We Rate Tweets

1.6K posts

We Rate Tweets

We Rate Tweets

@Tweet_Ratez

Certified Objective Ratings of Tweet Quality, No Explanations Provided

Siskel, Ebert Katılım Ocak 2025
26 Takip Edilen17 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
We Rate Tweets
We Rate Tweets@Tweet_Ratez·
A tweet so nice I posted it twice: “What you do not wish for yourself, do not do to others.” Confucius c. 551-479 BC “For one would do for others as one would do for oneself.” Mozi ~400 BC “Do not do to others that which angers you when they do it to you." Isocrates 436–338 BC
Official Blood Raven@ShitposterSL

@Tweet_Ratez @memeticsisyphus I think math is a good comparison actually if we use morality to solve problems like "*Why* is this wrong?" The golden rule is the same as the rule of 3 or pedmas, sure. The problem is that you assume the golden rule existed before Christianity, which it didn't.

English
3
0
0
570
memetic_sisyphus
memetic_sisyphus@memeticsisyphus·
A geometric proof is a priori, so would be arriving at something through reason alone, which is why you brought it up. You keep using a priori (see tweet below) because you googled philosophy terms after being continually dunked on and tried to change the subject. A posteriori would be the more correct term if you learned the moral through interaction (which I’m guessing a helpful LLM explained the error to you), but you also didn’t do that because again, it was thought to you, which is a different way of knowing things.
memetic_sisyphus tweet media
English
1
0
49
333
We Rate Tweets
We Rate Tweets@Tweet_Ratez·
@memeticsisyphus I used it correctly? I’m saying I used a posteriori reasoning as a child. I drew from experience to figure out why the golden rule is good. “I don’t like my candy being stolen, so I shouldn’t steal Jimmy’s.” Thats a posteriori.
English
1
0
0
343
memetic_sisyphus
memetic_sisyphus@memeticsisyphus·
@Tweet_Ratez The ability to derive a geometric proof is unrelated to your misuse of the term in the post above.
English
1
0
110
552
We Rate Tweets
We Rate Tweets@Tweet_Ratez·
@HPLoveshafted “‘Why is having sex with roadkill bad? ‘Is asking the same question as ‘why is racism bad?’” What does the word same mean?
English
1
0
0
24
We Rate Tweets
We Rate Tweets@Tweet_Ratez·
If you think that someone saying “they reasoned their way to the golden rule at 7” means did it a priori is insane. A kid would go “I don’t like my candy being stolen, so I shouldn’t steal Jimmy’s.” That’s a posteriori. You have to know you don’t like candy being stolen first.
Dr. Righteous Idealed Dung@AtheistsL

@Tweet_Ratez Speak for yourself, you're a "right winger" by your own logic.

English
1
0
0
222
Jumpscare
Jumpscare@creamsentry·
@Tweet_Ratez All this and you're still so smug. So convinced that your tribe isn't a tribe at all. So convinced that all of these other people's thoughts are your own. That by approaching the exact same "point" from so many different angles that there must be a point there at all.
English
1
0
16
78
We Rate Tweets
We Rate Tweets@Tweet_Ratez·
I could fill an art gallery with tweets of right wingers who clearly don’t know the phrase “a priori.”
Tectus@TectusVulpes

@Tweet_Ratez @FaithAndAnger So point to the people who did that, absent exposure to and foundational work done by thinkers invoking divinity. But if the only way you can reason to it is by having first been told the answer by someone else, then you... really can't, can you.

English
7
0
0
24.2K
John Ohm
John Ohm@JohnHartfordOhm·
@Tweet_Ratez @Mari__Setogaya1 @JadeAtrophis There are millions of books published in the US, most libraries simply cannot shelve them all. Saying that because a library didn't have a book means that book is "banned" is completely retarded and so are you.
English
1
0
0
14
We Rate Tweets
We Rate Tweets@Tweet_Ratez·
A tweet so nice I posted it twice: “What you do not wish for yourself, do not do to others.” Confucius c. 551-479 BC “For one would do for others as one would do for oneself.” Mozi ~400 BC “Do not do to others that which angers you when they do it to you." Isocrates 436–338 BC
Official Blood Raven@ShitposterSL

@Tweet_Ratez @memeticsisyphus I think math is a good comparison actually if we use morality to solve problems like "*Why* is this wrong?" The golden rule is the same as the rule of 3 or pedmas, sure. The problem is that you assume the golden rule existed before Christianity, which it didn't.

English
3
0
0
570
We Rate Tweets
We Rate Tweets@Tweet_Ratez·
@Mortiguin91 @Nutguy2100 @JadeAtrophis Oh I’m sorry I thought you understood that I was posting a dictionary that defined bad as “suffering pain or distress” and not a thesaurus entry listing the word “suffering” as a synonym for “bad.” Question: when your dog pisses on the carpet do you scold it by saying “evil dog”
English
1
0
0
17
Mortiguin
Mortiguin@Mortiguin91·
@Tweet_Ratez @Nutguy2100 @JadeAtrophis >"Bad is not a synonym for evil" >Look inside >Bad is a synonym for evil >"Oh yeah well did you know it has other synonyms?" What are you doing here at this point?
English
1
0
2
18
We Rate Tweets
We Rate Tweets@Tweet_Ratez·
@Mari__Setogaya1 @JadeAtrophis Oh no a typo. Wow. You aren’t probing the definition. You’re basically telling people “I didn’t understand that’s what you meant, therefore it can’t be what you meant.”
English
0
0
0
31
We Rate Tweets
We Rate Tweets@Tweet_Ratez·
@Mari__Setogaya1 @JadeAtrophis At this point you’re just fighting the definition. It’s like being upset that people use “top 40” to refer to sales and streams and not the quality of the music.
English
1
0
0
43
Mortiguin
Mortiguin@Mortiguin91·
@Tweet_Ratez @Nutguy2100 @JadeAtrophis Are you sure about that? I think we can reasonably say you're the type that just makes stuff up on the spot. Stupid as you are, you don't realize that that stuff tends to be easily googlable.
Mortiguin tweet media
English
1
0
0
26
We Rate Tweets
We Rate Tweets@Tweet_Ratez·
@Mortiguin91 @Nutguy2100 @JadeAtrophis Evil and bad aren’t synonyms, yet again. Suffering is bad is a self evident claim because of the a nature of the word suffering itself. “Suffering is evil” does not necessarily follow from “suffering is bad.” “Suffering is evil” is not self evident. Not all bad things are evil
English
2
0
0
36
Nothin'
Nothin'@_coolguy5000·
@Tweet_Ratez @jjjs674443 @JadeAtrophis You do in fact have to prove what is considered to be, is actually in the truest sense so, as that is what is being disputed in each worldview. Truth may be real, but even truth itself is commonly disputed.
English
1
0
8
60