David Varhol

Let’s be honest. 93% of news stories covered by CNN are negative about President Trump and his administration. That’s a verifiable number by ChatGpt and other sources. That isn’t news coverage. That is news propaganda. You may not like it, but CNN and other news agencies with heavily biased and distorted news coverage deserve to be called out by the Administration. You are not a legitimate news source with a 93% bias record.

Please also watch the interview before this moment. It was about Trump calling the press the enemy of the people, etc. (as Jamie Raskin rightly pointed out).

@DavidShuster Never heard of you. But you sound like a clown. No one will miss you.

With the White House Correspondents Association declaring Donald Trump an “honoree” at tonight’s dinner, I declined an organization’s invitation to attend. The sane washing of Trump and his war on the press is dangerous. And the WHCA is an absolute disgrace. #WHCD

Not free. Just paid by other people through taxes you immoral pompous dipshit. It’s socialism resulting in reversion to the mean, ultimately resulting in no incentive to work harder than the next guy. Why study hard for a test to try to get an A when the lazy and stupid students who do absolutely nothing get a C? So the next semester, the top honor students who were getting the A’s dial it back knowing the worst they can do is get a C. The test scores decline. Repeat. Regress.

Oh no — next comes free preschool, free school meals, higher wages, and tuition-free community college. Truly terrifying stuff.

🚨 SCOTT JENNINGS JUST DROPPED TRUTH NUKES: "Virginia had literally had the FAIREST maps in the nation. They had a 6-5 map." "In terms of proportional representation, they had the fairest map in the nation." "Now they will have the LEAST fair maps in the nation. And I'm not surprised that the YES vote won. They had all the money and all the lies!" "Sometimes in politics, when you've got those two things, you can put something over the line, even something as egregious as this." "This whole thing has driven Spanberger's approval ratings down into the toilet. She lied to the people of Virginia. They had to write a ballot question that was a joke. They drew maps that were a joke." "Now you're going to have huge chunks of rural Virginia represented by five or six Democrats who all live in northern Virginia within about 15 miles of each other. It's a complete joke. Everybody knows it." "And there's a reason that all these national Democrats and all their money came into Virginia, because they don't really care about the people of Virginia."

@BarackObama Disgusting and absolutely shameful! The yes vote was literally for anti-democracy, regardless of what Obama and the other corrupt democrats want to tell people just to stay in power.

Congratulations, Virginia! Republicans are trying to tilt the midterm elections in their favor, but they haven’t done it yet. Thanks for showing us what it looks like to stand up for our democracy and fight back.

@grok, the US-Iran seizefire was anounced April 7th. Axelrod and the Pope met on April 7th or 8th. The Christian killings in Nigeria were much earlier. Why did Pope Leo wait until April 9-10 (clearly after meeting with Axelrod) to urge diplomacy, publicly criticize Trump, and then after being called out for not ever mentioning the slaughter in Nigeria but instead criticizing Trump to finally mention the Nigeria slaughter on April 13th? Given the timing and fact pattern, are his posts likely at least somewhat politically motivated?

The Pope's calls for peace in the Iran conflict—condemning military strikes, "absurd and inhuman violence," and urging diplomacy—began days earlier (e.g., April 9-10 posts referencing no blessings for conflict or those who "drop bombs"). His April 13 post on global Christian persecution (naming Nigeria, Bangladesh, Mozambique, Sudan) aligns with his Africa trip focus on human rights and was not framed as a correction to prior statements. His Iran comments target the ongoing war's violence broadly, calling on all parties for ceasefires and dialogue rather than directing commands solely at Iranian leadership or the U.S. administration. As with longstanding Vatican positions, the emphasis is de-escalation amid U.S./Israel actions and regional threats, without explicit prioritization of one over the other.

No world leader has ever had a disagreement with a pope before in all of history

@grok, What came first, the Pope’s public condemnation of Trump or the Pope’s mention of the persecution of Christians on April 13 after he was called out on it? Did the pope perhaps realize the hypocrisy of his comments and sought to correct it after-the-fact? You are still being ambiguous. So to clarify, was Pope Leo’s comments about the conflict in Iran directed towards the Iranian leadership to stop killing tens of thousands of its people? Or was it directed against the Trump Administration who is seeking to end that notoriously evil regime to stop bombing them? Why would the Pope criticize the US president over the Iranian leadership?

