Top End Rooster

8.1K posts

Top End Rooster banner
Top End Rooster

Top End Rooster

@TopEndRooster

Katılım Eylül 2013
361 Takip Edilen210 Takipçiler
Top End Rooster
Top End Rooster@TopEndRooster·
Well 50kg for the Stradbroke, just need to beat Beadman, grafterburners this weekend to make the field
English
0
0
0
60
Top End Rooster retweetledi
Robin Dods
Robin Dods@toy59496·
Small Cap Investing is Dead with a 77% spike in Tax Collection I have run 1,000 Monte Carlo simulations of portfolios of 20 Small Cap Stocks with the New Inflation Corrected CGT model versus the existing 50% CGT discount model. The results are devastating. The bottom line is that small caps are highly asymmetric bets where your small number of winners are meant to compensate you for your many losers. Mining companies are a good example of this situation and are a fundamental pillar of our national wealth. However if you tax those few winners at 47% with the trivial relative inflation correction you effectively wipe out the ability to offset your losses. This is because the tax drag on your few multi baggers is so high that it changes the entire logic of the investment process. It's become a loser's game. 1. ​The Moonshot Tax Penalty: Because Australian small caps rely heavily on a right-skewed distribution (a few massive winners offsetting many losers), the Indexation framework introduces a devastating tax penalty. For a stock that goes from $50,000 to $400,000, a 3% inflation adjustment on the original $50,000 cost basis is completely negligible. Under Indexation, you forfeit the 50% discount and pay a flat 47% on nearly the entire gain. 2. ​The Turnover Trap: With a 15% annual turnover, small-cap portfolios realize taxes continuously. Under the current system, every partial sale triggers a flat 23.5% effective tax rate, leaving more money inside the portfolio to compound. Under indexation, those early wins are hit at a full 47% clip, severely dampening the portfolio's forward compounding engine. 3. The Asymmetric Loss Failure: in small-cap investing, a stock can only ever lose 100% of its value, but explosive winners have unlimited compounding upside. The government’s asymmetric tax system completely devastates this dynamic: by replacing the flat 50% CGT discount with inflation-indexing for winners only, it leaves your nominal losses capped and completely unable to counteract the massive tax hike on your multi-baggers. Because a 3% inflation buffer barely dents a 400% moonshot gain, you end up paying a brutal, un-discounted 47% tax rate on the very winners that drive a small-cap portfolio's success, causing a 77% spike in total government tax take overall. Even in investing we see the socialist government wants us all to be the same. Communists. (Technical notes: Model executed using Gemini Pro with 1,000 portfolios of 20 stocks each with the volatility and median return typical of this class of small cap stocks over the last 10 years, using a geometric mean process to step forward each portfolio each year).
Robin Dods tweet mediaRobin Dods tweet media
English
42
127
490
67.4K
Ray Gatt
Ray Gatt@Gatty54·
@Allan_McFarlane @TopEndRooster There are people rorting the system. Thats who it’s aimed at. Anyway, the real story is Celtic winning the title and the cup and Rangers choking and finishing third! lol
English
1
0
1
142
Top End Rooster
Top End Rooster@TopEndRooster·
@Gatty54 If I kark my kids trust will be taxed even if they are minors
English
4
0
1
477
Ray Gatt
Ray Gatt@Gatty54·
@TopEndRooster Mate that is wrong. There is no death tax. Don’t be brainwashed
English
6
0
51
3.1K
Top End Rooster retweetledi
Aus Integrity
Aus Integrity@QBCCIntegrity·
Labor invent modelling and forecasts then rely on it as fact to GASLIGHT Australians Look at any Ai model, ask it a question about immigration, rent, energy, whatever - it is weighted to rely on govt modelling over real world facts Pathological liars.
English
28
149
620
7.4K
Top End Rooster retweetledi
TheRoadknight
TheRoadknight@RoadknightThe·
Bloody brilliant and hilarious! Video of the Year.
One Nation Domination (Fan Account)@OneNationDom

STOP! 👮🚫 DO NOT WATCH THIS VIDEO 😡 @PatsKarvelas was right! We cannot be sharing videos like these and legitimising One Nation any more than it already massively is. This is immoral. This is unjust. This is UNMULTICULTURAL. Stop it. Stop watching this. Stop sharing this. Do you want One Nation to get elected in 2028?!?! If you share this video then that nightmare might just come true! Don't become one of Pauline's Dark Forces. No. Just, no. #auspol

