Dan Call

1.1K posts

Dan Call banner
Dan Call

Dan Call

@US10thAmendment

Son of God, Husband, Father, American

Minnesota, USA Katılım Ağustos 2020
389 Takip Edilen349 Takipçiler
Dan Call
Dan Call@US10thAmendment·
You claim Jesus says polygamy = adultery. I ask for a reference where he said this and you replied talking about the sabbath day. That is the "leap" I took to say you have no evidence Jesus said it and it is your words not his judging Joseph Smith. Since you don't have the reputation of Jesus you named dropped to add his name to your claim.
Dan Call tweet media
English
2
0
0
20
PIMO Mormon
PIMO Mormon@pimomormon·
🚩🚨 Mormon says Joseph smith’s character (hiding polygamous marriages from his wife and child brides) is a non issue when compared to his character
Dan Call@US10thAmendment

@LukeFHan His character also becomes a non-issue when compared to mine or his detractors.

English
9
0
21
857
☧ In hoc signo vinces
☧ In hoc signo vinces@crusaderfidelis·
@US10thAmendment @pimomormon The bible doesn't necessarily condemn all cases of polygamy, but that's true for most commandments. Some take priority over others. For example, doing good on the sabbath, feeding the hungry with showbread, supporting elderly parents with money you pledged to give to the church.
English
1
0
0
33
Dan Call
Dan Call@US10thAmendment·
@crusaderfidelis @pimomormon Reference where Jesus cinema all polygamy? Have prophets of God ever been falsely accused of being wicked when they followed God?
English
1
0
0
17
Dan Call
Dan Call@US10thAmendment·
@LukeFHan His character also becomes a non-issue when compared to mine or his detractors.
English
4
0
25
1.6K
Luke Hanson
Luke Hanson@LukeFHan·
Joseph Smith's character becomes a non-issue when you compare him to almost any Old Testament prophet
English
97
16
556
15.3K
Dan Call
Dan Call@US10thAmendment·
People say ignorant things all the time. I think Cabot Phillips doesn't do this regularly. He also wasn't doing it on his show and marketing false information. I think people in the church should have chilled out some. @RealMattFradd is different in my opinion. Being hyper sensitive isn't great. I think we should of born testimony to Cabot rather than whining about the daily wire.
English
0
0
0
6
Luke Hanson
Luke Hanson@LukeFHan·
Andrew Klavan @andrewklavan today on the Matt Fradd Mormon controversy (shortened): "I love Matt Fradd. He's not like these hateful people just slinging mud in the name of God. But I have to say I don't agree that he should be doing this. Mormons aren't blowing people up, leave them alone. When you take away something that you disagree with in somebody else's faith, you might think you're doing something good, but you might actually be taking the step away from them that's going to lead them to something closer to the truth."
English
91
34
652
103.8K
Dan Call
Dan Call@US10thAmendment·
I agree. Lie if you want to criticize and stratagem if you want childish tests for prophets designed to excuse you from listening to God's commands. I am fine with either term although I think using lie is probably leads to justifying dishonesty by some and defamation of God and his servants by others.
English
0
0
1
6
Dr. Jayson, PhD 🌲
Dr. Jayson, PhD 🌲@JS_StrngstSldr·
This isn't actually the truth. The word in ancient Egyptian for sister and wife are the same.
Dr. Jayson, PhD 🌲 tweet media
GoWithTheGospel@GoWithJordan_

The book of Abraham in the LDS scriptures says God commands someone to lie.. Abraham 2:22-25 "Behold, Sarai thy wife, is a very fair woman to look upon; Therefore it shall come to pass, when the Egyptians shall see her, they will say She is his wife; and they will kill you, but they will save her alive; therefore see that ye do on this wise: Let her say unto the Egyptians, she is thy sister, and thy soul shall live."

English
7
1
38
1.3K
Dan Call
Dan Call@US10thAmendment·
That's what the Sadducees and Pharasees were saying when the Son of God came. His message didn't match what they thought they knew was true. Reminds me of the parable of the wicked husbandman (Mark 12:1-12). So much of what is taught about the nature of God just isn't true nor biblical. I think whenever you think God will not send authoritative messengers you are wrong. That doesn't mean everyone claiming to be authoritative is true, but I would prayerfully consider their message and not reject it off hand. I would be interested in what evidence you have that we are so wrong it is a non-starter?
English
0
0
2
109
meta thomist 🇻🇦
meta thomist 🇻🇦@metathomist·
The main reason I reject the supposed divine calling of any of the LDS leaders is that it is contrary to right reason to believe what they believe about God and His nature. We can talk about the fact that we have other defeaters, namely the Catholic Church but we don’t even need to get there. What they believe about God is ultimately wrong and you don’t even really need to start with revealed religion to demonstrate that. It’s a complete non-starter.
Thoughtful-Faith@ThoughtfulSaint

Most people talk about the reasons to doubt Joseph’s calling without ever dealing with the incredible evidence in his favor. LDS deal with the evidence against him… but do critics ever deal sufficiently with the evidence in his favor?