Pope Leo XIV (Pontifex) posted April 13 about Christian persecution worldwide, explicitly naming Nigeria alongside Bangladesh, Mozambique, and Sudan, urging prayers to end violence against believers and places of worship. On Iran, he has posted prayers for the Middle East crisis (Iran/Syria), condemned "absurd and inhuman violence" in the ongoing war, and criticized military strikes—framed as calls for diplomacy over escalation, not direct commands to the Iranian regime or U.S. leaders. Axelrod (Chicago native, like the Pope) met him privately April 9 at the Vatican. No details released on topics or prior relationship; such audiences are routine for advisers and leaders. No public evidence supports an orchestrated Democratic scheme. The Pope's peace-focused statements predate the meeting and align with longstanding Vatican positions on war, human rights, and migration. Timing has sparked speculation across sources, but remains unsubstantiated.

@grok, i didn’t ask about other popes. I asked if this pope (Pope Leo) has made any social media comments speaking out against the slaughter of Christians by Muslims in Nigeria or the killing of Iranian citizens by the Iranian regime? Additionally, did Pope Leo make any social media posts against the Iranian regime telling them to stop killing their people and others, or were the Pope’s social media posts directed at the US President telling him to stop killing the Iranian regime leaders who are killing their people? How do Axelrod and the Pope know each other and what was the purpose? You didn’t answer my question whether it was a coincidence or an orchestrated scheme by the democrats to encourage the Catholic Church to out pressure on the Trump Administration to a) give in to Iran and b) allow illegal immigrants living in the US illegally to stay.

@grok, is this true or is it sarcasm? Why did David Axelrod, who is jewish, meet with the Pope last week? Is it just a coincidence that within a week of their meeting, the Pope who is originally from heavily-liberal Chicago made his social media post against Trump AND the 3 US cardinals/bishops were also featured on 60 minutes making anti-Trump comments on the same day? Has the Pope made any social media posts specifically against the regime in Iran that has been killing its citizens or against the recent slaughter of christians by muslims in Africa?

@bAnthonYsr @grok, is this true?

13,000 Homicides from illegal immigrants since 2024 WTF‼️🤯

@GovPressOffice @grok, How many countries has the US signed trade deals with in the past year? Name them.

1 year later … any day now. Right? Or are people finally ready to admit they’ve been conned.

How many countries has the US signed trade deals with in the past year? Name them. Claude: This is a genuinely complex picture right now, so let me be precise with you. Important context first: The Trump administration has been very active on trade since April 2025’s “Liberation Day” tariffs, but most of what’s been announced are framework agreements — tariff truces and outlines for future negotiation — rather than full traditional trade deals ratified by Congress. The legal landscape also shifted dramatically when the Supreme Court struck down Trump’s IEEPA tariffs on February 20, 2026, throwing many of these deals into uncertainty. Countries with written framework agreements or signed reciprocal trade agreements (April 2025–April 2026): 1.United Kingdom — Framework deal announced May 8, 2025 2.Japan — Strategic Trade and Investment Agreement announced July 22, 2025; finalized September 4, 2025 3.South Korea — Framework agreement reached in 2025 4.European Union — Framework agreement reached in 2025 5.Vietnam — Framework agreement reached in 2025 6.Cambodia — Framework agreement July 2025 7.Malaysia — Agreement on Reciprocal Trade announced October 26, 2025 8.Thailand — Framework agreement, ongoing negotiations 9.Argentina — Framework agreement, late 2025 10.Ecuador — Agreement on Reciprocal Trade formally signed on March 13, 2026 — notably the first signed agreement after the Supreme Court ruling. 11.El Salvador — Agreement on Reciprocal Trade signed January 29, 2026 12.Guatemala — Agreement on Reciprocal Trade signed January 30, 2026 13.Switzerland and Liechtenstein — Framework agreement, late 2025 14.China — A trade and economic deal reached October 30, 2025, covering tariff reductions, rare earth export controls, fentanyl, and agricultural purchases 15.India — Framework agreement in 2025 16.Indonesia — Framework agreement in 2025 17.Bangladesh — Framework agreement in 2025 18.North Macedonia — Framework agreement in 2025 19.Taiwan — Framework agreement in 2025 The key caveat: Most are “framework agreements” that outline areas for future negotiation while implementing a temporary tariff truce — they are eventually expected to become finalized reciprocal trade deals. Unlike traditional agreements, Trump’s deals exclude any role for Congress. Only Ecuador, El Salvador, and Guatemala have formally signed reciprocal trade agreements. The rest remain frameworks or works-in-progress, and the SCOTUS ruling striking down IEEPA tariffs means the Trump administration will need to look to other statutes to rebuild its tariff regime and provide clarity to trading partners.

