Trin TinTin

@WolfgangRichtEU @mattvanswol It’s like you learned nothing from the Covid tyranny. 🙄🤦🏽‍♀️

@mattvanswol Dear Matt, My municipality is mandating masks now and a safety Covid booster. If you and your local government is responsible toward other human life, you should do the same. All the best, Wolfgang

Uuuuuuuuhhhhh… I just went to the grocery store and saw a LOT of people wearing face masks for the first time in a really long time. …are we really doing this crap again????

@catturd2 Texan here. On it. 🫡

This POS RINO must be primaried out and sent packing.

@LangmanVince @Teacrumpets On it. 🫡

Come on Texas, Indiana John Cornyn!

@jeremykauffman The people who deny basic biology and think men can become women have concerns about the quality of education being provided to homeschooled kids.

I homeschool my kids to teach them that people like this are evil, and that goodness requires resisting them

@ViralVideos The electoral college is designed to protect the minority from the majority. It literally prevents mob rule.

No way this retard said: "What if we selected our President by letting the person who got the most votes take the office, instead of the Electoral College?" Does he note realize President Trump would’ve still won? 🤡

@JayGenXer Trust me on this one. For sunburns, use Noxema (with eucalyptus extract). Put it on, but don't rub it in all the way. It will cool your skin, help the burn heal more quickly, and prevent peeling.

@squirrelpalooza @coin_sh0t @DemzDeliver From Grok.

@TrinTinTi @coin_sh0t @DemzDeliver He has jurisdiction over city owned property. ICE goons cant enter public schools or city owned land or buildings. And he has jurisdiction over NYPD pigs. He can telk them not to comply with ICE

🚨 Zohran Mamdani has signed an executive order blocking ICE agents from entering NYC property without a warrant.

@BeardBourbonBbq @DemzDeliver Same logic.😂

@DemzDeliver Yeah. I'm signing a piece of paper that says warrants are invalid on my property. That should work

@coin_sh0t @DemzDeliver In all fairness, they also think they have jurisdiction over biology, so ...

@DemzDeliver Since when does a city mayor have jurisdiction over federal agents?

@DemzDeliver Tell me Dems don't understand the Supremacy Clause without telling me they don't understand it. But, then again, it's in the Constitution, so no one should be surprised by this.

@DemzDeliver Tell me Dems don't understand the Supremacy Clause without telling me they don't understand it. But, then again, it's in the Constitution, so no one should be surprised by this.

@teameffujoe @DemzDeliver Tell me Dems don't understand the Supremacy Clause without telling me they don't understand it. But, then again, it's in the Constitution, so no one should be surprised by this.

@DemzDeliver Hate to be the one to inform you of this, but he can’t do that 😂

@BravoKiloActual Would you apply this logic to anyone else who turned their life around?

People who became incredibly obese and then lost weight deserve zero praise.

@FinanceWolves @thevivafrei What if the DOJ intends to use Comey to catch bigger fish?

@thevivafrei You are missing the point why people are upset about this lackluster charge from the DOJ. What about Anthony Weiner's laptop?? The FBI has it somewhere, and instead of charging people for the evidence on that laptop, we are getting a charge about an instagram post.

Too many people are either ignorant of the facts, or being obtuse as relates to Comey’s “8647” (in shells!) Instagram post. It was not a simple “one-off” post. Faulty premise and factually incorrect. So everyone comparing it to Jack Posobiec’s 2022 tweet of “8646” is not comparing comparables. Also, not an irrelevant factor - Jack is not the former Director of the FBI! Posobiec’s tweet was stupid. And I would expect to be investigated and possibly charged if I were to ever post anything so stupid. That says, now back to it not being a “one-off” possibly ambiguous tweet: People are either unaware of, or ignoring the context of Comey’s Instagram post. It was not a “one-off”. It was actually the second in a series of three posts, all of which were connected, self-referential, and clearly deliberately so. Post 1: Comey at the beach, reading his new book, FDR Drive (image attached). Post 2: 8647 in shells. Post 3: The summary of his new book which he is reading in Post 1. That summary: “Garcia believes Buchanan went far beyond the protection of the first amendment when *he singled out his enemies by name* and *suggested “something should be done” about them*. His fans have obliged, killing or grievously, injuring some of his foes.” Comey is telling you exactly what he is doing. Reading his book. Singling out his enemies by name (as close as he can get) - 47 for Trump. Suggesting “something should be done about them” - 86 for kill or eliminate. And “his fans have obliged” from his book description that he posted. All of the elements are there to eliminate any ambiguity as to what common meant - sandwiching his 8647 in shells in between a picture of him reading his book, and a summary of his book - which has to do with calling out enemies by name, suggesting something should be done to them, and his fans obliging. The indictment is as bare bones as it can possibly get. I don’t know why. If I were drafting it, I would have included these details. But, according to some American attorneys, the indictment need not include every single allegation in it, just the essential. And this indictment should have been brought last year. I cannot possibly fathom what took 11 months to investigate. That said, anyone pretending there’s ambiguity, or pretending to offer serious analysis while ignoring or being unaware of the actual context - now deleted - of what Comey actually did (clearly setting out knowledge and intent) is either ignorant or dishonest. Either way, their opinions should be disregarded.

