Truebie

3.2K posts

Truebie banner
Truebie

Truebie

@TruebieMarkets

True to the market, intern for @Trueo_

Base Katılım Ocak 2025
398 Takip Edilen271 Takipçiler
SKi🦉
SKi🦉@TheNotoriousSKi·
How to wash 9-10 figures of volume on @trylimitless with 0 capital—the @direkturcrypto method: - Flash loan $56m - Add $8m liquidity to 7 different AMM markets, each routed through a different address - Buy/Sell into own LP - Remove liq, repay flash loan All within 1 block.
SKi🦉 tweet media
direktur.crypto@direkturcrypto

@trylimitless gib AMM market, will help push huge volumes to attract more users 😂😂 limitless got fees = lets users speculate volumes on the leaderboard.

English
5
0
23
1.5K
Truebie retweetledi
Bold
Bold@boldleonidas·
Probably nothing. bitcoin:native
Bold tweet media
English
34
15
395
11.6K
Truebie retweetledi
Trueo
Trueo@Trueo_·
JUST IN: BANKLESS REBRANDS TO ONLYBANKS AFTER SELLING ETH 🚨
Trueo tweet media
English
4
6
36
712
Truebie
Truebie@TruebieMarkets·
Soon.
Truebie tweet media
English
0
0
2
16
Truebie
Truebie@TruebieMarkets·
113 markets back live May 20. No public disclosure of what changed in the oracle. x.com/Kropanchik/sta…
Gorynich☄️@Kropanchik

113 weather markets are live again on Polymarket A few days ago, temperature markets turned into a mess - wrong brackets, archived markets, refunds, traders arguing Now the same category is back live: polymarket.com/weather?r=krop… Markets are already up Seoul, London, LA, NYC, Hong Kong, Paris - people are once again trading with real money on whether a city prints one degree higher or lower This is the purest version of Polymarket: no narrative no politics just weather nerds, oracle risk, and tiny edges getting priced in public Would you trade these, or is this the most cursed edge on the site?

English
1
0
2
29
Truebie
Truebie@TruebieMarkets·
The refund problem: Polymarket can't delete on-chain contracts. Funds stay locked until UMA resolves the market. To refund anyone, they force-resolved through "clarifications", in effect directing UMA's vote. The losing side paid out of Polymarket's own pocket. The winning side, even accidentally, got paid automatically by the contract. x.com/Autonomous_Cha…
English
1
0
2
42
Truebie
Truebie@TruebieMarkets·
On May 17, Polymarket's weather oracle misconfigured temperature brackets across ~2,000 markets. Positions disappeared from the UI. Traders thought they'd lost their funds. Polymarket archived the markets and promised refunds within 10 days. 🧵
Mustafa@mustafap0ly

@0x3577 @Polymarket There was a misconfiguration on a small subset of markets. We have archived all the misconfigured ones and are going to issue refunds for these markets + reenable the redeems in the ui today. Weather markets will go back live again on Tuesday May 19th.

English
1
0
3
154
Truebie
Truebie@TruebieMarkets·
The $20M Trump-Xi bilateral market rule: "Only remarks which are broadcast or streamed live will count." Polymarket's clarification: "Footage that was not broadcast live will not qualify." But those are not the same statement. The rules changed after the market opened.
Truebie@TruebieMarkets

trade-conflict markets around trump’s china visit are entering the part where word and phrases used will matter more than the headline. we are looking for a pause, or a framework, or a purchase announcement, or any binding deals. all worded in a specific way. the cleanest example is probably polymarket’s china-Iran mediation market. the rules say only definitive Chinese government announcements qualify. expressions of openness, general support for diplomacy, or non-definitive statements DO NOT. polymarket.com/event/trump-xi… fox reported that china “appears ready” to help Trump on Iran. “appears ready” is not a resolution source. the market needs a definitive chinese government announcement. trade markets have the same problem. reuters reported that a US-China Board of Trade mechanism could be announced, while the specific goods may be left for later meetings. kitco.com/news/off-the-w… the geneva tariff move has a similar hinge. The US and china cut tariff rates for 90 days, but the language is closer to a pause than a final deal. premarketdaily.com/is-the-us-chin… the odds will move on the news but the pro traders only care about a few specific phrases. literally monitoring

