Tough Call Podcast🎙️ 🇨🇦

50.8K posts

Tough Call Podcast🎙️ 🇨🇦 banner
Tough Call Podcast🎙️ 🇨🇦

Tough Call Podcast🎙️ 🇨🇦

@ToughCallPod

I want more open ice hitting!! This account is what I’d do to make it happen as head of player safety of my own league . Contributor for Heavy Hockey Network.

Brookfield, Nova Scotia Katılım Ocak 2016
2.8K Takip Edilen3.9K Takipçiler
AJ949
AJ949@AJ949_·
@ToughCallPod Would you prefer they lay down and die? I don't understand what you would want them to do?
English
0
0
0
18
Tough Call Podcast🎙️ 🇨🇦
Hockey is predictable and stupid when there’s an insurmountable lead. Everyone knows the team losing will start something and try to scrum/fight. And we just…accept it. We don’t do anything to discourage it or punish it. On the contrary, we encourage it. Praise it. So backward.
English
1
0
3
230
Tough Call Podcast🎙️ 🇨🇦
@BradInvestment But the blueline is there. In any other case it would make no sense for the attacker to take the route he does, yes. But if you’re going to penalize a player for taking the ice on the other side of the blueline with offside, hard to ask him to vacate the ice on the side he’s on.
English
1
0
0
15
IB
IB@BradInvestment·
@ToughCallPod Take the Blueline away and watch the play that way. Which player interferes with which. It's usually the attacking player.
English
1
0
1
16
Tough Call Podcast🎙️ 🇨🇦
How is it fair that when a defender pushes an attacker into the zone and forces them offside they call offside on the attacker and not interference on the defender, but if an attacker stops to stay onside and a defender backs into them, the attacker IS called for interference?
English
1
0
10
736
Tough Call Podcast🎙️ 🇨🇦
@BradInvestment In those cases I agree, but often times they just stop. Often times even if they’re moving the defender turns into them following the play. The overwhelming benefit of the doubt goes to the defender in both cases.
English
1
0
0
21
IB
IB@BradInvestment·
@ToughCallPod Because in this situation the defender is usually remaining in his current ice/path of travel. The attacking player is usually changing his path of travel to remain onside. This usually makes the attacking player responsible for the contact creating the interference or offside
English
1
0
0
29
Tough Call Podcast🎙️ 🇨🇦
There’s not a chance they’d call that penalty on Thompson if Montreal hadn’t just had a powerplay. It definitely WAS a penalty, and a stupid one at that, but I just doubt that would have stood out as THE thing to call if there hadn’t already been one.
English
0
0
2
239
WestCDN_Sport
WestCDN_Sport@finance4urneeds·
@ToughCallPod Why? It’s Frank Seravelli who created it all. People and other media listen to him and blow things up which is baffling to me.
English
1
0
0
26
Tough Call Podcast🎙️ 🇨🇦
The officials have chosen the “not calling anything” approach, which people erroneously refer to as “letting them play.”
English
3
0
7
409
Jari Tallgren
Jari Tallgren@FinnHab·
@ToughCallPod There's a huge difference between puck on ice vs puck above the ice surface with that tilted view. But I don't know how they determined that puck was over the goalline...
English
1
0
1
16