Cannae, Gaugamela, Austerlitz

107.8K posts

Cannae, Gaugamela, Austerlitz banner
Cannae, Gaugamela, Austerlitz

Cannae, Gaugamela, Austerlitz

@TherouxPeter

Arabic translator. “Not interested in this ad.” قبلما صورتك في البطن، عرفتك.

LA Katılım Mart 2014
119 Takip Edilen1.3K Takipçiler
Cannae, Gaugamela, Austerlitz
@EliLake Pakistan historically is trash, they attacked our embassy in 1979 and harbored Bin Laden. Their ISI was an enemy intelligence service.
English
1
0
5
338
Eli Lake
Eli Lake@EliLake·
Pakistan has a tangled history with Iran’s nuclear program. AQ Khan gave warhead designs to Iran in the 90s. Pakistan also burned America in the war on terror. But Pakistan is hosting the ceasefire talks.
English
29
56
310
8.8K
Cannae, Gaugamela, Austerlitz retweetledi
David Marcus
David Marcus@BlueBoxDave·
I travel America constantly, here’s one thing I can tell you with certainty, nobody cares what anybody in any other country thinks. At all. Not even a little bit. It’s buried in a deep ditch of irrelevance.
English
71
108
1.1K
13K
Cannae, Gaugamela, Austerlitz
The Iranians are used to winning negotiations with this kind of BS because like Hezbollah and the Syrian Ba’ath, they are willing to kill people. This is the first time they will be negotiating with a side, Trump’s administration, which is happy to kill THEM in record numbers.
Max Meizlish@maxmeizlish

There is so much to NOT believe in reported discussions between the U.S. and Iran. But this may take the cake - and it's a direct quote. The notion that releasing Iran's blocked assets is a precondition for negotiations to begin are laughable.

English
0
0
3
248
Cannae, Gaugamela, Austerlitz retweetledi
Dan Burmawi
Dan Burmawi@DanBurmawy·
At a time when the official Lebanese state is trying to disentangle itself from Iran, France is doubling down on reconnecting Lebanon to the Iranian arena and to U.S.-Iran negotiations. This is not surprising given France’s historical relationship with the Safavid (Iranian) state: In the 1970s, Paris became a haven for Iranian opposition to the Shah. France hosted Ayatollah Khomeini in Neauphle-le-Château, from where the Iranian revolution was managed and broadcast. At that time, Imam Musa al-Sadr (founder of the Amal movement) had close ties with Iranian opposition figures in Paris. France provided political cover for figures like Mostafa Chamran and Sadegh Ghotbzadeh (who served as a link between Musa al-Sadr and Yasser Arafat, convincing him to open his camps to establish Amal and train Iranian factions in asymmetric warfare). Lebanon thus became a testing ground for cadres who later ruled Iran and re-exported the revolution to Lebanon through Hezbollah. After the 1979 revolution, despite tensions (the hostage crisis and the 1983 bombing of French paratroopers in Beirut), France maintained a role as a “mediator.” It has consistently sought to preserve its influence in Lebanon by engaging with dominant forces on the ground, including Hezbollah. This French recognition of Iran’s role in Lebanon, especially under Macron, has strengthened the legitimacy of Iranian presence and its proxies at the expense of Lebanese sovereignty. Among its indirect support: •Blocking the designation of Hezbollah in its entirety as a terrorist organization within the European Union. •In 2021 and 2022, when European countries considered sanctions against Lebanon’s “corrupt political elite,” including Hezbollah allies, France acted as a restraining force. •During meetings of the International Support Group (ISG), France consistently softened the tone of final statements. •France had an interest in securing security guarantees from Hezbollah to initiate energy exploration. This indirect cooperation was seen as a “French acknowledgment” of Hezbollah’s de facto authority over war, peace, and oil decisions in Lebanon.
Antonios Nader@Antonnaderx