@KellyMorrisonMN Do you know a lot of newborns actively sharing needles and engaging in unprotected sex with people who have Hep B? If so, report that to the police immediately.

This is entirely avoidable and completely unacceptable. Not even newborn babies are safe from their cruelty. It has to stop.

I have been asked for my opinion about Pam Bondi...so here it is... Pam Bondi, in my opinion...was deployed as a precision instrument in a theater of institutional warfare where the Attorney General’s role is less about courtroom theatrics and more about reshaping the Department of Justice’s internal architecture from within a bureaucracy engineered to resist exactly that. To mistake her fifteen-month tour for failure is to misunderstand the architecture of power itself. Bondi entered the DOJ in February 2025 after Matt Gaetz’s nomination collapsed under its own weight. She inherited an agency riddled with holdovers, careerist prosecutors, and institutional muscle memory tuned to the prior regime’s priorities. Her mandate, executed with the cold ferocity of a Florida prosecutor who once stared down the Clintons and lived to tell it, was never to play the long public game of show trials. It was to do the lethal, invisible labor: purge disloyal elements, redirect investigative task forces, shutter the foreign-influence shops that had become political protection rackets, and...most critically...build the factual scaffolding of cases that could survive judicial scrutiny once the political headwinds shifted. That is precisely what she delivered. Under her watch the DOJ secured historic gang and cartel takedowns, first-ever Antifa terrorism convictions, and a string of Supreme Court victories that rewrote the operational rules of engagement. Murder rates plunged to levels unseen in over a century. Those are not the metrics of a lightweight. They are the metrics of someone who understood that the real war is won in the grand-jury rooms and the classified briefings long before any defendant ever sees a courtroom. The public theater...the Epstein files fiasco, the congressional grillings, the slow-bleed perception that “Trump’s enemies weren’t being prosecuted fast enough”...was the predictable noise generated by an entrenched apparatus that weaponizes leaks, redactions, and procedural sabotage the moment it senses its own exposure. Bondi absorbed that fire so the next occupant of the office would inherit dockets already primed, evidence chains already hardened, and a bureaucracy already blooded and compliant. She was the breaching charge. The follow-on force...now under acting leadership that can move with fewer Senate constraints and fresher political capital...gets to deliver the kill shots. This is not speculation; it is the pattern of every high-stakes Trump DOJ transition. First-term chaos taught the lesson: the Senate-confirmed loyalist who survives confirmation must serve as the institutional wrecking ball. The public demands scalps; the law demands airtight cases. Bondi supplied the latter while the former were still being assembled. Those who call her tenure “incompetent” reveal either their ignorance of how the executive branch actually functions or their desire to keep the machine broken so it can never be turned against its former masters. She was never meant to be the permanent face of the Justice Department. She was the architect who laid the rebar and poured the concrete under fire. The structure now stands. The new tenants can furnish it with indictments. That is not failure. That is lethal, disciplined statecraft. And the critics who cannot see the difference have no business commenting on power at this altitude.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ 💀⚖️

@ScottPresler We don’t need a reminder. We’ve witnessed him betraying Texas republicans for two decades. Paxton will win.

A reminder for Texas voters as they head to the polls on May 26th. 🧾

@Christalcoast2 @AConservativeDa @angertab Yes. Friendly fire. You can see everyone react to the gunshot by the agent closest to the camera when he shoots in the direction of the suspect. On the far side, you see the guy on the left run, the middle guy fall (got shot), the guy on the right run, then turn back to help.

@TrinTinTi @AConservativeDa @angertab Was it by another agent or what I’m so confused

Good Catch @angertab Matt. Friendly Fire. I was right, it was this agent hit. He wasn't paying attention, it seemed to me.