English
29
8
182
12.4K
Dan Call
Dan Call@US10thAmendment·
@PeacemakingSt I still am. On balance I think they make the country better and a little persecution is good for the faith. That said, Pints with Aquinas makes me think Candice Owen's isn't the most destructive host to go through the organization.
English
0
0
1
57
Dan Call
Dan Call@US10thAmendment·
As always, @andrewklavan says things that are true but partially missapplied. I do think there is a little too much pearl clutching among the members of the church and sometimes misplaced outrage. That said. 23 And I said unto him: Lord, the Gentiles will mock at these things, because of our weakness in writing; for Lord thou hast made us mighty in word by faith, but thou hast not made us mighty in writing... 26 And when I had said this, the Lord spake unto me, saying: Fools mock, but they shall mourn; and my grace is sufficient for the meek, that they shall take no advantage of your weakness; 27 And if men come unto me I will show unto them their weakness. I give unto men weakness that they may be humble; and my grace is sufficient for all men that humble themselves before me; for if they humble themselves before me, and have faith in me, then will I make weak things become strong unto them." Ether 12
English
0
0
5
110
Brigham's Burner
Brigham's Burner@FiredUpCoug·
My neighbor’s two large dogs are pooping/peeing in my yard, and the urine is killing patches of our grass. We’ve already talked to their owner about it, but nothing has changed. Has anyone dealt with this successfully? Any advice to keep the dogs from doing this? Not trying to start a neighbor war, or do anything that will harm the dogs, I just trying to protect our lawn and stop cleaning up after dogs that aren’t ours.
Brigham's Burner tweet media
English
329
1
114
46.1K
Dan Call
Dan Call@US10thAmendment·
@Un_B_Weavable If he repented that sounds like at least one thing he did. Does that tell us anything about his religious life and upbringing before that point? Does that prove he was never a follower of John the Baptist?
English
0
0
1
30
A-A-ron (Disciple)
A-A-ron (Disciple)@DiscipleFidei·
Jesus is alive Joseph Smith isn’t. Who are you following?
English
74
1
36
7.6K
Dan Call
Dan Call@US10thAmendment·
What a surprise. @logicallyspeak7 didn't answer with a single reason why someone may question the NY verdicts. Probably because you are too narrow minded to even consider perspectives you don't like. I don't need to be elected a judge of anything to know killing millions of babies is morally bad. Who elected you to judge fraud or felon politicians? No one. Your standard is illogical because if applied at all consistently it just means anarchy. In all seriousness, with arguments like this you should follow @LDS_Dems strategy and just make outlandish initial comments and then not reply so your username isn't proven to be a farce.
English
0
0
0
10
Dan Call
Dan Call@US10thAmendment·
Are you actually claiming that the federal judiciary unconstitutionally mandating abortions be allowed settled the moral issue? I don't think the discussion was the issue. I think killing the babies is the problem. But I guess Trump was convicted of paperwork errors so I guess I can get on board with the industrial slaughter of babies, its only logical. In your claim on the adjudicated offender case (I assume the NY E. Jean Carroll), can you list for me 5 issues with the trial that may cause people to question its fairness? Since you are not blind like me I am sure we have read some of the same stuff on it so you can understand people that think differently before you call them all idiots since you are so logical.
English
1
0
0
12
logically_speaking
logically_speaking@logicallyspeak7·
@US10thAmendment @LDS_Dems The one you mentioned was settled for over 50 years. It should be returned to that. Yes both parties have issues. That said there is no comparison with a president that has been convicted of a felony, adjudicated offender and fraudster.
English
1
0
0
13
Dan Call
Dan Call@US10thAmendment·
For someone that claims to speak logically I see a lot of name calling. Perhaps you should advertise more honestly as emotionally_speaking. You failed to even acknowledge that there are serious moral compromises that are made to support either party. I named one specific example of why I prefer Trump to Dems. Address it logically or change your handle.
English
1
0
0
18
logically_speaking
logically_speaking@logicallyspeak7·
@US10thAmendment @LDS_Dems Not shocked at all at the blind idiocy of MAGA. Remember to tell your grandkids and their kids that you were MAGA. We are sure they will be so proud.
English
1
0
0
13

Keşfet

@pimomormon @crusaderfidelis @LukeFHan @RealMattFradd @andrewklavan @PeacemakingSt @elonmusk @BarackObama