Thomas Krogh Jensen

2.3K posts

Thomas Krogh Jensen banner
Thomas Krogh Jensen

Thomas Krogh Jensen

@ThomasKrogh

Husband, father, runner and foodie. CEO @cphfintech. Passion for innovation, startups, fintech, leadership and all the good things in life. Tweets are mine.

Copenhagen Katılım Nisan 2009
1.8K Takip Edilen1.3K Takipçiler
Thomas Krogh Jensen retweetledi
Gandalv
Gandalv@Microinteracti1·
Robert Mueller died last night. He was 81 years old. He had a wife who loved him for sixty years. He had two daughters, one of whom he met for the first time in Hawaii, in 1969, on a few hours of military leave, before he got back on the plane and returned to Vietnam. He had grandchildren. He had a faith he practiced quietly, without performance. He had, in the way of men who have seen real things and survived them, a quality that is increasingly rare and increasingly mocked in the country he spent his life serving. He had integrity. And tonight the President of the United States said good! I have been sitting with that word for hours now. Good. One syllable. The thing you say when the coffee is hot or the traffic is moving. The thing a man who has never had to bury anyone, never had to sit in the specific silence of a room where someone is newly absent, reaches for when he wants the world to know he is satisfied. Good. The daughters are crying and the wife is alone in the house and good. I want to speak directly to the Americans reading this. Not the political Americans. Just the human ones. The ones who have lost a father. The ones who know what it is to be in that first hour, when you keep forgetting and then remembering again, when ordinary objects become unbearable, when the world outside the window seems obscene in its indifference. I want to ask you, simply, to hold that feeling for a moment, and then to understand that the man you elected looked at it and typed a single word. Good. This is not a country having a bad day. I need you to understand that. Countries have bad days. Elections go wrong. Leaders disappoint. Institutions bend. But there is a different thing, a rarer and more terrible thing, that happens when the moral center of a place simply gives way. Not dramatically. Not with a single catastrophic event. But quietly, in increments, until one evening a president celebrates the death of an old man whose family is still warm with grief, and enough people find it acceptable that it becomes the weather. Just the weather. That is what is happening. That is what has happened. The world knows. From Tokyo to Oslo, from London to Buenos Aires, people are not angry at America tonight. Anger would mean there was still something to fight for, some remaining faith to be betrayed. What I see, in the reactions from everywhere that is not here, is something older and sadder than anger. It is the look people get when they have waited a long time for someone they love to find their way back, and have finally understood that they are not coming. America is being grieved. Past tense, almost. The idea of it. The thing it represented to people who had nothing else to believe in, who came here with everything they owned in a single bag because they had heard, somehow, across an ocean, that this was the place where decency was written into the walls. That idea is not resting. It is not suspended. It is being buried, in real time, with 7,450 likes before dinner. And the church said nothing. Seventy million people have decided that this man, this specific man who has cheated everyone he has ever made a promise to, who has mocked the disabled and the dead and the grieving, who celebrated tonight while a family wept, is an instrument of God. The pastors who made that bargain did not just trade away their credibility. They traded away the thing that made them worth listening to in the first place. The cross they carry now is a costume. The faith they preach is a loyalty oath with scripture attached. When the history of American Christianity is written, this will be the chapter they skip at seminary. Now I want to talk about the men who stand next to him. Because this is the part that actually breaks my heart. JD Vance is not a bad man. I have to say that, because it is true, and because the truth matters even now, especially now. Marco Rubio is not a bad man. Lindsey Graham is not a bad man. They are idiots, but not bad, as in BAD! These are men with mothers who raised them and children who love them and friends who remember who they were before all of this. They are not monsters. Monsters are simple. Monsters do not cost you anything emotionally because there is nothing in them to mourn. These men are something more painful than monsters. They are men who knew better, and know better still, and will get up tomorrow and do it again. Every small compromise they made had a reason. Every moment they looked the other way had a justification that sounded, at the time, almost reasonable. And now they have arrived here, at a place where a president celebrates the death