Tony Rucinski 🇬🇧

Some people literally hate you for saying it. But it’s not a moral judgement, a value statement, or a bias preference – it’s based on the abundance of evidence from everywhere. Man-woman marriage works: for kids for adults and for society.

If only there was a good explanation of the different Christian denominations. Oh, wait, there is … ALL Christian Denominations EXPLAINED in Under 40 Minutes | Live Free wi... youtu.be/hHDoeJLbR3A?si… via @YouTube

@RoyalMail your guy came to collect without the label I’d paid for. I’m registered blind, so no, I can’t “just print it”. It’s not about the 30p (though yes I want that back), it’s more about the complete lack of ownership and impenetrable customer services. I need a number or an email to vent please!

This is probably worth the 7 minute listen. The Truth About Carrying Your Cross DAILY (Most Miss This) youtu.be/ECH97XXpWuA?si… via @YouTube

Poland Under Heavy Fire From Anti-Marriage Forces - Olivier Bault interview with Tony Rucinski. "On 30 April 2026, President Karol Nawrocki vetoed the Tusk government’s ‘express divorce’ Bill. “A Las Vegas-style marriage – quickly entered into and easy to end – may be a cinematic scene,” he said. “In a serious state, laws and statutes are not the writing of a film script.” The Bill would have let couples without children dissolve a marriage at a civil registry desk. No court. No reflection. It would have transformed marriage, Olivier says, “into entering a trial period where the actual commitment would come about only with the first child”. The pressure has been building for months. The EU’s top court had ordered Poland to recognise foreign same-sex marriages contracted in other EU states. The Tusk government approved a ‘cohabitation agreement’ Bill that extends partnership recognition to same-sex couples. Then the dam broke. On 7 May, days before our interview, Poland’s Supreme Administrative Court forced three more civil registries to transcribe foreign same-sex marriages. On 12 May, Prime Minister Donald Tusk apologised to same-sex couples “who, for many, many years, felt rejected and humiliated” by Poland’s refusal to recognise their relationships. “For many years”, he continued, “the state has failed the test”. Why fight so hard over a few same-sex marriages? Because the legal logic is one-way. Every child has a biological mother and a biological father, and no same-sex couple can be both. Recognise their ‘marriage’ in law as equal to a man-and-woman marriage, and the State must rewrite who a parent is. Poland’s Digital Affairs Ministry has already proposed replacing the civil registry’s man-and-woman marriage categories with “first spouse” and “second spouse”. Marriage is what ties a child to their biological mother and father. Redefine it, and the state – not biology, not the vows of the parents – decides who a child’s parents are. “Families are the stronghold of our liberties”, Olivier says. “It is a lot harder for state authorities to have control over citizens when you have strong families.” Poland’s defence rests on one constitutional sentence and one office. Article 18 places marriage, family, motherhood and parenthood under the protection of the Republic as the union of a man and a woman. President Nawrocki uses that sentence and his veto to hold the line. The last attempt to override one of his vetoes got 244 votes in favour, 180 against – short of the three-fifths threshold the Constitution requires." @Olivier_Bault @VisionTony @OrdoIuris @c4mtweets Poland Under Heavy Fire From Anti-Marriage Forces - Olivier Bault interv... youtu.be/ABmwKoFTSh0?si… przez @YouTube

Sorry me recommending @howertonjosh again. I don’t care, he’s right… A *BATTLE CRY* for every single father in America youtube.com/shorts/rx1gm4K… via @YouTube

@fdotinc But it’s massive.

They reinvented the hearing aid by studying the human ear Normal hearing aid: $4700 Theirs: $20

🤔

How many pastors would ever say this? Parents, YOU Set the Culture of Your Family youtube.com/shorts/KpM4ODZ… via @YouTube

@thinkymachines I love it – an introvert’s nightmare! AI that will interrupt and correct you …

Our model interjects to save Alex's parents from his eccentric ideas.

@DefiantLs Why doesn’t he man up and talk about the underlying problem - absent fathers?!

Actor Idris Elba has an idea how to stop knife attacks in the UK. You're gonna want to hear this one.

@JamesEsses Congrats, James!

