Tom_W

@Zainismaster2 @Acts17David @xyzzrryyy Show me in the quran or hadith where aisha HERSELF said she was on that age when he consummated the marriage with her

@Acts17David @xyzzrryyy Aisha is 17-19 debate me

Aint this you?

@xyzzrryyy @Acts17David If you can get cooked by David on X, imagine how cooked you would be in real face to face or call in debate.

@Acts17David Isn’t that what you should do

@Abdullah1155048 @Acts17David @NotToday14093 Issac 800000 Rebecca -1

@Acts17David @NotToday14093 Issac 60 Rebecca 3

It was a pedophile, not a gay person. These "savage" Muslims have more morals seemingly then the entirety of the U.S government who let pedos live free.

@Abdullaahi75043 @Jamaal4Jesus Can allah do that?

@Jamaal4Jesus Can Yahweh create a stone that he can’t actually Lift?

Muslims, is Allah powerful enough to incarnate and enter into creation? 🤔🤔🤔

@ounoughi_zaki @Acts17David @masteroogwgay Ooff...you don't realize that DW was intentionaly wear the dress of his wife to mimic what muhamad did in a hadith, where he wore aisha's dress. You posting this means you laugh at what muhammad did in that hadith.

@Acts17David @masteroogwgay

God cannot do logical impossibilities, you are making a contradiction with the statement. It’s like saying make him go left right or make him create a square circle. This doesn’t make him less powerful if he can’t do it, you are asking for something impossible. Him making himself enter creation contradicts the definition of God.

@RandBoyo @paleochristcon @jamal_sare1037 Mary was a virgin fool. But the pedo arabian prophet who cannot read or write has been ridden by 30 men of al zutt all night long and he married a 6 year old kid and consummate the marriage when she was 9 years old.

@paleochristcon @jamal_sare1037 Mary was between 12 and 16 years old when she gave birth to Jesus. Wake up fool. Is abortion and transgender common in Iran? You want American filth in Iran too? Their culture is their business. We cant invade every country in which we don’t approve of their culture.

More wins!

@GodLogic_GL I think he's doing what i call "khamene-ing". Basically after khamenei was killed, iran went on berserk and launch strikes at US bases on all middle east. Hajib lost the debate and went berserk and launch copyright strikes at his debate video on all channel.

Mohammed Hijab's post-debate meltdown continues. He took down yet another video of ours, then struck GodLogic 2.0, and struck at least 2 other channels (one of which was a commentary video). Blatant misuse of YouTube's terms of service.

@TeamYouTube please investigate into this abuse of copyright strike

Dear @TeamYouTube: The YouTube channel (@MohammedHijab) is abusing the copyright system to attack other channels. Here is a video clip of him giving me VERBAL CONSENT to put our discussion on my channel. After I posted it, he filed a copyright complaint. Why is this being allowed? Are people allowed to deceptively give verbal consent to post content in order to get the person a strike? Video that got struck: youtube.com/watch?v=vxPkAv…

@aocburneracct @paleochristcon @GodLogic_GL @mohammed_hijab Yes he did. This is just ONE OF an example of how he stumped an atheist. There are several others. So what you gonna say now? youtu.be/w8OTSQJdx64?si…

@paleochristcon @GodLogic_GL @mohammed_hijab Does that dude ever debate atheists? Pretty easy to show Islam isn't true when you both start from a place that God exists lol, take up a challenge

Our story so far, Godlogic @GodLogic_GL a prominent online christian apologist known for taking on Islamic apologists did a high profile debate with @mohammed_hijab After filibustering the entire debate post debate Hijab Issues a copyright strike (Abuse of YT system)

@Yjey @paleochristcon @GodLogic_GL @mohammed_hijab The topic here is the copyright strike, not the debate itself. 1. Hijab didn't ask him, he reported him, that's it. 2. Hijab gave explicit confirmation, GL even asked him on this multiple times and it was very clear. Conclusion: Hijab lied, plain & simple.

I think Hijab asked him to remove the video because it was supposed to be only a live conversation. But GL twisted the whole video cuttin Hijab s responses and adding stupid sound effects making it sound like he dominated the conversation. Guys need to do live fact checks also I have checked a lot of Hijab/GL answers and GL lied on a bunch of points.

@Josh_Alice @MJAKIRALI89 @GodLogic_GL The fact that hijab need to copyright strike prove otherwise, at this point, muslims coping so hard. Imagine if it was a Christian apologist doing copyright strike to a muslim after a debate. I know muslims would screaming on the christians about how coward & liar they are.