of an old man and they will find a way, on television, to say nothing that means anything, and they will go home to houses where children who carry their name are waiting, and they will say goodnight, and they will say nothing. Their oldest friends are watching. The ones who knew Rubio when he still believed in something. Who knew Graham when he said, out loud, on the record, that this exact man would destroy the Republican Party and deserve it. Who sat next to Vance and thought here is someone worth knowing. Those friends are not angry tonight. They moved through anger a long time ago. What they feel now is the quiet, irrecoverable sadness of watching someone disappear while still being present. Of watching a person they loved choose, again and again, to become less. That is what cowardice costs. Not the coward. The people who loved him. And in the comments tonight, the followers celebrate. People who ten years ago brought casseroles to grieving neighbours. Who stood in the rain at gravesides and meant the words they said. Who told their children that we do not speak ill of the dead because the dead were someone's beloved. Those people are tonight typing gleeful things about a man whose daughters are not yet done crying. And they feel clean doing it. Righteous. Because somewhere along the way the thing they were given in exchange for their decency was the feeling of belonging to something, and that feeling is very hard to give up even when you can no longer remember what you gave for it. When Trump is gone, they will still be here. Standing in the silence where the noise used to be. Without the permission the crowd gave them. Without the pastor who told them their cruelty was holy. They will be alone with what they said and what they cheered and what they chose to become, and there will be no one left to tell them it was righteous. That morning is coming. Robert Mueller flew across the Pacific on military leave to hold his newborn daughter for a few hours before returning to the war. He came home. He buried his dead with honour. He served presidents of both parties because he understood that the institution was larger than any one man. He told his grandchildren that a lie is the worst thing a person can do, that a reputation once lost cannot be recovered, and he lived that, every day, in the quiet and unglamorous way of people who actually believe what they say. He was the kind of American the world used to point to when it needed to believe the story was true. He died last night. His wife is alone in their house in Georgetown. His daughters are learning what the world is without him in it. And somewhere in the particular hush that falls over a family in the first hours of loss, the most powerful man and the biggest loser on earth sent a message to say he was glad. The world that loved what America was supposed to be is grieving tonight. Not for Robert Mueller only. For the country that produced him and then became this. For the distance between what was promised and what was delivered. For the suspicion, growing quieter and more certain with each passing month, that the America people believed in was always partly a story, and the story is over now, and there is nothing yet to replace it. That is all it needed to be. A man died. His family is broken open with grief. That is all it needed to be. Instead the President said good. And the country that once stood for something looked away 🇺🇸 Gandalv / @Microinteracti1
Gandalv tweet media
English
4K
15.4K
49K
3.3M
Thomas Krogh Jensen retweetledi
Orla Joelsen
Orla Joelsen@OJoelsen·
New details are emerging about a heated meeting on Saturday afternoon at the Bayerischer Hof hotel in Munich between several senators and members of Congress and Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen, along with Greenland’s Premier Jens-Frederik Nielsen. It was during this meeting that Senator Lindsey Graham reportedly went completely off the rails. The American outlet Puck had previously described how so-called “f-bombs” (f short for the word “fuck,” ed.) were thrown around the room. “Imagine Graham on his worst day,” a source told Puck. But Berlingske can now reveal that events unfolded even more violently than previously reported — and that Graham’s outburst was directed in particular at Mette Frederiksen and Jens-Frederik Nielsen. “He called her ‘little lady,’” a source who was in the room told Berlingske. However, the prime minister did not appear affected by what everyone present perceived as extremely degrading and outright sexist. “She seemed cool,” the source said. When Graham had finished, Frederiksen simply responded: “When you’re done with that, the meeting can continue.” Earlier, Graham had also stressed to Frederiksen and Nielsen that Donald Trump was the President of the United States — and thus the most powerful man in the world. The implication: neither Denmark nor Greenland should believe they are anything in comparison with the mighty United States. This “rant,” as a Danish source who was