William Snyder

410 posts

William Snyder

William Snyder

@WJSJ86693

Katılım Kasım 2024
89 Takip Edilen79 Takipçiler
Homeland Security
🚨DHS and @FEMA have SUSPENDED Rep. Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick, her brother, and multiple associates from receiving future federal funds. These individuals were indicted for funneling OVER $5 MILLION of FEMA relief funds for personal enrichment and illegal campaign contributions. Under the leadership of @POTUS Trump and @SecMullinDHS, DHS and FEMA will continue to investigate fraud and hold offenders ACCOUNTABLE.
New York Post@nypost

DHS bars ex-Dem Rep. Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick, her family and friends from federal funds over alleged $5M FEMA theft trib.al/HAlXqUs

English
1.9K
7.7K
24.5K
305.7K
Anti Left Memes
Anti Left Memes@AntiLeftMemes·
Should President Trump be allowed to build a Big Beautiful Ballroom at the White House?
Anti Left Memes tweet media
English
7.8K
512
5.4K
103.4K
ƤƖҲƖЄ
ƤƖҲƖЄ@Pixie1z·
Do you agree with Jay Leno?
ƤƖҲƖЄ tweet media
English
2.6K
2.9K
18.8K
149.2K
Michael E. NIX
Michael E. NIX@MichaelNIXG·
STEPHEN MILLER IS TRYING TO EXCLUDE ILLEGALS FROM THE U.S. CENSUS, WHICH REMOVES HOUSE SEATS FROM BLUE STATES LIKE CALIFORNIA, NEW YORK, ETC. DO YOU SUPPORT THIS MOVE? A. Yes B. No
Michael E. NIX tweet media
English
3.8K
710
5.8K
63.3K
Baby
Baby@Babywwir·
After Jimmy Kimmel explained his joke, do you still think he should be fired? A) Hell YES. B) Huge NO.
Baby tweet media
English
6.8K
293
1.8K
79.5K
Val
Val@TrumpsHurricane·
What’s your response to this woman ??
Val tweet media
English
3.8K
327
1.4K
54.7K
MAGA NEWS
MAGA NEWS@AlexanderNews_·
🚨Public opinion poll: In your view, should ABC make the decision to remove Jimmy Kimmel from his current role/show, or allow him to continue. Please share your choice. A. Yes, he should be removed B. No, he should continue Vote now and make your voice heard!
MAGA NEWS tweet media
English
21.2K
1K
6.4K
505.2K
Vince Langman
Vince Langman@LangmanVince·
Debbie Wasserman Schultz is about to lose her congressional seat because of redistricting in Florida. What job will she be doing one year from today?
Vince Langman tweet media
English
7K
584
4.4K
191.4K
William Snyder
William Snyder@WJSJ86693·
@officer_Lew About time people are finally being held accountable for their actions/crimes
English
0
0
0
5
Officer Lew
Officer Lew@officer_Lew·
BREAKING🚨: The Louisiana Supreme Court has SUSPENDED the law license of Black Lives Matter attorney Tanzanika Ruffin after her FEDERAL indictment for STEALING ~$250,000 from a client’s family.
English
1.6K
8.9K
42K
404.3K
AJ Inapi (Allan)
AJ Inapi (Allan)@aj_inapi·
Marjorie, this is selective framing dressed up as moral clarity. You’re taking fragmented data, stripping context, and calling it “Republican failure” when the record shows the opposite direction of travel. Let’s keep it grounded. 1. The censorship architecture you’re ignoring The Biden-era issue wasn’t “vibes” or perception. It’s documented in multiple layers: Internal platform disclosures (“Twitter Files”) showed sustained contact between federal agencies (FBI, DHS, CISA) and social media companies flagging content for removal. Congressional investigations and court filings show government officials routinely flagged posts related to: ~ COVID dissent ~ Hunter Biden laptop reporting ~ Election integrity discussions Platforms complied with a significant portion of federal requests (FBI flag requests alone were partially acted on at scale). The 5th Circuit in Missouri v. Biden found strong evidence the federal government likely engaged in unconstitutional coercion or significant encouragement of censorship activity. That is the record: state-adjacent pressure + platform compliance loop. 2. What the Trump administration actually did (2025 onward) Instead of continuing that framework, the policy direction was explicitly REVERSED: Executive Order: “Restoring Freedom of Speech and Ending Federal Censorship” (Jan 20, 2025) Restricts federal agencies from engaging in indirect or direct content suppression Launches investigations into prior federal involvement in platform moderation Bars taxpayer-funded coordination for content policing initiatives Structural rollback: ~ No White House “misinformation” units ~ No DHS-style centralized narrative enforcement pipelines ~ Federal agencies instructed to avoid speech-based coordination with platforms That is not continuity. It is REVERSAL. 3. The AI “moratorium” argument (what it actually was) The 10-year federal preemption proposal wasn’t a blanket “pro-Big Tech protection” policy. It was designed to: Prevent 50-state regulatory fragmentation on AI systems Stop conflicting state rules governing model outputs, disclosures, and liability frameworks Preserve federal-level uniformity in a strategic sector competing with China It was later stripped in the Senate (99–1 opposition) due to political and procedural resistance, not because it was a finalized censorship framework. Separately, later executive direction focused on: Blocking state laws that compel AI systems to alter truthful outputs Preventing compelled speech or viewpoint manipulation through regulation So the real tension here is not “censorship vs freedom” in ISOLATION - it’s: fragmented state control vs federal standardization in AI governance You can argue against it, but calling it a coordinated censorship expansion ignores the actual legal framing. 4. “MIGA” is a distraction layer Dragging foreign policy or Israel into a domestic speech debate is a category error. Free speech arguments here are about: ~ State pressure on platforms ~ Institutional coordination (government + tech + media) ~ Content governance systems evolving into soft enforcement networks Not foreign alignment narratives. That framing shift doesn’t clarify ANYTHING - it dilutes the argument. There are two competing realities: One side built and documented a federal–platform pressure ecosystem that courts have now scrutinized as unconstitutional in structure. The other side moved to formally restrict that same pipeline through executive and legislative countermeasures. You don’t have a “Republican failure” on free speech. You have a transition battle: centralized narrative enforcement → decentralized and legally constrained speech environment If you want to critique policy, do it on mechanics: ~ overreach vs underreach ~ enforcement vs ~ non-enforcement ~ federal vs state control But don’t flatten a documented institutional shift into a political slogan. That’s narrative substitution.
Marjorie Taylor Greene 🇺🇸@mtgreenee