Have woken up today and clocked that I’m now both a counsellor and councillor. 🤓

An important article. Secular truths Christians should know. (albeit written by an ordained woman!) Sam Allberry’s fall: What we must learn about LGBT identity christianpost.com/voices/sam-all…

@AIHighlight But it’s a left leaning, pathological liar, prone to skipping critical detail and leaving tasks unfinished without telling you.

🚨BREAKING: Anthropic just published a study mapping exactly which jobs its own AI is replacing right now. The workers most at risk are not who anyone expected. They are older. They are more educated. They earn 47% more than average. And they are nearly four times more likely to hold a graduate degree than the workers AI is not touching. The argument is straightforward. Anthropic built a new metric called "observed exposure." Not what AI could theoretically do. What it is actually doing right now in professional settings, measured against millions of real Claude conversations from enterprise users. For computer and math workers, AI is theoretically capable of handling 94% of their tasks. It is currently handling 33% of them. For office and administrative roles, theoretical capability is 90%. Current observed usage is 40%. The gap between what AI can do and what it is already doing is enormous. The researchers are explicit about what comes next. As capabilities improve and adoption deepens, the red area grows to fill the blue. The demographic finding is what makes the paper uncomfortable. The most AI-exposed workers earn 47% more on average than the least exposed group. They are more likely to be female. They are more likely to be college educated. This is not a story about warehouse workers or truck drivers. It is a story about lawyers, financial analysts, market researchers, and software developers. The exact group whose education was supposed to insulate them. Computer programmers showed the highest observed AI exposure at 74.5%. Customer service representatives at 70.1%. Data entry keyers at 67.1%. Medical record specialists at 66.7%. Market research analysts and marketing specialists at 64.8%. These are not predictions. These are measurements of work that is already happening on AI platforms right now. Then there is the pipeline finding nobody is talking about loudly enough. Anthropic's researchers found a 14% decline in the job-finding rate for workers aged 22 to 25 in highly exposed occupations since ChatGPT launched. No comparable effect for workers over 25. Entry-level roles were never just jobs. They were the training ground where junior analysts became senior analysts, where junior lawyers learned how arguments hold together. If that layer disappears, nobody has answered the question of where the next generation of senior professionals comes from. The detail buried in the paper that most coverage missed: 30% of American workers have zero AI exposure at all. Cooks. Mechanics. Bartenders. Dishwashers. The technology reshaping professional careers is completely irrelevant to roughly a third of the workforce. The divide is no longer between high skill and low skill. It is between presence and absence. The company publishing this study is the same company selling the AI doing the replacing. Anthropic had every commercial incentive to soften these findings. They published them anyway. If you spent four years and $200,000 on a degree to land a white collar career, the company that builds Claude just confirmed your job is more exposed than the bartender pouring drinks at your graduation party. Source: Anthropic, "Labor market impacts of AI: A new measure and early evidence" PDF: anthropic.com/research/labor…

@conservmillen Since neither of you mention repentance, both explanations are lacking I’m afraid.

A different gospel? The LDS gospel and the Christian gospel sound similar, but we ultimately mean different things. Mormon apologist Jacob Hansen and I each present what we believe is the true Good News:

@jonhoneyball @Scobleizer @elonmusk That was a week ago. Surely it’s sorted by now? 🙄

For those who think that Tesla supervised fsd is coming to the UK any time soon @Scobleizer @elonmusk

Gold 👌

Biblically, homosexuality is sin ergo, cannot be blessed by God. Nobody in a liberal democracy is forced to believe that, or live by it. Neither should believers be coerced by ironically named “conversion therapy” laws, to deny or refrain from saying it.

Maybe twice I’ve come across a married couple where this is not the case. The rest: exactly as she states. (Shame we couldn’t have just the headshot without the full “65” but hey-ho). x.com/fem_mindset/st…

@jessegenet @MiniMax_AI @openclaw @AnthropicAI How do you get your voice notes in please - or do you speak directly to the agent?

Local model update! 🚨 The @MiniMax_AI 2.7 model has been powering my homeschool @openclaw for a week without any issue 💕 Sooo much cheaper than @AnthropicAI options in general, but with my Mac Studio it’s running for the cost of electricity!

@MattWallace888 A new M5 Mac Studio?

Pay close attention to what the Secret Service agent behind President Trump is holding!