present in the room described it, came across as extremely demeaning toward Denmark and Greenland — particularly after the “little lady” remark directed at Mette Frederiksen. Graham’s behavior was described by a source as outright “disturbing,” “shocking,” and “extremely inappropriate.” An almost theatrical scene also unfolded between Graham and Premier Jens-Frederik Nielsen. “Graham yawned directly in his face in a way that could only be interpreted as mocking,” the source told Berlingske. It became too much for some of the American participants at the meeting, and Senator Elissa Slotkin (Democrat) was reportedly so shocked that she stood up and left the meeting. In a sense, the meeting marked the culmination of Graham’s angry outbursts. Already on Friday, he had stunned observers on live television when asked about Greenland. “Who the hell cares who owns Greenland?” Graham said, according to CSPAN. Participants at the meeting described his conduct as “completely out of line.” According to Berlingske’s information, there was quiet speculation afterward as to whether the senator from South Carolina had lost his composure entirely — whether he was not in his right mind when meeting the Danish and Greenlandic leaders. Only Graham himself likely knows the answer to that. —Berlingske
Orla Joelsen tweet media
English
2.3K
6.1K
16.7K
2.8M
Thomas Krogh Jensen retweetledi
Occupy Democrats
Occupy Democrats@OccupyDemocrats·
BREAKING: Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney blindsides Trump by forming a super alliance of 40 powerful countries to defeat his disastrous MAGA agenda. Carney has become one of Trump's most brilliant adversaries... According to Politico, the European Union, composed of 27 nations, as well as a geopolitical bloc of 12 Indo-Pacific countries, have begun negotiations to form one of the largest economic alliances in the entire world. This historic pivot comes as Trump continues to wage erratic tariff wars on close allies, turning the once-stable United States into a deeply unreliable partner. The talks are being led by Canada and will be the fruit of Carney's vision of a world in which the so-called "middle powers" unite to undermine Trump's tariffs and make themselves immune to his bullying coercion. If successful — and it certainly appears to be heading in that direction — the supply chains of countries as far off as Canada, Malaysia, and Germany could be intwined into one super supply chain. “The work is definitely coming along,” a Canadian government official said to POLITICO. “We’ve had very fruitful discussions on it with other partners around the world.” “We see a lot of value in increasing trade among the EU and [Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership] parties, which would also contribute to enhancing supply chain resilience,” stated a Japanese trade official. Last month, Carney gave an astonishing speech at the Davos World Economic Forum during which he announced the end of American dominance, stating that the "bargain no longer" works for the rest of the world. American hegemony once offered benefits, now it offers only chaos. "Let me be direct, we are in the midst of a rupture not a transition," Carney said during that speech. "Over the past two decades a series of crises in finance, health, energy, and geopolitics have laid the bare risks of extreme global integration." "But more recently, great powers have begun using economic integration as weapons," he said, referring to Trump. "Tariffs as leverage. Financial infrastructures as coercion. Supply chains as vulnerabilities to be exploited. You cannot live within the lie of mutual benefit through integration when integration becomes the source of your subordination." He predicted that allied nations would "diversify to hedge against uncertainty" and "rebuild sovereignty" and that's exactly what's happening with this nascent trade alliance. Carney said that the deal will "create a new trading bloc of 1.5 billion people." Left out in the cold would be the American people, who will be forced to stand by as the citizens of other nations enjoy easier, cheaper access to reliable goods. Trump has made us a world pariah, and the price will be shouldered by your wallet. “We hope that if that’s a success, if you can see tangible benefits in different areas, that could also entice other countries to join in and team up in a positive sense,” said Klemens Kober, the Director of Trade Policy, EU Customs, Transatlantic Relations at the Association of German Chambers of Industry and Commerce. “So the more the merrier," Kober added. This is what happens when you elect an ignorant conman and give him unilateral power over foreign policy. Trump and his MAGA sycophants thought that the rest of the world would simply roll over as America proceeded to pillaged and ransack their coffers. Instead, they'e banding together to completely shatter the balance of power forever. Please ❤️ and share if you think that Trump is the worst president in American history!