I’m shocked, but I’m not. The Biden admin and Democrats literally worked with social media companies to censor people. My account I’m using right now was permanently banned, only brought back because Elon bought Twitter. But this shows you how badly Trump and Republicans have failed. This is the result of turning MAGA into MIGA, becoming big tech’s biggest defender, and trying to put a 10 yr moratorium on states to make laws and regulations on AI. Republicans brought it on themselves.

English
2
72
83
5.2K
Terrence K. Williams
Terrence K. Williams@w_terrence·
Dear Jimmy Kimmel, listen to me very closely. I’m a comedian. I’ve made fun of Jill Biden. I’ve made fun of Michelle Obama. I’ve roasted First Ladies before. But I have never in my life joked about Jill Biden becoming a widow or Michelle Obama becoming a widow. I’ve never joked about Joe Biden or Barack Obama having an attempt made on their life. I’ve never laughed at the thought of their wives standing there in fear, wondering if their husbands are going to make it home alive. Because that is not comedy. That is sick. You could have joked about Melania being married to Trump. You could have joked about politics. You could have even gone after her accent like liberals usually do. But no — you chose to joke about Melania Trump becoming a widow. And let’s be honest, Jimmy: when you hate Donald Trump as much as you do, that doesn’t sound like a joke. It sounds like how you really feel. They always say there is truth in comedy.
Terrence K. Williams tweet media
English
11.2K
22.4K
103.8K
1.9M
William Snyder
William Snyder@WJSJ86693·
@TrumpNewsFanss @WakeUpPatriott Absolutely not, these Hollyweird elites made their money off our backs and now they think they’re smarter than us, they think they’re better than us and they all should move to Iran since they hate our country.
English
0
1
2
18
William Snyder
William Snyder@WJSJ86693·
@JoshHall2024 This sounds like treason to me, not to mention undermining the President. It’s time for the DOJ to go after the democrats the way they did President Trump
English
0
0
1
235
Joshua Hall
Joshua Hall@JoshHall2024·
🚨BREAKING:🚨DISGRACED former President Barack Hussein Obama is reportedly coordinating with fellow globalist, leftist world leaders and has established a back channel with Iran in order to undermine the Trump administration and its war effort against the terrorist regime and to broker a brand new "nuclear deal" with the Iranians. Obama is the alleged ringleader behind these negotiations and is secretly facilitating the transfer of BILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN CASH to the Iranian government through our so-called "allies" that are against President Trump and America's war with the nation that has the stated goal of wiping us off the map. In other words, Barack Obama has established a shadow government and is betraying our own country on behalf of the country that we are at war with whose people are infamously known for chanting "Death to America". As always, ALL ROADS LEAD TO OBAMA... THROW AYATOLLAH HUSSEIN IN GITMO ALREADY!
Joshua Hall tweet mediaJoshua Hall tweet media
English
2.1K
3.1K
5.6K
162.1K