Truebie
3.2K posts

Truebie
@TruebieMarkets
True to the market, intern for @Trueo_


@trylimitless gib AMM market, will help push huge volumes to attract more users 😂😂 limitless got fees = lets users speculate volumes on the leaderboard.

113 weather markets are live again on Polymarket A few days ago, temperature markets turned into a mess - wrong brackets, archived markets, refunds, traders arguing Now the same category is back live: polymarket.com/weather?r=krop… Markets are already up Seoul, London, LA, NYC, Hong Kong, Paris - people are once again trading with real money on whether a city prints one degree higher or lower This is the purest version of Polymarket: no narrative no politics just weather nerds, oracle risk, and tiny edges getting priced in public Would you trade these, or is this the most cursed edge on the site?


@0x3577 @Polymarket There was a misconfiguration on a small subset of markets. We have archived all the misconfigured ones and are going to issue refunds for these markets + reenable the redeems in the ui today. Weather markets will go back live again on Tuesday May 19th.

trade-conflict markets around trump’s china visit are entering the part where word and phrases used will matter more than the headline. we are looking for a pause, or a framework, or a purchase announcement, or any binding deals. all worded in a specific way. the cleanest example is probably polymarket’s china-Iran mediation market. the rules say only definitive Chinese government announcements qualify. expressions of openness, general support for diplomacy, or non-definitive statements DO NOT. polymarket.com/event/trump-xi… fox reported that china “appears ready” to help Trump on Iran. “appears ready” is not a resolution source. the market needs a definitive chinese government announcement. trade markets have the same problem. reuters reported that a US-China Board of Trade mechanism could be announced, while the specific goods may be left for later meetings. kitco.com/news/off-the-w… the geneva tariff move has a similar hinge. The US and china cut tariff rates for 90 days, but the language is closer to a pause than a final deal. premarketdaily.com/is-the-us-chin… the odds will move on the news but the pro traders only care about a few specific phrases. literally monitoring


This time we should protect market integrity! Endless times we can see how UMA rocks manipulate market outcomes (farming UMA tokens rewards and simultaneously trading on polymarket). Two big problems with this market: 1.) Vague rules and inconsistent polymarket clarification. By rules we have: Only remarks which are broadcast or streamed live will count toward this market's resolution. By polymarket team clarification: Footage that was not broadcast live, even if filmed during the relevant events and released during market timeframe, will not qualify toward resolution. They subverted their own rules. There is a BIG difference in meaning: (broadcast) OR (streamed live) != (broadcast live) or (streamed live) Polymarket's clarification is trying to manipulate the semantics - we need urgent attention to this. 2.) A lot of evidence of live translation, or at least of broadcast. We have a lot of evidence of live translation of time-frame that clarify to market resolution on YES side. And we also have overwhelming amount that clarifies that video fragment is broadcasting and should resolve to YES. WHAT DO WE NEED TO DO? "If you believe you've witnessed potentially manipulative or prohibited trading activity on Polymarket, we want to hear from you." Send letter with complaint here - Integrity@polymarket.com




When a @Polymarket result is disputed, it goes to a decentralized panel of judges. But the system is rife with conflicts: ~60% of judges were linked to Polymarket accounts, and in nearly 20% of disputes we found judges tied to bets on the very markets they were deciding. w/ @aosipovich wsj.com/finance/polyma…

Please block Polymarket. They are not real news. They are hedging bets on real world events to make them true.




we are yet to see a prediction markets that serves the long tail markets almost every prediction platform is focused on crypto, sport and usa politics this is a gap yet to be filled…. Who’s building?

Im risking weeks of profit on this market but have very little faith in the resolution... You can read my argument in the post below, but essentially. Kalshi rules state: only strikes said after the start of round 1 count. The argument here is.. weather the bell starts the round or the ref. but... I found out that both should make this resolve no (which BEWARE. it prob wont cause Kalshi likes to resolve on something known as VIBES) The ref Mike Beltran does a "ready to fight" CLAP "Alright, Lets GO" cadence. Most Y holders claim the ref starts the fight over the bell with the CLAP, well with that claim...assuming the "GO" is the start of the fight then this "should" resolve N even off that claim. Now for the fun part... the ref before the fight says "you know the rules....on the sound of the bell come out" which is very clear that the fight starts on the bell. then there is the other arg that the fight starts when the clock starts ticking which also would make this go N. Why the price is at 90 Y? traders believe the Kalshi team will resolve based on price and vibes... which after some recent res's I totally get and am expecting the same since sometimes its easier to just ignore the technicalities and sometimes I would do the same if i were them, but it would be sad on this since we pm traders put so much effort into TRUTH SEEKING and the evidence seems very clear. my next post will most likely be me loosing weeks of profit but I want to hear y'all opinion on this because I truly think this is N and have 0 arg for Y. And ofc this is NFA. dont tail me blindly.