في الوقت الذي يسعى فيه لبنان الرسمي إلى فك ساحته بإيران تمعن #فرنسا في إعادة ربطه بالساحة الإيرانية والمفاوضات الأمريكية-الإيرانية وهذا ليس غريبًا عن فرنسا وتاريخ علاقتها مع الدولة الصفوية: ⭕️ في السبعينيات، تحولت باريس إلى ملاذ للمعارضة الإيرانية ضد الشاه. استضافت فرنسا آية الله الخميني في "نوفل لوشاتو"، ومن هناك أُديرت الثورة الإيرانية إعلاميًا. في ذلك الوقت، كان الإمام موسى الصدر (مؤسس ميليشيا أمل) يتمتع بعلاقات وثيقة مع المعارضة الإيرانية في باريس. وفرت فرنسا الغطاء السياسي لشخصيات مثل مصطفى چمران وصادق قطب زاده (وهو قناة التواصل بين موسى الصدر وياسر عرفات الذي أقنعه بفتح مخيماته لتأسيس ميليشيا أمل وتدريب العديد من الفصائل الإيرانية على الحروب غير المتكافئة)، مما جعل لبنان مختبرًا للكوادر التي حكمت إيران وإعادة تصدير الثورة إلى لبنان عبر حزب الله. ⭕️ بعد الثورة عام 1979، ورغم الصدامات (أزمة الرهائن وانفجار مقر المظليين الفرنسيين في بيروت 1983)، حافظت فرنسا على دور "الوسيط". فقد سعت فرنسا دائمًا لضمان نفوذها في لبنان عبر التفاهم مع القوى الفاعلة على الأرض، بما في ذلك حزب الله. هذا الاعتراف الفرنسي بالدور الإيراني في لبنان (خاصة في عهد ماكرون مؤخرًا) عزز من شرعية الوجود الإيراني ونفوذ أذرعه في لبنان على حساب السيادة. ومن جملة دعمها غير المباشر: - منع إدراج حزب الله بكافة أجنحته على قوائم الإرهاب في الاتحاد الأوروبي. - في عامي 2021 و2022، عندما لوّحت دول أوروبية بفرض عقوبات على "النخبة السياسية الفاسدة" في لبنان، بما في ذلك حلفاء حزب الله، كانت فرنسا هي التي تضع الكوابح. - خلال اجتماعات مجموعة ISG (التي تضم الأمم المتحدة، الاتحاد الأوروبي، والجامعة العربية)، كانت فرنسا دائمًا تلطف نبرة البيانات الختامية. - كان لفرنسا مصلحة في تأمين غطاء أمني من حزب الله لبدء عمليات التنقيب. هذا التعاون غير المباشر اعتُبر "اعترافًا فرنسيًا" بسلطة الحزب الفعلية على قرارات الحرب والسلم والنفط في لبنان. #لبنان #إيران #المفاوضات_المباشرة

English
6
133
370
10.1K
Cannae, Gaugamela, Austerlitz retweetledi
Lee Smith
Lee Smith@LeeSmithDC·
Hezbollah was founded in Lebanon in the mid-70s as part of the anti-Shah opposition. Great @tabletmag colleague @AcrossTheBay has written the definitive account of the true origins of the Hezb, dispelling decades of anti-Israel, pro-IRCG propaganda.
AG@AGHamilton29

So let's talk a bit about the history of Hezbollah... Hezbollah was founded in the early 1980s during the Lebanese Civil War, a period marked by intense sectarian violence. However, the group was specifically created to follow the model of Iran’s 1979 Islamic Revolution. Their openly stated goals, laid out in their 1985 manifesto, included: The destruction of Israel The establishment of an Islamic state in Lebanon, modeled after Iran and loyal to Iran’s Supreme Leader Hezbollah didn’t limit its attacks to Israelis. They also targeted Sunni Muslims, Christians, and Westerners — most notably killing 241 U.S. Marines in the 1983 Beirut barracks bombing. From the beginning, Hezbollah functioned as an Iranian-backed Islamic Republic entity operating inside Lebanon, working to undermine the Lebanese state. As a direct terror proxy for Iran, it has always refused to disarm. For years, Hezbollah regularly launched attacks into Israel, provoking several major flare-ups. The largest was the 2006 war, which began when Hezbollah raided Israel, killed several soldiers, and abducted two others. Israel responded with a major offensive, and Hezbollah fired thousands of rockets into Israeli cities. That war ended with UN Security Council Resolution 1701, which called for Israel to withdraw from southern Lebanon. In exchange, the Lebanese army and UNIFIL (UN peacekeeping forces) were supposed to take control of the area and disarm Hezbollah south of the Litani River. Neither the UN nor the Lebanese forces ever enforced this requirement. They stood by as Hezbollah, heavily backed by Iran, built up a massive arsenal of over 150,000 rockets in the very region where it was supposed to be disarmed. Many of these rockets were placed in civilian homes and villages. During this period, Hezbollah also diverted much of its fighting force to help Iran’s ally, Bashar al-Assad, massacre civilians and prop up the regime in Syria. Despite this growing threat and the clear violation of Resolution 1701, Israel largely held back between 2006 and 2023. Then, on October 8, 2023 — just one day after the October 7 Hamas massacre — Hezbollah, clearly under orders from Tehran, opened a second front, firing rockets and drones at northern Israel. This forced Israel to evacuate tens of thousands of civilians from the north and eventually respond more forcefully. In 2024, Israel carried out the pager operation, eliminated most of Hezbollah’s senior leadership, and launched a limited ground invasion that significantly degraded the group’s arsenal. In November 2024, the U.S. brokered another ceasefire. Once again, the agreement required Hezbollah to disarm south of the Litani River in accordance with Resolution 1701. Once again, the Lebanese army and UNIFIL failed to enforce it. After Israel began striking Iran in March 2025, Hezbollah resumed rocket attacks on Israel. Once again, the lack of follow-through on the disarmament commitments made the conflict inevitable. In summary, Iran established Hezbollah as a terror proxy to occupy southern Lebanon, with the explicit goals of destroying Israel and turning Lebanon — a country that was once Christian-majority — into an Islamic state. The UN and Lebanese government repeatedly promise to address the problem but never follow through. As a result, both Lebanon and Israel keep getting dragged into wars dictated by Tehran. Israel has no active conflicts with Arab neighbors that do not host terror groups openly dedicated to its destruction. The solution is clear: Lebanon must finally take back control of its own country and enforce Resolution 1701 by dismantling Hezbollah. Until that happens, the cycle will continue.