Occupy Democrats tweet media
English
2.7K
7.7K
26.2K
1.7M
Thomas Krogh Jensen
Thomas Krogh Jensen@ThomasKrogh·
Read and let it sink in 👇
Gandalv@Microinteracti1

This video should unsettle anyone who takes the United States seriously as a nation. Because it exposes something dangerous: the trivialization of the world's most consequential office. It shows how carelessly the power, credibility, and accumulated moral authority of a superpower can be squandered for a few seconds of viral attention. In any other major democracy, this behavior from a head of state would trigger a constitutional crisis. Paris would burn. Berlin would convene emergency sessions. In the Nordic countries, resignation would follow within hours. Across functioning democracies, the public, institutions, and political class would recognize this for what it is: an assault on the dignity of the state itself. Leaders are not free to perform as entertainers without consequence. National honor is not personal property, it's held in trust. But the United States is not just another country with a provocateur in charge. It is the linchpin of global order. It maintains formal alliances and security guarantees with forty to fifty nations. It underwrites the financial architecture, trade systems, and diplomatic frameworks that billions of people depend on daily. When the American president speaks—or posts—it doesn't land as satire, meme, or personal whim. It reads as a signal about what the country is becoming. American power has never relied solely on carrier strike groups or economic output. It has rested on something more fragile and more valuable: trust. The belief that beneath domestic turbulence lies institutional seriousness, predictability, and a baseline commitment to dignity. That belief is now disintegrating in real time. Millions of American companies operate globally. They negotiate multibillion-dollar contracts in environments where reputation is currency. Boardrooms in Frankfurt, Singapore, and Dubai aren't debating whether a post was clever—they're asking whether the United States remains a reliable partner. Whether agreements signed today will be honored tomorrow. Whether American leadership has devolved from institutional to purely theatrical. Consider tourism, which sustains millions of American jobs—airlines, hotels, restaurants, museums, entire regional economies. Soft power isn't an abstraction. It materializes in flight bookings, conference locations, study-abroad programs, and decades of accumulated goodwill. A quiet, decentralized boycott doesn't require government action—only a collective sense that a nation no longer respects itself. Now picture this image being studied by foreign ministers, central bank governors, defense strategists, and sovereign wealth fund managers. Picture them asking a coldly rational question: How do we write binding thirty-year agreements with a country whose public face will be this, relentlessly, for years to come? How do we plan for the long term when the tone is impulsive, mocking, and unbound by the gravity of office? This is where the real calculus begins. Trillions in foreign capital depend on confidence that America is stable, credible, and rule-governed. That confidence is now being traded for what, exactly? Applause from an online mob? A dopamine rush from manufactured outrage? Content designed to dominate the news cycle rather than serve the national interest? Every serious nation eventually confronts this choice: burn long-term credibility for short-term spectacle, or safeguard the reputation previous generations bled to build. The United States spent eighty years constructing an image of reliability, restraint, and leadership under pressure. That image wasn't born from perfection—it came from a visible commitment to standards that transcended impulse. This isn't a partisan issue. Europeans who value democratic norms recognize something ominously familiar here. Americans—Democrat and Republican alike—who believe in responsibility and restraint should see it too. Power attracts scrutiny. Leadership demands discipline. A superpower cannot behave like a reality TV contestant without paying a price. The presidency is not a personal broadcast channel. It's a symbol carried on behalf of 330 million people and countless international partners who never voted but whose lives are shaped by American decisions anyway. Every post either reinforces or erodes the idea that America can be counted on when it matters most. So the question is no longer whether this is offensive. The question is whether this is who America chooses to be: a nation that trades a century of hard-won reputation for viral moments. A country that replaces statecraft with content creation. A republic governed like a season of reality television. History offers a harsh lesson here. Great powers don't fall because enemies mock them. They collapse when they begin mocking themselves—publicly, proudly, and without grasping the cost until it's far too late. Stay connected, Follow Gandalv @Microinteracti1

English
0
0
0
48
Thomas Krogh Jensen retweetledi
Orla Joelsen
Orla Joelsen@OJoelsen·
A pointed remark from businessman Tom Dans, who has been described as Trump’s man in Greenland, has prompted a strong reaction from Greenlandic MP Aaja Chemnitz. Both appeared on Nyhetsmorgen on NRK, where Tom Dans explained why the United States views Greenland as part of its own backyard. He portrayed Greenland as being constrained by Danish control. “But with the world’s richest economy and the most powerful man in your corner, good things can and will happen,” he said, according to NRK. As he was leaving the studio to make room for Chemnitz, he turned to her and said: “The check is in the mail.” Chemnitz later responded on Instagram: “On several occasions, I have experienced Americans implying that the check is on its way in the mail. But my encounter with Tom Dans represents the pinnacle of manipulative, boundary-crossing, and undiplomatic behavior.” -TV2 Hi Tom! This is my message to you: - I hope you will never again set foot in Greenland, given the arrogance you display toward the people of Greenland! Greenland is not for sale! Get it through your head! Period.
