Wasabi 🥥🌴

The Kokonut Framework is modular by design and allows you to mix and match outcomes across several pillars: Governance, Tokenomics, Impact Dimensions, and Impact Framework You can have a setup like - Multi-sig deploys a @hatsprotocol - Hats Tree governs a @DAOhaus for Community-first Governance - Can do @stationxnetwork for liquidity - Can let the community self-govern using a Reputation-based mechanism like @joincolony Effectively giving "root" control to stakeholders via the Hats Tree and "Exit to the Community" using the Moloch Framework, and allowing the moving parts to self-govern using Merits with Time-based Reputation.

The problem with tokens? Tunnel vision toward liquidity. Protocols can use tokenized units of account for way more than just LP incentives. The real output is Trust as an on-chain, programmable, stakeholder-specific primitive. Stop optimizing for liquidity. Start designing for trust.

@StoutimonO @sudoingX probably this helps x.com/sudoingX/statu…

@WasabiNetwork @sudoingX how do I do that? I've tried with grok and gpt and openclaw to make it work but can't figure this out. I wanna use ollama with qwen3.5:4b

you deserve the best and majestic tool anon get rid of that claw wall.

@StoutimonO @sudoingX You need to double check your API endpoints and model name from your provider.

@sudoingX can't seem to get past this issue

@Teknium @rronak_ @YinjieW2024 @MengdiWang10 Hermes is living in the future while others are just theoretical about it.

@rronak_ @YinjieW2024 @MengdiWang10 What do you think we made Hermes agent for 🤗🫣

This paper is almost too good that I didn't want to share it Ignore the OpenClaw clickbait, OPD + RL on real agentic tasks with significant results is very exciting, and moves us away from needing verifiable rewards Authors: @YinjieW2024 Xuyang Chen, Xialong Jin, @MengdiWang10 @LingYang_PU

@fileverse @jerri_nft @ethdaily @ensdomains @ethisnetwork i approve this collab, Jerri is such a privacy maxi that i know his eyes shine like a diamond every time you guys drop a privacy-related update.

@jerri_nft @ethdaily @ensdomains @ethisnetwork sharing w/ team now :))

dDocs Weekly Update Share Private Folders 👩‍🏭📁 10 docs 1 folder 1 link Share ZK Folders w/ ur peers. Set access granular permissions via email or @ensdomains. 💛Platforms shouldn’t know who u collab with. Invite anyone, reveal n0thing. Anonymity guaranteed by ZK/vOPRF.

2 days later and i'm already running 3 Agentic Frameworks - Hermes on my Desktop - OpenFang (likely to be the one to power @SyntropicAgent) on a VPS - Zo on @zocomputer Personal Cloud I see a bunch of grants and hackathons for Agents. It is time to have fun and join the arena!

@zacodil I think it is going in a great direction from staking their governance token to mine a utility token to use NEAR as the provider for Encrypted and "over the average" private inference without having to KYC a single time thru the whole journey, it is a decent win for Web3 Rails.

Everyone’s hyping “E2EE for AI.” Almost nobody understands where you’re still being watched. Venice just shipped end-to-end encrypted inference powered by NEAR - and to be fair, the crypto is legit: keys generated inside a TEE, verified via attestation, Diffie-Hellman handshake, XChaCha20 encryption. No passwords, no centralized trust anchor. That part is solid. But here’s what the marketing doesn’t tell you: - In 3 out of 4 modes, you still have to trust Venice - The proxy layer isn’t independently audited - “Zero retention” is a claim, not something you can verify - Even in E2EE mode, Venice still sees metadata (IP, timing, request patterns) And E2EE comes with tradeoffs: no web search, no memory, no file uploads, slower speeds, limited models. So yes - the encryption is real. But privacy in AI isn’t just about encrypting content. It’s about removing trust assumptions across the entire stack. Venice is the interface. NEAR is the infrastructure. We’re getting closer. But we’re not there yet.

@jerri_nft Trust is the Output from each step in the Kokonut Framework journey.

@WasabiNetwork You start building the trust layer with alignment.

A token-centric engine is when revenue, governance, and oversight are aligned, defined & designed around your stakeholders. Kokonut Protocol will feature purpose-built building blocks to address the Needs & Wants of stakeholders.

@z0r0zzz Ross did it again @jerri_nft

a local model trained for crypto. So you can talk to chains from your laptop. V smol & V fast. nani mode.

@CoastalFuturist LFG!

