Walter Reade

8.2K posts

Walter Reade

Walter Reade

@WalterReade

AI at Google/Kaggle (inversion). PhD chemical engineer. Too many hobbies.

Neenah, Wisconsin 54956 Katılım Aralık 2007
2K Takip Edilen9.2K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Walter Reade
Walter Reade@WalterReade·
Is your child texting about @kaggle ?
Walter Reade tweet media
English
9
205
702
0
Walter Reade retweetledi
meg.ai 🇨🇦
meg.ai 🇨🇦@MeganRisdal·
We added a model filter to Kaggle Benchmarks! Check it out to see the models we support. Anyone can eval these models at no cost on our platform. :) Plus, of course explore results for models you're interested in!
English
1
6
28
3K
Walter Reade retweetledi
kami
kami@634kami·
Kaggle は昇進の役にたつ “入社3年目でスペシャリストグレードに昇格しており、20代で同グレードに到達している社員はいないという。スペシャリストグレードへの昇格には、社内での業務実績に加え、社外でも通用する専門性が求められる。Kaggle Masterの称号や技術力の高さが評価された”
ITmedia@itmedia

[ITmedia ビジネスオンライン]Kaggleトップ1%のAI人材、なぜNTT東日本に? 若手データサイエンティストの活躍 itmedia.co.jp/business/artic…

日本語
0
9
160
47.4K
Walter Reade
Walter Reade@WalterReade·
Technical writing these days: - Step 1: Ask AI to write the paper - Step 2: Ask AI to review the paper for signs that it was written by AI - Step 3: Ask AI to suggest less AI-sounding phrases - Step 4: (Optional) Read the draft before submitting
English
4
4
33
2.1K
Walter Reade retweetledi
Kaggle
Kaggle@kaggle·
Join the 5-Day AI Agents: Intensive Vibe Coding Course with @Google! Learn from Google experts through theory sessions, hands-on labs, a capstone challenge, and connect with a vibrant community!
English
5
53
259
64.1K
Michael LaColla
Michael LaColla@michael_lacolla·
@WalterReade @ggreenwald Maybe at first, like any new technology. But once you scrutinize the foundations, the institutions, and the motives behind its scaling, the shine wears off. The issue isn’t the AI itself — it’s the concentration of power and potential for abuse.
English
1
0
1
32
Glenn Greenwald
Glenn Greenwald@ggreenwald·
AI is a technology that has been constantly and aggressively touted as one of the most consequential and transformative in human history, yet there's been almost no attempt to convince the public that any of this is good for them and their lives. The potential harms of AI -- wiping out jobs en masse, replacing most human functions, dangers of losing control of it, having it bestow itself unforeseeable powers -- have been more prominent in the discourse and are more intuitively visible. If anything, this growing public concern/anger is overdue. It should at least produce far more transparent and informed debates about where things are, where they're likely going, what protections are possible, etc.
The Spectator Index@spectatorindex

The Wall Street Journal reports that 'the only thing growing faster than the artificial-intelligence industry may be Americans’ negative feelings about it', and that the 'rebellion' against artificial intelligence is 'gaining steam'.

English
162
207
1.1K
108.4K
Walter Reade
Walter Reade@WalterReade·
Help the Natural History Museum of Denmark automate label transcription on a Danish Dung Beetle collection. MuseumSCAT: Specimen Collection Annotation Task@CVNH ECCV26 kaggle.com/competitions/m…
English
0
2
4
755
Walter Reade
Walter Reade@WalterReade·
@WashedPolicy @ggreenwald Throughout history, technology advances have been net beneficial for society. It will be the same with AI. And, with all technology advances, there will be those who want nothing to do with them. They are the people who get left most behind.
English
1
0
0
16
Neo-Luddite
Neo-Luddite@WashedPolicy·
@WalterReade @ggreenwald But you admit there will be losses right? Like there just won’t be enough demand to justify the supply of labor even if everyone learns AI. You can admit that, right?
English
1
0
1
21
Walter Reade
Walter Reade@WalterReade·
I jumped into machine learning ~14 years ago. It was an exciting and fun time. The last few years, though, have felt like a grind trying to keep up with everything. Agentic coding has made things fun again.
English
0
0
19
928
Walter Reade
Walter Reade@WalterReade·
@JFPuget 90% of the work I do, I'd do for free, for fun. Getting paid is a nice perk.
Neenah, WI 🇺🇸 English
0
0
2
98
Walter Reade
Walter Reade@WalterReade·
If they are going to apply this standard, it should be independent of the use of AI. If a co-author mistakenly keys in a non-existent reference, it should also result in a suspension for all authors. (What a great use of time, to have all 90 authors from a physics paper each checking references.)
Neenah, WI 🇺🇸 English
2
0
1
278
Bojan Tunguz
Bojan Tunguz@tunguz·
Here is another big issue with "checking all the references by all authors on the paper": most of the times many of the references are behind paywall that many collaborators don't have an easy access to. This is especially the case for small independent researchers with no institutional backing.
English
15
3
43
5.2K
Walter Reade retweetledi
Nick
Nick@nick_kango·
we're launching kaggle benchmarks local development capabilities v soon (i.e., you can build your benchmarks in your own IDE with agents!!) lmk if you want to join our early access program:)
English
3
1
14
1.3K
Walter Reade
Walter Reade@WalterReade·
Who else feels this way: If a task uses to take 10 hours to complete, and now AI can do the first 9 hours of work in 10 minutes, that last hour of non-AI work feels 10x harder. Anyone feeling this?
Neenah, WI 🇺🇸 English
5
1
13
1.1K
Walter Reade
Walter Reade@WalterReade·
@tunguz I hope her name wasn't Gemini.
Mendota, MN 🇺🇸 English
1
0
1
230