Oli

85 posts

Oli banner
Oli

Oli

@TofuDood

29 | Programmer | 🇬🇧

Norwich, England Katılım Haziran 2024
230 Takip Edilen8 Takipçiler
Oli retweetledi
⚡︎
⚡︎@_sorrengailll·
Unpopular Opinion: Caps & Gowns should be FREE at universities whenever a student is graduating.
English
443
14.3K
160.3K
2M
NFBUK
NFBUK@NFBUK·
New zebra crossing at Blackfriars Station floating bus stop. We have tried to explain to @cityoflondon why these bus stops are not safe or accessible for blind people but more are being planned. @citylordmayor can we urgently meet to discuss our concerns please. This is dangerous
English
178
338
1.2K
157.1K
Oli
Oli@TofuDood·
@NFBUK @mysaymysay1 @cityoflondon Right, but the question is whether that is better or worse than how many injuries would have happened if cyclists were still mixed in with traffic.
English
2
0
1
30
mysaymysay
mysaymysay@mysaymysay1·
@TofuDood @NFBUK @cityoflondon It's a regression for pedestrians, a solution that places pedestrians & the most vulnerable is danger is not a solution. Imagine if the cyclist gave way to pedestrians or even slowed right down at a floating bus stop. The problem here is cyclists behavior.
English
1
0
4
91
Oli
Oli@TofuDood·
@HereHareHa @NFBUK @cityoflondon Agreed. Cyclist coming in at 15-20mph might not even see the markings until they're almost on top of them (granted that's not what happens in the clip), especially as they're raised. Seems like half an installation.
English
0
0
1
398
HereHare
HereHare@HereHareHa·
@TofuDood @NFBUK @cityoflondon Looks like a nightmare. Why no stripy poles and yellow balls like on roads? It seems like the cyclists are just not aware rather than choosing to endanger people. I'm not familiar with these set ups, is there a constant flow of pedestrians and cyclists- is that the issue?
English
1
0
1
455
Oli
Oli@TofuDood·
@mysaymysay1 @NFBUK @cityoflondon Which is more dangerous for cyclists - a regression. I'm asking if there is a design which still protects cyclists from road traffic without being a negative for pedestrians.
English
2
0
1
94
Oli
Oli@TofuDood·
@Dan_1200RT @charliechiv @NFBUK @cityoflondon Well lots of the replies wanted cyclists to be put back with the regular traffic including cars and buses, which is presumably less safe than this design. Hence I was asking if they had a design in mind that was better for pedestrians, without reducing cyclist safety.
English
2
0
4
220
Oli
Oli@TofuDood·
@NinoushkaLondon @NFBUK @cityoflondon Not necessarily, but when they are criticising the current design I think it's fair to ask what design they would prefer.
English
4
0
4
564
Judith
Judith@NinoushkaLondon·
@TofuDood @NFBUK @cityoflondon Is it the job of the NFBUK to come up with an alternative design? This design clearly does not work. TFL and whoever came up with this need to go back to the drawing board & start again.
English
2
0
14
584
Oli
Oli@TofuDood·
@charliechiv @NFBUK @cityoflondon I agree with you, which is why I'm asking what better design they would propose to protect both cyclists and pedestrians better.
English
2
0
6
592
charlie chivington
charlie chivington@charliechiv·
@TofuDood @NFBUK @cityoflondon It’s not about cyclist what about pedestrians with disabilities like myself I have been shouted at sworn out on that crossing because an entitled cyclist has had to stop
English
1
0
28
697
Oli
Oli@TofuDood·
@Carm5012 @NFBUK @cityoflondon Agreed. Is there a design change that can be made here to incentivise better cyclist behaviour (or disincentivise bad cyclist behaviour)?
English
7
0
2
522
mysaymysay
mysaymysay@mysaymysay1·
@TofuDood @NFBUK @cityoflondon What's your alternative to ignoring those with and without disabilities? Floating bus stops are not only dangerous they're anti-pedestrian.
English
1
0
14
524
Oli retweetledi
James Clark 📈📉¯\_(ツ)_/¯
The thing about bond markets is that if Labour said: "We're going to borrow this money to do a massive investment in nuclear energy, built to Korean standards, we're going to expand our airports and ports, renew and expand Britain's highway and rail systems, renew Britain's armed services and we're going to dramatically overhaul our planning and approvals system to do it rapidly" Labour would get a very positive response from the markets and its borrowing rate would fall. Unfortunately what Labour tells the markets is "we're going to borrow money and throw it at our client groups - welfare recipients, pensioners, the public sector and unions - basically the least productive members of society". Oddly enough this doesn't go down very well.
English
100
720
4.1K
117.5K