English
3
37
108
7.6K
Eylon Levy
Eylon Levy@EylonALevy·
🇪🇺 Last year I visited Brussels for a series of meetings with EU officials. The conversations were off-record, so I can’t tell you what they said, but I can tell you what I said and what they didn’t. I urged them to call explicitly for Israeli-Lebanese peace. They should say in every statement, the EU expects Lebanon to make peace with Israel. Maybe it’s not immediately realistic, but that should be the goal. Just like they keep talking about the “two-state solution” ad nauseam, even if it won’t happen tomorrow. Wars, I said, should end with peace, not a piece of paper. Just two months earlier, Israel and Lebanon reached a ceasefire that committed Beirut to dismantle Hezbollah. But that wasn’t enough. They had to say the P word, and if they wanted to invest in peace, they should facilitate discreet meetings between young leaders in both countries to lay the groundwork. No more making excuses or allowances for Lebanon’s footdragging. Peace must be the explicit goal. The reaction was not an enthusiastic “yes.”
Eylon Levy tweet media
English
41
52
403
14.8K
Cannae, Gaugamela, Austerlitz retweetledi
Jonathan Elkhoury- جوناثان الخوري
This fella was the Lebanese government coordinator for UNIFIL. If you’re wondering why didn’t UNIFIL do its job by disarming Hezbollah and reporting all those years on their rearming and regrouping under their noses. UNIFIL is a corrupt organization that should be dissolved
Jonathan Elkhoury- جوناثان الخوري tweet media
English
11
140
442
17.7K
James Jay Carafano
James Jay Carafano@JJCarafano·
LOL. Iran’s geopolitical influence. They are one step below the Somali pirates. The thoughts that this is the roots of sustainable counter strategy to getting their butts kicked is beyond laughable
CSIS@CSIS

"Iran can now use its newfound geopolitical influence to lean on Gulf OPEC nations to 'make room' for Iran’s barrels to return to pre-sanctions destinations," writes @CSISEnergy expert @ClaySeigle. How else will the ceasefire impact oil markets? Read more:csis.org/analysis/whats…