English
54
281
1.2K
33K
Thomas Krogh Jensen retweetledi
Gandalv
Gandalv@Microinteracti1·
Thousands of Danish veterans, joined by supporters, gathered outside the U.S. Embassy in Copenhagen today to protest remarks by Donald Trump that dismissed the contribution of NATO allies in Afghanistan. 🇩🇰🇺🇸
English
48
510
2.3K
33.5K
Thomas Krogh Jensen retweetledi
Jesper Møller Sørensen 🇩🇰
After 9/11, the U.S. called. Denmark answered. Thousands of Danish troops served in Helmand—on the front line. We lost more soldiers per capita than even the United States. That was solidarity. We stood with America then—and we still do. I witnessed our brave men & women during my 1,5 years in Afghanistan.
Jesper Møller Sørensen 🇩🇰 tweet media
English
324
1.5K
7.6K
440.1K
Thomas Krogh Jensen retweetledi
Jesper Møller Sørensen 🇩🇰
Joint statement by Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, and the United Kingdom 👇
Jesper Møller Sørensen 🇩🇰 tweet media
English
402
1.5K
5.8K
258.3K
Thomas Krogh Jensen retweetledi
Jesper Møller Sørensen 🇩🇰
The last few days have highlighted shared objectives & clear differences between the Kingdom of Denmark & the U.S. The position of 🇩🇰 & 🇬🇱 remains clear: 👉 Through the Kingdom of Denmark, 🇬🇱 is a member of @NATO & covered by Article 5. A stronger NATO role in the Arctic remains a priority. 👉 Under the 1951 Defence Agreement, the U.S. can request an increased military presence in 🇬🇱. Any such request would be examined constructively and expeditiously. 👉 The Kingdom of Denmark is open to expanding 🇺🇸 collaboration on Arctic security and has already significantly increased its own contributions, committing $13.7bn to new defense and Arctic security capabilities. 👉 🇩🇰🇬🇱 & 🇺🇸 agree on the objective: strengthening long-term security in the Arctic. 👉 Greenland is not for sale. The future of 🇬🇱 should only be determined by the people of Greenland. A high-level working group will meet in the coming weeks to address 🇺🇸 security concerns while respecting the Kingdom of Denmark’s clear red lines.
Jesper Møller Sørensen 🇩🇰 tweet mediaJesper Møller Sørensen 🇩🇰 tweet mediaJesper Møller Sørensen 🇩🇰 tweet mediaJesper Møller Sørensen 🇩🇰 tweet media
English
35
112
556
14.3K
Thomas Krogh Jensen retweetledi
Glenn Tunes
Glenn Tunes@glenn_tunes·
NORWAY STANDS WITH DENMARK AND GREENLAND ✊✊✊✊✊✊✊✊✊✊✊✊✊
Glenn Tunes tweet media
English
1.3K
7.7K
58.9K
672K
Thomas Krogh Jensen retweetledi
Bernie Sanders
Bernie Sanders@BernieSanders·
Trump is raising tariffs on 8 NATO allies because they rightly support Denmark's sovereignty in Greenland. Destroying our closest alliances to take Greenland — which Denmark lets us use freely already — is insane. Congress must say NO.
English
4.2K
16.4K
139.4K
3.2M
Senator Thom Tillis
Senator Thom Tillis@SenThomTillis·
This response to our own allies for sending a small number of troops to Greenland for training is bad for America, bad for American businesses, and bad for America's allies. It's great for Putin, Xi and other adversaries who want to see NATO divided. The fact that a small handful of "advisors" are actively pushing for coercive action to seize territory of an ally is beyond stupid. It hurts the legacy of President Trump and undercuts all the work he has done to strengthen the NATO alliance over the years.
The Washington Post@washingtonpost

Breaking news: The U.S. will impose tariffs on countries that have sent troops to Greenland in recent days, President Trump said, dramatically escalating his effort to acquire the territory despite assertions that the Arctic island is not for sale. wapo.st/4pPmrqH

English
4.4K
2.1K
13.5K
1.7M
Thomas Krogh Jensen retweetledi
Brian Krassenstein
Brian Krassenstein@krassenstein·
BREAKING: Secret recording between Trump and France’s Emmanuel Macron about Ukraine and Russia shows you how Trump only cares about himself and the Nobel peace prize. Macron: Zelensky accepted your proposal for a 30-day ceasefire. Trump: “Oh… Good! Nobel Prize please!” Trump is a national embarrassment.