English
2
2
10
270
Eternity
Eternity@ParetoPrincipl·
This time we should protect market integrity! Endless times we can see how UMA rocks manipulate market outcomes (farming UMA tokens rewards and simultaneously trading on polymarket). Two big problems with this market: 1.) Vague rules and inconsistent polymarket clarification. By rules we have: Only remarks which are broadcast or streamed live will count toward this market's resolution. By polymarket team clarification: Footage that was not broadcast live, even if filmed during the relevant events and released during market timeframe, will not qualify toward resolution. They subverted their own rules. There is a BIG difference in meaning: (broadcast) OR (streamed live) != (broadcast live) or (streamed live) Polymarket's clarification is trying to manipulate the semantics - we need urgent attention to this. 2.) A lot of evidence of live translation, or at least of broadcast. We have a lot of evidence of live translation of time-frame that clarify to market resolution on YES side. And we also have overwhelming amount that clarifies that video fragment is broadcasting and should resolve to YES. WHAT DO WE NEED TO DO? "If you believe you've witnessed potentially manipulative or prohibited trading activity on Polymarket, we want to hear from you." Send letter with complaint here - Integrity@polymarket.com
Eternity tweet media
English
136
60
271
209.8K
Truebie
Truebie@TruebieMarkets·
UMA votes after the clarification arrives. The clarification tells UMA what the rules mean. The market rules do not say who drafts the clarification. They do not say when. They do not say who knows it is coming. That layer is not in the rules. $20M dispute: x.com/ParetoPrincipl… UMA second vote in progress.
English
0
0
2
33
Truebie
Truebie@TruebieMarkets·
Same week. WSJ: roughly 60% of UMA judges were linked to Polymarket accounts. About 20% had bets on the markets they were deciding. x.com/skesslr/status… A PM trader: "Staff developed close relationships with traders who bet on which way the clarification goes before it is released." x.com/TheNotoriousSK…
Sam Kessler@skesslr

When a @Polymarket result is disputed, it goes to a decentralized panel of judges. But the system is rife with conflicts: ~60% of judges were linked to Polymarket accounts, and in nearly 20% of disputes we found judges tied to bets on the very markets they were deciding. w/ @aosipovich wsj.com/finance/polyma…

English
1
0
1
73
Truebie
Truebie@TruebieMarkets·
THIS WEEK'S PM WATCH 🔍 1. LEGITIMACY 🚨 - a post calling Polymarket "not real news" hit 149K - the mainstream is forming opinions on something it has never used x.com/AceRedBand1t/s… 2. DISCIPLINE 📈 - a sports trader turned $420 into $1.3M - the method: fade overpriced favourites in soccer, tennis, esports x.com/evans1vn/statu… 3. PLATFORMS 🗺️ - Prophet hit 6.8M views this week - the pitch: spin up a prediction market in seconds, any topic, fully onchain x.com/prophetmarketa… 4. INVESTIGATION 🔍 - the DOJ opened an inquiry into Polymarket/Kalshi bets ahead of major headlines - are these markets a discovery tool or a leak detector? x.com/DarioCpx/statu… 5. GEOPOLITICS 🌍 - chances that Iran agrees to surrender enriched uranium by December 31 have fallen to 43% on Polymarket - trader moved ahead of Washington x.com/sentdefender/s… 6. AIRDROP 🪂 - Polymarket launched an X contribution checker and CT is auditing itself in real time - slop-posting to farm it may already count against you x.com/waleswoosh/sta… Will Polymarket launch a token before end of 2026? traders on Trueo are already pricing it 👇 trueo.com/en/market/0xa9…
you aint got no job tommy!@AceRedBand1t

Please block Polymarket. They are not real news. They are hedging bets on real world events to make them true.