English
54
372
1.3K
74K
Top End Rooster
Top End Rooster@TopEndRooster·
Watching this saints team makes me think we should have promotion n relegation with metro cup teams
English
0
0
0
28
Top End Rooster
Top End Rooster@TopEndRooster·
@MarkGottlieb Thankfully the local Bowlo still has $5 schooners, just one of the reasons the sunny coast is the best place in Oz to live
English
0
0
0
39
Ray Gatt
Ray Gatt@Gatty54·
@TopEndRooster So you are happy for people to negative gear 6,7,8 or more homes and forcing young people out of owning a house?
English
2
0
0
64
Top End Rooster
Top End Rooster@TopEndRooster·
@Gatty54 Ive set up a trust a trust for my kids n most people i know have as well
English
1
0
0
41
Top End Rooster
Top End Rooster@TopEndRooster·
How good are these qtis bonuses, especially when u get a horse good enough to win a few of em
English
0
0
0
30
Top End Rooster
Top End Rooster@TopEndRooster·
1 week after the budget n u can see why they didn’t take it to an election for a 3rd time
English
0
0
0
24
Top End Rooster retweetledi
Alister Berkeley
Alister Berkeley@alisterberkeley·
There is a vicious circle at the heart of Australian fiscal policy. Government taxes workers’ wages. Spends more than it collects. Lifts the wage tax. Spends more. Lets bracket creep quietly raise the burden every year, a hidden tax nobody votes for. Spends more. Prints and borrows, so inflation eats what’s left in your pocket, another hidden tax. Spends more. Stacks excise on fuel, tobacco and alcohol; stamp duty on homes and shares; a Medicare levy on top of income tax. Spends more. Brings in a consumption tax. Spends more. Now it has to tax capital. @cjoye At every step the answer to overspending has been a new base to tax, never less spending. Wages weren’t enough. Bracket creep wasn’t enough. Inflation wasn’t enough. Excise wasn’t enough. GST wasn’t enough. So the productive stock the country has spent generations building is next in line. That is what the proposed tax regime actually is. Not a fairness measure. The latest turn of a ratchet that only moves one way and it won’t stop until the spending does.
Alister Berkeley@alisterberkeley

Successive governments have overspent, misallocated capital and treated taxpayer money as if it were unlimited. Now Australians are being drawn into a false argument over who should carry the burden: capital or labour, investors or workers, business or households. That is the trap. The real issue is not simply who pays more. The real issue is whether the government spends wisely, disciplines itself, and stops asking the productive parts of the economy to fund waste, duplication and poor policy design. Without serious spending reform, the debate becomes a zero-sum fight between taxpayers. Capital resists. Labour feels squeezed. Households lose trust. Business delays investment. Productivity stalls. A country cannot tax and transfer its way to prosperity if the underlying system keeps wasting the money it already takes. Australia needs a harder conversation: not just how revenue is raised, but whether public money is being used well. Until that happens, we will keep arguing over the bill, while avoiding the real question: why is the bill so high in the first place?

English
11
36
170
7.5K
Top End Rooster
Top End Rooster@TopEndRooster·
@ReadingThePlay A 34-30 game between a bunch of players who are playing for other countries isn’t origin
English
0
0
1
9
ReadingThePlay
ReadingThePlay@ReadingThePlay·
The elephant in the room now, is how is #Origin going to be played? Will it be the nitpicking infringements with ref interference every 3 to 4 mins as is now the game's execs flavour, or the traditional best vs the best Origin match up that has 30 yrs of history and folklore (and tv ratings) behind it? Both QRL and NSWRL have been trying to get direction on this for weeks (toward team selection) from the NRL but have been given zero.. Having crapped on the game offering this season by further meddling with the rules to beyond common sense, do the @nrl now do the same to Origin..  And if they don't, then face the outcry of how obvious it is that the weekly NRL game is being manipulated and nitpicked, and how screamingly obvious the fark up is..
GIF
English
12
2
48
3.7K
Top End Rooster
Top End Rooster@TopEndRooster·
@ReadingThePlay It’s just like golden point, which I have hated from day 1, 1 pt from a draw use to be very handy on the ladder as u got to the end of the year
English
0
0
1
103
ReadingThePlay
ReadingThePlay@ReadingThePlay·
NRL. Why it doesn’t matter as much as it once did. The NRL has prioritised the quick hit, more-is-more approach, while neglecting the aspect of the game that drew people in and made them care in the first place. When tries are cheap and plentiful, each individual event loses value. It’s ultra-processed rugby league, and everyone knows that’s bad for you. c/ @MikeMeehallWood ↘️ open.substack.com/pub/mikemeehal…
ReadingThePlay tweet media
English
9
7
103
7.8K
Top End Rooster retweetledi
Fusilier
Fusilier@firstfusilier·
If it looks like a death tax, works like a death tax and stinks like a death tax, then it’s a fucken death tax. Tell me I’m wrong @AlboMP ?
English
69
501
1.8K
18.8K
Top End Rooster
Top End Rooster@TopEndRooster·
@TMFScottP Well they have outdone themselves this time with everybody losing all at once
English
0
0
1
53
Scott Phillips
Scott Phillips@TMFScottP·
We've really, really gotta stop expecting 'no-one loses' policies from governments and oppositions. It's national-interest poison, driven by focus groups and grievance politics. We should choose the losers carefully and fairly, but the national interest *must* come first.
English
102
25
291
8.6K