English
483
3.7K
16.8K
1.3M
Thomas Krogh Jensen retweetledi
Occupy Democrats
Occupy Democrats@OccupyDemocrats·
BREAKING: Republican Congressman Don Bacon announces that he'd "lean" towards impeaching Trump if he proceeds with the "utter buffoonery" of invading Greenland. And it gets so much worse for MAGA... "I'll be candid with you: There's so many Republicans mad about this," Bacon told the Omaha World-Herald. "If he went through with the threats, I think it would be the end of his presidency. And he needs to know: The off-ramp is realizing Republicans aren't going to tolerate this and he's going to have to back off. He hates being told no, but in this case, I think Republicans need to be firm." Bacon's willingness to possibly support impeachment is noteworthy because he voted against impeachment twice during Trump's first disastrous term in office, including in the wake of the deadly January 6th insurrection. His decision to speak out now suggests that Trump's support is waning within his own party as his popularity craters. "I don't want to give you a definite yes or no, but I would lean that way," Bacon said of impeachment. "It would be a total mistake to invade an ally. It would be catastrophic to our allies and everything. It's just the worst idea ever in my view." Bacon also explained his support of a House bill that would limit the president's ability to attack a NATO ally. He is the sole Republican co-sponsor. "I think it should be unnecessary," he said. "It's ridiculous that this has to even be done. But when the president talks about taking Greenland one way or the other way every day this last week or so and that it's unacceptable if Greenland refuses to be part of the United States, I felt like I needed to make a statement that Republicans disagree." “It’s utter buffoonery to think that we should compel Greenland to be part of the United States,” he continued. Trump's saber-rattling towards Greenland is one of his most insane and downright stupid blunders to date. He insists that the U.S. needs to seize the Arctic island for "national security," but under existing NATO agreements we can already station our military there. This is about his desperate need to carve out some semblance of a legacy for himself. His domestic policies are imploding our country and so he's grasping at imperialist dreams to convince himself that he's anything other than an abject failure. "You don't treat allies that way," Bacon said. "You do that with Russia or China, Iran, but don't treat your best friends like a piece of S-H-I-T. That's what he's doing. I think it's totally wrong to treat your best friends like this and bully them." Please ❤️ and share if you support impeaching Trump!
Occupy Democrats tweet media
English
354
2.3K
7.1K
319.5K
Thomas Krogh Jensen retweetledi
Senator Chris Coons
Senator Chris Coons@ChrisCoons·
There's a lot of rhetoric and not a lot of reality in the conversation about Greenland in Washington. We're in Copenhagen today to separate fact from fiction and show support for a trusted NATO ally.
English
292
455
2.5K
50.4K
Thomas Krogh Jensen retweetledi
Orla Joelsen
Orla Joelsen@OJoelsen·
The demonstrators in Nuuk, have now reached the area in front of the American consulate. People are still continuing to arrive from the city center. January 17, 2026 (1:40pm) #StandWithGreenland 🇬🇱
English
2.3K
6.3K
31.1K
1.3M
Thomas Krogh Jensen retweetledi
Jesper Møller Sørensen 🇩🇰
There’s been a lot of talk about 🇩🇰🇬🇱 lately. So let’s clarify a few things: 👉 Denmark takes Arctic security very seriously. In 2025 alone, 🇩🇰 has committed $13.7 bn to strengthen Arctic capabilities & operations. 👉Greenland's status as a part of the Kingdom of 🇩🇰 is not in doubt, but internationally recognized. This includes by 🇺🇸 on numerous occasions. 👉The US has had the option to establish additional military bases and increase its military presence in 🇬🇱 since 1951 & that option remains open today. These are not opinions. They are facts, grounded in 225 years of our enduring partnership, shared history & agreements between 🇬🇱🇩🇰 & 🇺🇸
Jesper Møller Sørensen 🇩🇰 tweet media
English
540
1.4K
5.1K
201.4K
Thomas Krogh Jensen retweetledi
Brian Allen
Brian Allen@allenanalysis·
🚨 BREAKING: The Danish Ambassador to the United Nations just slammed Donald Trump for threatening to take over Greenland. Denmark is making it clear: sovereignty is not up for negotiation. This isn’t strength. It’s America burning credibility with allies — in real time.
English
438
2.6K
12.3K
277.7K