Simon Vandekar

259 posts

Simon Vandekar banner
Simon Vandekar

Simon Vandekar

@VandyAtVandy

Bio Statistics

Philadelphia, PA Katılım Ekim 2017
220 Takip Edilen263 Takipçiler
Simon Vandekar retweetledi
nature
nature@Nature·
Nature research paper: Study design features increase replicability in brain-wide association studies go.nature.com/4iaWEq5
English
0
12
39
16.5K
Simon Vandekar retweetledi
Kaidi Kang @kaidikang.bsky.social
Thrilled to have worked with @meharpist and the amazing editorial team at @Nature on our paper! Honored to share our research!
Mary Elizabeth@meharpist

How can we increase the replicability of brain-wide association studies in a rigorous way? A @Nature paper by @kaidikangkk @jakob_seidlitz @rai_bethlehem @sattertt @VandyAtVandy et al identifies the relevant study design features that contribute nature.com/articles/s4158…

English
0
2
3
855
Simon Vandekar retweetledi
Kaidi Kang @kaidikang.bsky.social
🎤 It's my greatest honor to have such a fantastic lineup of speakers: Dr. Joshua Lukemire (@JoshuaLukemire) Dr. Mikail Rubinov Dr. Bennett Landman (@MASI_Lab) Don't miss our talks if you are interested. See you there!! #ICSAnashville @ICSA_Statistics @vandy_biostat
Kaidi Kang @kaidikang.bsky.social@kaidikangkk

🚀 Excited to organize this #ICSA2024 Invited Session #55 on neuroscience research. The topic will be "Reliable and Rigorous Inference for Brain Structure and Networks"! Join us on Tuesday, June 18th, 3:00-4:30PM. @VandyAtVandy @vandy_biostat

English
1
3
5
1.1K
Simon Vandekar retweetledi
Lucy D’Agostino McGowan
Lucy D’Agostino McGowan@LucyStats·
One of the most common questions I get when talking about why you need to include the outcome in your imputation model is whether this is “double dipping” or “data leakage” — if this is you, what would convince you that this is not a concern?
Lucy D’Agostino McGowan@LucyStats

Curious why statisticians recommend including the outcome in your imputation models? Check out our new paper in Statistical Methods in Medical Research! @SarahLotspeich, @StatStaci5, and I show with some simple mathematical derivations why this is really a requirement!

English
1
15
74
19.6K
Simon Vandekar retweetledi
Arielle Keller
Arielle Keller@ArielleKeller·
🌟Our paper linking the "exposome" with personalized functional brain network organization and cognition is now out in Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience! 🌟 #tbl0010" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">sciencedirect.com/science/articl… findings summarized in the thread below 👇
Arielle Keller@ArielleKeller

New preprint! Our brains don’t develop in a vacuum, but enmeshed in a complex web of experiences+environments. How can we characterize the interconnected and co-occurring features of a child’s environment to better understand cognitive neurodevelopment? biorxiv.org/content/10.110… /1

English
1
16
52
14.4K
Simon Vandekar retweetledi
Anderson M. Winkler
Anderson M. Winkler@AndersonWinkler·
We have a new preprint. In short: separate FDR for positive/negative effects avoids direction errors with 2-tailed tests. More power with adaptive BKY (vs BH). But visualization software needs asymmetric thresholds. w/@afni_pt, @ten_photos & Chris Rorden arxiv.org/pdf/2401.03554…
English
0
10
19
4.4K
Simon Vandekar retweetledi
Thomas Nichols @nichols.bsky.social
Come to Neuroimaging Statistics at @OHBM, June 20-21! The Keith Worsley lecture will be given by Michael I. Miller, keynote lecture by Paul M. Thompson, and many other talks from the interface of statistics and neuroimaging. Registration free but required sites.google.com/view/neuroimag…
English
0
11
41
4.2K
Simon Vandekar retweetledi
Ted Satterthwaite
Ted Satterthwaite@sattertt·
Please RT! We are recruiting for two positions! Both are for recent grads, with a start date of Spring/Summer 2024. Great for people who want to do brain science, work in a fun envi, and prep for grad school (psych, neuro, etc). Info here: pennlinc.io/JoinUs
English
4
83
99
24.9K