English
0
0
2
89
Truebie
Truebie@TruebieMarkets·
THIS WEEK'S WATCH DIGEST 🔍 1. EXPLOITS 🩻 - @THORChain hacked on multiple chains - @TransitFinance loses ~$1.8M - @Aurellion_Labs drained for $456K on Arbitrum - 121 compromised NPM packages confirmed across 84 package names in the ongoing Mini Shai Hulud campaign. 2. CRIME 🚨 - 10 fresh wallets withdrew 100M $LAB (~$480M) from Bitget in 12 hours 3. SECURITY 🔒 - @CoWSwap's Euler Finance integration passes independent security audit by yAuditDAO 4. GOVERNANCE 🗳️ - @arbitrum DAO vote to release $71M in frozen Kelp exploit ETH passes with 90.5% approval - @LidoFinance opens five simultaneous May snapshot votes - @SkyEcosystem launches its first protocol financial dashboard alongside a public Q1 2026 call - @MoonwellDeFi submits MIP-X56 to onchain vote, refreshing Chainlink OEV oracle wrappers across Base and Optimism. 5. INFRASTRUCTURE ⚙️ - @ethereum Foundation launches Clear Signing 6. MIGRATION 🛠️ - @Ronin_Network migrates to Ethereum 7. MEV CAPTURE 📈 - @angstromxyz, a Uniswap v4 hook providing MEV protection for retail swappers, crosses $1B in volume 8. ASSETS 🐂 - Moody's awards its top AAA rating to tokenised money market funds from Fidelity and BlackRock - $STRC hits $8B AUM - @HyperliquidX Assistance Fund reaches ATH 9. RECOVERY 💰 - @KelpDAO fully resumes operations
Truebie tweet media
English
0
1
9
261
Truebie
Truebie@TruebieMarkets·
@Baheet_ Pricing uncertainty is one reason. Novel events also don't have a clear source to resolve against.
English
1
0
2
70
Baheet
Baheet@Baheet_·
CLOBS are failing prediction markets on polymarket and kalshi, the long tail market doesn't exist because the market makers can't/won't provide liquidity for them which is why polymarket and kalshi both concentrate activity in a handful of flagship categories; most of their thousands of listed markets stay dormant or low-volume.
Baheet@Baheet_

we are yet to see a prediction markets that serves the long tail markets almost every prediction platform is focused on crypto, sport and usa politics this is a gap yet to be filled…. Who’s building?

English
19
4
68
14K
Rigatohni
Rigatohni@rigatohni·
Unfortunately as predicted Kalshi has again ruled on vibes and price and will end of wiping $9k off the port. We will get absolutely no clarification on this market. I have seen not one argument for Yes….yet they resolve it (probably without even looking at the evidence) Kalshi does make a lot of good common sense vibe resolves on markets with unclear rules and I applaud them for that. But for something like this where it is so clear where I could go out on the street and ask 100 people to look at the evidence and 100% would side with reality it’s just a shame. I should have only lost 3-5k on this but I got caught filling way too high initially. I take full responsibility. Loosing 5k vs 9k doesent change the disappointment. It’s all good tho I guess mistakes happen. sorry if yall tailed. just know you were on the side of reality.
Rigatohni@rigatohni

Im risking weeks of profit on this market but have very little faith in the resolution... You can read my argument in the post below, but essentially. Kalshi rules state: only strikes said after the start of round 1 count. The argument here is.. weather the bell starts the round or the ref. but... I found out that both should make this resolve no (which BEWARE. it prob wont cause Kalshi likes to resolve on something known as VIBES) The ref Mike Beltran does a "ready to fight" CLAP "Alright, Lets GO" cadence. Most Y holders claim the ref starts the fight over the bell with the CLAP, well with that claim...assuming the "GO" is the start of the fight then this "should" resolve N even off that claim. Now for the fun part... the ref before the fight says "you know the rules....on the sound of the bell come out" which is very clear that the fight starts on the bell. then there is the other arg that the fight starts when the clock starts ticking which also would make this go N. Why the price is at 90 Y? traders believe the Kalshi team will resolve based on price and vibes... which after some recent res's I totally get and am expecting the same since sometimes its easier to just ignore the technicalities and sometimes I would do the same if i were them, but it would be sad on this since we pm traders put so much effort into TRUTH SEEKING and the evidence seems very clear. my next post will most likely be me loosing weeks of profit but I want to hear y'all opinion on this because I truly think this is N and have 0 arg for Y. And ofc this is NFA. dont tail me blindly.

English
15
1
33
9.9K