@MJAKIRALI89 @GodLogic_GL Not at all. Mohammed copyright striked GL video cuz he lost and is a sore loser. Dude is getting clowned everywhere but the blind lead the blind so i dont expect somebody named Mohammed to understand something so obvious. If you could, you wouldnt be a muslim.

MOHAMMED HIJAB COPYRIGHT STRUCK THE DEBATE...after giving verbal agreement that he wouldn't do this (and allowed me to upload it). The video was uploaded from a streamyard recording, not his YouTube channel.

@MJAKIRALI89 @K23295864 @GodLogic_GL He asked hijab about it multiple times, why did you not responding to @K23295864 and the screenshot provided?

@K23295864 @GodLogic_GL Hijab made a clarification: “We're good. Well, I mean, look, you can go live right now. I mean, I haven't got any issues with that myself.”

@GillGarmesh @GodLogic_GL Same energy

@GodLogic_GL The best thumbnail

Mohammed Hijab - the CHAMPION of self-owns 😂😂😂Hijab getting some flashbacks here of this embarrassing interview he conducted a few years back.

@message2the @Prettikaliii @KatKanada_TM @GodLogic_GL 1) No, you made a rebuttal & tu quoque fallacy. 2.) No straw man, he simply say christians have been accused for many bad things, the latest 1 is taqiyya, he includes your argument but didn't say it's all your argument. 3.) ??? 4.) yes it does matter

@Prettikaliii @KatKanada_TM @GodLogic_GL 1.) I made a statement. It was a statement of fact. It was not a “rebuttal”. But, your attempt to rebut it fella short. 2.) your use of Taqiyyah shows your own misconceptions. 3.) your accusation falls short. 4.) if you want to use AI, know the question you ask matters.

@Ihunanya_chi @Falcons16858 FAAAHHH!!

@Falcons16858 Boom 💥 😭

Muslim: Your Bible is corrupted. Me: Okay… and? Muslim: It’s altered and full of contradictions. Me: Alright, noted. Muslim: Jesus didn’t write the Gospels. Me: True. Muslim: The Gospel writers are anonymous, so it’s unreliable. Me: Exactly why I don’t see how “Muhammad is mentioned in a corrupted Bible” so the Quran is wrong for saying he was mentioned. Muslim: He is in the Bible! How can you say the Quran is wrong? Me: Oh okay… where exactly? Muslim: Deuteronomy 18:18, Isaiah 42, John 17, Song of Solomon. Me: Interesting. So is the Bible still corrupted or not? Muslim: Well… not all of it is corrupted. Me: So it’s corrupted… but also trustworthy… depending on the argument? Muslim: We only accept the parts that agree with the Quran. Me: So a corrupted book becomes reliable… when it agrees with your conclusion? Muslim: It’s not completely corrupted, just partially. Me: So… half-trust it when convenient, half-discard it when inconvenient? Muslim: The Quran is the final preserved truth. Me: Got it. You said Isaiah 42 is about Muhammed right? Muslim: Yes, Isaiah 42 is about Muhammad. The prophecy points to a prophet arising in Arabia. Me: Okay, let’s read it: “Behold My Servant… I have put My Spirit upon Him…” So does Allah have a spirit? Muslim: No, Allah doesn’t have a spirit but it means Jibril. Me: But it literally says “My Spirit” and “put upon Him.” Muslim: You’re misinterpreting it, it doesn’t mean that exactly. Me: So the text says one thing… but it means another thing when needed? Muslim: That’s not what it means. Me: So what does it means? Muslim: To you is your religion, and to me is mine, there is no compulsion in religion. Me: uhm😅

@Jamesputty8 @GodLogic_GL It's through the divine person death that the atonement of sins can be done. And Jesus isn't a mere person that becomes divine, he's already divine pre human. He's divinity means he's God.

@Tom_Wmd @GodLogic_GL person refers to who someone is, and nature or being refers to what someone

@Jamesputty8 @GodLogic_GL Since you agree person is what determines the value and not nature, that means human nature death is out of question. How 1 sinless person death atone the sins? Jesus according to christian paradigm is not just a person, he's a divine person who incarnate to human nature.

@Jamesputty8 @GodLogic_GL Oh okay, you're right. Now did you know the difference between personhood & nature/being?

@Tom_Wmd @GodLogic_GL x.com/Tom_Wmd/status…

@Jamesputty8 @GodLogic_GL Notice that you keep straw manning me? I never said "human person" & in earlier reply you also didn't say "human person". We only said "person". Why did you keep straw manning?

@Tom_Wmd @GodLogic_GL a sinless human person has more value. but how can one sinless human life pay for the sins of all mankind?