If there’s enough interest I’d like to make a group chat for people using openclaw / hermes agent heavily I really want to understand some good use cases, best practices, and just have a place for people to talk shop Comment if you’re interested

@NousResearch Just use Hermes 🐙

hermes claw migrate

@tallyxyz Sad day for DAOs; long live DAOs. We need to protect our remaining DAO Maxis at Aragon & @DAOhaus

Just deployed my first ever Personal Agent powered by @NousResearch and of course, the first skill to learn had to be ETHSkills by @austingriffith

@zacodil @z0r0zzz TLDR: Web3 is still a joke that you can’t even think of competing with TradFi😭. We’re so early! But the bright side is that NEAR Intents can solve this liquidity and UX issues eventually.

Read both post mortems from CoW Protocol and Aave on the $50M swap. What they reveal is worse than the headlines. Here's what stood out: The auction timeline: - Three solvers quoted. Two found routes returning ~52K AAVE (~$5.7M). One returned ~330 AAVE (~$36K). The two good quotes were rejected by a hardcoded 12M gas limit in the verification system - legacy code nobody updated. The worst quote set the limit price. - A solver later found the good route again and won two consecutive auctions. Then never submitted the transaction. No revert. No error. Just didn't execute. Then stopped bidding. CoW says this is "under investigation." - The last solver standing had the worst route. Won the third auction with no competition. That's what executed. Mempool leak: - The solver submitted via private RPC. Etherscan tagged it as seen in the public mempool. If confirmed, the transaction leaked - enabling ~$34M in backrun extraction. Also "under investigation." Aave's side: - UI showed 99.9% price impact. Checkbox: "I confirm the swap with a potential 100% value loss." User confirmed on mobile. - Initially announced a $600K fee refund. Post mortem now says $110K. That's not a rounding error. - Shipping "Aave Shield" - blocks swaps over 25% price impact by default. A threshold check. After $50M. - The user still hasn't contacted them. What neither report addresses: - Why CoW is hardcoded as the only swap provider with no price comparison. - The SolverParticipationGuard deleted six weeks earlier instead of fixing it - The 12M gas ceiling that rejected 160x better quotes was legacy code. CoW says it's "already fixed." It took a $50M loss to update a hardcoded number. - CoW confirms even the best quotes reflected ~90% value loss. The liquidity wasn't there on any single chain. This isn't a routing problem - it's a liquidity fragmentation problem. - Solver E found a 160x better route, won two consecutive auctions - and never submitted the transaction. Didn't even try. Then stopped bidding. The worst solver won the third auction by default. CoW's explanation: "ongoing investigation."

@KookCapitalLLC TON lives in every Telegram App, it is hardly a ghost chain, they have native distribution without 3rd parties.

what ever happened to > sui > avax > atom > cosmos > inj > monad > ton > insert ghost chain so weird they tried to push all these vc scams

The Kokonut Protocol will feature foundational logics to measure Ecological Impact and allocate & distribute Financial Capital based on verifiable inputs. Vegetation Index Attestations are the "keeper" of the Harvest Oracle and Revenue Distribution to token holders.

@jackfriks a 2-year VPS plan for $130

what’s a material thing under $1000 you’ve bought that actually changed your life?

@Edgarsosa10 Bienvenido primo!

After being stuck in Iran 14 days, I finally made it out that country and heading home. I’ve had some unique experiences during my basketball career but being in a war for 2 weeks definitely takes the cake 🤦🏽‍♂️.. Thank You God!!!

@zacodil NEAR is the only production-ready liquidity layer for Web3

A trader swapped $50M USDT for AAVE and got back $36K. Everyone blamed the solver, the UI, the routing. But all of that is symptoms. The root cause: there wasn't enough AAVE liquidity on Ethereum for a $50M swap. Even the best pool would've returned a fraction of fair value. Liquidity is fragmented across chains, and no single chain had enough. To fix this, you need solvers who operate across all chains at once. Today that means bridging - locking capital, waiting for finality, paying fees. A solver with $10M has to split it across chains and hope the orders come where the money sits. NEAR Intents removes this with Chain Signatures. Solvers hold assets on any chain and settle directly - no bridges, no locked capital. One balance serves all chains. That makes cross-chain solving capital-efficient enough to attract serious liquidity - not through farming rewards, but through better unit economics. A solver quoting $50M should pull from Arbitrum, Base, Binance, and Ethereum in one intent. Not choose between two pools on one chain. This isn't theoretical. NEAR Intents runs natively across Bitcoin, Solana, Zcash (including shielded pool), Ethereum, Arbitrum, Base, BNB, Avalanche, Polygon, Gnosis, NEAR, Dogecoin, XRP and many others. $2B in monthly volume. 500K+ monthly users. 20M+ total swaps. $14.5B all-time volume. The $50M problem isn't solvable with smarter code. It's solvable with connected liquidity.