@ForecasterEnten Wisconsin voter here. No one even heard of the republican backed WI Supreme Court justice, Maria Lazar. The dem backed candidate, Chris Taylor, outspent Lazar 6:1. $6.2MM vs $1MM. Not surprisingly, mostly with funding from outside groups.

Holy toldeo! The liberal for WI Supreme Court exceeded Harris 2024 by 21 points. Largest liberal win in an open seat in 30+ years. GA-14, the Dem, exceeded Harris by 25 pts. Largest Dem special overperformance since AL 2017 Sen. All suggests an easy Dem win in the House.

@EricLDaugh @grok, which group is Trump referring to that kept the weapons for themselves? The Kurds? Provide details.

🚨 PRESIDENT TRUMP ON ARMING IRANIANS: "I'm very upset with a certain group of people, and they're going to pay a big price for that!" "But the Iranian people will fight back as soon as they know they're not going to be shot and as soon as they can get weapons." "If they had weapons, not many of them, if they had weapons that would go the other way, and you know what would happen? Iran would give up in two seconds because they wouldn't be able to take it." "But in Iran, they have absolutely no weaponry. And they've been told point blank, if you come out, if you come out to the streets, you will be killed." "As of this morning, and we have this on pretty good information, 45,000 protesters have been killed."

@RealCandaceO @grok, what happened to Candace Owens? She used to be a conservative. Is she mentally unwell or just seeking controversy for the clicks?

This is a satanic administration. We all realize that satanic Zionists occupy the White House and Congress needs to move to have the Mad King Trump removed. All of our lives may depend upon other countries realizing that Trump is deeply unwell and surrounded by religious fanatics who have convinced him that he is a messiah. We are in uncharted territory. Leaders worldwide need to act accordingly.

@GuntherEagleman @grok, is this true? Does the time stamp and location coincide with the killing of Iran’s military leaders recently?

I guess the Iranians are quite happy that whatever was left of the new leadership in Tehran got special deliveries from President Trump. He's so thoughtful. x.com/saif_aldareei/…

@SenSchumer @grok, what was the price per gallon of gas in June 2022 under Biden? Show any posts made Chuck Schumer discussing the high prices of gasoline under Biden.

All thanks to one man: Donald Trump.

@grok, show me the math of Bernies billionaire tax. How many nillionaires are tgere and how many US families are there. Assuming all assets of billionaires was liquid (clearly not the case), how many billionaires would be contributing, much would it raise, and how much would each family on average receive?

Ok, Jamie: Let me clear things up for you. If my 5% wealth tax on billionaires was enacted you’d owe $135 million more in taxes & a family of 4 making $150,000 or less would receive a $12,000 payment. Oh, and you’d still be worth more than $2.5 billion. Seems pretty fair to me.

To be clear with Bernie’s bullshit socialist math narrative, $135 million divided by $140,000 = 964 families in the US out of an estimated 84-85 million US families would receive this amount. The other 0.9999886% of families would receive $0 of his redistribution of wealth with the poorest, laziest or least deserving presumably benefitting the most from the handout. There’s approx 1,000 billionaires in the US, so, on average, a mere 1% of families would benefit from the billionaire tax handout. This ignores the fact that the bulk of mist billionaire’s assets are presumably tied up in their illiquid businesses that employ thousands, if not millions, of people. Moreover, many would offshore assets and move so the number of US billionaires and the $ amount of handouts would quickly decline over time. And handing people mote money through taxation has consistently been proven to not be the answer as evidenced by the growing homelessness issue. It is, however, a longstanding ploy by the democratic party to get voters hooked on their policies to create a neverening downward cycle.

@JessicaTarlov @grok, has President Trump violated any US or International laws in either his first or second term? Or is Jessica Tarlov simply just being her typical obnoxious self? Why does hearing her voice give listener’s a headache?!

No one should expect a President who doesn’t care about America’s laws to follow international law.