English
4
3
14
819
Cannae, Gaugamela, Austerlitz retweetledi
James Jay Carafano
James Jay Carafano@JJCarafano·
Strait of Hormuz freak out is a replay of when the world thought they were being held hostage by Somali pirates. We were not then we are not now. All the latest in the strait shows is that Iran like the pirates are menace that needs to be dealt not they are some world power to fear- the level of fear mongering and handwringing is pathetic
English
51
24
114
4.1K
Cannae, Gaugamela, Austerlitz retweetledi
dan linnaeus
dan linnaeus@DanLinnaeus·
There’s nothing particularly incendiary about the view that the Iranian regime are butchers and need to be finished off. It’s the consensus among our GCC partners, not just a fringe hawk eyed take on things in compartments of American or Israeli public opinion. It likely doesn’t require large-scale boots on the ground or occupation. A combination of taking small key islands temporarily, like Abu Musa, the Tunbs, perhaps Siri, to establish a seaward defensive shield over the Gulf coast, and strategic isolation of their hardened bunkers followed by Sof raids targeting critical sites that the regime relies on to project extraterritorial power, like their underground ‘missile cities’ (a la idf Maysaf raid in sept ‘24 in Syria), could enable collapse from within. No Iraq or Afghanistan 2.0 needed. Not even the 100 hour half million US troop maneuver of ‘91’s Left Hook. Over 75%, probably closer to mid-eighties after January’s massacres, want secular governance in Iran today. That’s a flip from only 30 in 2012. President Pezeshkian’s own PR office leaked details of a survey his office commissioned last November that showed 92% opposed the regime’s policies and governance. Neutralize their ability to project power and threaten the Gulf, blockade their petrochem exports to throttle their financial lifeline, and their people may eat them alive in a matter of months, if not weeks. The moment that kind of reality sets in and catches up to their domestic propaganda, they’re quite likely to enter an acute crisis. The regime’s ability to sustain itself under those conditions after their internal repression apparatus has been meaningfully degraded is questionable. The prospects of success are seismic. A population that seizes control of their destiny after 47 brutal years of repression may very well enshrine its protesters and those who sacrificed for their freedom to become, over time, a beacon of hope in the region. It’s not certain. There’s a lot at stake and it’s wrongheaded not to consider the risks of post collapse chaos. Anonymous insider leaks on regime change scenarios, not direct statements from officials about the Feb. 11 Netanyahu briefings, but media reports, characterized Cia dir. Ratcliffe’s reaction as calling them “farcical”, and Secstate Rubio’s “In other words it’s bullshit” comment, painting a picture of broad intel community skepticism. What cannot be ruled out is misdirection. There’s a clear interest to avoid compressing the regime into a survival “use it or lose it” mentality. In fact a little over two weeks ago Centcom Cdr. Adm. Cooper told Iran International “There will be a clear signal at some point, as the President has indicated, for you to be able to come out.” Setting aside media spin, political toxicities and adversary narratives, what’s available in the open source domain suggests these possibilities remain real and legible. Given the stakes, the regime is hardening its positions, partly because it must save face domestically to survive, and partly because it views its regional footprint as integral to its core mission. The positions of the US and Iran therefore remain structurally incompatible on core interests unless the Iranians dramatically capitulate. It is likely that Washington will try to arrive at something workable and show flexibility where it can -- up to a point. It is possible the negotiations enter a more protracted phase. Perhaps among many reasons so as not to cast a security shadow over the FIFA World Cup being hosted June 11–July 19. However it is likely wishful thinking that the 15 day pause can be fully converted into a lasting diplomatic resolution. It is more likely that upon sufficient indications of IRGC-AF recuperation, resupply and mobilization, the US and Israel will resume combined high intensity operations to isolate provincial command and control bunkers and move to finish the job under a new Wpr letter.
English
6
22
95
4.1K
Ben Rhodes
Ben Rhodes@brhodes·
In the best case scenario, Trump struck a deal to reopen a Strait that was open before the pointless war he started, with the IRGC demonstrating its control over the Strait and potentially extracting fees plus sanctions relief. Thousands of innocents - including hundreds of children - dead in Lebanon and Iran for no reason. U.S. troops killed and wounded. U.S. embassies and bases in the Middle East badly damaged. U.S. standing in the world obliterated. U.S. munitions badly depleted. Hundreds of billions spent. Prices up everywhere. More global economic fallout to come. Putin strengthened and enriched. Just a catastrophic situation even in the best of circumstances. A profoundly shameful episode in American history no matter what happens next.
English
839
8K
27.5K
1.1M
Cannae, Gaugamela, Austerlitz retweetledi
Noah Pollak
Noah Pollak@NoahPollak·
Post-war French foreign policy (with a brief departure in the 1950's) has been designed to make France "une puissance musulmane." It's not just that the goal itself -- siding with every dictator and terrorist in the Middle East from Saddam Hussein to Arafat to Khomeini to Hezbollah -- is disgusting. It has also been ineffective, since the thugs to which France attaches itself always eventually lose to Israel and the US and even during periods when the bad guys are thriving, they never help France. So why does France do it? There are two ugly reasons: France is genuinely attracted to evil actors. And France loves being a troublemaker for the US and Israel, two successful countries that France envies deeply. It's very sad and what Macron is doing here is perfectly consistent with many decades of French Middle East policy.
Emmanuel Macron@EmmanuelMacron

I have just spoken with Lebanese President Joseph Aoun and Prime Minister Nawaf Salam. I expressed France’s full solidarity in the face of the indiscriminate strikes carried out by Israel in Lebanon today, which resulted in a very high number of civilian casualties. We condemn these strikes in the strongest possible terms. They pose a direct threat to the sustainability of the ceasefire that has just been reached. Lebanon must be fully covered by it. I reiterated the need to preserve Lebanon’s territorial integrity and France’s determination to support the efforts of the Lebanese authorities to uphold the country’s sovereignty and implement the Hezbollah disarmament plan.

English
12
61
262
13.8K
Cannae, Gaugamela, Austerlitz retweetledi
Rob Henderson
Rob Henderson@robkhenderson·
lol
Rob Henderson tweet media
3
5
39
4.2K
Cannae, Gaugamela, Austerlitz retweetledi