named Thomas Mosley that “our new backers are Jews.” These “Israel did it” scholars believed LBJ was the quarterback but Israel was the coach. But I don’t see the primary documents or eyewitness accounts that I find in support of the LBJ/CIA hypothesis. What I do see, however, is a community of researchers beginning to foreground a worldview that—regardless of guilt or innocence—demonstrates a massive elephant in the room of American history. What happens when one widens one’s lens to the world setting, that view that eschews narrow tribalism and allows every voice from around the world to join in the story? What does the Kennedy assassination tell us about our relationship with Southeast Asia and the Middle East? How did Kennedy’s murder change our policies in Vietnam, Cambodia, Ukraine, France, India, Indonesia, China, Central America, Israel, Congo, the Dominican Republic, Cuba, and Egypt? Was America captured by Israel? Is our foreign policy and our media beholden to Zionist interests like AIPAC? If so, how do we go about declaring our independence here in the year of #America250? @timfattig @Andria816 @TheOliverStone @TruthSerum2016 @RogerJStoneJr @RepLuna @RoKhanna @StephenKing @usslibertyvets @BeschlossDC @timgproject @SolvingJfk @jeffersonmorley @FourDiedTrying @TuckerCarlson @ggreenwald @JFKChokeholds @KenBurns #JFK

@mcarmystrong @StackingAG @GWOTstudies I don’t work for anyone. Do you?

@TheRealCurly5 @StackingAG @GWOTstudies Not me. You?

@mcarmystrong @StackingAG @GWOTstudies Ur Constantly promoting LBJ did it narratives without reasonable doubt hey? Seems like you’re on someone’s roll. Are you?

@TheRealCurly5 @StackingAG @GWOTstudies Who do you work for, I ask in good faith?

How is it policing? Dirty can mean many things. By trying to gain gotcha points you keep making my point look better lol. What’s next, I’m a disinform dupe?. Instead of refuting the claim like I do to you constantly in good faith, you instead result to snarky adhominem attacks that backfire? When do you learn Matt🤦🏻‍♂️.

@TheRealCurly5 @StackingAG @GWOTstudies So fascinating to document the feverish policing of the LBJ argument.

@mcarmystrong @StackingAG @GWOTstudies @RogerJStoneJr Yess. He does a great job laying out the motive. The evidence and paper trail tho? No so much.

@StackingAG @TheRealCurly5 @GWOTstudies Agreed. Have you read @RogerJStoneJr 's book on Lyndon Johnson's role in both the JFK assassination and the cover-up? x.com/rogerjstonejr/…

@StackingAG @mcarmystrong @GWOTstudies Yes. Because I’ll say it again, he was a political operator. A dirty politician who took advantage of being able to fulfill his presidency while holding dirt over the perpetrators of the crime.

@TheRealCurly5 @mcarmystrong @GWOTstudies But LBJ could have accomplished all of that and more without a full scale cover up & in fact been a hero by pursuing and incarcerating the criminals, firing the incompetent staff responsible, relieved military leaders of their command, etc. — but he did none of that

These 1962 documented notes taken from a destroyed transcript, is a total mask-off moment for the Joint Chiefs. Right after the Cuban Missile Crisis, the top military generals in the country weren't just disagreeing with JFK’s handling of the crisis, they were straight-up mocking him. By calling his briefing “condescending" and "full of platitudes," they were treating the Commander-in-Chief like some incompetent kid who needed to be put in his place. Their internal stance which was, “Now see here, young man, here is what we want you to do", is the proof that the chain of command had already collapsed. When the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs and General Curtis LeMay start looking at the President as an obstacle to manage instead of a leader to follow, you’re looking at a cold-blooded mutiny in the making. They didn't just hate his policy towards Cuba and communism, they were filing the paperwork that justified his end. static.history.state.gov/frus/frus1961-…

@mcarmystrong @StackingAG @GWOTstudies Not rlly. It depends on documentation since you like to go of off “primary documentation”. It just dosnt support him as the mastermind to take out a sitting U.S president. 🤷🏽‍♂️

@StackingAG @TheRealCurly5 @GWOTstudies So much depends on language. Establishment historians have no problem calling Lyndon Johnson the master of the senate or the supreme coalition builder. But if you say mastermind or conspirator, heads explode. Was Lyndon Johnson a social engineer? x.com/i/status/20346…

@StackingAG @mcarmystrong @GWOTstudies Yes. And that’s just what he did. But with a few distinctions. No invasion of Cuba. And no nuclear war with the soviets.

@TheRealCurly5 @mcarmystrong @GWOTstudies You indicate there was a conspiracy to assassinate JFK, actually a coup d’état Seeming your take indicates the conspirators were benevolent in just handing the presidency over to LBJ, demonstrating total confidence LBJ would not pursue the criminals & he would even cover it up

@DuffBrainard @mcarmystrong @GWOTstudies If I’m going tbh. I don’t even think Dulles was a mastermind. I think Dulles may have been crucial in supported efforts to call for action within the White House. And maybe providing contacts there and than.

@TheRealCurly5 @mcarmystrong @GWOTstudies I think the conversation between Dulles and LBJ happened. How it went and who first brought up the idea of killing the president I don't know. However, I do think Allen Dulles was a lot meaner and had a history of toppling democracies.

@StackingAG @mcarmystrong @GWOTstudies The motive is not in dispute. What’s in dispute is how this somehow automatically means LBJ orchestrated the assassination of a sitting U.S president. The paper trail dosnt support it.

@TheRealCurly5 @mcarmystrong @GWOTstudies LBJ was quite the mastermind. Look at his political ascent. He was also the consummate deal maker LBJ also had a lot of personal motivation to eliminate Kennedy. LBJ needed to stay on the 1964 ticket & stop the criminal investigations into his dealings & links to murders.